BACKGROUND:Fibrosis is a common side effect after treatment with ionizing radiation. Several methods to ameliorate debilitating fibrosis have been employed but without consistent results. The goal of this pilot study is to determine if Pirfenidone, a novel regulator of cytokine gene expression, has the potential to ameliorate established radiation-induced fibrosis.METHODS:Open label, prospective pilot study of 800 mg three times/day, orally administered Pirfenidone was administered to enrolled patients who were had completed radiation therapy and who had established radiation-induced fibrosis. Range of motion (ROM) was assessed using standard measures, and subjective measures of pain, fatigue, disability and global health were measured every three months.RESULTS:Seven patients were enrolled of whom 3 had ROM assessments of 1 site and 2 had ROM assessments of 2 sites. Of these assessments, 6 revealed increased ROM during drug intervention while 1 revealed a decreased ROM. There was an overall improvement in the mental composite score of the SF36 while physical composite score was decreased and the vitality score was unchanged. Two patients were removed from the study because of syncopal episodes.CONCLUSION:Several patients experienced improved function of at least 25% and reported subjective improvement. Pirfenidone may benefit patients with radiation-induced fibrosis and is worthy of a larger well controlled trial.

6550 Background: Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is a key component in the treatment of various malignancies. Preparatory regimens for PBSCT often include total body irradiation (TBI). Pulmonary toxicity is often prominent, and is felt to be related to total lung dose and dose rate. The Radiation Oncology Branch of the National Institute of Health initially administered TBI without lung shielding, however shielding was added in 2002. Pulmonary function testing (PFT) was undertaken both before and after stem cell transplant and TBI for all patients. The PFT results were analysed to test the hypothesis that TBI patients with pre-treatment combined ventilation/diffusion capacity deficits, defined as both FEV1 and DLCO below 100% predicted, would benefit most from reduction of lung dose. Methods: From 1997–2004, 146 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies received fractionated TBI before PBSCT. The first 85 patients were treated without lung dose reduction to 13.6 Gray (Gy). Thereafter, total body dose was decreased to 12 Gy (1.5 Gy BID for 4 days). Initially, lung dose was limited to 9 Gy by use of lung shielding. Later lung dose was reduced to 6 Gy. All patients received PFTs prior to treatment, 90 days after treatment, and annually. Results: Median F/U was 44 months (range 12–90 months). Sixty-one patients had combined ventilation/diffusion capacity deficits defined as both a forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and a diffusion capacity of carbon dioxide (DLCO) less than 100% predicted. Of these 61, 27 had lung dose reduction and 34 did not. One-year survival was 71% versus 50% with and without lung dose reduction respectively (log rank test p=0.042). Eighty-five patients had FEV1 and/or DLCO greater than or equal to 100% predicted; 34 were treated with lung dose reduction and 51 without. In both groups, 1 year survival was 70%. Conclusions: Among patients treated without lung dose reduction, survival was significantly worse among those with pretreatment combined ventilation/diffusion capacity deficits. Among those with combined ventilation/diffusion capacity deficits, lung dose reduction significantly improved survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Purpose: To determine the value of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) done before peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) in predicting mortality after total body irradiation (TBI) performed with or without dose reduction to the lung.Methods and Materials: From 1997 to 2004, 146 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies received fractionated TBI before BSCT. With regimen A (n = 85), patients were treated without lung dose reduction to 13.6 gray (Gy). In regimen B (n = 35), total body dose was decreased to 12 Gy (1.5 Gy twice per day for 4 days) and lung dose was limited to 9 Gy by use of lung shielding. In regimen C (n = 26), lung dose was reduced to 6 Gy. All patients received PFTs before treatment, 90 days after treatment, and annually.Results: Median follow-up was 44 months (range, 12-90 months). Sixty-one patients had combined ventilation/ diffusion capacity deficits defined as both a forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and a diffusion capacity of carbon dioxide (DLCO) < 100 % predicted. In this group, there was a 20% improvement in one-year overall survival with lung dose reduction (70 vs. 50%, log-rank test p = 0.042).Conclusion: Among those with combined ventilation/diffusion capacity deficits, lung dose reduction during TBI significantly improved survival. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.

