Background Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a cancer predisposition due to biallelic mutations in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes associated with early onset of cancers, especially high-grade gliomas. Our aim was to decipher the molecular specificities of these gliomas.Methods Clinical, histopathological, and whole exome sequencing data were analyzed in 12 children with genetically proven CMMRD and a high-grade glioma.Results PDL1 expression was present in immunohistochemistry in 50% of the samples. In 9 patients, the glioma harbored an ultra-hypermutated phenotype (104-635 coding single nucleotide variants (SNV) per Mb, median 204). Driver mutations in POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domains were described for 8 and 1 patients respectively and were always present in the mutation burst with the highest variant allele frequency (VAF). The mutational signatures were dominated by MMR-related ones and similar in the different mutation bursts of a same patient without subsequent enrichment of the mutation signatures with POL-driven ones. Median number of coding SNV with VAF above one of the driving polymerase mutation per Mb was 57 (17-191). Our findings suggest that somatic polymerase alterations does not entirely explain the ultra-hypermutant phenotype. SETD2, TP53, NF1, EPHB2, PRKDC, and DICER1 genes were frequently mutated with higher VAF than the deleterious somatic polymerase mutation.Conclusions CMMRD-associated gliomas have a specific oncogenesis that does not involve usual pathways and mutations seen in sporadic pediatric or adult glioblastomas. Frequent alterations in other pathways such as MAPK may suggest the use of other targeted therapies along with PD1 inhibitors. Patients with mutations in genes responsible for repairing damaged DNA are at a higher risk of developing cancer at an early age. Gliomas are a type of aggressive brain cancer that can occur in these patients. The authors of this study wanted to understand the differences between gliomas in patients with and without this specific genetic condition. To do this, they reviewed 12 children with the genetic condition who developed gliomas. Their results showed that 9 patients had tumors with a higher than expected number of mutations (ultra-mutated). The genes that are commonly mutated in these patients were not identical to those that are commonly known to occur without this genetic condition.

IntroductionMicrosatellite instability (MSI) is a genetic marker that is useful in the detection and treatment of Lynch syndrome (Sd). Although conventional techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the standards for MSI detection, the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has offered new possibilities, especially with circulating DNA.Case reportWe present the case of a 26-year-old patient with Lynch Sd and a BRAF-mutated metastatic colon cancer. The discordant MSI results between the conventional methods and NGS posed challenges in making treatment decisions. Subsequent NGS analysis revealed a high MSI status, leading to participation in an immunotherapy trial, with remarkable clinical response.ConclusionThis case emphasizes the importance of comprehensive molecular profiling and strong interdisciplinary collaborations, especially in cases with ambiguous MSI results.

Lynch syndrome (LS) and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) are distinct cancer syndromes caused, respectively, by mono- and bi-allelic germline mismatch repair (MMR) variants. LS predisposes to mainly gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers in adulthood. CMMRD predisposes to brain, haematological, and LS-spectrum cancers from childhood. Two suspected LS patients with first cancer diagnosis aged 27 or 38 years were found to be homozygous for an MMR (likely) pathogenic variant, MSH6 c.3226C>T (p.(Arg1076Cys)), or variant of uncertain significance (VUS), MLH1 c.306G>A (p.(Glu102=)). MLH1 c.306G>A was shown to cause leaky exon 3 skipping. The apparent genotype-phenotype conflict was resolved by detection of constitutional microsatellite instability in both patients, a hallmark feature of CMMRD. A hypomorphic effect of these and other variants found in additional late onset CMMRD cases, identified by literature review, likely explains a LS-like phenotype. CMMRD testing in carriers of compound heterozygous or homozygous MMR VUS may find similar cases and novel hypomorphic variants. Individualised management of mono- and bi-allelic carriers of hypomorphic MMR variants is needed until we better characterise the associated phenotypes.

