Exogenous cell-based therapy has emerged as a promising new strategy to facilitate repair of hearts damaged by acute or chronic injury. However, the field of cell-based therapy is handicapped by the lack of standardized definitions and terminology, making comparisons across studies challenging. Even the term 'stem cell therapy' is misleading because only a small percentage of cells derived from adult bone marrow, peripheral blood, or adipose tissue meets the accepted haematopoietic or developmental definition of stem cells. Furthermore, cells (stem or otherwise) are dynamic biological products, meaning that their surface-marker expression, phenotypic and functional characteristics, and the products they secrete in response to their microenvironment can change. It is also important to point out that most surface markers are seldom specific for a cell type. In this article, we discuss the lack of consistency in the descriptive terminology used in cell-based therapies and offer guidelines aimed at standardizing nomenclature and definitions to improve communication among investigators and the general public.

Aims CONCERT-HF is an NHLBI-sponsored, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial designed to determine whether treatment with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and c-kit positive cardiac cells (CPCs), given alone or in combination, is feasible, safe, and beneficial in patients with heart failure (HF) caused by ischaemic cardiomyopathy.Methods and results Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to transendocardial injection of MSCs combined with CPCs, MSCs alone, CPCs alone, or placebo, and followed for 12 months. Seven centres enrolled 125 participants with left ventricular ejection fraction of 28.6 +/- 6.1% and scar size 19.4 +/- 5.8%, in New York Heart Association class II or III. The proportion of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was significantly decreased by CPCs alone (-22% vs. placebo, P = 0.043). Quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score) was significantly improved by MSCs alone (P = 0.050) and MSCs+CPCs (P = 0.023) vs. placebo. Left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, scar size, 6-min walking distance, and peak oxygen consumption did not differ significantly among groups.Conclusions This is the first multicentre trial assessing CPCs and a combination of two cell types from different tissues in HF patients. The results show that treatment is safe and feasible. Even with maximal guideline-directed therapy, both CPCs and MSCs were associated with improved clinical outcomes (MACE and quality of life, respectively) in ischaemic HF without affecting left ventricular function or structure, suggesting possible systemic or paracrine cellular mechanisms. Combining MSCs with CPCs was associated with improvement in both these outcomes. These results suggest potential important beneficial effects of CPCs and MSCs and support further investigation in HF patients.

Introduction: Although preclinical studies of cell delivery in models of ischemic heart failure (HF) suggest a beneficial interaction between mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and c-kit+ cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) resulting in additive therapeutic effects, no clinical trial has examined a combination of different cell types in ischemic HF. Furthermore, comparative studies of different cell products in humans are rare. CONCERT-HF (NCT02501811) is an NHLBI-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) investigating feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MSCs and CPCs, alone and in combination, in patients with chronic ischemic HF. Objectives: To address the following questions: Is combined treatment with MSCs and CPCs feasible and safe in patients with ischemic HF? Do MSCs and CPCs, given alone or in combination, alleviate LV dysfunction, reduce scar size, improve quality of life, and/or augment functional capacity? Is either cell type more effective than the other? Is the combination of MSCs and CPCs more efficacious than MSCs alone or CPCs alone? Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive i) the combination of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs and autologous CPCs, ii) MSCs alone, iii) CPCs alone, or iv) placebo. Target doses were 150 x 10 6 MSCs and 5 x 10 6 CPCs. All patients underwent bone marrow aspiration and right heart catheterization. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed only in the MSC + CPC and CPC alone groups; a “sham biopsy” was performed in the MSC alone and placebo groups. All patients underwent study product injection using the NOGA ® XP Mapping System and were followed for 12 months. Results: A total of 125 patients (116 M, 9 F), 62.5 ± 8.9 years old, were enrolled at 7 CCTRN centers between Nov 2016 and Oct 2018. Baseline LVEF (cardiac MRI) was 28.6 ± 6.1% with a mean scar size of 31.8 ± 10.9 g and NYHA class II (80%) or class III (15.2%). Conclusions: CONCERT-HF is the first cell therapy trial to assess a combination of different cell types and to directly compare two different cell products in patients with HF. All patients will complete follow-up by the end of June and final primary (12-month) safety and outcomes data will be available in August 2020.

