Importance:Suicide is a leading cause of death in the US. Suicide-specific cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is effective for reducing suicide attempts but is difficult to implement. Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of a smartphone-based digital therapeutic intervention designed to deliver suicide-focused CBT in reducing suicidal behavior among patients hospitalized for a suicide attempt or suicidal ideation. Design, Setting, and Participants:This multisite, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 psychiatric inpatient units across the US. Adult patients admitted with elevated suicide risk from April 2022 to April 2024 were included. Participants completed a baseline assessment and were randomly assigned to either the digital therapeutic group or control application group. The trial was stopped early by the Data Management Safety Board because it surpassed the prespecified futility boundary for the primary end point. Statistical analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. Interventions:The digital therapeutic intervention includes 12 sessions of smartphone-based educational modules (lasting 10-15 minutes each) drawn from CBT for suicide prevention. The active control is a 12-session smartphone-based application that delivers safety planning and psychoeducation about suicide. For both interventions, the first session was completed prior to hospital discharge and the remaining self-paced sessions could be completed after discharge. All participants also received treatment as usual, which included suicide risk assessment, supportive listening, crisis resources, clinician assessment, safety planning, and referral to outpatient treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary end point was time (days) to first actual suicide attempt during follow-up. The secondary end points were change in suicidal ideation from baseline to week 24 (quantified as a change in the Scale for Suicide Ideation total score) and clinician-rated clinical improvement at week 24. The nonprespecified sensitivity analysis end point for suicide attempts was the rate of suicide attempts (actual, aborted, and interrupted). Prespecified subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine treatment effects among patients with vs without prior suicide attempts. Results:A total of 339 participants (mean [SD] age, 27.9 [10.7] years; 224 females [66.1%]) were included. Follow-up data were available from 266 participants (78.5%). Time to first actual suicide attempt, the primary end point, was not significantly different across treatment groups (log-rank χ21 = 3.6; P = .06). Among the 170 participants with prior suicide attempts, nonprespecified sensitivity analyses indicated that the adjusted rate of follow-up suicide attempts was 58.3% lower in the digital therapeutic group than the control application group (0.70 vs 1.68 attempts per person-year; rate ratio [RR], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.95]; P = .04), and the odds of clinical improvement were higher in the digital therapeutic group than the control application group (97.9% vs 87.5%; odds ratio, 7.59; 95% CI, 1.14-153.62; P = .04). Trajectories of suicidal ideation significantly differed between the digital therapeutic and control application groups (F3,206 = 2.9, P = .04), with decreased suicidal ideation through week 24 in the digital therapeutic group, but in the control application group, suicidal ideation decreased through week 12 and then increased at week 24. Nonprespecified dose-response analyses indicated the suicide attempt rate among patients with a prior suicide attempt decreased by 14.0% for every digital therapeutic module completed (adjusted RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance:In this randomized clinical trial, the digital therapeutic intervention did not change the time to first actual suicide attempt but helped to sustain reductions in suicidal ideation among inpatients with elevated suicide risk. However, among patients with prior suicide attempts, the digital therapeutic intervention helped reduce recurrent suicide attempts and increased the percentage of inpatients with clinician-rated clinical improvement. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05144685.

Psychiatric emergency services (PESs) have been evolving since the beginning of community-based care. Early on, psychiatric patients overwhelmed emergency departments (EDs) that had few staff with appropriate training and little space for psychiatric emergencies. Teams began to form inside hospitals to include psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and social workers to work more specifically with the mentally ill population. Care has become more specialized for the treatment of psychiatric emergencies. When it comes to treating a psychiatric emergency, the first goal is basic evaluation and stabilization. Encephalitis, CNS depressant withdrawal, and alcohol intoxication can all present with seemingly psychotic behavior: delayed medical attention can be fatal. Mobile crisis services, which once focused on triage, now offer much more support and brief therapies. Crisis stabilization and larger respite facilities tend to have a more therapeutic focus, rather than warehousing of patients.