Differential diagnosis between constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is crucial as treatment and surveillance differ. We report the case of a girl with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic NF1 who developed a glioblastoma. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins identified PMS2 loss in tumour and normal cells and WES showed the tumour had an ultra-hypermutated phenotype, supporting the diagnosis of CMMRD. Germline analyses identified two variants (one pathogenic variant and one classified as variant(s) of unknown significance) in the PMS2 gene and subsequent functional assays on blood lymphocytes confirmed the diagnosis of CMMRD. The large plexiform neurofibroma of the thigh and the freckling were however more compatible with NF1. Indeed, a NF1 PV (variant allele frequencies of 20%, 3% and 9% and in blood, skin and saliva samples, respectively) was identified confirming a mosaicism for NF1. Retrospective analysis of a French cohort identified NF1 mosaicism in blood DNA in 2 out of 22 patients with CMMRD, underlining the existence of early postzygotic PV of NF1 gene in patients with CMMRD whose tumours have been frequently reported to exhibit somatic NF1 mutations. It highlights the potential role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of CMMRD-associated gliomas and argues in favour of testing MEK inhibitors in this context.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Constitutional mismatch repair defi- ciency (CMMRD) is a rare recessive childhood cancer predis-position syndrome caused by germline mismatch repair variants. Constitutional microsatellite instability (cMSI) is a CMMRD diagnostic hallmark and may associate with cancer risk. We quantified cMSI in a large CMMRD patient cohort to explore genotype-phenotype correlations using novel MSI markers selected for instability in blood. METHODS: Three CMMRD, 1 Lynch syndrome, and 2 control blood samples were genome sequenced to >120x depth. A pilot cohort of 8 CMMRD and 38 control blood samples and a blinded cohort of 56 CMMRD, 8 suspected CMMRD, 40 Lynch syndrome, and 43 control blood samples were amplicon sequenced to 5000x depth. Sample cMSI score was calculated using a published method comparing microsatellite reference allele frequencies with 80 controls. RESULTS: Thirty-two mononucleotide re-peats were selected from blood genome and pilot amplicon sequencing data. cMSI scoring using these MSI markers ach-ieved 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 93.6%-100.0%) and speci-ficity (95% CI 97.9%-100.0%), was reproducible, and was superior to an established tumor MSI marker panel. Lower cMSI scores were found in patients with CMMRD with MSH6 deficiency and patients with at least 1 mismatch repair missense variant, and patients with biallelic truncating/copy number variants had higher scores. cMSI score did not correlate with age at first tumor. CONCLUSIONS: We present an inex-pensive and scalable cMSI assay that enhances CMMRD detec-tion relative to existing methods. cMSI score is associated with mismatch repair genotype but not phenotype, suggesting it is not a useful predictor of cancer risk.

Background Spliceogenic variants in disease-causing genes are often presumed pathogenic since most induce frameshifts resulting in loss of function. However, it was recently shown in cancer predisposition genes that some may trigger in-frame anomalies that preserve function. Here, we addressed this question by using MSH2, a DNA mismatch repair gene implicated in Lynch syndrome, as a model system. Methods Eighteen MSH2 variants, mostly localised within canonical splice sites, were analysed by using minigene splicing assays. The impact of the resulting protein alterations was assessed in a methylation tolerance-based assay. Clinicopathological characteristics of variant carriers were collected. Results Three in-frame RNA biotypes were identified based on variant-induced spliceogenic outcomes: exon skipping (E3, E4, E5 and E12), segmental exonic deletions (E7 and E15) and intronic retentions (I3, I6, I12 and I13). The 10 corresponding protein isoforms exhibit either large deletions (49–93 amino acids (aa)), small deletions (12 or 16 aa) or insertions (3–10 aa) within different functional domains. We showed that all these modifications abrogate MSH2 function, in agreement with the clinicopathological features of variant carriers. Conclusion Altogether, these data demonstrate that MSH2 function is intolerant to in-frame indels caused by the spliceogenic variants analysed in this study, supporting their pathogenic nature. This work stresses the importance of combining complementary RNA and protein approaches to ensure accurate clinical interpretation of in-frame spliceogenic variants.

Some patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) have extreme phenotypes, i.e. cancer before the recommended screening age, or cancer for which there are no screening guidelines. We made the hypothesis that additional germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSG) could explain some of these phenotypes. We compared the prevalence of additional CSG variants in LS patients with a cancer diagnosis before age 30 (early-onset, EO group) and after 40 (usual-onset, UO group). While there was no overall difference, we did find an excess of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance in EO cases when only gastrointestinal CSG were considered (OR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.01–5.06, p value = 0.04). Four EO cases stood out: two with POLE/POLD1 variants in the key exonuclease domain, one with a BMPR1A duplication and one with an EPCAM deletion. Additional germline variants should be considered in future screening recommendations, as they might influence cancer risk.

