The multi-channel cochlear implant codes sounds on the bases of rate and place pitch. Experimental studies on animals and patients have shown it is difficult for electrical stimulation to code rate pitch above about 200-400 pulses/second. Therefore to convey as much information about speech as possible it is necessary to produce multi-channel stimulation or place pitch so that the important frequency cues in vowels and consonants can be perceived by the patient.

This is a publisher’s version of an abstract published in Australian Journal of Otolaryngology 1992. This version is reproduced with permission from Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.

The surgical complications for the first 153 multiple-channel cochlear implant operations carried out at the Medizinische Hochschule in Hannover and the first 100 operations at the University of Melbourne Clinic, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, are presented. In the Hannover experience the major complications were wound breakdown, wound infection, electrode tie erosion through the external auditory canal, electrode slippage, a persistent increase in tinnitus, and facial nerve stimulation. The incidence of wound breakdown requiring removal of the package was 0.6% in Hannover and 1.0% in Melbourne. The complications for the operation at both clinics were at acceptable levels. It was considered that wound breakdown requiring implant removal could be kept to a minimum by making a generous incision and suturing the flap without tension.

Studies have been undertaken to confirm the biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multi-electrode intracochlear implant. The materials used are biocompatible. The electrode array is flexible: it can be inserted with minimal or no trauma, providing the insertion is stopped when resistance is first felt. An atraumatic insertion is facilitated if a good view is obtained along the scala tympani of the basal turn of the cochlea by drilling through the crista fenestrae. The passage of the electrode around the cochlea can be facilitated if the electrode is rotated during insertion (clockwise for the left and anticlockwise for the right cochlea). The electrode can be explanted and another one reinserted with minimal or no trauma. A seal established around the electrode after an implantation period of 2 weeks can prevent infection extending from the middle to the inner ear. The electrical stimulus parameters produced by the Nucleus receiver-stimulator cause no loss of spiral ganglion cells or corrosion of the platinum band electrodes. Long-term stimulation has been carried out for up to 8 years in patients without affecting their clinical performance.

To summarize, our preliminary results indicate that some prelingually deaf patients may get worthwhile help from a multiple-electrode cochlear implant which extracts formants. They can understand words and running speech better when using the cochlear implant with lip-reading compared to lip-reading alone. It has been encouraging that these improvements can occur in young adults and teenagers. It has also been encouraging that some can recognize place pitch as well as rate pitch. There are, however, considerable variations in performance and this may be due to the following factors: whether they have had some hearing after birth, the method of education used, the motivation of the patient and age at implantation. In conclusion it is important to emphasize that deaf children are severely disadvantaged however good their teacher of the deaf. Research on cochlear implants offers hope for profoundly-totally deaf children. These developments will not replace the caring, competent educators but complement their skills. There is also a greater need than ever for an interdisciplinary approach to these children.

(1988). The Histopathology of the Human Temporal Bone and Auditory Central Nervous System Following Cochlear Implantation in a Patient: Correlation with Psychophysics and Speech Perception Results. Acta Oto-Laryngologica: Vol. 105, No. sup448, pp. 1-65.

Adhering to the surgical technique outlined in the protocol for the Nucleus implant has resulted in over 100 patients worldwide obtaining significant benefit from multichannel stimulation. A detailed analysis of the results in 40 patients shows that it improves their awareness of environmental sounds and their abilities in understanding running speech when combined with lipreading. In addition, one third to one half of the patients also understand significant amounts of running speech without lipreading and some can have interactive conversations over the telephone. It is clear that any insertion trauma is not significant, which is confirmed by the excellent clinical results.

The preliminary results from this study indicate that some prelingually deaf patients may get worthwhile help from a multiple-electrode cochlear implant that uses a formant-based speech processing strategy. It is encouraging that these improvements can occur in young adults and teenagers. The results for two children are also encouraging. A 10-year-old child obtained significant improvement on some speech perception tests. It was easy to set thresholds and comfortable listening levels on a 5-year-old child, and he is now a regular user of the device. There are, however, considerable variations in performance among the prelingual patients, which may be related to the following factors: whether they have had some hearing after birth, the method of education used, the motivation of the patient, and age at implantation.

A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant that provides 21 stimulus channels has been designed for use in young children. It is smaller than the adult version and has magnets to facilitate the attachment of the headset. It has been implanted in two children aged 5 and 10 years. The two children both lost hearing in their third year, when they were still learning language. Following implantation, it was possible to determine threshold and comfortable listening levels for each electrode pair. This was facilitated in the younger child by prior training in scaling visual and electrotactile stimuli. Both children are regular users of the implant, and a training and assessment program has been commenced.

A banded free-fit scala tympani array was inserted into the basal turn of nine human cochleas to evaluate the trauma produced by the procedure. These nine cochleas, together with five nonimplanted controls, were serially sectioned and examined microscopically for damage to the membranous labyrinth, in particular the spiral ligament, the basilar and Reissner's membranes, the stria vascularis, and the osseous spiral lamina. The severity and location of any trauma along the cochlear spiral were recorded. The results indicate that the insertion of the banded scala tympani array resulted in minimal mechanical damage, occurring primarily to a localized region of the spiral ligament. This would not result in significant neural degeneration, and therefore would not compromise the efficacy of the multichannel cochlear prosthesis.

We have performed a number of temporal bone and animal studies in order to evaluate the histopathological effects of intracochlear electrode implantation and chronic electrical stimulation. Our results indicate that (a) the insertion of a free-fit scala tympani array results in minimal damage to the membranous labyrinth; (b) the materials used in the electrode array evoke mild tissue reactions when implanted subcutaneously, in muscle, or within the scala tympani; (c) intracochlear electrical stimulation for periods of 500 to 2000 hours, using carefully controlled biphasic pulses, does not adversely affect the population or neural activity of the primary auditory neurones; (d) labyrinthine infection severely reduces the number of viable spiral ganglion cells; (e) an adequate fibrous tissue seal of the round window can prevent the spread of infection from the bulla to the implanted cochlea in cats, following inoculation of the bulla cavity with bacteria; (f) bone growth is not associated with electrical stimulation per se; (g) the electrode arrays show minimal platinum dissolution and no apparent degradation of the Silastic carrier following periods of long-term intracochlear electrical stimulation.

The clinical trial of a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis has been carried out on 10 profoundly-totally deaf adult patients. Speech perception tests have shown that all the patients received significant benefit from the device. They obtained improvements in understanding running speech from 47% to 550% when using the device in conjunction with lipreading compared to lipreading alone. With an open-set CID sentence test, three patients obtained scores showing an ability to understand speech without the need to lipread, and a further three patients had scores indicating they could also receive useful information without lipreading. In two patients, very limited open-set scores for electrical stimulation alone were obtained. This was most probably due to the fact that only a few channels of stimulation were possible due to cochlear disease, and they were therefore receiving information more like a single-channel device. The prosthesis has also been found to provide considerable help in hearing and recognizing everyday sounds.

A total of eight profoundly deaf patients have been implanted with the Nucleus Limited multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis at the University of Melbourne since it became available in late 1982. All patients are everyday users of the device. Speech testing using the device alone has shown consistently high scores for a variety of closed set tests and significant levels of open set speech understanding in most of the patients. Lipreading assessment with phoneme, word, sentence and speech tracking material shows significant improvement when using the prosthesis for all patients tested. Other benefits reported are recognition of environmental sounds, decrease in tinnitus, increased confidence in social and vocational situations and improved voice control. One patient is able to cope with interactive conversations over the telephone and three others are able to use the telephone in a limited way without special codes.