BACKGROUND:Prospective data on definitive radiotherapy alone for early-stage oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are limited. JCOG1208 evaluated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone with reduced prophylactic nodal irradiation in selected patients with early-stage OPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS:JCOG1208 was a prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study that enrolled patients aged 20-80 years with T1-2 N0-1 M0 OPC of the tonsil, base of tongue, or soft palate according to the UICC 7th edition. Concurrent chemotherapy was not permitted. Patients received two-step adaptive IMRT to 70 Gy in 35 fractions, including 46 Gy to the initial target volumes followed by a 24 Gy boost. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS), with a predefined threshold of 80 %. RESULTS:Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 6.8 years. Three-year OS was 93.0 % (95 % CI, 82.4-97.3 %), and 5-year OS was 87.6 % (95 % CI, 75.8-93.9 %). Five-year progression-free survival and loco-regional progression-free survival were 77.0 % and 78.8 %, respectively. No recurrences occurred solely within omitted prophylactic nodal regions. Most patients with progression had p16-negative/unknown disease and/or smoking history. Grade ≥ 3 late adverse events were observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS:IMRT alone with reduced prophylactic nodal irradiation showed encouraging long-term survival in selected patients with early-stage OPC, with no failures solely within omitted prophylactic nodal regions. However, progression patterns suggest that careful patient selection based on p16/HPV status and smoking history is essential when considering radiotherapy alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION:UMIN-CTR UMIN000014274.

PURPOSE:The palliative effects of the QUAD shot regimen were prospectively assessed using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Fifty patients with stage III to IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. One cycle consisted of 14 to 14.8 Gy in 4 fractions administered over 2 consecutive days and was repeated up to 3 cycles. Toxicity and quality of life (QOL) were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, and the University of Washington QOL Questionnaire, version 4, respectively. RESULTS:Two patients refused treatment prior to the initial cycle, whereas the remaining 48 were included in the analysis. 3D-CRT and IMRT were delivered to 16 (33%) and 32 (67%) patients, respectively. Thirty-nine (81%) patients completed all 3 cycles. Treatment response on physical examination was confirmed in 42 (88%) patients. Radiation therapy-associated grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in 4 (8%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. Of the 12 domain-specific QOL scores, >50% of patients reported the same or better status across all domains at 3 months. The global QOL scores were well preserved, with >70% of patients reporting the same or better scores, rising to >80% at 3 months. The median overall survival was 8.3 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that a T category < T4 (P = .001) and 3 QUAD shot cycles (P = .004) were significantly associated with improved overall survival. The median progression-free survival was 6.7 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that a T category < T4 (P = .026) and 3 QUAD shot cycles (P = .014) were significantly associated with improved progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS:The QUAD shot regimen using 3D-CRT or IMRT achieves a high completion rate over 3 cycles, good palliative effects with lower toxicity, and improved or stable QOL. Three cycles are preferred for improved treatment outcomes.

The aim of this multi-institutional phase II study was to confirm the safety and the potential efficacy of moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with prostate-based image-guidance for Japanese patients. Patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were eligible. Patients with a part of high risk (having only one of the following factors, cT3a, 20 < PSA ≤ 30, or GS = 8 or 9) were also included. Hypofractionated IMRT using daily image-guided technique with prostate matching was performed with a total dose of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 4–8 months was mandatory for patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. From 20 institutions, 134 patients enrolled. The median follow-up was 5.16 years (range, 1.43–6.47 years). The number of patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer was 20, 80, and 34, respectively. The 5-year overall, biochemical failure-free, and clinical failure-free survival was 94.5