BACKGROUND:Approximately half of those who attempt suicide report experiencing suicidal ideation and suicidal planning in advance; others deny these experiences. Some researchers have hypothesized that rapid intensification is due to past suicidal ideation and/or behaviors that are "mentally shelved" but remain available for rapid access later.METHOD:To evaluate this hypothesis, we examined (a) temporal sequencing of suicidal ideation, suicidal planning, and suicidal behavior, and (b) speed of emergence of suicidal behavior in a prospective cohort study of 2744 primary care patients.RESULTS:Of 52 patients reporting suicidal behavior during follow-up, 20 (38.5%) reported suicidal ideation and planning prior to their suicidal behavior, 23 (44.2%) reported suicidal ideation but not planning, and nine (17.3%) denied both suicidal ideation and planning. Over half (n = 30, 57.7%) reported the onset of suicidal ideation and/or planning on the same day as or after their suicidal behavior (i.e., rapid intensification). Rapid intensification was not associated with increased likelihood of reporting recent or past suicidal ideation, planning, or behaviors, suggesting rapid intensification does not depend on prior experience with suicidal ideation and/or behaviors.CONCLUSION:Detecting primary care patients at risk for this form of suicidal behavior may be limited even with universal suicide risk screening.

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Controversies in Psychiatric ServicesNo AccessWeighing the Costs and Benefits of Universal Suicide Risk Screening in Primary Care: An Evidence-Based ApproachCraig J. Bryan, Psy.D., A.B.P.P., Michael H. Allen, M.D., Charles W. Hoge, M.D.Craig J. Bryan, Psy.D., A.B.P.P., Michael H. Allen, M.D., Charles W. Hoge, M.D.Published Online:11 Jul 2022https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202100611AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article Access content To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access. Personal login Institutional Login Sign in via OpenAthens Register for access Purchase Save for later Item saved, go to cart PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services $35.00 Add to cart PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services Checkout Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability. Not a subscriber? Subscribe Now / Learn More PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development. Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.). FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byNone Volume 74Issue 1 January 01, 2023Pages 79-81 Metrics KeywordsRisk screeningSuicideSelf-destructive behaviorPrimary careUniversal screeningPDF download History Published online 11 July 2022 Published in print 1 January 2023

Objective: The effectiveness of suicide risk screening relative to depression screening alone among primary care patients has not been tested rigorously. This study compared the performance of multiple depression screening methods (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-2, PHQ-8, and PHQ-9) and multiple suicide risk screening methods (PHQ-9 item 9 and suicide-focused screening of "thoughts of killing yourself" during the entire lifespan, within the past month, and within the past week) in a convenience sample of primary care patients.Methods: A total of 2,744 patients (military personnel, family members, and retirees) from six militar y primar y care clinics completed the PHQ-9 and screening for suicidal ideation (SI) during routine clinic visits. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted for one year post-baseline to assess the incidence of suicide attempts, the study's primary outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 statistics were calculated for each screening method for identifying patients who attempted suicide.Results: More than 65% of patients who screened positive for SI also screened positive for depression on the PHQ-9. Depression screening with the PHQ-9 correctly identified more patients who attempted suicide during follow-up than the PHQ-2, past week SI, and past month SI. The PHQ-9 correctly identified more patients who attempted suicide within 3 months than lifetime SI, but lifetime SI correctly identified more patients who attempted suicide within 6 and 12 months.Conclusion: Depression screening with the PHQ-9 was the most effective strategy for identifying patients who attempted suicide in the near term. Universal suicide risk screening is unlikely to meaningfully improve identification of higher-risk patients beyond PHQ-9 depression screening.

Targeted biologic therapies can elicit an undesirable host immune response characterized by the development of antidrug antibodies (ADA), an important cause of treatment failure. The most widely used biologic across immune-mediated diseases is adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. This study aimed to identify genetic variants that contribute to the development of ADA against adalimumab, thereby influencing treatment failure. In patients with psoriasis on their first course of adalimumab, in whom serum ADA had been evaluated 6–36 months after starting treatment, we observed a genome-wide association with ADA against adalimumab within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The association signal mapped to the presence of tryptophan at position 9 and lysine at position 71 of the HLA-DR peptide-binding groove, with both residues conferring protection against ADA. Underscoring their clinical relevance, these residues were also protective against treatment failure. Our findings highlight antigenic peptide presentation via MHC class II as a critical mechanism in the development of ADA against biologic therapies and downstream treatment response.

