The authors provide an analysis of data from a two-year (1996-1998), multicenter (ten US cities), double-blinded, placebo-controlled influenza vaccine trial in children. The vaccine was the trivalent cold-adapted influenza vaccine. Estimates are made of the vaccine efficacy for susceptibility to culture-confirmed influenza (VE(S)) while taking inter-center variability in the risk of infection into account. Our overall estimate of VE(S) against influenza is 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.94). In addition, for the second year, although the vaccine contained antigen for A/Wuhan-like (H3N2), the estimated VE(S) for epidemic variant A/Sydney-like (H3N2) was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). Thus, the vaccine showed a high degree of protection against a variant not closely matched to the vaccine antigen. With regard to natural immunity, an influenza A infection in the first year reduces the estimated risk of an influenza A infection in the second year by a factor of 0.88 (95% CI 0.21-0.98). When comparing year 1 to year 2, there is a negative correlation of -0.50 in the center-specific attack rates in the placebo groups. This is consistent with the theory that natural immunity provides overall community protection to children. The authors argue that mass vaccination of 70% of the children with the cold-adapted influenza vaccine could provide substantial protection to the community at large.

Fifty-seven human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected (CDC class A1-2) and 54 non-HIV-infected adults, not prescreened for influenza susceptibility, were randomized to receive trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) or placebo intranasally. LAIV was safe and well tolerated with no serious adverse events attributable to vaccine. Reactogenicity rates were similar in LAIV and placebo recipients except that runny nose/nasal congestion was significantly more common in LAIV recipients regardless of HIV status. No prolonged shedding of LAIV was observed in HIV-infected participants. HIV RNA levels were not increased and CD4 counts were not decreased in HIV-infected LAIV recipients compared with placebo recipients after immunization. Shedding of LAIV and increases in antibody titers were infrequent, consistent with prior experience in unscreened adults. The data suggest that inadvertent vaccination with LAIV in relatively asymptomatic HIV-infected adults would not be associated with frequent significant adverse events.

ABSTRACT An investigational live influenza virus vaccine, FluMist, contains three cold-adapted H1N1, H3N2, and B influenza viruses. The vaccine viruses are 6/2 reassortants, in which the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes are derived from the circulating wild-type viruses and the remaining six genes are derived from the cold-adapted master donor strains. The six genes from the cold-adapted master donor strains ensure the attenuation, and the HA and NA genes from the wild-type viruses confer the ability to induce protective immunity against contemporary influenza strains. The genotypic stability of this vaccine was studied by employing clinical samples collected during an efficacy trial. Viruses present in the nasal and throat swab specimens and in supernatants after culturing the specimens were detected and subtyped by multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. Complete genotypes of these detected viruses were determined by a combination of RT-PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism, multiplex RT-PCR and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism, and nucleic acid sequencing analysis. The FluMist vaccine appeared to be genotypically stable after replication in the human host. All viruses detected during the 2-week postvaccination period were shed vaccine viruses and had maintained the 6/2 genotype.

Twenty-six human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women participated in a placebo-controlled study of immunogenicity and safety of multiple doses of MN rgp120 vaccine over the last half of pregnancy. The women had CD4 lymphocyte counts>400/mm3, no AIDS-defining illness and normal pregnancies. Vaccination was well tolerated, with no significant local or systemic reactions in the women and no adverse outcomes in the infants attributable to the vaccine. Vaccination did not alter plasma RNA reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction copy number; moreover, immunization was not associated with changes in CD4 counts or HIV binding and neutralization antibody titers. Infants were followed up until 18 months of age. Five of 26 infants (19%) were HIV infected, with infection occurring in children of both vaccinated and placebo women. Analysis of factors that influence transmission did not disclose associations with immunization status, viral load, CD4 count, or maternal viral neutralization titers.