Objectives:To compare the long-term adverse events of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with those of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk uterine cervical cancer who underwent postoperative pelvic radiation therapy (PORT). Methods:We reviewed the medical records of 177 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery and PORT. IMRT and 3D-CRT were administered to 93 and 84 patients, respectively. Follow-up and toxicity assessments were then carried out. Results:The median follow-up period was 63 months (range: 3 to 177). There was a significant difference in the follow-up period between the IMRT and 3D-CRT cohorts (median: 59 vs. 112 mo, P<0.0001). The crude incidences of acute grade 2+ and grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicities were significantly lower with IMRT than with 3D-CRT (22.6% vs. 48.1%, P=0.002, and 3.2% vs. 11.1%, P=0.04, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of late toxicities revealed that IMRT significantly reduced grade 2+ genitourinary (GU) toxicity and lower-extremity lymphedema ([LEL] requiring intervention) compared with 3D-CRT ([6.8% vs. 15.2% at 5-year, P=0.048] and [3.1% vs. 14.6% at 5-year, P=0.0029], respectively). IMRT was the only significant predictor of reducing LEL risk. Conclusions:The risks of acute gastrointestinal toxicity, late GU toxicity, and LEL from PORT for cervical cancer were reduced by IMRT. Lower inguinal doses may have contributed to a lower risk of developing LEL, which should be validated in future studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:To determine the optimal primary tumor dose for cervical cancer treatment using computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed 171 patients with cervical cancer who underwent both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and IGBT between May 2015 and December 2019. Majority of EBRT plan included central shielding technique. CT-based IGBT was performed weekly a median of three times. Magnetic resonance imaging preceded the first and third session of IGBT for target delineation. RESULTS:The median age of the patients was 64 years (range: 30-91 years). The median follow-up time for living patients was 43 months (range: 6-76 months). The 3-year local control rates according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2008) stages were 89%, 100%, 92%, 89%, 78%, and 100% for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA, respectively. The median EBRT dose to the central pelvis and parametrium/pelvic wall was 41.4 Gy and 50.4 Gy, respectively. Patients who received a cumulative 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) (α/β = 10 Gy) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) D90% ≥ 75 Gy achieved a long-term local control rate of 93%, compared with 80% in those who received <75 Gy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION:This is one of the largest CT-based IGBT series examining the treatment of cervical cancer based on the tumor dose-volume relationship. An HR CTV D90% ≥75 Gy was significantly associated with favorable local control in this study.

Abstract Background JCOG1015A1 is an ancillary research study to determine the organ-specific dose constraints in head and neck carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using data from JCOG1015. Methods Individual patient data and dose-volume histograms of organs at risk (OAR) were collected from 74 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT who enrolled in JCOG1015. The incidence of late toxicities was evaluated using the cumulative incidence method or prevalence proportion. ROC analysis was used to estimate the optimal DVH cut-off value that predicted toxicities. Results The 5-year cumulative incidences of Grade (G) 1 myelitis, ≥ G1 central nervous system (CNS) necrosis, G2 optic nerve disorder, ≥ G2 dysphagia, ≥ G2 laryngeal edema, ≥ G2 hearing impaired, ≥ G2 middle ear inflammation, and ≥ G1 hypothyroidism were 10%, 5%, 2%, 11%, 5%, 26%, 34%, and 34%, respectively. Significant associations between DVH parameters and incidences of toxicities were observed in the brainstem for myelitis (D1cc ≥ 55.8 Gy), in the brain for CNS necrosis (D1cc ≥ 72.1 Gy), in the eyeball for optic nerve disorder (Dmax ≥ 36.6 Gy), and in the ipsilateral inner ear for hearing impaired (Dmean ≥ 44 Gy). The optic nerve, pharyngeal constrictor muscle (PCM), and thyroid showed tendencies between DVH parameters and toxicity incidence. The prevalence proportion of G2 xerostomia at 2 years was 17 versus 6% (contralateral parotid gland Dmean ≥ 25.8 Gy vs less). Conclusions The dose constraint criteria were appropriate for most OAR in this study, although more strict dose constraints might be necessary for the inner ear, PCM, and brainstem.

