BACKGROUND:Lateral epicondylitis is a common orthopaedic condition often massively restricting the quality of life of the affected patients. There are a wide variety of treatment options - with varying levels of evidence. METHOD:The following statements and recommendations are based on the current German S2k guideline Epicondylopathia radialis humeri (AWMF registry number: 033 - 2019). All major German specialist societies participated in this guideline, which is based on a systematic review of the literature and a structured consensus-building process. OUTCOMES:Lateral epicondylitis should be diagnosed clinically and can be confirmed by imaging modalities. The Guidelines Commission issues recommendations on clinical and radiological diagnostic workup. The clinical condition results from the accumulated effect of mechanical overload, neurologic irritation and metabolic changes. Differentiating between acute and chronic disorder is helpful. Prognosis of non-surgical regimens is favourable in most cases. Most cases spontaneously resolve within 12 months. In case of unsuccessful attempted non-surgical management for at least six months, surgery may be considered as an alternative, if there is a corresponding structural morphology and clinical manifestation. At present, it is not possible to recommend a specific surgical procedure. CONCLUSION:This paper provides a summary of the guideline with extracts of the recommendations and statements of its authors regarding the pathogenesis, prevention, diagnostic workup as well as non-surgical and surgical management.
There is a lack of consensus on what physicians can recommend and what patients can expect concerning sports activity after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this retrospective register-based observational study was to investigate the association between participation in sports or physical activity involving the upper extremity and 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes for primary RSA patients. We screened the institutional arthroplasty registry for patients reporting the type and level of sports postoperatively after primary, unilateral RSA due to rotator cuff deficiency. One hundred thirty-eight patients with clinical and radiological outcomes documented at a minimum 5-year follow-up were divided into three groups comprising those who participated regularly in: sports mainly involving the upper extremity (sports upper extremities, SUE, n = 49), sports mainly involving the lower extremities (sports lower extremities, SLE, n = 21), and those who did not participate in sports at all (no sports, NS, n = 68). The participants had a mean age of 72 years (standard deviation (SD) 8) and were overall predominantly female patients (62%). Primary clinical outcomes included the Constant Score (CS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Secondary radiographs were analyzed for radiolucent lines (RLL), signs of glenoid or humeral prosthesis loosening, bone resorption, bone formation, and scapular notching. A total number of 8 senior surgeons were involved in treatment of patients, and two types of prosthesis were used. The SUE group had non-significantly higher mean scores for CS (75 points) and SPADI (88 points) compared to SLE (71 and 78 points, respectively) and NS patients (66 and 78 points, respectively) (p ≥ 0.286). The incidence of RLL around the humeral diaphysis was higher in NS compared to SUE patients (32% versus 12%, respectively) (p = 0.025); all other radiological parameters were similar between the groups. There were no cases of loosening in the SUE group that led to revision surgery. Patients engaging in sports activities involving the upper extremity show similarly good functional scores 5 years post-RSA as the other groups, without additional signs of implant loosening as a result of increased shoulder use.
BACKGROUND:With increasing health care expenditures, knowledge about the benefit and costs of surgical interventions such as total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) becomes important for orthopedic surgeons, social insurance programs, and health policy decision makers. We examined the impact of TSA on quality of life (QOL), direct medical costs, and productivity losses and evaluated the cost-utility ratio of TSA compared with ongoing nonoperative management using real-world data.METHODS:Patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and/or rotator cuff tear arthropathy indicated for anatomic or reverse TSA were included in this prospective study. QOL (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire) and shoulder function (Constant score; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and Subjective Shoulder Value) were assessed preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively. Health insurance companies provided all-diagnosis direct medical costs for 2018 in Swiss francs (CHF), where 1 CHF was equivalent to US $1.02. Indirect costs were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Baseline data at recruitment and the total costs of the preoperative year served as a proxy for nonoperative management. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the total costs to gain 1 extra quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) based on both the health care system perspective and societal perspective. The relationship between QOL and shoulder function was assessed by regression analysis.RESULTS:The mean preoperative utility index for the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire of 0.68 for a total of 150 patients (mean age, 71 years; 21% working; 58% women) increased to 0.89 and 0.87 at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, respectively. Mean direct medical costs were 11,771 CHF (preoperatively), 34,176 CHF (1 year postoperatively), and 11,763 CHF (2 years postoperatively). The ICER was 63,299 CHF/QALY (95% confidence interval, 44,391-82,206 CHF/QALY). The mean productivity losses for 29 working patients decreased from 40,574 CHF per patient (preoperatively) to 26,114 CHF at 1 year postoperatively and 10,310 CHF at 2 years postoperatively. When considering these productivity losses, the ICER was 35,549 CHF/QALY (95% confidence interval, 12,076-59,016 CHF/QALY). QOL was significantly associated with shoulder function (P < .001).CONCLUSION:Using real-world direct medical cost data, we calculated a cost-utility ratio of 63,299 CHF/QALY for TSA in Switzerland, which clearly falls below the often-suggested 100,000-CHF/QALY threshold for acceptable cost-effectiveness. In view of productivity losses, TSA becomes highly cost-effective with an ICER of 35,546 CHF/QALY.
