BACKGROUND:Intraoperative events and clinical management of deceased organ donors after brain death are poorly characterized and may consequently vary between hospitals and organ procurement organization (OPO) regions. In a multicenter cohort, we sought to estimate the incidence of hypotension and anesthetic and nonanesthetic medication use during organ recovery procedures. METHODS:We used data from electronic anesthetic records generated during organ recovery procedures from brain-dead adults across a Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) cohort of 14 US hospitals and 4 OPO regions (2014-2020). Hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure or MAP <60 mm Hg for at least 10 cumulative minutes was the primary outcome of interest. The associations between hypotension and age, sex, race, anesthesia time, OPOs, and OPO case volume were examined using multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression analyses with robust standard error estimates. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to describe the variation between-MPOG centers and the OPO regions in the use of medications, time of the operation, and duration of the operation. RESULTS:We examined 1338 brain-dead adult donors, with a mean age of 42± (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 60% (n = 801) were males and 67% (n = 891) non-Hispanic White. During the entire intraoperative monitoring period, 321 donors (24%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-26%) had hypotension for a median of 13.8% [quartile1-quartile 3: 9.4%-21%] of the monitoring period and a minimum of 10 minutes to a maximum of 96 minutes [(median: 17, quartile1-quartile 3: 12-24]). The probability having hypotension in donors 35 to 64 years and 65 years and older were approximately 30% less than in donors 18 to 34 years of age (adjusted relative risk ratios, aRR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.55-0.82, aRR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.94, respectively). Donors received intravenous heparin (96.4%, n = 1291), neuromuscular blockers (89.5%, n = 1198), vasoactive medications (82.7%, n = 1108), crystalloids (76.2%, n = 1020), halogenated anesthetic gases (63.5%, n = 850), diuretics (43.8%, n = 587), steroids (16.7%, n = 224), and opioids (23.2%, n = 310). The largest practice heterogeneity observed between the MPOG center and OPO regions was steroids (between-center ICCs = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62-0.75, between-region ICCs = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.27-0.63) and diuretics (between-center ICCs = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.36-0.6, between-region ICCs = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.22-0.49). CONCLUSIONS:Despite guidelines recommending maintenance of MAP >60 mm Hg in adult brain-dead organ donors, hypotension during recovery procedures was common. Future research is needed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative events with donation and transplantation outcomes and to identify best practices for the anesthetic management of brain-dead donors in the operating room.

BACKGROUND:There remains a critical shortage of pediatric organ donors and there is a gap in understanding of optimal perioperative management to optimize donor organ outcomes for this valuable resource. AIMS:To survey practice patterns for intraoperative management of pediatric (age < 18 years) brain-dead donors during organ recovery procedures. METHODS:This retrospective observational study included organ recovery cases from 24 centers included in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) cohort in the United States from 2014 to 2020. Practice variation was evaluated using descriptive statistics, Fleiss' kappa, and logistic regression for between-group comparisons for volume-based analysis (case volume < 10 or ≥ 10) without adjustment for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:A total of 231 cases were included in this analysis. The median case volume for the Higher-Volume (≥ 10 cases) group was 25 [IQR 17, 46] cases and 7 [IQR 3, 8] cases for the Lower-Volume (< 10 cases) group. Descriptive analyses identified differences in case volume, race, and administration of steroids and vasoactives (bolus and infusion). The Fleiss' kappa scores were negative across all medications administered, suggesting a lack of within-group agreement. The odds ratio for steroid administration in the Lower-Volume group was 0.319 (95% CI: 0.116-0.745, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS:This study found substantial practice variation across MPOG centers grouped based on case volume frequency for organ recovery procedures in pediatric donation after brain death. A major limitation of this study is the inability to correlate perioperative management with organ recipient outcomes. The main takeaway is an opportunity to improve consistency in perioperative management for brain-death donors from case classification to medication administration that reflects an understanding of brain death physiology.

Hadler, Rachel A. MD; Curry, Saundra E. MD; Hendrix, Joseph M. MD, FASA; Michaelis, Maria MD, FASA; Minzter, Beth MD, FIPP; Pelletier, Pete MD, FASA; West, James M. MD, MA; Souter, Michael J. MBChB, FRCA; on behalf of the Committee on Ethics of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Author Information

To explore Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) practices regarding verification of Death by Neurologic Criteria (DNC).