BACKGROUND:Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) may be irreversible with a poor prognosis, disproportionately affecting women and young adults. Administration of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (allo-MSCs) is a promising approach to heart failure (HF) treatment. OBJECTIVES:SENECA (Stem Cell Injection in Cancer Survivors) was a phase 1 study of allo-MSCs in AIC. METHODS:Cancer survivors with chronic AIC (mean age 56.6 years; 68% women; NT-proBNP 1,426 pg/ml; 6 enrolled in an open-label, lead-in phase and 31 subjects randomized 1:1) received 1 × 108 allo-MSCs or vehicle transendocardially. Primary objectives were safety and feasibility. Secondary efficacy measures included cardiac function and structure measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), functional capacity, quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), and biomarkers. RESULTS:A total of 97% of subjects underwent successful study product injections; all allo-MSC-assigned subjects received the target dose of cells. Follow-up visits were well-attended (92%) with successful collection of endpoints in 94% at the 1-year visit. Although 58% of subjects had non-CMR compatible devices, CMR endpoints were successfully collected in 84% of subjects imaged at 1 year. No new tumors were reported. There were no significant differences between allo-MSC and vehicle groups with regard to clinical outcomes. Secondary measures included 6-min walk test (p = 0.056) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (p = 0.048), which tended to favor the allo-MSC group. CONCLUSIONS:In this first-in-human study of cell therapy in patients with AIC, transendocardial administration of allo-MSCs appears safe and feasible, and CMR was successfully performed in the majority of the HF patients with devices. This study lays the groundwork for phase 2 trials aimed at assessing efficacy of cell therapy in patients with AIC.

Background Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) can be irreversible with a poor prognosis, and disproportionately affects women and young adults. Administration of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (allo-MSCs) is a promising approach to heart failure treatment. Allo-MSCs are known to favorably affect fibrosis, apoptosis, and inflammation, which are key features of AIC. Methods This phase I study evaluated 37 adult cancer survivors (68% female) with left ventricular dysfunction secondary to chronic AIC. The study included a six-subject open-label, lead-in phase followed by 31 subjects randomized 1:1 to receive 1 × 108 allo-MSCs or vehicle via 20 transendocardial injections. Subjects were followed for 1 year to assess safety and feasibility (Fisher's test). Secondary efficacy measures included cardiac function/structure measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional capacity, quality of life (MLHFQ), and biomarkers. These were assessed by ANCOVA adjusting for baseline values. Results Ninety-seven percent of subjects underwent successful study product injections, all allo-MSC-assigned subjects received the target dose. Follow-up visits were well attended (92%) with successful collection of endpoints in 94% at the 1-year visit. Although 58% of subjects had non-MRI compatible devices, MRI endpoints were successfully collected in 84% of subjects imaged at 1 year. No new tumors were reported. There were no significant differences between allo-MSC and vehicle groups with regard to clinical outcomes including major adverse cardiac events, other significant adverse events, and days alive and out of the hospital. Ten of the 13 efficacy measures numerically favored the allo-MSC group including a lower MLHFQ score (p = .048). Conclusion In this first-in-human study of cell therapy in patients with AIC, transendocardial administration of allo-MSCs appears safe and feasible and MRI was successfully performed in the majority of patients with devices. This study provides crucial information for designing Phase II trials aimed at assessing efficacy of cell therapy in patients with AIC.

