AimFremanezumab is approved for migraine prevention in Europe, the United States (US), Japan, South Korea, and several other countries; however, there are no data available on fremanezumab as a migraine preventive treatment in a Chinese population. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in Chinese adults with migraine.MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, Phase 3 trial consisted of a 4-week screening period, a 12-week double-blind period (DBP), and a 12-week open-label extension (OLE). Chinese adults with episodic and chronic migraine were randomized 1:1:2 to receive fremanezumab monthly (225 mg), fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg), or matched monthly placebo during the DBP. During the OLE, all participants received fremanezumab monthly (225 mg). The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) during the DBP. Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in migraine days during the first 4 weeks of treatment and in monthly number of days with acute headache medication use during the DBP. Similar endpoints were assessed during the OLE. Safety assessments included, but were not limited to, adverse event (AE) reporting.ResultsIn total, 365/454 screened participants were randomized to fremanezumab (n = 182 [monthly, n = 91; quarterly, n = 91]) or placebo (n = 183). Significantly greater changes from baseline in MMD were observed with fremanezumab versus placebo during the DBP (-4.6 vs -2.8; p < 0.0001) and in mean migraine days during the first 4 weeks of treatment (-4.5 vs -2.2; p < 0.0001). The mean change from baseline in days of acute headache medication use during the DBP was -3.0 with fremanezumab and -1.1 for placebo (p < 0.0001). During the OLE, the mean change from baseline in MMD was -6.8 and -7.2 for those assigned to fremanezumab and placebo, respectively, during the DBP. The percentage of participants with any AE was similar between fremanezumab and placebo groups during the DBP (47% vs 43%); serious AEs were infrequent (fremanezumab, 1%; placebo, <1%). Similar trends in AEs were observed during the OLE.ConclusionIn this study, fremanezumab demonstrated significant improvements over placebo with respect to reductions in MMD and days with acute headache medication use, with these reductions being maintained over the OLE. Fremanezumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no safety signals. These results are comparable to pivotal adult trials in Europe and the US, supporting the use of fremanezumab in Chinese adults living with migraine.Clinical trial pre-registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05458011; submitted: 11 July 2022; first participant enrolled: 30 September 2022; available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05458011; first submitted: 11 July 2022).

BACKGROUND:Fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide, is approved for the prevention of migraine in adults. Evidence from randomized, controlled trials in children and adolescents is needed. METHODS:We randomly assigned participants 6 to 17 years of age with a diagnosis of episodic migraine (defined as migraine for ≥6 months and a history of ≤14 headache days per month) to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of fremanezumab (120 mg for participants with a body weight of <45 kg and 225 mg for those with a body weight of ≥45 kg) or matched placebo for 3 months. Participants were allowed to use migraine-specific medications to treat acute headaches. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the average number of migraine days per month. Key secondary end points included the change in the number of days per month with headache of at least moderate severity and a reduction of 50% or more in the number of migraine days per month. RESULTS:Of 237 participants who underwent randomization, 234 were included in the full analysis population: 123 in the fremanezumab group (36 received the 120-mg dose and 87 received the 225-mg dose) and 111 in the placebo group. Fremanezumab reduced the number of migraine days per month by 2.5 as compared with 1.4 with placebo (difference, 1.1; P = 0.02) and the number of days per month with headache of at least moderate severity by 2.6 as compared with 1.5 with placebo (difference, 1.1; P = 0.02). The percentage of participants who had a reduction of 50% or more in the number of migraine days per month was 47.2% with fremanezumab and 27.0% with placebo (P = 0.002). Injection-site erythema was the most common adverse event with fremanezumab (9.8% of participants, vs. 5.4% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS:Among children and adolescents with episodic migraine, fremanezumab resulted in greater reductions in the number of migraine days and headache days than placebo. Injection-site erythema was the most common adverse event with fremanezumab. Longer follow-up is required to further understand the efficacy and safety of the drug in this population. (Funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04458857.).

This subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide, in patients with migraine and obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2 [BMI-high]).