Vail, Emily A. MD, MSc*; Chun, Rebekah H. BA†; Tsai, Steven D. MD*; Souter, Michael J. MBChB, FRCA, FNCS‡; Lele, Abhijit V. MBBS, MD, MSCR, FNCS, CPHQ‡ Author Information

Background and Objectives: We analyzed delirium testing, delirium prevalence, critical care associations outcomes at the time of hospital discharge in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to an intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: We examined the frequency of assessment for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit. We assessed delirium testing frequency, associated factors, positive test outcomes, and their correlations with clinical care, including nonpharmacological interventions and pain, agitation, and distress management. Results: Amongst 11,322 patients with ABI, delirium was tested in 8220 (726%). Compared to patients 18–44 years of age, patients 65–79 years (aOR 0.79 [0.69, 0.90]), and those 80 years and older (aOR 0.58 [0.50, 0.68]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Compared to English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients (aOR 0.73 [0.64, 0.84]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Amongst 8220, 2217 (27.2%) tested positive for delirium. For every day in the ICU, the odds of testing positive for delirium increased by 1.11 [0.10, 0.12]. Delirium was highest in those 80 years and older (aOR 3.18 [2.59, 3.90]). Delirium was associated with critical care resource utilization and with significant odds of mortality (aOR 7.26 [6.07, 8.70] at the time of hospital discharge. Conclusions: In conclusion, we find that seven out of ten patients in the neurocritical care unit are tested for delirium, and approximately two out of every five patients test positive for delirium. We demonstrate disparities in delirium testing by age and preferred language, identified high-risk subgroups, and the association between delirium, critical care resource use, complications, discharge GCS, and disposition. Prioritizing equitable testing and diagnosis, especially for elderly and non-English-speaking patients, is crucial for delivering quality care to this vulnerable group.

Background: To examine the association between external ventricular drain (EVD) placement, critical care utilization, complications, and clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods: A single-center retrospective study included SAH patients 18 years and older, admitted between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2022. The exposure variable was EVD. The primary outcomes of interest were (1) early mortality (<72 h), (2) overall mortality, (3) improvement in modified-World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (m-WFNSs) grade between admission and discharge, and (4) discharge to home at the end of the hospital stay. We adjusted for admission m-WFNS grade, age, sex, race/ethnicity, intraventricular hemorrhage, aneurysmal cause of SAH, mechanical ventilation, critical care utilization, and complications within a multivariable analysis. We reported adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The study sample included 1346 patients: 18% (n = 243) were between the ages of 18 and 44 years, 48% (n = 645) were between the age of 45–64 years, and 34% (n = 458) were 65 years and older, with other statistics of females (56%, n = 756), m-WFNS I–III (57%, n = 762), m-WFNS IV–V (43%, n = 584), 51% mechanically ventilated, 76% White (n = 680), and 86% English-speaking (n = 1158). Early mortality occurred in 11% (n = 142). Overall mortality was 21% (n = 278), 53% (n = 707) were discharged to their home, and 25% (n = 331) improved their m-WFNS between admission and discharge. Altogether, 54% (n = 731) received EVD placement. After adjusting for covariates, the results of the multivariable analysis demonstrated that EVD placement was associated with reduced early mortality (aOR 0.21 [0.14, 0.33]), an improvement in m-WFNS grade (aOR 2.06 [1.42, 2.99]) but not associated with overall mortality (aOR 0.69 [0.47, 1.00]) or being discharged home at the end of the hospital stay (aOR 1.00 [0.74, 1.36]). EVD was associated with a higher rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (aOR 2.32 [1.03, 5.23]), delirium (aOR 1.56 [1.05, 2.32]), and a longer ICU (aOR 1.33 [1.29;1.36]) and hospital length of stay (aOR 1.09 [1.07;1.10]). Critical care utilization was also higher in patients with EVD compared to those without. Conclusions: The study suggests that EVD placement in hospitalized adults with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with reduced early mortality and improved neurological recovery, albeit with higher critical care utilization and complications. These findings emphasize the potential clinical benefits of EVD placement in managing SAH. However, further research and prospective studies may be necessary to validate these results and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in SAH.

