BACKGROUND:The pivotal phase 3 EPITOPE trial, a 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of epicutaneous immunotherapy with the VIASKIN patch containing 250 μg of peanut protein (VP250), previously reported significant treatment response versus placebo in peanut-allergic toddlers aged 1 through 3 years. OBJECTIVE:To assess the interim efficacy and safety of VP250 from the first year of the EPITOPE open-label extension (OLE) study. METHODS:Eligible participants enrolled in the OLE study for up to 3 years of total treatment with annual double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) and safety assessments; here we report the first-year OLE (year 2) results. RESULTS:A total of 266 EPITOPE participants enrolled in the OLE study; 244 underwent month 24 DBPCFC (n = 166 VP250; n = 78 placebo). After 24 months of VP250, 81.3% reached an eliciting dose (ED) ≥1000 mg, 63.8% reached an ED ≥2000 mg, and 55.9% completed the DBPCFC (cumulative dose: 3444 mg) without meeting stopping criteria. No treatment-related anaphylaxis or serious treatment-related adverse events occurred during year 2 in this treatment arm. Local application-site reactions occurred less frequently in year 2 versus year 1. In placebo-treated EPITOPE participants, outcomes after 1 year of open-label VP250 were consistent with EPITOPE treatment results: 62.7% reached an ED ≥1000 mg, 36.5% reached an ED ≥2000 mg, and 28.4% completed the DBPCFC without meeting stopping criteria; and there was 1 treatment-related anaphylaxis event. CONCLUSIONS:Two years of VP250 in young peanut-allergic children demonstrated continued increases in treatment effect without new safety signals. This supports the potential of VP250 as a safe and effective treatment for peanut allergy in young children. CLINICALTRIALS:GOV: NCT03859700.

Receptor Interacting Serine/Threonine Kinase 1 (RIPK1) is widely expressed and integral to inflammatory and cell death responses. Autosomal recessive RIPK1-deficiency, due to biallelic loss of function mutations in RIPK1, is a rare inborn error of immunity (IEI) resulting in uncontrolled necroptosis, apoptosis and inflammation. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been suggested as a potential curative therapy, the extent to which disease may be driven by extra-hematopoietic effects of RIPK1-deficiency, which are non-amenable to HSCT, is not clear. We present a multi-centre, international review of an additional 5 RIPK1-deficient children who underwent HSCT. All patients presented with very early onset inflammatory bowel disease, 2 also suffered from inflammatory arthritis. Median age at transplant was 3 years (range 1—5 years); 1 received matched sibling marrow, 1 matched unrelated peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), 2 TCRαβ/CD19-depleted PBSC from maternal-haploidentical donors, and 1 had TCRαβ/CD19-depleted PBSC from a mismatched unrelated donor. All received reduced-toxicity conditioning, based on treosulfan (n = 4) or busulfan (n = 1); 1 patient underwent a successful second transplant following autologous reconstitution. Four of five patients (80

Background/Objectives: The aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly if occurring early in childhood, is a diverse and patient-focused treatment that is required when standard therapy is ineffective. Materials and Methods: A clinical case report is presented of a child with very early-onset IBD (VEOIBD) and evidence of high serum IL-18 responding to anti-IL-18 immunotherapy. Detailed cytokine profiling was performed by ELISA and multiplex assay flow cytometry. Results: A four-year-old girl with recalcitrant VEOIBD from six weeks old due to an IL-18opathy, characterised by high blood IL-18 concentration, responded to therapy with a novel neutralising anti-IL-18 antibody (GSK1070806). After two years of hospitalisation, the child’s systemic inflammation and extensive upper and lower gastrointestinal mucosal ulceration remitted with this cytokine inhibitor, allowing the discontinuation of total parenteral nutrition and the resumption of normal oral intake and daily activities. After 18 months on regular GSK1070806, the patient remains in disease remission. Conclusions: VEOIBD can be associated with evidence of an underlying IL18opathy and responds to anti-IL-18 antibody therapy. IL-18 should be measured in patients with IBD unresponsive to conventional treatments, and, if elevated, anti-IL-18 antibody therapy should be considered as a potential therapy.

Background Dupilumab is licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged >= 6 months.Objectives The aim of this study was to examine real-world outcomes and safety of dupilumab in British children with moderate-to-severe AD attending a tertiary referral paediatric centre.Methods Skin and quality of life scores, adverse events and discontinuation rates were assessed. Patients aged <= 18 years with moderate-to-severe AD were included if they had skin scores recorded at baseline and at least one follow-up visit. Efficacy and safety were assessed using descriptive statistics.Results In this retrospective observational survey, 72 children/teenagers, with a median age of 14 years (range 7-18) were included. Oral systemic immunosuppressants had failed to control AD in 88% of children recruited. All patients commenced on dupilumab had pretreatment eczema skin scores consistent with moderate-to-severe disease, with a median Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of 25 [interquartile range (IQR) 20-31]. EASI scores decreased by a median of 94% (IQR 82-100) and remained consistently low over 10-52 months of the study, with a median EASI score at final follow-up of 2 (IQR 0-6). Of the 72 children, 8 (11%) were able to discontinue dupilumab as they were in remission. Nineteen (26%) experienced adverse events, most commonly conjunctivitis (12 patients; 17%). Eight (11%) discontinued dupilumab (six with ongoing inflammatory skin flares, one with severe allergic conjunctivitis, one with intercurrent Wilson disease).Conclusions Dupilumab was highly effective in treating most children with moderate-to-severe AD with good safety outcomes in the real world. However, 10% of children may need alternative therapy because of drug ineffectiveness or side-effects. This retrospective, observational study examined real-world outcomes and safety of dupilumab in 72 British children with moderate-to-severe AD. Over a median period of 20 months, EASI scores decreased by a median of 94% (interquartile range 82-100) and remained consistently low. Eleven per cent of children were able to discontinue dupilumab as their disease remitted; 26% suffered adverse events, most commonly conjunctivitis (17%), but only one of eight discontinued because of this problem. Eight per cent discontinued dupilumab because of ongoing AD flares. We conclude that dupilumab is effective in treating most children with moderate-to-severe AD with a good safety profile in the real world. At least 10% can discontinue therapy after remission, but another 10% may need alternative therapy because of side-effects or lack of drug efficacy.