OBJECTIVE:To describe exploratory endpoints from a previous phase 2b/3 placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan and Korea, specifically investigating the effect of fremanezumab or placebo on migraine-associated symptoms and acute headache medication use in patients with episodic migraine (EM). BACKGROUND:EM is associated with non-head pain symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or phonophobia, which contribute substantially to the disease burden, healthcare resource utilization, and impaired quality of life. Current EM treatments include a mix of nonspecific/migraine-specific acute headache medications, but medication overuse can induce headaches and progression from EM to chronic migraine (CM). In multiple phase 2b/3 trials, the monoclonal antibody fremanezumab significantly reduced the average number of monthly migraine days experienced by patients with EM/CM compared with placebo. METHODS:This was a prespecified analysis of exploratory endpoints in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial conducted in Japanese and Korean patients with EM (NCT03303092). Patients were randomized to receive fremanezumab, either monthly or quarterly, or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously at 4-week/28-day ("monthly") intervals to maintain blinding. Exploratory endpoints reported here were the mean change from baseline in the number of days/month with (i) the use of any acute headache medication, (ii) the use of any migraine-specific acute headache medication, (iii) nausea or vomiting, and (iv) photophobia and phonophobia. RESULTS:Overall, 357 Japanese and Korean patients with EM received either monthly (n = 121) or quarterly (n = 119) fremanezumab or placebo (n = 117). Compared with placebo, fremanezumab administered monthly or quarterly was associated with a significant reduction from baseline in the average number of days/month with acute headache medication use over three months (difference vs. placebo -2.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.52, -2.11]; p < 0.001 and -2.79 [95% CI -3.50, -2.08]; p < 0.001, respectively). Similar findings were observed in the monthly average number of days with migraine-specific acute headache medications (difference vs. placebo with monthly and quarterly fremanezumab, -2.63 [95% CI -3.31, -1.95] for both; p < 0.001), the average number of days/month with nausea or vomiting (difference vs. placebo -1.09 [95% CI -1.60, -0.58]; p < 0.001 for monthly fremanezumab and -1.37 [95% CI -1.88, -0.86]; p < 0.001 for quarterly fremanezumab), and the average number of days with photophobia and phonophobia (difference vs. placebo -1.22 [95% CI -1.80, -0.65]; p < 0.001 and -1.64 [95% CI -2.22, -1.06]; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION:Monthly and quarterly administered fremanezumab effectively prevented EM in Japanese and Korean patients. Fremanezumab also improved other disease aspects including the need for acute headache medications and the frequency of migraine-associated symptoms.

Purpose: The monoclonal antibody fremanezumab has been shown effective and well tolerated in numerous Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials. This subgroup analysis of the international HALO episodic migraine (EM; [NCT02629861]) trial and a similarly designed phase 2b/3 trial in Japanese and Korean patients (NCT03303092) sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in Japanese patients with EM. Patients and Methods: In both trials, eligible patients were randomly assigned at baseline to receive subcutaneous monthly fremanezumab, quarterly fremanezumab, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the monthly (28-day) average number of migraine days during the 12-week period after the first dose of fremanezumab or placebo. Secondary endpoints assessed other aspects of efficacy, including disability and medication use. Results: A total of 301 patients in the Japanese and Korean phase 2b/3 trial and 75 patients in the HALO EM trial were Japanese with baseline and treatment characteristics similar between treatment groups. According to ANCOVA analysis of the primary endpoint, both fremanezumab quarterly and monthly led to greater reductions in the monthly (28-day) average number of migraine days than placebo. This was supported by MMRM analysis of the primary endpoint over the initial 4 weeks, highlighting the rapid onset of action of fremanezumab. Results of secondary endpoint analysis supported the primary endpoint analyses. Fremanezumab was well tolerated with no new safety signals seen in this population of Japanese patients. Conclusion: Fremanezumab appears to be an effective and well-tolerated preventive medication for Japanese patients with EM.

Fremanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide for subcutaneous use to suppress migraine attacks. A phase 3 study was conducted to investigate the safety of autoinjector (AI)-assisted self-injection of fremanezumab 225 mg.The multicenter, open-label study involving 71 patients with migraine was conducted between June 2020 and November 2020 at ten institutions in Japan. The study consisted of a 4-week (28-day) screening period and an 8-week (57-day) treatment period. According to the investigator's instructions, all patients successfully performed self-injection for 4 weeks at the institutional site and at home and maintained eDiaries of their headaches. The primary endpoint was safety of the drug based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).Treatment-emergent adverse events were more frequent after at-home injection than after at-site injection, but they were mainly injection site reactions and mostly mild. The safety profile was comparable, raising no concerns compared with what has been reported in previous studies. Both migraine days and headache days were decreased considerably.Overall, AI-assisted, at-home self-injection of fremanezumab was found to be generally safe and well-tolerated. This injection strategy is considered clinically meaningful in view of improved utility of and adherence to the drug.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate quality of life (QoL) endpoints from two 12-week trials investigating fremanezumab efficacy and safety in Japanese/Korean patients with chronic (CM) or episodic (EM) migraine. BACKGROUND:Migraine is a leading cause of disability and affects QoL considerably, interfering with work and daily activities, social and family life, and emotional wellbeing. METHODS:This planned exploratory analysis used data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in which Migraine-Specific QoL (MSQoL; Role Function-Restrictive [RR], Role Function-Preventive [RP], and Emotional Function [EF] domains) scores and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores were pre-specified QoL outcomes in individuals receiving monthly or quarterly fremanezumab or placebo. In both trials, MSQoL was assessed at baseline, and MSQoL and PGIC at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. PGIC responders had a score of ≥5 points, indicating significant improvement. RESULTS:Mean baseline MSQoL scores were similar across groups in both CM (N = 565; RR, 60.3-61.5; RP, 78.5-80.0; EF, 69.0-71.4) and EM (N = 353; RR, 68.6-71.1; RP, 83.1-85.7; EF, 76.7-81.9) trials. In the CM trial, all three MSQoL domains improved in both fremanezumab groups at 12 weeks compared with placebo: least squares mean (LSM) and standard error (SE) change from baseline, p versus placebo (quarterly; monthly; placebo): RR 14.9 (1.3), p = 0.030; 15.1 (1.4), p = 0.020; 11.6 (1.3); RP 8.9 (1.1), p = 0.007; 8.6 (1.1), p = 0.013; 5.4 (1.1); EF 13.3 (1.5), p < 0.001; 12.5 (1.5), p = 0.003; 7.5 (1.5). In the EM trial, RR/EF domains improved in both fremanezumab groups compared with placebo: LSM change from baseline, p versus placebo (quarterly; monthly; placebo): RR 16.3 (1.4), p = 0.003; 16.4 (1.3), p = 0.002; 11.6 (1.4); EF 13.0 (1.3), p < 0.001; 11.5 (1.2), p = 0.004; 7.4 (1.3); RP improved in the quarterly group RP 8.6 (1.1), p = 0.010; 7.6 (1.1), p = 0.066; 5.4 (1.1). The proportion of PGIC responders at Week 12 was greater in the monthly and quarterly fremanezumab groups compared with the placebo group in the CM (96/182 [52.7%] and 98/180 [54.4%] vs. 68/179 [38.0%]; p < 0.05) and EM trial (81/118 [68.6%] and 86/113 [76.1%] vs. 38/111 [34.2%]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Patients with EM/CM receiving monthly or quarterly fremanezumab, for a duration of 12 weeks, showed significant improvements in their QoL.

Chronic migraine (CM) patients commonly take acute headache medications, often resulting in medication overuse (MO). This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of fremanezumab in CM patients from Japan with and without MO, which is not yet established. A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2b/3 trial randomized patients (1:1:1) to monthly fremanezumab via subcutaneous injection (initial dose: 675 mg, second/third doses: 225 mg), quarterly fremanezumab (initial dose: 675 mg, second/third doses: placebo), or placebo for 3 months. This post hoc analysis analyzed data from Japanese patients with and without MO (monthly use of acute headache medication ≥ 15 days, migraine-specific acute medication ≥ 10 days, or combination medication ≥ 10 days). Outcomes included the original primary endpoint of average headache days of moderate or greater severity per month (HDs), the proportion of patients with ≥ 50