Abstract Background The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation questionnaire (PRTEE) is a specific questionnaire available for assessing the health status of patients with lateral epicondylitis. An official German translation does not yet exist. Objectives The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the PRTEE into German. Material and Methods The translation and cross-cultural adaptation was completed by an expert committee comprising people of varying professional and linguistic backgrounds. According to international guidelines, the English original was first translated into German, then back-translated and the final version was pre-tested on patients. Results No major difficulties were encountered during the translation process and smaller linguistic discrepancies could be resolved in the expert committee. For the pre-validation testing, 11 patients with extensor repair due to persistent lateral epicondylitis were included. They rated the questionnaire as easy to understand and complete. The final version was approved by the developers of the original questionnaire as the official German translation. Conclusions Although the measurement properties of the German version were not evaluated in this study, the original shows good reliability, validity and responsiveness. In summary, the PRTEE is a questionnaire quick and easy to complete for patients with lateral epicondylitis. Therefore, it is suitable for the clinical routine assessment of subjective health status or the outcome after an intervention. Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Zur Beurteilung des Gesundheitszustandes von Patienten mit einer Epicondylitis lateralis (Tennisellenbogen) gibt es einen spezifischen Fragebogen, den Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire (PRTEE). Jedoch existiert bisher noch keine offizielle deutsche Version. Ziel der Arbeit Ziel dieser Arbeit war, die englische Version des PRTEE für den deutschsprachigen Gebrauch zu übersetzen und transkulturell zu adaptieren. Material und Methoden Die Übersetzung und transkulturelle Adaptation erfolgte in einem Expertengremium bestehend aus Personen mit verschiedenen fachlichen und sprachlichen Hintergründen. In Anlehnung an internationale Richtlinien wurde zuerst das englische Original ins Deutsche übersetzt, anschließend rückübersetzt und die Synthese in einer Prävalidierung an Patienten getestet. Ergebnisse Der Übersetzungsprozess verlief ohne große Probleme, kleinere linguistische Diskrepanzen konnten im Expertengremium gelöst werden. Für die Prävalidierung konnten 11 Patienten mit Status nach Extensorenrefixation rekrutiert werden. Sie beurteilten den Fragebogen als gut verständlich und einfach auszufüllen. Die finale Version wurde von den Entwicklern des Originals als offizielle deutsche Übersetzung anerkannt. Diskussion Die Messeigenschaften der deutschen Version wurden in dieser Studie nicht untersucht, das Original zeigt jedoch sehr gute Reliabilität, Validität und Responsivität. Zusammenfassend kann man sagen, dass der PRTEE ein schnell und einfach auszufüllender Fragebogen für Patienten mit Epicondylitis lateralis ist. Daher ist er im klinischen Alltag gut anwendbar, um den subjektiven Gesundheitszustand oder den postinterventionellen Verlauf eines Patienten quantifizieren zu können.
Purpose Our primary aim was to describe the re-intervention and revision rates after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) documented in a local shoulder arthroplasty registry. We also identify the main indication for revision and re-intervention, which may be relevant for patient outcome post-RSA. Methods Since July 2006, RSAs are consecutively documented in our clinic registry and prospectively controlled with follow-ups. Any intervention after primary RSA requiring a return to the operating room for any shoulder-related indication was termed a re-intervention. Revisions were defined as surgeries involving any exchange, removal, or addition of at least one component. The study endpoints were survival rates at two, five and ten years follow-up for both definitions. Results Until July 2017, 63 from a total of 1480 primary RSAs required at least one re-intervention and 33 patients had a revision. Open reduction and internal fixation for fractures around the implant (n = 14) were the predominating indications for re-intervention. The re-intervention rate for instability was 0.5%. For re-interventions, survival rates were 97.7, 95.4 and 90.8% at two, five and ten years, respectively, and the respective rates for revisions were 98.7, 97.5 and 95.3%. Conclusion The revision rate after primary RSA for our patient registry is low. A relevant number of additional interventions were noted that did not require any component revision but may impair the final outcome post-RSA. By only reporting revision rates, the number of post-RSA re-interventions is clearly underestimated. We recommend the documentation of all events leading to any re-intervention in arthroplasty registries.
Ruptures of the distal biceps and triceps tendon are rare. Most frequently these injuries occur in men, athletes and patients with physically demanding work activities. This review article describes aetiology and pathogenesis as well as diagnostics, treatment options, the expected outcome and provides insights in our own approach.
Loss of elbow motion is a common symptom following elbow injury or immobilization. Sudden onset of limited elbow motion in the sense of locking and catching is usually associated with loose bodies or an impinging plica. Other reasons limiting elbow motion include ganglion cysts, which are extremely rare and characteristically affect rheumatoid arthritis patients. Depending on the location, cysts may not only restrict motion but also cause compression of the radial, median or ulnar nerve. We present a rare case of isolated loss of elbow flexion caused by a ganglion cyst anterior to the radiocapitellar joint which was successfully treated by arthroscopic cyst resection. This minimally invasive technique reduces soft tissue damage, but carries a potentially high risk of neurovascular complications.