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) to verify and document that any potential organ donor has been pronounced dead per applicable legal requirements of local, state, and federal laws. However, OPO practices regarding death by neurologic criteria (DNC) verification are not standardized, and little is known about their DNC verification processes. This study aimed to explore OPO practices regarding DNC verification in the United States. An electronic survey was sent to all 57 OPOs in the United States from June to September 2023 to assess verification of policies and practices versus guidelines, concerns about policies and practices, processes to address concerns about DNC determination, and communication practices. Representatives from 12 OPOs across six US regions completed the entire survey; 8 of 12 reported serving > 50 referral hospitals. Most respondents (11 of 12) reported comparing their referral hospital’s DNC policies with the 2010 American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter and/or other (4 of 12) guidelines. Additionally, most (10 of 12) reported independently reviewing and verifying each DNC determination. Nearly half (5 of 12) reported concerns about guideline-discordant hospital policies, and only 3 of 12 thought all referral hospitals followed the 2010 American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter in practice. Moreover, 9 of 12 reported concerns about clinician knowledge surrounding DNC determination, and most (10 of 12) reported having received referrals for patients whose DNC declaration was ultimately reversed. All reported experiences in which their OPO requested additional assessments (11 of 12 clinical evaluation, 10 of 12 ancillary testing, 9 of 12 apnea testing) because of concerns about DNC determination validity. Accurate DNC determination is important to maintain public trust. Nearly all OPO respondents reported a process to verify hospital DNC policies and practices with medical society guidelines. Many reported concerns about clinician knowledge surrounding DNC determination and guideline-discordant policies and practices. Educational and regulatory advocacy efforts are needed to facilitate systematic implementation of guideline-concordant practices across the country.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) opposes automatic reversal of do-not-resuscitate orders during the perioperative period, instead advocating for a goal-directed approach that aligns decision-making with patients' priorities and clinical circumstances. Implementation of ASA guidelines continues to face significant barriers including time constraints, lack of longitudinal relationships with patients, and difficulty translating goal-focused discussion into concrete clinical plans. These challenges mirror those of advance care planning more generally, suggesting a need for novel frameworks for serious illness communication and patient-centered decision-making. This review considers ASA guidelines in the context of ongoing transitions to serious illness communication and increasingly multidisciplinary perioperative care. It aims to provide practical guidance for the practicing anesthesiologist while also acknowledging the complexity of decision-making, considering limitations inherent to anesthesiologists' role, and outlining a need to conceptualize delivery of ethically informed care as a collaborative, multidisciplinary endeavor.

Background Managing neurocritical care patients encompasses many complex challenges, necessitating specialized care and continuous quality improvement efforts. In recent years, the focus on enhancing patient outcomes in neurocritical care may have led to the development of dedicated quality improvement programs. These programs are designed to systematically evaluate and refine care practices, aligning them with the latest clinical guidelines and research findings. Objective To describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of a dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program (NCC-QIP) at Harborview Medical Center, United States; a quaternary academic medical center, level I trauma, and a comprehensive stroke center. Materials and methods We describe the development of the NCC-QIP, its structure, function, challenges, and evolution. We examine our performance with several NCC-QI quality measures as proposed by the Joint Commission, the American Association of Neurology, and the Neurocritical Care Society, self -reported quality improvement (QI) concerns and QI initiatives undertaken because of the information obtained during our event/measure reporting process for patients admitted between 1/1/2014 and 06/30/2023. Results The NCC-QI reviewed data from 20,218 patients; mean age 57.9 (standard deviation 18.1) years, 56% (n=11,326) males, with acute ischemic stroke (AIS; 22.3%, n=4506), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; 14.8%, n=2,996), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; 8.9%, n=1804), and traumatic brain injury (TBI; 16.6%, n=3352) among other admissions, 37.4% (n=7,559) were mechanically ventilated, and 13.6% (n=2,753) received an intracranial pressure monitor. The median intensive care unit length of stay was two days (Quartile 1 -Quartile 3: 2-5 days), and the median hospital length of stay was seven days (Quartile 1 -Quartile 3: 3-14 days); 53.9% (n=10,907) were discharged home while 11.4% (2,309) died. The three most commonly reported QI concerns were related to care coordination/communication/handoff (40.4%, n=283), medication -related concerns (14.9%, n=104), and equipment/devices-related concerns (11.7%, n=82). Hospital -acquired infections were in the form of ventilator -associated pneumonia (16.3%, n=419/2562), ventriculostomy catheter -associated infections (4%, n=102/2246), and deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (3.2%, n=647). The quality metrics documentation was as follows: nimodipine after SAH (99.8%, 1802/1810), Hunt and Hess score (36%, n=650/1804), and ICH score (58.4% n=1752/2996). In comparison, 72% (n=3244/4506) of patients with AIS had a documented National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Admission Glasgow Coma Score was recorded in 99% of patients with SAH, ICH, and TBI. Educational modules were implemented in response to event reporting. Conclusion A dedicated NCC-QIP can be successfully implemented at a quaternary medical medical center. It is possible to monitor and review a large volume of neurocritical care patients, The three most reported NCC-QI concerns may be related to care coordination-communication/handoff, medication -related concerns, and equipment/devices-related complications. The documentation of illness severity scores and stroke measures depends upon the type of measure and ability to reliably and accurately abstract and can be challenging. The quality improvement process can be enhanced by educational modules that reinforce quality and safety.