Among 2099 uninfected subjects in phase I and II trials of candidate AIDS vaccines, 23 were diagnosed with intercurrent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. High-risk sexual exposures accounted for 17 infections, and intravenous drug use accounted for 6. Four subjects received placebo, 13 received a complete immunization schedule (> or = 3 injections), and 6 were partially immunized (< or = 2 injections). There was no significant difference between vaccine recipients and control groups in incidence of HIV-1 infection, virus load, CD4 lymphocyte count, or V3 loop amino acid sequence. In summary, 19 vaccinated subjects acquired HIV-1 infection during phase I and II trials, indicating that immunization with the products described is < 100% effective in preventing or rapidly clearing infection. Laboratory analysis suggested that vaccine-induced immune responses did not significantly affect the genotypic or phenotypic characteristics of transmitted virus or the early clinical course of HIV-1 infection.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant glycoprotein (rgp) 120, a candidate vaccine for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), formulated with a novel adjuvant, MF59, with or without a biological response modifier, MTP-PE.DESIGN:Multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial.SETTING:University medical centers.PARTICIPANTS:49 healthy, HIV-seronegative volunteers 18 to 60 years of age who were at low risk for HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection.INTERVENTIONS:In part A of the study, 32 participants were randomly assigned to receive either 15 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59, 15 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59 plus 50 micrograms of MTP-PE, 50 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59, or 50 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59 plus 50 micrograms of MTP-PE. Participants were vaccinated at 0, 1, 6, and 12 to 18 months. In part B, 17 participants were randomly assigned to receive five monthly injections of either 50 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59 or MF59 alone followed by a booster injection at 12 to 18 months.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Local and systemic reactions; laboratory measures of hepatic, renal, immunologic, and bone marrow toxicity; and HIV-specific serologic and cell-mediated immune responses.RESULTS:13 patients in part A received 50-micrograms doses of rgp 120; type-specific neutralizing antibody responses against the SF-2 strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1/SF-2) were induced in all 13. Nine of the 13 had crossreactive neutralizing activity against the MN strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1/MN), and 2 had crossreactive neutralizing activity against the IIIB strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1/IIIB). Twelve patients had typespecific fusion inhibition activity; only 1 had crossreactive fusion inhibition activity against HIV-1/MN. The monthly vaccination schedule used in part B resulted in decreased antibody titers, indicating that a rest period in the schedule is necessary for maximal immunogenicity. Lymphoproliferative responses against gp120 were induced in all vaccine recipients. The stimulation index to gp120 was persistently greater than 15 for 6 months after the last booster vaccination was given. CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity was detected in 1 of the 11 participants tested. Vaccine that contained MTP-PE caused a greater number of moderate or severe local and systemic reactions (of 16 participants, 4 had local reactions and 13 had systemic reactions) than did vaccine formulated with MF59 alone (of 16 participants, 7 had local reactions [P < 0.01] and 0 had systemic reactions [P < 0.001]).CONCLUSIONS:The SF-2 rgp120 vaccine is safe and immunogenic. Three vaccinations with rgp120 in MF59 can induce type-specific and crossreactive neutralizing antibody against B-subtype laboratory strains of HIV-1. Human immunodeficiency virus-specific lymphoproliferative responses were induced in all vaccinated participants, and CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity was shown in one participant. A trend toward the augmentation of lymphoproliferative and humoral responses by MTP-PE was seen in the participants receiving 15 micrograms of rgp120. However, MTP-PE caused a statistically significant increase in the incidence of local and systemic side effects, which was felt to outweigh the small increase in immunogenicity provided by this biological response modifier in an otherwise well-tolerated vaccine.

A phase I double-blind trial was done to examine the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype synthetic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 MN strain (HIV-1MN) third variable region domain (V3) branched peptide vaccine in HIV-1-uninfected healthy adult volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20, 100, or 500 micrograms of vaccine or alum adjuvant control on days 0, 28, and 168. The vaccine was well-tolerated and appeared safe. Induction of binding antibody to V3 MN branched peptide was vaccine dose-related and was detectable in 9 of 10 subjects in the highest-vaccine-dose group. HIV-1MN-neutralizing antibody was detected after the third 500-micrograms dose in 8 of 10 subjects at the 90% neutralization end point. V3 MN peptide stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in 15 (75%) of 20 subjects after vaccination. In conclusion, this prototype vaccine was safe and it induced humoral and cell-mediated immune responses.