Abstract PURPOSE Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMRD) is a cancer predisposition due to bi-allelic mutations in one of the four main mismatch repair (MMR) genes (PMS2, MSH2, MSH6 or MLH1) associated with early onset of cancers, especially glioblastomas (GBM). Our aim was to decipher the molecular specificities of gliomas occurring in this context. METHODS A comprehensive analysis of clinical, histopathological and genomic data (whole exome sequencing) was performed for 12 children with a CMMRD for which we had available frozen brain tumor material (10 GBM and 2 anaplastic astrocytomas). RESULTS Eight patients harbored an ultra-mutated phenotype with more than 100 somatic non synonymous (NS) SNV/Mb. No correlation was observed between the number of mutation and sex, age, overall survival or mutated MMR gene. POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domain driver somatic mutations were described for eight and one patients respectively. The 4/12 tumors without POLE somatic mutation did not show the classical ultra-hypermutation pattern. All patients with POLE mutation had already more than 20 NS SNV/Mb (median 40NS SNV/Mb, [range 23-114]) suggesting that the hypermutation phenomenon started before the appearance of the somatic POLE mutation. The mutational signatures of the tumors, dominated by the MMR signatures, were not modified after the onset of the POLE mutation when analyzing the different mutation bursts. Specific recurrent somatic mutations were observed in SETD2 (9/12), TP53 (9/12), NF1 (9/12), EPHB2 (8/12), and DICER1 (7/12). Only half of the tumors overexpressed PDL1 by immunohistochemistry and this overexpression was not associated with a higher tumor mutation burden. CONCLUSION CMMRD-associated gliomas have a specific oncogenesis that does not trigger usual pathways and mutations seen in sporadic pediatric or adult GBM. Frequent alterations in other pathways (e.g. MAPK or DNA-PK pathway) may suggests the use of other targeted therapies aside from PD1 inhibitors.

Abstract Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMRD) and Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are brain tumor predisposing syndromes associated with café-au-lait macules (CALM). Due to this overlap, establishing the differential diagnosis can be difficult, but remains crucial as treatments and surveillance protocols clearly differ for affected patient according to the underlying disease. We reported a girl, with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic NF1 during childhood, who presented a glioblastoma at 16 years-old. Faced with the NF1-like phenotype, diagnosis of CMMRD was suspected because tumor was ultra-hypermutated (228.67 mut/Mb), with a loss of PMS2 expression in both tumor and normal cells. Germline analyses identified a compound heterozygous pathogenic variant (PV) in the PMS2 gene, with an abnormal methylation tolerance test, that confirmed CMMRD. Moreover, a NF1 PV (20% and 9% in blood and saliva samples respectively) was identified compatible with a germline mosaicism. Patient's phenotype was atypical for CMMRD, with a voluminous neurofibroma and ephelids rather observed in NF1. CMMRD oncogenesis is not currently understood, in particular involvement of an NF1 PV, which could arise early from the ultra-hypermutated burden and might explain clinical signs, in particular CALMs. CMMRD diagnosis allowed proposing an adapted genetic counseling and surveillance for the patient and her parents according to the published guidelines due to the major impact on the patient’s oncological risks and prognosis. The best strategy for surveillance of the neurofibroma is still debated due to uncertainties about its risk of degeneration with a CMMRD underlying disease. This observation raises the question of the frequency of mosaic NF1 germline PV in CMMRD-patients and the time of its postzygotic appearance in the context of a biallelic deficit of one of the MMR genes. Combination of these both CMMRD and NF1 germline PVs would be a strong argument for a combination of MEK-inhibitors with immunotherapy.

BackgroundConstitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) is the most aggressive cancer predisposition syndrome associated with multiorgan cancers, often presenting in childhood. There is variability in age and presentation of cancers and benign manifestations mimicking neurofibromatosis type 1. Genetic testing may not be informative and is complicated by pseudogenes associated with the most commonly associated gene,PMS2. To date, no diagnostic criteria exist. Since surveillance and immune-based therapies are available, establishing a CMMRD diagnosis is key to improve survival.MethodsIn order to establish a robust diagnostic path, a multidisciplinary international working group, with representation from the two largest consortia (International Replication Repair Deficiency (IRRD) consortium and European Consortium Care for CMMRD (C4CMMRD)), was formed to establish diagnostic criteria based on expertise, literature review and consensus.ResultsThe working group established seven diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of CMMRD, including four definitive criteria (strong evidence) and three likely diagnostic criteria (moderate evidence). All criteria warrant CMMRD surveillance. The criteria incorporate germline mismatch repair results, ancillary tests and clinical manifestation to determine a diagnosis. Hallmark cancers for CMMRD were defined by the working group after extensive literature review and consultation with the IRRD and C4CMMRD consortia.ConclusionsThis position paper summarises the evidence and rationale to provide specific guidelines for CMMRD diagnosis, which necessitates appropriate surveillance and treatment.