A phase II study of adaptive two-step intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) (JCOG1015) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety. Patients aged 20–75 years with stages II–IVB NPC were enrolled. As adaptive two-step IMRT, computed tomography planning was performed twice before IMRT for the initial plan of 46 Gy/23 fractions and during treatment for the boost plan of 24 Gy/12 fractions with a total dose of 70 Gy. Chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2/3-weeks × 3 courses) was administered concurrently with IMRT, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin at 70 mg/m2 with 5-FU 700 at mg/m2 for 5 days/4 weeks × 3 courses). Between 2011 and 2014, 75 patients were enrolled from 12 institutions. The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the 75 patients was 88%, and the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI of 78%–94% were higher than the expected 3-year OS of 75% for the target population adjusted by the actual proportion of stage II:III:IV = 21%:44%:35%. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and loco-regional PFS were 71% [59–80%] and 77% [66–85%], respectively. Although no grade 4–5 late toxicities were observed, 15 patients (20%) developed grade 3 late toxicities. Grade 2 xerostomia was noted in 26%, 12%, and 9% at 1, 2, and 3 years after starting IMRT, respectively. Adaptive two-step IMRT for NPC demonstrated an excellent 3-year OS with acceptable toxicities. This method may be one treatment option for locally advanced NPC.

Background The aims of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with chemotherapy plus cetuximab in real-world patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN) and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Methods This is a prospective observation study involving 20 oncology institutions in Japan. Patients with RM-SCCHN treated with a first-line therapy consisting of cetuximab plus any chemotherapy regimen between December 2013 and February 2017 were enrolled. The primary objective of the study was 1-year OS. Secondary objectives included response rate and adverse events. Results Of 120 patients recruited, 114 patients were analyzed. Median age was 64 years. Cetuximab in combination with platinum plus 5-FU (EXTREME regimen) was chosen in 86 patients (75.4%). The median OS was 12.4 months. A point estimate of the 1-year survival rate was 51.1%. Overall response rate was 26.3%. Grade 3 or worse adverse events included neutropenia (22.8%), hypokalemia (9.6%), acneiform rash (7.0%), pneumonitis (1.8%), and infusion-related reaction (0.9%). On multivariate analysis, regional lymph node metastasis, absence of intervention by dermatologists, lack of response to therapy, skin metastasis, and non-EXTREME regimen were identified as independent unfavorable prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion The combination of cetuximab plus chemotherapy was tolerable and efficacious in patients with RM-SCCHN in a real-world setting. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors extracted from this study provide a reference of the current clinical practice as well as for the future development of novel therapy in RM-SCCHN.

Background: Induction chemotherapy (IC) is a treatment option for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). However, treatment with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (TPF) followed by cisplatin and radiotherapy is controversial because of toxicity concerns. The aim of this phase II study was to assess the feasibility of docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab (TPEx) followed by cetuximab and concurrent radiotherapy for LA SCCHN. Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients with histological evidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx without distant metastases. IC comprised cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for up to three courses. Cetuximab was initiated at 400 mg/m2, followed by 250 mg/m2 doses weekly until the end of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy (70 Gy/35 fr/7 w) was initiated after the last docetaxel administration. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment completion. Results: We enrolled 54 patients (median age, 58 years) between August 2013 and October 2015. Our patients were 49 males and 5 females with hypopharyngeal (n = 28), oropharyngeal (n = 19), or laryngeal (n = 7) cancers, and 48 of them had stage IV disease. The overall response rate was 72.2% with a median follow-up of 36.1 months and a 3-year overall survival of 90.7%. The treatment completion rate was 76%; 50 patients (93%) received ≥2 courses of IC, and 41 (76%) completed radiotherapy. The frequencies of grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia or allergy/infusion reactions were 39% and 11%, respectively. There was one treatment-related death. Conclusions: IC with TPEx followed by cetuximab with concurrent radiotherapy showed acceptable compliance for the treatment of LA SCCHN. However, high frequency of febrile neutropenia remains a challenge and further improvement in the management of TPEx is necessary. Trial Registration: UMIN000009928.