We examined the associations between the Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) and disposition at hospital discharge in patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary outcome was discharge disposition (home/acute rehabilitation vs. death/hospice/skilled nursing facility). Secondary outcomes were tracheostomy tube placement and transition to comfort measures. Among 2258 patients who received serial NPi assessments within the first seven days of ICU admission, 47.7% (n = 1078) demonstrated NPi ≥ 3 on initial and final assessments, 30.1% (n = 680) had initial NPI < 3 that never improved, 19% (n = 430) had initial NPi ≥ 3, which subsequently worsened to <3 and never recovered, and 3.1% (n = 70) had initial NPi < 3, which improved to ≥3. After adjusting for age, sex, admitting diagnosis, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, craniotomy/craniectomy, and hyperosmolar therapy, NPi values that remained <3 or worsened from ≥3 to <3 were associated with poor outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.58, 95% CI [2.03; 3.28]), placement of a tracheostomy tube (aOR 1.58, 95% CI [1.13; 2.22]), and transition to comfort measures only (aOR 2.12, 95% CI [1.67; 2.70]). Our study suggests that serial NPi assessments during the first seven days of ICU admission may be helpful in predicting outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making in patients with ABI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of interventions to improve NPi trends in this population.

The development of critical care stimulated brain death criteria formulation in response to concerns on treatment resources and unregulated organ procurement. The diagnosis centered on irreversible loss of brain function and subsequent systemic physiologic collapse and was subsequently codified into law. With improved critical care, physiologic collapse (while predominant) is not inevitable—provoking criticisms of the ethical and legal foundation for brain death. Other criteria have been unsuccessfully proposed, but irreversibility remains the conceptual foundation. Conflicts can arise when families reject the diagnosis—resulting in ethical, cultural, and communication challenges and implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Background: We report adherence to 6 Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE) quality metrics (QMs) relevant to patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy or endoscopic clot evacuation after spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we describe adherence to the following ASPIRE QMs: acute kidney injury (AKI-01); mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg for less than 15 minutes (BP-03); myocardial injury (CARD-02); treatment of high glucose (> 200 mg/dL, GLU-03); reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB-02); and perioperative hypothermia (TEMP-03). Result: The study included 95 patients (70% male) with median (interquartile range) age 55 (47 to 66) years and ICH score 2 (1 to 3) undergoing craniectomy (n=55) or endoscopic clot evacuation (n=40) after sICH. In-hospital mortality attributable to sICH was 23% (n=22). Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 5 (n=16), preoperative reduced glomerular filtration rate (n=5), elevated cardiac troponin (n=21) and no intraoperative labs with high glucose (n=71), those who were not extubated at the end of the case (n=62) or did not receive a neuromuscular blocker given (n=3), and patients having emergent surgery (n=64) were excluded from the analysis for their respective ASPIRE QM based on predetermined ASPIRE exclusion criteria. For the remaining patients, the adherence to ASPIRE QMs were: AKI-01, craniectomy 34%, endoscopic clot evacuation 1%; BP-03, craniectomy 72%, clot evacuation 73%; CARD-02, 100% for both groups; GLU-03, craniectomy 67%, clot evacuation 100%; NMB-02, clot evacuation 79%, and; TEMP-03, clot evacuation 0% with hypothermia. Conclusion: This study found variable adherence to ASPIRE QMs in sICH patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy or endoscopic clot evacuation. The relatively high number of patients excluded from individual ASPIRE metrics is a major limitation.

The development of critical care stimulated brain death criteria formulation in response to concerns on treatment resources and unregulated organ procurement. The diagnosis centered on irreversible loss of brain function and subsequent systemic physiologic collapse and was subsequently codified into law. With improved critical care, physiologic collapse (while predominant) is not inevitable-provoking criticisms of the ethical and legal foundation for brain death. Other criteria have been unsuccessfully proposed, but irreversibility remains the conceptual foundation. Conflicts can arise when families reject the diagnosis-resulting in ethical, cultural, and communication challenges and implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion.

SUMMARY:For the task of estimating a target benchmark dose such as the ED50 (the dose that would be effective for half the population), an adaptive dose-finding design is more effective than the standard approach of treating equal numbers of patients at a set of equally spaced doses. Up-and-down is the most popular family of dose-finding designs and is in common use in anesthesiology. Despite its widespread use, many aspects of up-and-down are not well known, implementation is often misguided, and standard, up-to-date reference material about the design is very limited. This article provides an overview of up-and-down properties, recent methodologic developments, and practical recommendations, illustrated with the help of simulated examples. Additional reference material is offered in the Supplemental Digital Content.