Integrated incremental immunoreactive insulin and connecting peptide responses to an oral glucose load of 50 g and an "isoglycaemic" intravenous glucose infusion, respectively, were measured in 14 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and 8 age- and weight-matched metabolically healthy control subjects. Differences between responses to oral and intravenous glucose administration are attributed to factors other than glucose itself (incretin effect). Despite higher glucose increases, immunoreactive insulin and connecting peptide responses after oral glucose were delayed in diabetic patients. Integrated responses were not significantly different between both groups. However, during "isoglycaemic" intravenous infusion, insulin and connecting peptide responses were greater in diabetic patients than in control subjects as a consequence of the higher glycaemic stimulus. The contribution of incretin factors to total insulin responses was 72.8 +/- 6.9% (100% = response to oral load) in control subjects and 36.0 +/- 8.8% in diabetic patients (p less than or equal to 0.05). The contribution to connecting peptide responses was 58.4 +/- 7.6% in control subjects and 7.6 +/- 14.5% (p less than or equal to 0.05) in diabetic patients. Ratios of integrated insulin to connecting peptide responses suggest a reduced (hepatic) insulin extraction in control subjects after oral as compared to intravenous glucose. This was not the case in diabetic patients. Immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide responses were not different between control subjects and diabetic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In type-2 diabetes, the overall incretin effect is reduced. The present investigation was designed to compare insulinotropic actions of exogenous incretin hormones (gastric inhibitory peptide [GIP] and glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1] [7-36 amide]) in nine type-2 diabetic patients (fasting plasma glucose 7.8 mmol/liter; hemoglobin A1c 6.3 +/- 0.6%) and in nine age- and weight-matched normal subjects. Synthetic human GIP (0.8 and 2.4 pmol/kg.min over 1 h each), GLP-1 [7-36 amide] (0.4 and 1.2 pmol/kg.min over 1 h each), and placebo were administered under hyperglycemic clamp conditions (8.75 mmol/liter) in separate experiments. Plasma GIP and GLP-1 [7-36 amide] concentrations (radioimmunoassay) were comparable to those after oral glucose with the low, and clearly supraphysiological with the high infusion rates. Both GIP and GLP-1 [7-36 amide] dose-dependently augmented insulin secretion (insulin, C-peptide) in both groups (P < 0.05). With GIP, the maximum effect in type-2 diabetic patients was significantly lower (by 54%; P < 0.05) than in normal subjects. With GLP-1 [7-36 amide] type-2 diabetic patients reached 71% of the increments in C-peptide of normal subjects (difference not significant). Glucagon was lowered during hyperglycemic clamps in normal subjects, but not in type-2 diabetic patients, and further by GLP-1 [7-36 amide] in both groups (P < 0.05), but not by GIP. In conclusion, in mild type-2 diabetes, GLP-1 [7-36 amide], in contrast to GIP, retains much of its insulinotropic activity. It also lowers glucagon concentrations.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide (GLP-1) are glucose-dependent insulinotropic gut hormones that may explain the greater insulin secretory response with oral compared to iv glucose (incretin effect). To study their individual and combined contributions, in eight healthy volunteers, on separate occasions, synthetic human GIP (1 pmol/kg.min) and/or GLP-1 (0.3 pmol/kg . min) or placebo were infused iv (-30 to 120 min), while at 0 min, a glucose infusion ''isoglycemic'' to the profile after an oral glucose load of 50 g/400 mL was started. After the administration of 50 g oral glucose, immunoreactive GIP rose several-fold to 337 +/- 43 pmol/L, while there was only a transient (10-30 min) and moderate increment in immunoreactive GLP-1 (from basal, 25-30, to 41 +/- 4 pmol/L). Isoglycemic iv glucose infusions led to smaller B-cell responses (estimated incretin effect, 41 +/- 5%). With single infusions of GIP or GLP-1 (circulating concentrations, 464 +/- 73 and 54 +/- 3 pmol/L, respectively), B-cell responses were significantly augmented compared to iv glucose alone and were no longer significantly different from those after oral glucose. The combination of GIP and GLP-1 led to B-cell responses that were significantly higher than those with either hormone alone (additive mode of cooperation). Plasma GIP concentrations were similar after endogenous secretion (oral glucose) and iv infusion, while exogenously administered GLP-1 led to plasma levels that were maintained at an elevated level for a longer period during exogenous infusion than after stimulation by oral glucose. When, in seven volunteers, a lower dose (0.15 pmol/kg.min) of GLP-1 was infused during isoglycemic glucose infusion experiments only for the duration of elevated plasma levels in the oral glucose challenges (0-30 min), a significant, but transient, increment in insulin and C-peptide concentrations was observed, which was equivalent to 26 +/- 10% of the estimated incretin effect. Therefore, in conclusion, circulating GIP seems to make a major contribution to the incretin effect after oral glucose, and GLP-1 appears to mediate a smaller proportion. GIP and GLP-1 can interact in an additive manner in normal man.

