CONTEXT The Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score serves as the basis for the distribution of deceased-donor (DD) livers and was developed in response to "the final rule" mandate, whose stated principle is to allocate livers according to a patient's medical need, with less emphasis on keeping organs in the local procurement area. However, in selected areas of the United States, organs are kept in organ procurement organizations (OPOs) with small waiting lists and transplanted into less-sick patients instead of being allocated to sicker patients in nearby transplant centers in OPOs with large waiting lists. OBJECTIVE To determine whether there is a difference in MELD scores for liver transplant recipients receiving transplants in small vs large OPOs. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective review of the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between February 28, 2002, and March 31, 2003. Transplant recipients (N = 4798) had end-stage liver disease and received DD livers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES MELD score distribution (range, 6-40), graft survival, and patient survival for liver transplant recipients in small (<100) and large (> or =100 on the waiting list) OPOs. RESULTS The distribution of MELD scores was the same in large and small OPOs; 92% had a MELD score of 18 or less, 7% had a MELD score between 19 and 24, and only 2% of listed patients had a MELD score higher than 24 (P =.85). The proportion of patients receiving transplants in small OPOs and with a MELD score higher than 24 was significantly lower than that in large OPOs (19% vs 49%; P<.001). Patient survival rates at 1 year after transplantation for small OPOs (86.4%) and large OPOs (86.6%) were not statistically different (P =.59), and neither were graft survival rates in small OPOs (80.1%) and large OPOs (81.3%) (P =.80). CONCLUSIONS There is a significant disparity in MELD scores in liver transplant recipients in small vs large OPOs; fewer transplant recipients in small OPOs have severe liver disease (MELD score >24). This disparity does not reflect the stated goals of the current allocation policy, which is to distribute livers according to a patient's medical need, with less emphasis on keeping organs in the local procurement area.

We retrospectively analyzed all listed patients having hepatic artery chemoembolization (HACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stage T2 or less. Outcomes were transplantation, waiting list removal, death, and HCC recurrence. Twenty patients (mean age 55.7 years; 15 males) were identified. Twelve (60%) were transplanted, seven (35%) were removed from the list and one (5%) remains listed. Fourteen (70%) are alive. All 12 transplanted patients are alive (mean 2.94 years); one of seven removed from the list is alive (mean 1.45 years). Survival was significantly higher for those transplanted or listed vs. removed from the list (100% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0002). No HCC's recurred. Three patients (15%) were removed from the list after prolonged waiting times before MELD. Hepatic artery chemoembolization induced deterioration and removal from the list of one (5%) patient. Survival for those transplanted was excellent(100%), but overall survival was significantly lower (61.3%) at a mean 5.48 years. Hepatic artery chemoembolization for listed patients with ≤€ T2 stage HCC is beneficial, but must be weighed against decreased waiting times and risk of HACE-induced deterioration. This balance is influenced greatly by the MELD system's determination of waiting times for HCC patients.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the fourth leading diagnosis in liver transplant recipients in the United States. The disease is known to recur in 15% to 30% of liver transplant recipients. We set out to investigate how different immunosuppression regimens affected natural history of PSC after liver transplantation at our center. We reviewed records of all patients who underwent a liver transplantation at our institution in between 1988 and 2000 and had a diagnosis of PSC at the time of liver transplantation. Primary sclerosing cholangitis recurred in 15 of 71 patients (21.1%) who had complete records and survived more than 30 days after liver transplantation. Although recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis was most often seen (but not statistically significantly so) in patients who received maintenance corticosteroids, the time to recurrence was not significantly different between those who were treated with maintenance, those who were not successfully weaned, and those who successfully weaned off corticosteroids within 3 months after liver transplantation. Orthoclone (OKT3) therapy (Ortho-Biotech, Inc., Raritan, NJ) was associated with a higher risk of primary sclerosing cholangitis recurrence (29% versus 10%, P <.05). Recurrence was not influenced by immunosuppression with either cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Coexistent inflammatory bowel disease was a cause of failure to wean off corticosteroids, was associated with a shorter time to recurrence of sclerosing cholangitis, and was responsible for significant comorbidity (colon cancer in 7.3%). Primary sclerosing cholangitis recurrence is commonly seen after liver transplantation. More immunosuppression seems to be detrimental to the outcome of our patients with sclerosing cholangitis: use of OKT3 was associated with a greater incidence of recurrence. Length of corticosteroid use did not affect timing or risk of recurrence, and because it has been proven that early corticosteroid withdrawal after liver transplantation is beneficial, we continue to recommend this practice.