We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a candidate HIV-1 vaccine, Env 2-3 (Chiron Biocine Co.), in combination with an adjuvant emulsion, MF59, with or without an additional immune modulator, MTP-PE, in 78 healthy HIV-1-seronegative adults. Sixteen subjects participated in a dose escalation study of MTP-PE in MP59 without Env 2-3, given at 0 and 1 months; 48 subjects participated in a study of a fixed dose of 30 mu g of Env 2-3 in MF59 with increasing doses of MTP-PE (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mu g), and 14 subjects participated in a study of 100 mu g of Env 2-3 in MF59 without MTP-PE. Subjects were assigned to study groups under a randomized, double-blind allocation. Subjects received immunization at 0, 1, and 6 months, and had the option of receiving a fourth dose at 12-18 months.Env 2-3 in MTP-PE/MF59 was associated with significant reactogenicity, in that severe, although self-limited systemic and/or local reactions occurred in 15 of 30 vaccinees. In contrast, Env 2-3 in MF59 without MTP-PE was relatively well tolerated, and severe local and/or systemic reactions occurred in only 2 of 18 subjects, Env 2-3 stimulated serum antibodies to HIV-1 envelope protein (gp120) as detected by Western blot in 39 of 43 subjects and to HIV-1 virus lysate by EIA in 28 of 43 subjects after three injections. The majority of subjects also developed EIA antibodies to recombinant gp120 (SF-2), gp120 (LAI), and V3 peptide (SF-2). Neutralizing antibodies to the homologous SF-2 strain developed in 30 of 43 and 27 of 34 subjects, and fusion inhibition antibodies in 25 of 43 and 15 of 36 subjects after three and four injections, respectively, Lymphoproliferative responses to the immunogen, Env 2-3, were observed in over 80% of the vaccinees examined, and CD4+ cytotoxic T cell activity directed against HIV-1 was noted transiently in 2 of 20 vaccinees. Addition of MTP-PE to Env 2-3 or increasing the dose of Env 2-3 from 30 to 100 mu g did not augment immunogenicity.Env 2-3 in MF59 was well tolerated and immunogenic in HIV-1-seronegative individuals. The addition of MTP-PE significantly increased reactogenicity, but had little, if any, effect on immunogenicity.

As part of a phase I safety and immunogenicity trial of a vaccinia-expressed HIV-1 recombinant gp160 (rgp160) candidate vaccine, we measured serum and saliva antibody responses in low risk, uninfected volunteers. Six healthy adult volunteers received 50 μg doses of rgp160 vaccine adjuvanted in alum and deoxycholate at months 0, 1, 6, and 12. A 200 μg rgp160 immunization was given to four volunteers at 18 months. The vaccine induced anti-envelope glycoprotein IgG and IgA serum antibodies in all six volunteers. Saliva antibodies to envelope glycoprotein appeared in some volunteers at certain timepoints. Three volunteers appeared to transiently develop vaccine-induced secretory IgA antibody to envelope glycoprotein in whole saliva.

The goal of a prophylactic human immunodeficiency (HIV) vaccine is to elicit immune response(s) that will, upon subsequent exposure to HIV. prevent lnfection and/or disease. On the other hand. therapeutic administration of a vaccine to an individual in whom infection is already established might benefit the individual by augmenting existing functional immune responses or inducing new ones. Development of vaccines for the prevention of AIDS offers unique challenges. Concerns regarding the safely of attenuated and whole-killed products have led to the pursuit of alternativc designs. including recombinant proteins, vectors and particles, synthetic peptides and naked DNA. Seven recombinant envelope. two recombinant vector and four other candidate vaccines that have entered into phase 1 trials in noninfected individuals have proven safe to date, and have differed In their ability lo induce functional antibody and Cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Two recombinant envelope products have recently progressed to phase 2 testing, Five envelope-based and six other products have entered trial in HIV-infected and individuals and have appeared to be safe, Evidence of new antibody, increased T cell proliferation and lncreased cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity have been reported. Additional placebo controlled trials will be required to evaluate the impact of therapeutic vaccination on CD4 cell count. viral burdrn and clinical end-points. The status of HIV/AIDS vaccine development is reviewed. with emphasis on the challenging task of finding an effieacious, safe, prophylactic vaccine.