To estimate the contribution of postprandial cholecystokinin (CCK) responses to circulating insulin concentrations and insulin secretion, a specific CCK receptor antagonist (loxiglumide; 10 mg/kg body weight/h) or saline were infused intravenously in normal volunteers, beginning 90 min before insulin secretion was stimulated on separate occasions by the intraduodenal administrations of glucose, glucose and protein, and glucose plus protein with the admixture of pancreatin. The release of CCK (radioimmunoassay) was stimulated by the protein component of the nutrients from basal 2.4 +/- 0.4 to 8.0 +/- 1.2 pmol/l. CCK plasma levels were significantly higher with loxiglumide (p < 0.05). Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) was also released by all nutrient mixtures. Loxiglumide significantly inhibited the amount of bilirubin and pancreatic enzymes recovered from duodenal aspirates. In contrast, in none of the experiments, C-peptide increments and hence insulin secretion rates were altered by loxiglumide. With glucose and protein as intraduodenal stimulus (no pancreatin added), the plasma amino acids rose significantly less (by approximately 50% of the control experiment) and the increment in insulin (but not C-peptide) concentrations was significantly reduced by loxiglumide. This is most likely explained by a change in insulin metabolic clearance. This effect cannot be a primary action of CCK because there was no similar effect of loxiglumide with the same intraduodenal stimulus plus added pancreatin. Pancreatic enzymes reduced maldigestion secondary to loxiglumide effects on pancreatic exocrine secretion: The increment in circulating amino acid concentrations was similar with and without loxiglumide. In conclusion, CCK does not alter insulin secretion and, therefore, is not an incretin hormone in man. Blocking CCK actions on the exocrine pancreas by loxiglumide, however, can secondarily cause reductions in postprandial insulin profiles by altering insulin clearance. These changes are possibly related to reductions in circulating amino acid concentrations.

The secretion of pancreatic and gastrointestinal hormones in the basal state and after nutrient stimuli (50 g glucose, 50 g protein, or 30 g triglyceride administered on separate occasions) was assessed in ten previously type-1-diabetic patients after successful combined kidney and pancreas transplantation (systemic venous drainage). Fasting values were compared to matched non-diabetic kidney-transplanted patients and related to kidney function (endogenous creatinine clearance) and to the type and dosage of immunosuppressive medication. In the fasting state, only IR insulin concentrations were higher in pancreas-kidney-transplanted patients (by 88%; P=0.001) than in the kidney graft recipients. There were significant inverse correlations of plasma C-peptide, GIP, and gastrin immunoreactivity to endogenous creatinine clearance (kidney function). In response to nutrients, insulin secretion (IR insulin, C-peptide) was significantly stimulated by glucose, and — to a lesser degree — also by protein. Pancreatic glucagon was suppressed by glucose and stimulated by protein ingestion. GIP was raised after glucose and triglyceride more than after protein (P=0.0003). GLP-1 immunoreactivity was stimulated by all nutrients, with a tendency towards higher responses to protein and fat (P=0.06). Gastrin was mainly raised by protein. In conclusion, the overall pattern of pancreatic and gastrointestinal hormone release is normal in patients after combined pancreas-kidney-transplantation, but there are some peculiarities due to (a) systemic venous drainage of the pancreas graft (elevated fasting IR insulin) and (b) impaired kidney function (negative correlation of fasting plasma values to endogenous creatinine clearance for C-peptide, GIP, and gastrin). The plasma levels of these important regulatory peptides and their responses to nutrient stimulation are compatible with and may contribute to the well-preserved endocrine function of the pancreatic grafts (normal or slightly impaired glucose tolerance, preserved incretin effect).

The functional connection between the gut and the islet cells comprises nerves and gastrointestinal hormones. In this study, we quantified the incretin effect and the glucose tolerance (KG value) before and after denervation of the pancreas in dogs in order to find out whether the incretin effect is mediated by nerves. The participation of nerves was estimated by comparing metabolic tests before and after total extrinsic pancreatic denervation in 10 dogs. Fifty-nine percent of the insulin response after intragastric glucose was calculated preoperatively to be the result of incretin factors, a value similar to the 62% found in the postoperative series (with denervated pancreas). The response of GIP to intragastric glucose was not significantly different between pre- and postoperative tests. The KG values pre- and postoperative were in the same range. From our data, we conclude that extrinsic nerves of the pancreas do not seem to play an important role in mediating glucose homeostasis in dogs.

We examined the effects of exogenous and endogenous GIP on plasma triglyceride levels in rats, pretreated with a fat-enriched diet, during intraduodenal infusion of a lipid test meal (Lipomul, 8 ml/h). Following the fat load the plasma triglyceride levels increased nearly linearly from a fasting value of 0.621 +/- 0.031 mmol/l to 3.32 +/- 0.403 mmol/l at 150 min. Simultaneously, the plasma GIP levels rose from 47.1 +/- 5.1 at fasting to a peak value of 268.4 +/- 32.2 pmol/l at 120 min. When porcine GIP was infused intravenously during the fat load, the plasma triglyceride increments were significantly smaller (control 1.64 +/- 0.264 mmol/l versus 0.949 +/- 0.114 mmol/l during GIP infusion at 60 min; p less than 0.002). GIP infusion in the absence of the fat load did not change fasting triglyceride levels. The effect of endogenous GIP was investigated by neutralization of GIP by injection of GIP antiserum (0.3 ml). Rats pretreated with the antiserum exhibited a significantly greater triglyceride increment late in the time course of the fat load. These data demonstrate that exogenous and endogenous GIP are able to lower the plasma triglyceride response to a fat load. Both, inhibition of fat absorption or stimulation of triglyceride uptake by peripheral tissues may be responsible for the GIP effects. The gut peptide GIP seems to represent an important hormonal regulator of postprandial triglyceride response.