OBJECTIVE:To compare patient preferences and acute adverse events of hypofractionated (HF) and conventionally fractionated (CF) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery in our institution.METHODS:We conducted a patient preference study comparing CF-WBI (50 Gy/25 fractions) and HF-WBI (41.6 Gy/16 fractions) after breast-conserving surgery. Eligible patients selected either type of fractionation following an explanation from the radiation oncologist. In this report, we analyzed the selection rate and acute toxicities.RESULTS:Between June 2009 and December 2013, 348 patients (349 breasts) were identified as eligible for the study. Among them, 259 patients (260 breasts [74.5%]) selected CF-WBI and 89 patients (89 breasts [25.5%]) selected HF-WBI. Factors significantly associated with the selection of HF-WBI were older age (P = 0.028) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041). Regarding acute adverse events, Grade 2 (G2) or higher radiation dermatitis was less frequently observed in HF-WBI than in CF-WBI (13.8% vs. 29.4%; P = 0.004). In addition, G2 or higher breast pain was only observed in the CF-WBI group (6.9%; P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the presence of fatigue, wound pain or radiation pneumonitis of G2 or higher between the groups.CONCLUSIONS:In this study, in which patients themselves selected the irradiation method, more patients tended to select CF-WBI. The frequency of G2 or higher dermatitis and breast pain was significantly lower in the HF-WBI group than in the CF-WBI group. Our results support the evidence for recommending HF-WBI after breast-conserving surgery while presenting aspects of patient preferences.

In treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), the use of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy (CRT) carries concerns over toxicity. We evaluated the feasibility of TPF as induction chemotherapy (IC) to Japanese patients and the tolerability of CRT with fractionated administration of cisplatin after IC.

頭頸部扁平上皮癌に対するセツキシマブ（Cmab）の国内実施状況，安全性と有効性を調査する多施設共同前向き観察研究（JROSG12-2）において，局所進行例に対するCmab併用放射線治療（BRT）の中間評価を行った。予定集積180例中90例のうち，解析が可能であった69例を解析した。年齢中央値66歳で75歳以上の後期高齢者は14例（20％）含まれた。「Cmab投与6回以上かつ放射線治療60Gy以上」の治療完遂割合は75％であった。Grade 3-4の急性期有害事象は咽頭粘膜炎58％，放射線皮膚炎42％，口腔粘膜炎39％と頻度が高く，また誤嚥性肺炎5％，肺臓炎3％と呼吸器合併症に注意が必要と思われた。実臨床におけるBRTの治療完遂割合は過去の臨床試験結果よりやや低く，許容しうる有害事象の発生割合と考えられた一方で，粘膜炎や呼吸器合併症には慎重な観察と支持療法の徹底が重要と考えられた。

Abstract Background Some studies have demonstrated that concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is an effective salvage treatment for isolated para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence. However, no studies have compared multi-treatment modalities, such as radiation therapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), surgery, chemotherapy, and best supportive care (BSC), across a sufficient number of patients with PALN recurrence. We thus aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of multi-treatment modalities for isolated PALN recurrence in uterine cervical cancer. Methods Records of 50 patients who were first diagnosed with isolated PALN recurrence after definitive cervical cancer treatment from 2002 to 2016 at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The initial definitive cervical cancer therapies included RT alone, CCRT, or surgery with or without post-operative RT. The median follow-up time was 33 months. The median age at recurrence diagnosis was 57 years (range, 26–84 years). The median duration between the end of initial treatment and recurrence was 10 months (range, 1–91 months). The median maximum metastatic lesion size was 17 mm (range, 8–60 mm). Twenty-four patients had one or two PALN metastases, while 26 had 3 or more. Eighteen patients were treated for recurrence with RT alone, seven with CCRT, three with surgery, 17 with chemotherapy, and five with BSC. Potential prognostic factors included histopathology, initial FIGO stage, initial treatment, age at recurrence, tumor markers (serum SCC-Ag and CEA) at recurrence, time to recurrence, maximum size of the metastatic lesion, number of metastases, and the recurrence treatment method. Results The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 47.0%. The 3-year OS rate of patients who underwent CCRT for recurrence was 85.7%; surgery, 66.7%; chemotherapy, 48.8%; RT, 41.3%; and BSC, 0% (p = 0.014). Univariate analysis revealed that only the recurrence treatment method was significantly associated with OS. The 3-year local control rate (LCR) and progression free survival (PFS) rate for CCRT were 100 and 71.4%; for surgery, 100 and 66.7%; for chemotherapy, 33.6 and 13.7%; and for RT, 55.5 and 14.1%, respectively (LCR: p = 0.028, PFS: p = 0.059). The number of metastatic lesions, SCC-Ag levels and recurrence treatment method were significantly associated with LCR. Age at recurrence, SCC-Ag levels, and number of metastatic lesions were significantly associated with PFS. Conclusions Although our patient cohort size was small, our results suggest that CCRT may be effective in preventing local disease recurrence in the PALN and may improve OS.