Eine Einschränkung der Ellenbogenbeweglichkeit ist oft die Folge eines Unfalls oder einer temporären Ruhigstellung. Plötzlich auftretende Gelenkblockaden wiederum lassen an die Einklemmung von freien Gelenkkörpern oder einer voluminösen Plica denken. Dass ein okkultes Ganglion zwar eine Rarität darstellt, aber dennoch eine isolierte Beugehemmung am Ellenbogen verursachen kann, beweist der vorliegende Fall. Die arthroskopische Resektion bietet eine minimal-invasive Methode der Therapie, birgt gleichzeitig aber relevante Gefahren bezüglich einer iatrogenen Schädigung der neurovaskulären Strukturen.
Purpose Clinical registries are essential for evaluation of surgical outcomes. The Schulthess Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (SAR) was established in 2006 to evaluate safety, function, quality-of-life and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Participants Adult patients undergoing anatomic or reverse shoulder joint replacement at the Schulthess Klinik, a high-volume, leading orthopaedic surgery centre in Zürich, Switzerland. Findings to date Between March 2006 and December 2019, the registry covered 98% of eligible operations. Overall, 2332 patients were enrolled with a total of 2796 operations and 11 147 person-years of follow-up. Mean age at baseline was 71 (range: 20–95), 65% were women. Most common indication was rotator cuff tears with osteoarthritis (42%) and the mean preoperative Constant Score was 31 (±15). The most frequent arthroplasty type was reverse, increasing from 61% in 2006–2010 to 86% in 2015–2019. Functional recovery peaked at 12-month postoperatively and did not show a clinically relevant deterioration during the first ten follow-up years. Since its establishment, the registry was used to address multiple pertinent clinical and methodological questions. Primary focus was on comparing different implant configurations (eg, glenosphere diameter) and surgical techniques (eg, latissimus dorsi transfer) to maximise functional recovery. Additionally, the cohort contributed to the determination of the clinical relevance and validity of radiological monitoring of cortical bone resorption and scapular notching. Finally, SAR data helped to demonstrate that returning to sports was among key patient expectations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Future plans As first patients are approaching the 15 years follow-up landmark, the registry will continue providing essential data on long-term functional outcomes, implant stability, revision rates and aetiologies as well as patient satisfaction and quality-of-life. In addition to research and quality-control, the cohort data will be brought back to the patients by bolstering real-time clinical decision support.
Background: Radial head fractures lead to persisting disability in a considerable number of cases. This study aimed to investigate their most common revision causes and procedures. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study reviewed the cases of 466 adult patients who had undergone surgical revision after operative or nonoperative treatment of a radial head fracture. The initial diagnosis was a Mason type I fracture in 13.0%, Mason type II fracture in 14.6%, Mason type III fracture in 22.8%, Mason type IV fracture in 20.9%, terrible-triad injury in 12.8%, Monteggia-like lesion in 13.1%, and Essex-Lopresti lesion in 2.0%. Initial treatment was nonoperative in 30.2%, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 44.9%, radial head arthroplasty in 16.6%, radial head resection in 3.7%, sole treatment of concomitant injuries in 2.6%, and fragment excision in 2.0%. Up to 3 revision causes and procedures were recorded per case. Results: The most common complications were stiffness (67.4%), instability (36.5%), painful osteoarthritis (29.2%), ORIF related (14.8%), nonunion or necrosis (9.2%), radial head arthroplasty related (7.5%), ulnar neuropathy (6.0%), and infection (2.6%). Revision procedures frequently included arthrolysis (42.1%), arthroplasty (24.9%), implant removal (23.6%), ligament repair or reconstruction (23.0%), debridement (14.2%), repeated ORIF (8.2%), and/or radial head resection (7.7%). Mason type I or II fractures were primarily revised because of stiffness and painful osteoarthritis. Complications after Mason type III fractures were predominantly ORIF related. Fracture-dislocations showed a wide range of complications, with instability and stiffness comprising the most common causes of revision. Conclusions: The complications of radial head fractures are characteristic to their classification. Knowledge of these findings might guide surgeons in treating these injuries and may help counsel patients accordingly. (C) 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
We describe the reconstruction of high-grade extensor tendon tears using a knotless suture anchor and hypothesize that this will result in improved elbow pain and function with a high healing rate. Twenty chronic lateral epicondylitis patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed high-grade extensor tendon tears underwent surgery using a knotless suture anchor technique. All underwent clinical and ultrasound assessments and completed the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation questionnaires at final follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were also determined. Mean patient age at surgery was 48 years with 11 women and 7 men available at final follow-up. Diagnostic arthroscopy was performed for all patients before repair; cartilage lesions were found in 8 patients. Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 55 to 100 points. At final follow-up, the median grip strength was 100% (range, 52 to 114) of the nonaffected side and patient-rated scores were almost 0. We did not observe any retears. Some tennis elbow patients may present with high-grade tears that contribute to chronic symptoms. Our repair technique resulted in a satisfactory outcome for these patients and may reduce the risk of secondary posterolateral instability following complete tendon release.
This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing resurfacing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with those treated with a stemmed TSA.