As we commemorate the 70th anniversary of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and celebrate important milestones that have been achieved by the division of cardiovascular sciences, it is imperative that division of cardiovascular sciences and the Extramural Research community at-large continue to address critical public health challenges that persist within the area of cardiovascular diseases. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Strategic Vision, developed with extensive input from the extramural research community and published in 2016, included overarching goals and strategic objectives that serve to provide a general blueprint for sustaining the legacy of the institute by leveraging opportunities in emerging scientific areas (eg, regenerative medicine, omics technology, data science, precision medicine, and mobile health), finding new ways to address enduring challenges (eg, social determinants of health, health inequities, prevention, and health promotion), and training the next generation of heart, lung, blood, and sleep researchers. Division of cardiovascular sciences has developed a strategic vision implementation plan to provide a cardiovascular framing for the pursuit of the institutes overarching goals and strategic objectives garnered from the input of the broader National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute community. This plan highlights 6 scientific focus areas that demonstrate a cross-cutting and multifaceted approach to addressing cardiovascular sciences, including (1) addressing social determinants of cardiovascular health and health inequities, (2) enhancing resilience, (3) promoting cardiovascular health and preventing cardiovascular diseases across the lifespan, (4) eliminating hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases, (5) reducing the burden of heart failure, and (6) preventing vascular dementia. These priorities will guide our efforts in institute-driven activities in the coming years but will not exclude development of other novel ideas or the support of investigator-initiated grant awards. The Division of Cardiovascular Sciences strategic vision implementation plan is a living document that will evolve with iterative dialogue with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute community and adapt as the dynamic scientific landscape changes to seize emerging opportunities.

OBJECTIVES:SENECA (StEm cell iNjECtion in cAncer survivors) is a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of delivering allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (allo-MSCs) transendocardially in subjects with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). BACKGROUND:AIC is an incurable and often fatal syndrome, with a prognosis worse than that of ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Recently, cell therapy with MSCs has emerged as a promising new approach to repair damaged myocardium. METHODS:The study population is 36 cancer survivors with a diagnosis of AIC, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40%, and symptoms of heart failure (NYHA class II-III) on optimally-tolerated medical therapy. Subjects must be clinically free of cancer for at least two years with a ≤ 30% estimated five-year risk of recurrence. The first six subjects participated in an open-label, lead-in phase and received 100 million allo-MSCs; the remaining 30 will be randomized 1:1 to receive allo-MSCs or vehicle via 20 transendocardial injections. Efficacy measures (obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) include MRI evaluation of LV function, LV volumes, fibrosis, and scar burden; assessment of exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test) and quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire); clinical outcomes (MACE and cumulative days alive and out of hospital); and biomarkers of heart failure (NT-proBNP). CONCLUSIONS:This is the first clinical trial using direct cardiac injection of cells for the treatment of AIC. If administration of allo-MSCs is found feasible and safe, SENECA will pave the way for larger phase II/III studies with therapeutic efficacy as the primary outcome.

Rationale: Autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and c-kit+ cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) are 2 promising cell types being evaluated for patients with heart failure (HF) secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy. No information is available in humans about the relative efficacy of MSCs and CPCs and whether their combination is more efficacious than either cell type alone. Objective: CONCERT-HF (Combination of Mesenchymal and c-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells As Regenerative Therapy for Heart Failure) is a phase II trial aimed at elucidating these issues by assessing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transendocardial administration of autologous MSCs and CPCs, alone and in combination, in patients with HF caused by chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (coronary artery disease and old myocardial infarction). Methods and Results: Using a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multitreatment, and adaptive design, CONCERT-HF examines whether administration of MSCs alone, CPCs alone, or MSCs+CPCs in this population alleviates left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction, reduces scar size, improves quality of life, or augments functional capacity. The 4-arm design enables comparisons of MSCs alone with CPCs alone and with their combination. CONCERT-HF consists of 162 patients, 18 in a safety lead-in phase (stage 1) and 144 in the main trial (stage 2). Stage 1 is complete, and stage 2 is currently randomizing patients from 7 centers across the United States. Conclusions: CONCERT-HF will provide important insights into the potential therapeutic utility of MSCs and CPCs, given alone and in combination, for patients with HF secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02501811.