Background: Approximately half of patients who attempt or die by suicide screened negative for suicidal ideation during their most recent medical visit. Maladaptive beliefs and schemas can increase cognitive vulnerability to suicidal behavior, even among patients without recent or past suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Assessing these beliefs could improve the detection of patients who will engage in suicidal behavior after screening negative for elevated suicide risk. Methods: Primary care patients who completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) during routine clinic visits and denied suicidal ideation at baseline (N = 2417) were included in the study sample. Suicidal behaviors during the 12 months after baseline were assessed. Logistic regression analyses examined the association of baseline SCS-R scores with later suicidal behavior. Results: In both univariate and multivariate analyses, SCS-R total scores were associated with significantly increased risk of suicidal behavior within 90, 180, and 365 days post-baseline. Results were unchanged when patients who reported prior suicidal behavior were excluded (N = 2178). In item-level analyses, all 16 SCS-R items significantly differentiated patients with and without follow-up suicidal behavior.Limitations: Study limitations included missing follow-up data, restriction of sample to U.S. military medical beneficiaries, and inability to assess representativeness of the sample relative to the full primary care population. Conclusions: SCS-R scores are elevated among patients who attempt suicide after denying both suicidal ideation and prior suicide attempts, suggesting the scale may reflect enduring suicide risk. The SCS-R could enhance suicide risk screening and assessment.

Introduction: Suicide rates are extremely high among emergency department patients seen for deliberate self-harm. Inpatient hospitalization is often recommended for these patients, but evidence on the suicide prevention impacts of hospitalization is scarce. Confounding by indication and challenges to implementing randomized designs are barriers to advances in this field. Methods: Investigators used 2009-2012 statewide data on 57,312 self-harm emergency department patients from California, linked to mortality records. Naive 12-month and 30-day suicide risks were estimated among patients who were hospitalized versus those who were discharged. Then, generalized random forest methods were applied to estimate the average treatment impacts of hospitalization on suicide, conditioning on observable covariates. Associations were calculated separately for sex- and age-specific subgroups. Analyses were conducted in February 2019-August 2021. Results: In naive analyses, suicide risk was significantly higher in hospitalized than in discharged patients in each subgroup. In 12-month models accounting for the observed covariates through generalized random forest methods, hospitalized male patients had 5.4 more suicides per 1,000 patients (95% CI=3.0, 7.8), hospitalized patients aged 10-29 years had 2.4 more suicides per 1,000 (95% CI=1.1, 3.6), and those aged >= 50 years had 5.8 more suicides per 1,000 (95% CI=0.5, 11.2) than corresponding discharged patients. Hospitalization was not significantly associated with suicide among female patients or patients aged 30-49 years in generalized random forest analyses. Patterns were similar in 30-day generalized random forest models. Conclusions: Emergency department personnel intend to hospitalize self-harm patients with high suicide risk; this study suggests that this goal is largely realized. Analyses that control for confounding by observable covariates did not find clear evidence that hospitalization reduces suicide risk and could not rule out the possibility of iatrogenic effects. (C) 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

The measurement of self-reported suicide risk can be complicated in medical settings due to patient apprehension about the potential consequences of self-disclosure. The Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) was designed to assess suicide risk by measuring a range of suicidogenic cognitions (e.g., hopelessness, perceived burdensomeness) collectively referred to as the suicidal belief system. The SCS's concurrent, known groups, and prospective validity for suicidal thoughts and behaviors have previously been supported. The present study examined the factor structure, known-groups, and concurrent validity of a revised, 16-item version of the SCS (SCS-R), which removed two items that explicitly used the word "suicide" and changed item scoring from a 1-5 to 0-4 scale, thereby improving the interpretation of scores. In a sample of 2,690 primary care patients presenting for routine medical care at one of six US military clinics, results of bifactor analysis supported the scale's unidimensionality. The SCS-R significantly differentiated participants with a history of suicide attempts and was significantly correlated with frequency of thoughts about death and self-harm during the previous 2 weeks. Results align with earlier research and provide psychometric support for the SCS-R.