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to test the safety and immunogenicity of an HIV-1(LAI) recombinant gp160 (rgp160) vaccine in healthy, uninfected volunteers using accelerated dosing schedules. Thirty volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 50-mu g doses of rgp160 in one of two immunization schedules. Group 1 received rgp160 at times 0, 1, 2 and 5 months; and group 2 received rgp160 at times 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 months. The vaccine was safe and stimulated high levels of HIV-1 envelope-specific binding antibody and T cell memory. There was a trend (P < 0.10) suggesting neutralizing antibodies were better induced by the regimen incorporating a rest period before the final immunization in group 1 volunteers. Both accelerated immunization schedules induced immune responses at levels similar to or better than those achieved by four rgp160 vaccine injections given over 12-18 months in other studies.

Anticipating the availability of one or more candidate HIV vaccines for efficacy testing in the next few years, public health agencies are now planning for the conduct of large-scale efficacy trials. We expect these trials to be randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with prevention of infection as the primary goal. We discuss in detail factors that influence sample size. Factors most influential are the incidence rate of HIV infection in the study population and the minimum efficacy at which a vaccine is still considered acceptable. The smaller either of these factors is, the larger the sample size will be. The desire to complete trials quickly, the gradual accrual of benefit from vaccination, the inaccuracies of assays to detect infection, the need to counsel participants to avoid exposure to HIV, and loss to follow-up all tend to drive up sample size. To illustrate, 83 subjects per study arm suffice to detect 90% efficacy in a population with a 7% annual risk of infection. This assumes a 3-year study with accrual completed in 1 year, no loss to follow-up, and Types I and II error rates of 5 and 10%, respectively. In contrast, 4,254 subjects per arm are required to identify a 60% effective vaccine in a population with a 1% annual risk. The study is also shortened to 2 years, assumes a 5% annual loss to follow-up, and supposes that the full benefit of vaccination is achieved in 6 months. The most realistic assumptions indicate that trials are very likely to require several thousand participants. Limitations of the proposed designs are also discussed.

From the Vaccine Research and Development Branch, Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

AIDS Research and Human RetrovirusesVol. 8, No. 8 Summary of the Working Group on Perinatal InterventionLYNNE M. MOFENSON, PETER F. WRIGHT, and PATRICIA E. FASTLYNNE M. MOFENSONSearch for more papers by this author, PETER F. WRIGHTSearch for more papers by this author, and PATRICIA E. FASTSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:16 Mar 2009https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.1992.8.1435AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySynergistic Neutralization of a Chimeric SIV/HIV Type 1 Virus with Combinations of Human Anti-HIV Type 1 Envelope Monoclonal Antibodies or Hyperimmune Globulins AN LI, TIMOTHY W. BABA, JOSEPH SODROSKI, SUSAN ZOLLA-PAZNER, MIROSLAW K. GORNY, JAMES ROBINSON, MARSHALL R. POSNER, HERMANN KATINGER, CARLOS F. BARBAS, DENNIS R. BURTON, TING-CHAO CHOU, and RUTH M. RUPRECHT15 March 2009 | AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, Vol. 13, No. 8Maternal Transmission of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Can It Be Prevented? TIMOTHY W. BABA, JONE E. SAMPSON, CANDIDA FRATAZZI, MICHAEL F. GREENE, and RUTH M. RUPRECHT12 June 2009 | Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 2, No. 3 Volume 8Issue 8Aug 1992 To cite this article:LYNNE M. MOFENSON, PETER F. WRIGHT, and PATRICIA E. FAST.Summary of the Working Group on Perinatal Intervention.AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses.Aug 1992.1435-1438.http://doi.org/10.1089/aid.1992.8.1435Published in Volume: 8 Issue 8: March 16, 2009PDF download