Objective: This study aimed to determine the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) in a post hoc analysis of the phase 3b FOCUS trial.Background: Fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety in adults with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), with documented previous inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications.Methods: In the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or matched monthly placebo. NNT was based on responder analysis, defined as >= 50% reduction in monthly average number of migraine days at 12 weeks. NNH was based on discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs).Results: Among patients with CM (n = 509), response rates and discontinuation rates were 27% (45/169) and 0 for quarterly fremanezumab, 29% (50/173) and 2% (3/173) for monthly fremanezumab, and 8% (13/167) and <1% (1/167) for placebo, respectively. These results translated to NNTs of 5.3 and 4.7, NNHs of 1000 and 88, and LHHs of 188 and 19 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. Among patients with EM (n = 328), response rates were 47% (50/107) for quarterly fremanezumab, 43% (47/110) for monthly fremanezumab, and 10% (11/111) for placebo. Discontinuation rates were <1% (n = 1) in all three groups. These results translated to NNTs of 2.7 and 3.0, NNHs of 1000 and 1000, and LHHs of 368 and 328 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively.Conclusions: The NNT, NNH, and LHH for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab compare favorably with those for traditional oral preventive medications, including topiramate, valproate, and propranolol.

The FOCUS phase 3b study evaluated the long-term efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with chronic or episodic migraine (CM/EM) and prior documented inadequate response to 2-4 preventive treatment classes during 12-week double-blind period (DBP) and open-label extension (OLE).Following 28-day baseline period, patients were randomised (1:1:1) to quarterly or monthly fremanezumab or placebo for DBP. Patients completing DBP entered OLE, where all patients received treatment with monthly fremanezumab. Outcomes are summarised by DBP group.During DBP, least squares mean changes in monthly migraine days (MMD) in placebo, quarterly, and monthly fremanezumab groups, respectively, were –0.8, –3.9, and –4.5 for CM patients (n=509) and –0.6,–3.7, and –3.8 for EM patients (n=328; P<0.0001 vs placebo); during OLE, mean MMD changes were –5.3,–5.1, and –5.8 for CM patients (n=493) and –3.9, –5.1, and –5.1 for EM patients (n=313). Reductions were also observed for CM and EM patients in monthly headache days of at least moderate severity during DBP and increased during OLE. In placebo, quarterly, and monthly fremanezumab groups, respectively, for DBP, ≥50% reduction in MMD were 8%, 27%, and 29% for CM patients and 10%, 47%, and 43% for EM patients (P<0.0001 vs placebo) and for OLE, were 31%, 35%, and 40% for CM patients and 49%, 63%, and 56% for EM patients.Fremanezumab demonstrated long-term efficacy in CM and EM patients with prior inadequate response to multiple preventive classes.

Abstract Background Early onset of action has become recognized as an important efficacy feature of preventive migraine treatment, which can help overcome adherence issues commonly associated with older medications. Preventive treatments that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or the CGRP receptor have been previously shown to provide early onset of action. Methods This subanalysis of primary endpoints of two separate phase 2b/3 studies sought to determine the onset of action of fremanezumab in Japanese and Korean patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). Results In EM patients (n = 357), both fremanezumab quarterly and fremanezumab monthly led to greater reductions in weekly migraine days (days/week) than placebo from the first week after the initial injection and thereafter during the remainder of the study period. Similarly, CM patients (n = 571) had a greater reduction in headache days of at least moderate severity (days/week) with fremanezumab (total) than placebo. The percentage of patients with a migraine day (EM) or headache day at least moderate severity (CM) was lower in those treated with fremanezumab than placebo and this effect was apparent from as early as Day 2 (1 day after first injection). Conclusions These results suggest that fremanezumab has an early onset of action, as noted in previous post hoc analyses of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03303092 , Registered 5 October 2017, NCT03303079 , Registered 5 October 2017.

This pooled analysis of data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials (HALO chronic migraine [CM], HALO episodic migraine [EM], and FOCUS) evaluated timing and location of injection-site adverse events (AEs).