PURPOSE Over 95% of patients who screen positive on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) suicide risk item do not attempt or die by suicide, which could lead to unnecessary treatment and/or misallocation of limited resources. The present study seeks to determine if suicide risk screening can be meaningfully improved to identify the highest-risk patients. METHODS Patients eligible to receive medical treatment from the US Department of Defense medical system were recruited from 6 military primary care clinics located at 5 military installations around the United States. Patients completed self-report measures including the PHQ-9 and 16 items from the Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) during routine primary care clinic visits. Postbaseline suicidal behaviors (suicide attempts, interrupted attempts, and aborted attempts) were assessed by evaluators who were blind to screening results using the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview. RESULTS Among 2,744 patients, 13 (0.5%) engaged in suicidal behavior in the 30 days after screening and 28 (1.0%) displayed suicidal behavior in the 90 days after screening. Multiple SCS items differentiated patients with suicidal behavior less than 30 days after screening positive for suicide risk. Augmenting the PHQ-9 suicide risk item with SCS items improved the identification of patients who were most likely to have suicidal behavior within a month of screening positive without sacrificing sensitivity. CONCLUSION Among primary care patients who screen positive for suicide risk on the PHQ-9, SCS items improved screening efficiency by identifying those patients who are most likely to engage in suicidal behavior within the next 30 days.

Background: There are few rapidly acting treatments for acute suicidality or treatment-resistant depression. Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is an intravenous anesthetic agent used in outpatient settings. It is a gamma-aminobutyric acid type A agonist and has affinity at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Elevation in mood and sociality in humans has been observed following propofol-induced anesthesia. Other authors reported an open-label study of repeated dosing of propofol in treatment-resistant depression in which several patients experienced sustained improvement. Recently, we reported that in a rodent model of despair, a forced swim test, 45 minutes after administration of 50 mg/kg propofol, immobility time was significantly reduced. Objective: The objective of the experiment was to determine whether the antidepressant-like effects of a single dose of propofol in mice are sustained for 24 hours. Methods: The time spent immobile during a forced swim test 24 hours after intraperitoneal administration of a single dose of propofol 50 mg/kg or 0.9% saline was evaluated in 24 adult male mice (C57/BL6). Immobility time was quantified and evaluated with a custom video analysis software program. Results: Propofol-treated mice were immobile for a mean (SEM) time of 115 (13) seconds, whereas saline-treated mice were immobile for a mean (SEM) time of 94 (14) seconds. A 2-tailed unpaired t test found no significant difference between the treatment groups (t = 1.07, df = 22; P = 0.30). Conclusions: Twenty-four hours after intraperitoneal administration, the effect of propofol on immobility time was not statistically significantly different from vehicle. However, given our previous report of at least a short-term benefit of propofol on struggling time in the forced swim time and an encouraging pilot study in humans with treatment-resistant depression, further evaluation of propofol's antidepressant potential may be warranted. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

BACKGROUND:Primary care is the most frequently visited clinic type immediately prior to suicidal behavior, with nearly half of suicide decedents visiting a primary care provider within a month of their death. Data supporting the efficacy of suicide risk screening in this setting is lacking, however. Improved suicide risk screening in primary care could lead to earlier intervention and treatment.PURPOSE:The PRImary care Screening Methods (PRISM) study is designed to develop and evaluate the efficacy of an alert algorithm that can be used by military primary care providers to accurately identify high-risk patients, to improve the identification of high-risk patients who deny suicidal thoughts, and to quantify patient subgroups who are more likely to be missed by existing screening methods (i.e., false negatives).METHODS:The rationale of the PRISM study is discussed, along with ethical and design considerations related to the conduct of suicide prevention research. The PRISM study enrolled 2690 patients from six primary care clinics across the U.S. Patients were enrolled during routine visits to a primary care clinic, and completed a battery of self-report scales in clinic waiting rooms. Follow-up phone interviews are conducted 1, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. The primary outcome is suicide attempt.CONCLUSIONS:PRISM is the first study to prospectively examine multiple suicide risk screening methods in "real-world" military primary care clinics. Ethical and design issues were considered to ensure that human participants, especially suicidal patients, were adequately protected while minimizing the potential confounding effect of risk management protocols.

