Background Heart disease has been and continues to be the number one cause of death in New York City and New York State. In 2009, an estimated 19,715 deaths were associated with heart disease in New York City alone. Health awareness has played a key role in the steady decline of this number. NYU Langone Medical Center has been receiving funding from a grant to support free health fairs that have provided basic testing to any individual willing to enroll since 2008. To date, nearly a hundred of these fairs have been conducted across New York City in places of worship, community centers, and Bellevue Hospital Center. Methods Health fairs were conducted over a four-year period targeting lower income communities in the New York City Metro area. The target population included any individual over the age of 18. When consented, they provided their demographics and filled a questionnaire. The patient then received a finger prick to examine blood glucose, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglyceride levels, along with their blood pressure. After receiving the results on-site, the patients were counseled by a qualified individual, often a NP or physician, and given an interpretation of their results accompanied with lifestyle advice and clinic referrals. The data from the fairs was compiled onto an online Electronic Data Capture system. Results A total of 4366 subjects were enrolled with a median age of 45. Analysis of the data showed significant numbers associated with risk factors of heart disease. 40.1% (1687 of 4204) of all subjects showed a total cholesterol level greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL with the highest risk group being African-Americans at 68.4% (661 of 966). A family history of coronary disease or sudden death before age 55 was noted by 23.33% (923 of 3966) of subjects. 24.07% (1051 of 4366) of the patients were referred to their primary care provider or Bellevue Hospital's clinic because of abnormal test results at the health fair. Conclusion The data values obtained provide a general outlook of the health within lower income communities in New York City. A significant portion of the enrolled subjects met at least one risk factor associated with heart disease. Many factors can be attributed to these statistics including lifestyle, genetics, and access to healthcare. These free health fairs have made dramatic impact in local communities by providing access to simple yet important tests.

BACKGROUND:The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) included 4039 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease; 1829 consented to randomization, and 2010 did not but were followed up in a registry. Thus, we can evaluate the outcome of physician-guided versus random assignment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).METHODS AND RESULTS:We compared the baseline features and outcomes for PTCA and CABG in the overall registry and its predesignated subgroups. We assessed the impact of treatment by choice versus random assignment by comparing the results in the registry with those of the randomized trial. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made. Within the registry, nearly twice as many patients were selected for PTCA (1189) as CABG (625); mortality at 7 years was similar for PTCA (13.9%) and CABG (14.2%) (P=0.66) before and after adjustment for baseline differences between patients selected for PTCA versus CABG (adjusted RR, 1.02; P=0.86). In contrast to the randomized trial, the 7-year mortality rate of treated diabetics in the registry was equally high (26%) with PTCA or CABG. Seven-year mortality was higher for patients undergoing PTCA in the randomized trial than in the registry (19.1% versus 13.9%, P<0.01) but not for those undergoing CABG (15.6% versus 14.2%, P=0.57). The adjusted relative mortality risk for PTCA in the randomized versus registry population was 1.17 (P=0.16).CONCLUSIONS:BARI physicians were able to select PTCA rather than CABG for 65% of registry patients who underwent revascularization without compromising long-term survival either in the overall population or in treated diabetics.

BACKGROUND:The influence of age on the relative success of either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients requiring myocardial revascularization continues to be controversial.METHODS:In the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial, 1,829 patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease requiring revascularization were randomly assigned to undergo either CABG or PTCA.RESULTS:Seven hundred nine patients (39%) were 65 to 80 years old at baseline; the other 1,120 were younger than 65 years. The in-hospital 30-day mortality rate for PTCA and CABG in the younger patients was 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively, and that for patients 65 years or older was 1.7% and 1.7%, respectively. In older compared with younger patients, stroke was more common after CABG (1.7% versus 0.2%, p = 0.015) and heart failure or pulmonary edema was more common after PTCA (4.0 versus 1.3%, p = 0.011). In both age groups, CABG resulted in greater relief of angina and fewer repeat procedures. The 5-year survival rate in patients younger than 65 years was 91.5% for CABG and 89.5% for PTCA. In patients 65 years or older, the 5-year survival rate was 85.7% for CABG and 81.4% for PTCA. Cardiac mortality at 5 years was greater in patients assigned to the PTCA group than in those assigned to the CABG group. However, no significant treatment differences were noted in cardiac mortality when only nondiabetic patients were examined.CONCLUSIONS:Within the context of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation trial, older patients with multivessel coronary disease do well with either PTCA or CABG. Compared with younger patients, older patients had less recurrent angina and were less likely to undergo repeat procedures, particularly among those assigned to undergo CABG. Cardiac mortality was greater in patients 65 years or older assigned to undergo PTCA; however, this difference was not noted when treated diabetic patients were excluded from analysis.

Background —Risks of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may be different in the presence of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Methods and Results —We analyzed outcomes of 550 patients with PVD enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation randomized trial and registry. Compared with 1770 patients without PVD, those with PVD were older and had a greater prevalence of medical comorbid conditions. No significant differences in coronary anatomy or PTCA success rates were found. The risk of any major complication (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coma, or emergency revascularization) after PTCA was significantly higher among patients with PVD (11.7% versus 7.8%, P =0.027). In multivariate analysis, this represented a 50% increase in the odds of having any major complication (multivariate odds ratio, 1.5; P =0.032). Among patients undergoing CABG, the risk of major complications was found to be markedly higher for patients with PVD (12%) than those without (6.1%, P =0.003) even after controlling for baseline differences (multivariate odds ratio, 1.8; P =0.018). Major differences between the PTCA and CABG groups were related primarily to a higher risk of neurological complications in PVD patients who had CABG (multivariate odds ratio, 2.8; P <0.001). Conclusions —We conclude that patients with PVD are at high risk for periprocedural complications after myocardial revascularization, in particular neurological events.

The elderly represent an increasingly important and challenging subset of the population of patients with ischemic heart disease. They are more likely to have comorbid conditions, atypical presentations, and unfavorable outcomes than their younger counterparts. Some of these findings are undoubtedly related to the structural and functional changes in the cardiovascular system associated with aging. The available data suggest that standard pharmacologic, thrombolytic, and definitive revascularization techniques have important roles in the therapy of geriatric patients but have been underused.