The purpose of this prospective nonrandomized study was to evaluate both safety and efficacy of the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent for treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Drug-eluting stents have been proven safe and efficacious in suppressing neointimal proliferation when used in simple native de novo coronary lesions. However, there are only limited data on safety and efficacy of these stents for treatment of more difficult lesion subsets, especially chronic total occlusions. Forty-five consecutive symptomatic patients with chronic total coronary occlusions were included in this observational single-arm study. Only patients with successfully crossed occlusions were enrolled. Primary endpoints were binary restenosis and late lumen loss at 6-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary endpoints were MACE at 30-day and 6-month follow-up. The 30-day MACE rate was 0%. At 6 months, the cumulative MACE-free survival was 84.4%. There were no deaths, myocardial infarctions, or stent thrombosis up to 6 months poststenting. At angiographic follow-up, the in-stent restenosis rate was 13.2% (5/38). There was a total of five in-stent restenoses, with three focal and two diffuse restenosis patterns. The in-segment late lumen loss was 0.13 +/- 0.58 mm. The stent edge analyses revealed a late loss of 0.21 +/- 0.66 proximally and a negative late loss of -0.10 +/- 0.67 at the distal edge segment. This study shows safety and indicators of efficacy of implantation of the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent for treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. The quantitative angiographic analysis revealed beneficial results with respect to the efficacy surrogates binary restenosis rate and late loss.

We report a case of crush-stenting with Paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stents in a left anterior descending artery (LAD) bifurcation lesion. In order to obtain precise information on the mid-term neointimal response of the main vessel to this approach, we evaluated the patient angiographically 9 months later, including intravascular visualization with optical coherence tomography (OCT), a new high resolution imaging technique, and IVUS. The evaluation revealed that there was a homogeneous neointimal coverage of the main vessel stents without evidence of significant recurrent lumen renarrowing or malappositions. Compared to IVUS, OCT proved the coverage of the stent struts adjacent to the vessel wall with a superior imaging quality and, in addition, provided new insights into the stent performance at the open bifurcation site.

Early results with polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents have shown significant improvements in the clinical and angiographic parameters of restenosis, as well as excellent safety outcomes. However, the duration of these beneficial effects is unknown. Therefore, the clinical outcomes of the TAXUS I study population were evaluated at 2- and 3-year follow-up. In TAXUS 1, 61 patients with single, focal coronary lesions were randomly assigned to receive either a paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent (n = 31) or a bare metal control stent (n = 30). Low rates of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) reported at 1-year follow-up (3.2% TAXUS vs 10.0% control) were maintained at 2 and 3 years, with no additional MACEs in either treatment group 1 year after implantation. The single target vessel revascularization in the TAXUS group was remote from the target lesion in contrast to 3 target lesion revascularizations in the control group. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background—The TAXUS NIRx stent (Boston Scientific Corp) provides local delivery of paclitaxel via a slow-release polymer coating. The TAXUS I trial was the first in-human experience evaluating safety and feasibility of the TAXUS NIRx stent system compared with bare NIR stents (control) (Boston Scientific Corp) for treatment of coronary lesions. Methods and Results—The TAXUS I trial was a prospective, double-blind, three-center study randomizing 61 patients with de novo or restenotic lesions (≤12 mm) to receive a TAXUS (n=31) versus control (n=30) stent (diameter 3.0 or 3.5 mm). Demographics, lesion characteristics, clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups. The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 0% in both groups (P =NS). No stent thromboses were reported at 1, 6, 9, or 12 months. At 12 months, the MACE rate was 3% (1 event) in the TAXUS group and 10% (4 events in 3 patients) in the control group (P =NS). Six-month angiographic restenosis rates were 0% for TAXUS versus 10% for control (P =NS) patients. There were significant improvements in minimal lumen diameter (2.60±0.49 versus 2.19±0.65 mm), diameter stenosis (13.56±11.77 versus 27.23±16.69), and late lumen loss (0.36±0.48 versus 0.71±0.48 mm) in the TAXUS group (all P <0.01). No evidence of edge restenosis was seen in either group. Intravascular ultrasound analysis showed significant improvements in normalized neointimal hyperplasia in the TAXUS (14.8 mm3) group compared with the control group (21.6 mm3) (P <0.05). Conclusions—In this feasibility trial, the TAXUS slow-release stent was well tolerated and showed promise for treatment of coronary lesions, with significant reductions in angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measures of restenosis.

The Jostent coronary stent graft (CSG) is composed of a PTFE layer sandwiched between two stainless steel stents, initially introduced for the treatment of coronary perforations and aneurysms with excellent results. By providing a mechanical barrier, this stent design also may be beneficial in the treatment of complex ulcerated lesions and in‐stent restenosis by preventing debris protrusion and neointimal proliferation through the stent struts. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this stent graft, we implanted 78 CSGs in 70 patients for a broad range of indications, including coronary perforations, aneurysms, degenerated saphenous vein grafts, complex lesions, and in‐stent restenosis. The primary angiographic success rate (95.9%) was high, and using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during stent implantation and high inflation pressures (19.3 ± 3.2 atm), stent expansion with optimal symmetry was achieved in 94.7%. One limitation of the Jostent CSG was the side‐branch occlusion rate (18.6%) and the resulting non‐Q‐wave infarction rate in seven cases (mean CK elevation, 238 U/l), acute Q‐wave MI in two cases, and transient ventricular fibrillation in one patient after occlusion of the proximal RCA side branch without further complications. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in four cases (5.7%) 7 to 70 days after stent implantation, despite using combined antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine, and/or clopidogrel for 30 days. Angiographic follow‐up was available in 56 patients (80.0%) after a mean of 159 ± 49 days, and follow‐up IVUS was available in 38 cases. The overall restenosis rate (> 50% diameter stenosis) was 31.6% manifest primarily as edge restenosis (29.8% stent edge vs. 8.8% stent center; P < 0.001). IVUS examinations showed a minimal late lumen loss of 0.4 ± 2.2 mm2 within the center of the stent graft vs. 3.2 ± 2.3 mm2 at the stent edges (P < 0.001). The restenosis rate in the prespecified subgroups was 33.3% for saphenous vein grafts (2/6 lesions), 30.0% in complex lesions (6/20 lesions), and 38.5% (10/26 lesions) for the treatment of in‐stent restenosis. Implantation of the Jostent CSG is feasible and safe, even in complex lesion subsets, and is associated with high primary success rates provided major side branches are avoided. The use of this stent may require an extended time course of antiplatelet therapy. Frequent focal stent edge renarrowing influences the overall restenosis rate. However, in treatment of complex in‐stent restenosis and vein graft lesions, stent grafts may offer benefit over conventional therapies. Covered stents such as the JoMed coronary stent graft may become essential for bailout treatment of coronary perforations. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;56:353–360. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.