Objective: Suicide screening followed by an intervention may identify suicidal individuals and prevent recurring self-harm, but few cost-effectiveness studies have been conducted. This study sought to determine whether the increased costs of implementing screening and intervention in hospital emergency departments (EDs) are justified by improvements in patient outcomes (decreased attempts and deaths by suicide). Methods: The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) study recruited participants in eight U.S. EDs between August 2010 and November 2013. The eight sites sequentially implemented two interventions: universal screening added to treatment as usual and universal screening plus a telephone-based intervention delivered over 12 months post-ED visit. This study calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves to evaluate screening and suicide outcome measures and costs for the two interventions relative to treatment as usual. Costs were calculated from the provider perspective (e.g., wage and salary data and rental costs for hospital space) per patient and per site. Results: Average per-patient costs to a participating ED of universal screening plus intervention were $1,063 per month, approximately $500 more than universal screening added to treatment as usual. Universal screening plus intervention was more effective in preventing suicides compared with universal screening added to treatment as usual and treatment as usual alone. Conclusions: Although the choice of universal screening plus intervention depends on the value placed on the outcome by decision makers, results suggest that implementing such suicide prevention measures can lead to significant cost savings.

Objective: Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is a gamma-aminobutyric acid type A agonist intravenous anesthetic agent used in outpatient settings. Based on anecdotal reports of improved mood in humans following propofol-induced anesthesia, the impact of acute propofol treatment alone or in combination with subchronic fluoxetine dosing was tested on forced swim test (FST) performance. Design: Seventy-two adult male mice (C57/BL6, CRL-provided) were pretreated daily with saline or fluoxetine (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) (21 days for cohort 1; 24 days for cohort 2). At 24 hours after the last pretreatment injection, the mice received saline or propofol (35 or 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Then, 45 minutes later, the mice underwent a five-minute FST. Immobility time was quantified and evaluated with a custom video-analysis software program. Results: A one-way analysis of variance indicated statistically significant effects of propofol on immobility time in cohorts 1 and 2. A comparison performed using Dunnett's method revealed that propofol 50 mg/kg (p < 0.05) but not 35 mg/kg (p = not significant) reduced immobility time as compared with in the saline-saline control group (difference between means of 38.42 and 16.46 seconds, respectively). Conclusion: In comparison with saline, propofol significantly decreased immobility time during the FST, which models depression and resilience to stress. Our preclinical results are consistent with a small open-label study of propofol used in treatment-resistant depression recently reported by Mickey BJ, White AT, Arp AM, et al (2018). Further investigation of propofol regarding its potential antidepressant effects seems warranted.

In clinical practice, welfare checks have become a fairly common aspect of suicide prevention. At the same time, the medical literature provides almost no guidance to inform clinicians under what circumstances welfare checks should be requested, how best to go about placing those requests, or how to document decision-making related to this important subject. Literature searches spanning both PubMed and Google Scholar failed to yield any applicable results. Performed correctly, welfare checks have the potential to be life-saving interventions for persons in suicidal crises. Performed incorrectly, welfare checks may become an overly defensive practice that damages therapeutic relationships, violates patients' rights, and consumes important and limited community resources. The need for thoughtful guidance to assist clinicians in navigating these difficult clinical scenarios is long overdue. This column, the second in a 2-part series, offers an approach to welfare checks informed by the tenets of therapeutic risk management.