Our observational study aimed to verify the safety of our original titanium fiducial markers in gynecological cancer by using a simple insertion method. We prospectively evaluated the safety in patients with gynecological cancer who had undergone our insertion procedure of the titanium markers. The decision to implant a titanium marker was at the discretion of each radiation oncologist. The fiducial markers were manufactured by severing ligating clips for surgery into 3-6 mm pieces and were sterilized thereafter. We inserted an 18-gauge injection needle containing the marker before the marker was extruded by a 22-gauge Cattelan needle or shape memory alloy wire into the tumor or tissues close to the tumor. Severe complications within 3 months after implantation were scored according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Between August 2016 and December 2018, we enrolled 46 patients. Of 46, 44 underwent implantation. The median age was 58.5 years. The most common primary site was the cervix. Two patients experienced detachment of the markers after implantation. No Grade 3 or higher level of complications was observed. Our simple insertion technique for original titanium fiducial markers was well-tolerated.

PURPOSE:In this paper, we report cases of two patients with vaginal tumor who underwent interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT), using three-dimensional (3D)-printed personalized templates designed inversely from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images.MATERIAL AND METHODS:Patient 1 presenting with vaginal vault recurrence was planned to receive whole pelvis external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by ISBT. The tumor invaded the paracolpium; thus, we planned to administer ISBT to include the tumor and vaginal membrane. A template was designed with holes for plastic needle applicator insertion considering the appropriate direction based on pre-treatment medical images. Patient 2 presenting with vaginal cancer was scheduled to receive EBRT and ISBT because of a paracolpium invasion. Before ISBT, MR imaging was performed with vaginal cylinder inserted in the patient's vagina. By measuring the length of the tumor manually and projecting the tumor orthogonally to a plane parallel to the bottom surface of the cylinder applicator, a template was designed. Computer-aided design software was used for planning both templates. Polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resin was selected as material of the templates.RESULTS:Patient 1 received 4-fraction ISBT one week apart. A mean of 10 applicators were inserted through the holes of the template in an average of 9 minutes (range, 5-15 minutes). All applicators were inserted toward the planned directions. Median minimum dose covering 90% (D90%) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was 634 cGy. Patient 2 underwent three-fraction irradiation twice daily at 6-hour interval. All applicators were inserted through the inside of the template. The median D90% of the CTV was 703 cGy. No grade 3 or higher toxicity were found in both series.CONCLUSIONS:3D-printed templates designed using medical images are useful, especially for ISBT of vaginal tumors. Further verification of clinical indications, design of templates, and manufacturing process are needed.

Background The selection of radiation therapy dose fractionation schedules for bone metastases is often based on the estimation of life expectancy. Therefore, accurate prognosis prediction is an important issue. It is reported that the Katagiri scoring system can be used to predict the survival of patients with bone metastases. We aimed to assess prognostic factors and validate the Katagiri scoring system in patients who were treated with radiation therapy for bone metastases. Materials/Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients who were treated with radiation therapy for bone metastases between 2004 and 2013. Age, sex, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), primary site (lesions and characteristics), visceral metastases, laboratory data, previous chemotherapy, and multiple bone metastases were analyzed for associations with overall survival (OS). Katagiri scores were calculated for each patient and were used to compare OS. Results Out of the 616 patients included in this analysis, 574 had died and 42 remained alive. The median follow-up time for survivors was 42 months. Univariate analysis revealed that age ( P = 0.604) and multiple bone metastases ( P = 0.691) were not significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, ECOG PS, KPS, primary characteristics, visceral metastases, laboratory data, and previous chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS. The survival rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, categorized by Katagiri score, were as follows: score 0–3, 94.4, 77.8, and 61.1%, respectively; score 4–6, 67.7, 48.7, and 31.2%, respectively; and score 7–10, 39.1, 22.1, and 9.0%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Sex, ECOG PS, KPS, primary characteristics, visceral metastases, laboratory data, and previous chemotherapy were significant predictors of survival in patients with bone metastases. The Katagiri scoring system was significantly correlated with OS and can help us select the optimal dose-fractionation.