In the last century, breeding programs have traditionally favoured yield-related traits, grown under high-input conditions, resulting in a loss of genetic diversity and an increased susceptibility to stresses in crops. Thus, exploiting understudied genetic resources, that potentially harbour tolerance genes, is vital for sustainable agriculture. Northern European barley germplasm has been relatively understudied despite its key role within the malting industry. The European Heritage Barley collection (ExHIBiT) was assembled to explore the genetic diversity in European barley focusing on Northern European accessions and further address environmental pressures. ExHIBiT consists of 363 spring-barley accessions, focusing on two-row type. The collection consists of landraces (~14%), old cultivars (~18%), elite cultivars (~67%) and accessions with unknown breeding history (~1%), with 70% of the collection from Northern Europe. The population structure of the ExHIBiT collection was subdivided into three main clusters primarily based on the accession’s year of release using 26,585 informative SNPs based on 50k iSelect single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data. Power analysis established a representative core collection of 230 genotypically and phenotypically diverse accessions. The effectiveness of this core collection for conducting statistical and association analysis was explored by undertaking genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using 24,876 SNPs for nine phenotypic traits, four of which were associated with SNPs. Genomic regions overlapping with previously characterised flowering genes (HvZTLb) were identified, demonstrating the utility of the ExHIBiT core collection for locating genetic regions that determine important traits. Overall, the ExHIBiT core collection represents the high level of untapped diversity within Northern European barley, providing a powerful resource for researchers and breeders to address future climate scenarios.

Waterlogging is expected to become a more prominent yield restricting stress for barley as rainfall frequency is increasing in many regions due to climate change. The duration of waterlogging events in the field is highly variable throughout the season, and this variation is also observed in experimental waterlogging studies. Such variety of protocols make intricate physiological responses challenging to assess and quantify. To assess barley waterlogging tolerance in controlled conditions, we present an optimal duration and setup of simulated waterlogging stress using image-based phenotyping. Six protocols durations, 5, 10, and 14 days of stress with and without seven days of recovery, were tested. To quantify the physiological effects of waterlogging on growth and greenness, we used top down and side view RGB (Red-Green-Blue) images. These images were taken daily throughout each of the protocols using the PSI PlantScreen™ imaging platform. Two genotypes of two-row spring barley, grown in glasshouse conditions, were subjected to each of the six protocols, with stress being imposed at the three-leaf stage. Shoot biomass and root imaging data were analysed to determine the optimal stress protocol duration, as well as to quantify the growth and morphometric changes of barley in response to waterlogging stress. Our time-series results show a significant growth reduction and alteration of greenness, allowing us to determine an optimal protocol duration of 14 days of stress and seven days of recovery for controlled conditions. Moreover, to confirm the reproducibility of this protocol, we conducted the same experiment in a different facility equipped with RGB and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging sensors. Our results demonstrate that the selected protocol enables the assessment of genotypic differences, which allow us to further determine tolerance responses in a glasshouse environment. Altogether, this work presents a new and reproducible image-based protocol to assess early stage waterlogging tolerance, empowering a precise quantification of waterlogging stress relevant markers such as greenness, Fv/Fm and growth rates.

To study how plants respond to their environment researchers use imaging phenotyping technologies. The use of image-based phenotyping has enabled researchers to analyse plants and produce data at a large scale. However, this large influx of data has created a 'big data' problem to emerge causing researchers to search for new innovative ways to tackle the challenges of processing their data in a reasonable timeframe. To address such issues, deep learning and data science techniques are being used to perform a comprehensive analysis. Here we use a Plant Screen™ compact system to image a series of barley plants using two different imaging sensors. This compact system contains an RGB top and side view camera and a hyperspectral visible near infrared (VNIR) camera. To streamline the processing and analysis of RGB and hyperspectral imaging, we are building a pipeline using a lightweight implementation of the U-Net architecture to improve the accuracy of semantic segmentation based on the raw images captured via the compact system. Several models were designed and developed, each of which was tailored to either the type of imaging sensor being used or the angle for which the images been provided were taken (e.g., top-down, side-view). Results showed that each model regardless of sensor or perspective produced an accuracy greater than 90% and could accurately segment cereal crops regardless of their size, shape or colour. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using DL models to semantically segment cereal crops imaged using either RGB or hyperspectral imaging sensors.

Farmers and breeders aim to improve crop responses to abiotic stresses and secure yield under adverse environmental conditions. To achieve this goal and select the most resilient genotypes, plant breeders and researchers rely on phenotyping to quantify crop responses to abiotic stress. Recent advances in imaging technologies allow researchers to collect physiological data non-destructively and throughout time, making it possible to dissect complex plant responses into quantifiable traits. The use of image-based technologies enables the quantification of crop responses to stress in both controlled environmental conditions and field trials. This paper summarizes phenotyping imaging technologies (RGB, multispectral and hyperspectral sensors, among others) that have been used to assess different abiotic stresses including salinity, drought and nitrogen deficiency, while discussing their advantages and drawbacks. We present a detailed review of traits involved in abiotic tolerance, which have been quantified by a range of imaging sensors under high-throughput phenotyping facilities or using unmanned aerial vehicles in the field. We also provide an up-to-date compilation of spectral tolerance indices and discuss the progress and challenges in machine learning, including supervised and unsupervised models as well as deep learning.

Yield losses to waterlogging are expected to become an increasingly costly and frequent issue in some regions of the world. Despite the extensive work that has been carried out examining the molecular and physiological responses to waterlogging, phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance has proven difficult. This difficulty is largely due to the high variability of waterlogging conditions such as duration, temperature, soil type, and growth stage of the crop. In this review, we highlight use of phenotyping to assess and improve waterlogging tolerance in temperate crop species. We start by outlining the experimental methods that have been utilized to impose waterlogging stress, ranging from highly controlled conditions of hydroponic systems to large-scale screenings in the field. We also describe the phenotyping traits used to assess tolerance ranging from survival rates and visual scoring to precise photosynthetic measurements. Finally, we present an overview of the challenges faced in attempting to improve waterlogging tolerance, the trade-offs associated with phenotyping in controlled conditions, limitations of classic phenotyping methods, and future trends using plant-imaging methods. If effectively utilized to increase crop resilience to changing climates, crop phenotyping has a major role to play in global food security.