BACKGROUND:Many emergency department (ED) patients are at risk of suicide, and the ED is a key setting for suicide prevention. Although ED interventions are associated with reduced suicide attempts and societal costs, most EDs do not have follow-up programs. This pilot investigated the feasibility and implementation process of a statewide program.METHODS:This multicenter prospective pilot program included all patients evaluated for suicidal behavior in, and discharged home from, participating EDs across Colorado. Suicidal ED patients were offered crisis hotline follow-up calls that focused on continued support and connection to outpatient care. Data collection at EDs focused on implementation issues and referral and participation rates; the crisis line collected patient information and call statistics.RESULTS:From July 1, 2015, to October 31, 2017, the program expanded to 15 EDs covering almost a quarter of ED visits in a large, high-burden state. Some sites achieved 100% referral rates, suggesting that referral became routine, and the mean referral rate was 76%. High referral rates were associated with an ED champion, record system enhancements, repeated training, and regular communication. Of 5,620 visits with referral, 2,737 resulted in participation (48.7%). Although the program was free for patients, half declined it. The call center made 15,414 calls, ultimately reaching all but 9.8% of participants. Few participants reported repeat ED visits or suicide attempts.CONCLUSION:This project demonstrated the feasibility of using a state crisis hotline to provide postdischarge follow-up for suicidal ED patients. Continued investigation into sustainable implementation and outcomes of such programs is warranted.

In clinical practice, welfare checks have become a fairly common aspect of suicide prevention. At the same time, there is almost no guidance in the medical literature to inform clinicians under what circumstances welfare checks should be requested, how best to go about placing those requests, or how to document decision-making around this important subject. Literature searches spanning both PubMed and Google Scholar fail to yield any applicable results. Performed correctly, welfare checks have the potential to be life-saving interventions for persons in suicidal crises. Performed incorrectly, the welfare check may become an overly defensive practice that damages therapeutic relationships, violates patients’ rights, and consumes important and limited community resources. The need for thoughtful guidance to assist clinicians in navigating these difficult clinical scenarios is long overdue. This article, the first in a 2-part series, will describe welfare checks and explore their potential risks and benefits.

This article reports the case of a 51-year-old woman in whom brain MRI to follow up multiple sclerosis incidentally discovered an intramural haematoma in the extracranial internal carotid artery. MR angiography of the supra-aortic trunks and CT angiography of the aorta showed arterial dilations, aneurysms, dissections, and intramural hematomas in the internal carotid arteries, vertebral arteries, and arteries in the splanchnic territory. These findings raised suspicion of segmental arterial mediolysis. After 6 months of treatment with antiplatelet drugs, the arterial involvement resolved.Segmental arterial mediolysis is an uncommon disease; low clinical suspicion and radiologists’ lack of knowledge about this entity mean that it can go undetected or be confused with other vasculitides. This report describes the most relevant pathophysiological findings and correlates them with the imaging findings.Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 51 años con esclerosis múltiple en la que de forma incidental se observó un haematoma intramural en la arteria carótida interna extracraneal en una resonancia magnética (RM) cerebral de control por su enfermedad de base. Adicionalmente se realizó una angio-RM de troncos supraaórticos y una angiografía por tomografía computarizada de aorta, donde se observó la presencia de dilataciones arteriales, aneurismas, disecciones y hematomas intramurales de las arterias carótidas internas, arterias vertebrales y arterias del territorio esplácnico. Estos hallazgos condujeron a la sospecha de mediolisis arterial segmentaria. Seis meses después, tras tratamiento antiagregante, la afectación arterial se autorresolvió. La mediolisis arterial segmentaria es una patología infrecuente, lo que unido a la baja sospecha clínica y al desconocimiento de esta entidad por parte de los radiólogos hace que pueda pasar desapercibida o ser confundida con otras vasculitis. En esta comunicación, se describen los hallazgos fisiopatológicos más relevantes y su correlación con las pruebas de imagen.

Acne vulgaris is a highly heritable common, chronic inflammatory disease of the skin for which five genetic risk loci have so far been identified. Here, we perform a genome-wide association study of 3823 cases and 16,144 controls followed by meta-analysis with summary statistics from a previous study, with a total sample size of 26,722. We identify 20 independent association signals at 15 risk loci, 12 of which have not been previously implicated in the disease. Likely causal variants disrupt the coding region of WNT10A and a P63 transcription factor binding site in SEMA4B . Risk alleles at the 1q25 locus are associated with increased expression of LAMC2 , in which biallelic loss-of-function mutations cause the blistering skin disease epidermolysis bullosa. These findings indicate that variation affecting the structure and maintenance of the skin, in particular the pilosebaceous unit, is a critical aspect of the genetic predisposition to severe acne.