Background Quinquennial overviews (1985-2000) of the randomised trials in early breast cancer have assessed the 5-year and 10-year effects of various systemic adjuvant therapies on breast cancer recurrence and survival. Here, we report the 10-year and 15-year effects.Methods Collaborative meta-analyses were undertaken of 194 unconfounded randomised trials of adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy that began by 1995. Many trials involved CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil), anthracycline-based combinations such as FAC (fluorouracil, doxombicin, cyclophosphamide) or FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide), tamoxifen, or ovarian suppression: none involved taxanes, trastuzumab, raloxifene, or modem aromatase inhibitors.Findings Allocation to about 6 months of anthracycline-based polychemotherapy (eg, with FAC or FEC) reduces the annual breast cancer death rate by about 38% (SE 5) for women younger than 50 years of age when diagnosed and by about 20% (SE 4) for those of age 50-69 years when diagnosed, largely irrespective of the use of tamoxifen and of oestrogen receptor (ER) status, nodal status, or other tumour characteristics. Such regimens are significantly (2p=0 . 0001 for recurrence, 2p<0 . 00001 for breast cancer mortality) more effective than CMF chemotherapy. Few women of age 70 years or older entered these chemotherapy trials.For ER-positive disease only, allocation to about 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen reduces the annual breast cancer death rate by 31% (SE 3), largely irrespective of the use of chemotherapy and of age (<50, 50-69, >= 70 years), progesterone receptor status, or other tumour characteristics. 5 years is significantly (2p<0 . 00001 for recurrence, 2p=0 . 01 for breast cancer mortality) more effective than just 1-2 years of tamoxifen. For ER-positive tumours, the annual breast cancer mortality rates are similar during years 0-4 and 5-14, as are the proportional reductions in them by 5 years of tamoxifen, so the cumulative reduction in mortality is more than twice as big at 15 years as at 5 years after diagnosis.These results combine six meta-analyses: anthracycline-based versus no chemotherapy (8000 women); CMF-based versus no chemotherapy (14 000); anthracycline-based versus CMF-based chemotherapy (14 000); about 5 years of tamoxifen versus none (15 000); about 1-2 years of tamoxifen versus none (33 000); and about 5 years versus 1-2 years of tamoxifen (18 000). Finally, allocation to ovarian ablation or suppression (8000 women) also significantly reduces breast cancer mortality, but appears to do so only in the absence of other systemic treatments.For middle-aged women with ER-positive disease (the commonest type of breast cancer), the breast cancer mortality rate throughout the next 15 years would be approximately halved by 6 months of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (with a combination such as FAC or FEC) followed by 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. For, if mortality reductions of 38% (age <50 years) and 20% (age 50-69 years) from such chemotherapy were followed by a further reduction of 31% from tamoxifen in the risks that remain, the final mortality reductions would be 57% and 45%, respectively (and, the trial results could well have been somewhat stronger if there had been full compliance with the allocated treatments). Overall survival would be comparably improved, since these treatments have relatively small effects on mortality from the aggregate of all other causes.Interpretation Some of the widely practicable adjuvant drug treatments that were being tested in the 1980s, which substantially reduced 5-year recurrence rates (but had somewhat less effect on 5-year mortality rates), also substantially reduce 15-year mortality rates. Further improvements in long-term survival could well be available from newer drugs, or better use of older drugs.

PURPOSE:Fibrotic sequelae remain the most important dose-limiting toxicity of radiation therapy to soft tissue. Functionally, this is reflected in loss of range of motion and muscle strength and the development of limb edema and pain. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), which are abnormally elevated in irradiated tissues, may mediate radiation fibrovascular injury.PATIENTS AND METHODS:In an open label drug trial, we studied the effects of pentoxifylline (400 mg orally tid for 8 weeks) on 30 patients who displayed late, radiation-induced fibrosis at 1 to 29 years posttreatment (40 to 84 Gy). The primary outcome measurement was change in physical impairments thought to be secondary to radiation, including active and passive range of motion (AROM and PROM), muscle strength, limb edema, and pain. Plasma levels of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha and FGF2) also were measured. Twenty-seven patients completed baseline and 8-week assessments, and 24 patients completed baseline, 8-week, and 16-week assessments.RESULTS:After 8 weeks of pentoxifylline intervention, 20 of 23 patients with impaired AROM and 19 of 22 with impaired PROM improved; 11 of 19 patients with muscle weakness showed improved motor strength; five of seven patients with edema had decreased limb girth; and nine of 20 patients had decreased pain. Pretreatment FGF2 levels dropped from an average of 44.9 pg/mL to 24.0 pg/mL after 8 weeks of treatment.CONCLUSION:Patients receiving pentoxifylline demonstrated improved AROM, PROM, and muscle strength and decreased limb edema and pain. Reversal of these delayed radiation effects was associated with a decrease in circulating FGF2.