The absorbable deoxynojirimycin derivative emiglitate (BAY o 1248) is a potent competitive inhibitor of small intestinal α-glucosidases in man.

In two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies, the efficacy, duration of action and tolerability of a single morning dose of 25, 50, and 100 mg miglitol (BAY m 1099), an absorbable inhibitor of intestinal alpha-glucosidases, were assessed after repetitive sucrose or maize-starch loads (50 g of carbohydrates in 400 ml of water each at 08.00, 12.00, and 17.00 h). With sucrose, miglitol reduced the postprandial rise in blood glucose, serum insulin and serum gastric inhibitory polypeptide concentrations at any dosage. This effect was dose-dependent and confined to the first carbohydrate load in the morning, thus indicating the duration of alpha-glucosidase inhibition of less than 4 h. Sucrose malabsorption, indicated by breath hydrogen responses, occurred dose-dependently with 50 and 100 mg, but not with 25 mg of miglitol. Similarly, symptoms of carbohydrate malabsorption were absent with 25 mg of the inhibitor and mild to moderate after 50 and 100 mg of miglitol. With starch as the substrate, BAY m 1099 led to a significant amelioration of glycemic and hormonal rises after the first meal, but not thereafter. A numerical dose dependency was recognized, but this was not significant at the 5% level. Symptoms of carbohydrate malabsorption were absent with 25 mg and negligible with 50 mg BAY m 1099, but occurred almost regularly with the 100-mg dose. Breath hydrogen concentrations increased gradually with the dose of miglitol administered. A single morning dose of 25-100 mg of miglitol thus may be useful for the control of postprandial hyperglycemia after breakfast. Due to the duration of action of less than 4 h, this substance should be given with the three main meals.

There is a well documented increase in the incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance in patients with Turner syndrome. To elucidate the pathophysiology of this phenomenon, we studied the serum concentrations of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) - as probably the most important hormonal factor of the entero-insular axis - in relation to impaired glucose tolerance in this syndrome. Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed in 12 Turner patients with simultaneous determination of plasma glucose, insulin and GIP. An impaired glucose tolerance (iGT) was found in four patients with a chronological age between 12.3 and 14.9 years. These patients were compared with four Turner patients of similar age and weight and a normal glucose tolerance (nGT). The highest insulin level occurred 90 min after stimulation in the patients with iGT compared to 30 min in the nGT group. Interestingly, the total areas under the insulin curves were not different. Stimulated plasma GIP concentrations and the areas under the GIP curves were significantly lower in iGT compared to nGT patients. A disturbed entero-insular axis might contribute to the delayed - rather than diminished - release of insulin in patients with Turner syndrome and impaired glucose tolerance.

The quantitative contribution of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)] to the incretin effect after oral glucose (augmentation of insulin secretion over the degree that is explained by the glycemic rise) is not known. Therefore, hyperglycemic clamp experiments (8 mmol/L, corresponding to postprandial glucose concentrations) were performed in healthy volunteers, and synthetic human GIP was infused for 60 min at a rate (approximately 1.3 pmol/kg.min) that results in plasma GIP concentrations similar to those occurring after oral glucose loads of 75 g. The MCR for exogenous GIP was approximately 6 mL/kg.min; the decay after ceasing infusion was exponential with a t1/2 of about 18 min, and the resulting volume of distribution was about 140 mL/kg. At euglycemic (basal) plasma glucose concentrations (5.0 mmol/L) similar values were found. Insulin secretion was stimulated by hyperglycemia alone, but was greatly (2.3-fold based on C-peptide) potentiated by GIP infusions (P less than or equal to 0.001 for integrated incremental values). When integrated incremental responses over 120 min of GIP, immunoreactive insulin, and immunoreactive C-peptide were compared after oral glucose and during GIP infusions, no significant differences were found. Peak glucose concentrations after oral glucose (7.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/L) were similar to mean plasma glucose values during clamp experiments (8.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/L; P = 0.124). However, mean glucose concentrations after oral glucose were lower (6.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/L; P = 0.0004). Additional infusion of sulfated cholecystokinin-8 (25 pmol/kg.h) or the amino acid phenylalanine (1.7 mumol/kg.min) did not further stimulate insulin secretion and had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of exogenous GIP. It is concluded that human synthetic GIP is insulinotropic in man and that this activity may well explain a substantial part of the incretin effect after oral glucose. There is no interaction with cholecystokinin or phenylalanine in concentrations found after mixed meals.