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not.The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a rare childhood cancer predisposition syndrome caused by biallelic germline mutations in one of four mismatchrepair genes. Besides very high tumour risks, CMMRD phenotypes are often characterised by the presence of signs reminiscent of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Because NF1 signs may be present prior to tumour onset, CMMRD is a legitimate differential diagnosis in an otherwise healthy child suspected to have NF1/Legius syndrome without a detectable underlying NF1/SPRED1 germline mutation. However, no guidelines indicate when to counsel and test for CMMRD in this setting. Assuming that CMMRD is rare in these patients and that expected benefits of identifying CMMRD prior to tumour onset should outweigh potential harms associated with CMMRD counselling and testing in this setting, we aimed at elaborating a strategy to preselect, among children suspected to have NF1/Legius syndrome without a causative NF1/SPRED1 mutation and no overt malignancy, those children who have a higher probability of having CMMRD. At an interdisciplinary workshop, we discussed estimations of the frequency of CMMRD as a differential diagnosis of NF1 and potential benefits and harms of CMMRD counselling and testing in a healthy child with no malignancy. Preselection criteria and strategies for counselling and testing were developed and reviewed in two rounds of critical revisions. Existing diagnostic CMMRD criteria were adapted to serve as a guideline as to when to consider CMMRD as differential diagnosis of NF1/Legius syndrome. In addition, counselling and testing strategies are suggested to minimise potential harms.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Approximately 75% of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome carry variants in MLH1 or MSH2, proteins encoded by these genes are required for DNA mismatch repair (MMR). However, 30% of these are variants of unknown significance (VUS). A assay that measures cell response to the cytotoxic effects of a methylating agent can determine the effects of VUS in MMR genes and identify patients with constitutional MMR-deficiency syndrome. We adapted this method to test the effects of VUS in MLH1 and MSH2 genes found in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome. METHODS: We transiently expressed MLH1 or MSH2 variants in MLH1- or MSH2-null human colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 or LoVo), respectively. The MMR process causes death of cells with methylation-damaged DNA bases, so we measured proportions of cells that undergo death following exposure to the methylating agent; cells that escaped its toxicity were considered to have variants that affect function of the gene product. Using this assay, we analyzed 88 variants (mainly missense variants), comprising a validation set of 40 previously classified variants (19 in MLH1 and 21 in MSH2) and a prospective set of 48 VUS (25 in MLH1 and 23 in MSH2). Prediction scores were calculated for all VUS according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, based on clinical, somatic, in silico, population, and functional data. RESULTS: The assay correctly classified 39 of 40 variants in the validation set. The assay identified 12 VUS that did alter function of the gene product and 28 VUS that did not; the remaining 8 VUS had intermediate effects on MMR capacity and could not be classified. Comparison of assay results with prediction scores confirmed the ability of the assay to discriminate VUS that affected the function of the gene products from those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Using an assay that measures the ability of the cells to undergo death following DNA damage induction by a methylating agent, we were able to assess whether variants in MLH1 and MSH2 cause defects in DNA MMR. This assay might be used to help assessing the pathogenicity of VUS in MLH1 and MSH2 found in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, caused by heterozygous mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Biallelic mutations in these genes lead however, to constitutive mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD). In this study, we follow the diagnostic journey of a 12-year old patient with CRC, with a clinical phenotype overlapping CMMRD. We perform molecular and functional assays to discard a CMMRD diagnosis then identify by exome sequencing and validation in a cohort of 134 LS patients, a candidate variant in the MLH1 UTR region in homozygosis. We propose that this variant, together with other candidates, could be responsible for age-of-onset modulation. Our data support the idea that low-risk modifier alleles may influence early development of cancer in LS leading to a LS-to-CMMRD phenotypic continuum. Therefore, it is essential that larger efforts are directed to the identification and study of these genetic modifiers, in order to provide optimal cancer prevention strategies to these patients.

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is an autosomal recessively inherited childhood cancer susceptibility syndrome caused by biallelic germline mutations in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The spectrum of CMMRD-associated tumours is very broad and many CMMRD patients additionally display signposting non-neoplastic features, most frequently café-au-lait macules and other pigmentation alterations. We report on a 13-month-old girl suspected of having CMMRD due to a desmoplastic medulloblastoma and a striking skin pigmentation that included multiple café-au-lait macules, hypopigmented areas and Mongolian spots. Whole-exome sequencing revealed homozygosity for MSH2 variant p.(Leu92Val) and MSH6 variant p.(Val809del), both variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Immunohistochemical analysis of the tumour tissue showed expression of all four MMR proteins and gMSI testing was negative. However, functional assays demonstrated that the cells of the patient displayed methylation tolerance and ex vivo microsatellite instability, which unequivocally confirmed the diagnosis of CMMRD. Taken together, the results render the MSH2 variant unlikely to be responsible for the phenotype, while they are compatible with MSH6-associated CMMRD. This case illustrates the diagnostic strategy of confirming CMMRD syndrome in patients with VUS.