A patient with renal cell carcinoma underwent external-beam radiation therapy (XRT) to treat a painful chest-wall metastasis. One month later, she underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation of two metastatic deposits within the liver; one of the target lesions was in the recent irradiation zone and the other was outside of the radiation field. RF ablation within the irradiated liver produced a slightly larger ablation zone with prominent needle tract scarring, and required less energy input than treatment in the unirradiated liver. RF ablation and XRT may interact, possibly producing a synergistic effect. Further study of the potentially adjunctive relationship between these two modalities is warranted.

BACKGROUND:Preoperative chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer may reduce locoregional tumors and provides initial treatment for systemic micrometastases. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the ability of intensive preoperative chemotherapy to enhance the outcome of this approach.METHODS:Patients with clinical stage II breast cancer (T2N0, T1N1, and T2N1) were prospectively randomized to receive either preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy with five 21-day cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FLAC)/granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Local therapy consisted of modified radical mastectomy or segmentectomy/axillary dissection/breast radiotherapy, according to patient preference.RESULTS:Fifty-three women were randomized (26 preoperative chemotherapy and 27 postoperative chemotherapy). The objective clinical response rate of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy was 80%, and the pathologic complete response rate was 20%. Preoperative chemotherapy reduced the overall incidence and number of axillary lymph node metastases. There was no difference in the use of breast-conserving local therapy between the two treatment arms. There were 20 local/regional or distant recurrences (9 preoperative and 11 postoperative). There was no difference in the overall or disease-free survival between the preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy arms.CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative FLAC/granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor chemotherapy was effective against local/regional tumors in stage II breast cancer but was otherwise comparable to postoperative chemotherapy.

Angiosarcoma is a malignant growth of endothelial origin, uncommon in the head and neck. We present the case of a 38-year-old woman with long-standing goiter who presented with a rapidly growing 6.0-cm neck mass. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the tumor showed features of "undifferentiated thyroid carcinoma (ThyrCa)." Total thyroidectomy resulted in extirpation of all gross disease. Pathology revealed a high-grade angiosarcoma of the neck invading the thyroid gland, coexisting with papillary ThyrCa (follicular variant) in the contralateral lobe. Aggressive external electron beam radiotherapy was initiated for local control. Despite the absence of systemic dissemination initially, bulky neck recurrences, and pulmonary metastases developed rapidly, leading to the patient's demise on postoperative day 41. Autopsy showed metastatic disease involving most organs. This case illustrates that neck angiosarcomas need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of "poorly differentiated" thyroid malignancies. These soft tissue neck tumors may complicate postoperative management due to their bleeding tendency and aggressive infiltrative behavior, and carry a dismal prognosis because of the rapidity of development of local recurrence and distant metastases.

Purpose/Objective: Because there is little data with follow-up greater than 15 years on the outcomes of breast conservation versus mastectomy for early stage breast cancer, the results of a randomized, single-institution study were updated. Materials/Methods: After obtaining fully informed, written consent, 247 patients with clinical stage I and II breast cancer were enrolled on an institutionally reviewed protocol and randomly assigned to undergo either modified radical mastectomy (116) or lumpectomy (121), axillary dissection and radiation therapy. The 237 patients who underwent randomization have been followed for a median potential follow-up of 18.4 years. The primary end points were overall survival and disease-free survival. Results: At 18.4 years, the overall survival was 58 percent for patients assigned to mastectomy and 54 percent for patients assigned to lumpectomy plus radiation. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (p=0.67). Disease-free survival at 18 years was 67 percent for the patients assigned to mastectomy and 63 percent for those assigned to lumpectomy plus radiation (p=0.64) after recurrences successfully salvaged by mastectomy were censored from analysis. A total of 27 of 121 women treated with breast conservation experienced an ipsilateral in-breast cancer event. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in distant disease-free survival which was 69 percent for mastectomy and 68 percent for breast conservation (p=0.82). Conclusions: With nearly 20 years follow-up, breast conservation with lumpectomy and radiation offers equivalent overall and disease-free survival to mastectomy. Ipsilateral in-breast cancer events were observed throughout the entire follow-up period for the breast conservation group.