PURPOSE:Ziftomenib-a potent, highly selective, oral menin inhibitor-was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging clinical activity as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory NPM1-mutated (NPM1-m) and KMT2A-rearranged AML in the KOMET-001 phase I trial. METHODS:In the registration-enabling phase II part of KOMET-001, patients with relapsed/refractory NPM1-m AML received ziftomenib 600 mg once daily. The primary end point was the rate of complete remission with full hematologic recovery (CR)/CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). RESULTS:From January 26, 2023, to May 13, 2024, 92 patients (median age, 69 years [range, 33-84]) were treated. The primary end point was met, with a CR/CRh rate of 22% (95% CI, 14 to 32; P = .0058); 61% were negative for measurable residual disease. Overall response rate was 33% (95% CI, 23 to 43), with a median duration of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 7.4). Prespecified subgroup analyses showed comparable CR/CRh regardless of previous therapy, including venetoclax, or type of comutations. Median overall survival was 6.6 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 8.6). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were febrile neutropenia (26%), anemia (20%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). Differentiation syndrome occurred in 25% of patients (15% grade 3; no grade 4-5) and was manageable with protocol-defined mitigation. Three patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of ziftomenib-related adverse events. CONCLUSION:Ziftomenib demonstrated significant clinical benefit and deep responses in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory NPM1-m AML. Ziftomenib was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with previous studies, including manageable differentiation syndrome, lack of clinically significant QTc prolongation, and low rates of myelosuppression.

e18535 Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects elderly patients. Standard of care treatment includes induction chemotherapy, followed by consolidation with 4 cycles of high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) at 3gm/m2 with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). HiDAC dose was established based on CALGB 8525, which showed an improved leukemia-free survival compared to lower doses cytarabine. Older patients did not have the same benefit due to increased mortality and neurotoxicity. There has not been a formal study of ideal dosing of consolidation for older patients. Our institution has utilized an approach for reducing the dose of HiDAC for patients aged ≥60. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of AML patients aged ≥60 treated with Ara-C consolidation at UPMC between January 1, 2004 and September 19, 2022. We described the dosing characteristics and incidence of neurotoxicity of patients who received at least one full cycle of consolidation Ara-C (6 doses total given on days 1,3,5). We evaluated the association between Ara-C dose, number of completed cycles, overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS). Results: 156 patients ≥60 years were included (median, 66.1 years; range, 59.6-78.3). Neurotoxicity was observed in 3 patients; after the 1 st cycle at 2gm/m2, 1 st cycle at 1gm/m2 and 2 nd cycle at 2gm/m2 respectively. Median Ara-C dose per cycle was 1.5 gm/m2 (range, 1.0-3.0). 41% of patients received a median dose ≥2gm/m2 per cycle. Over half of patients (58%) completed 4 cycles; 43% of these patients received a median dose ≥2gm/m2 per cycle. Among all patients, the most common reasons for discontinuation were progression (24 patients, 17%) and alloSCT (8 patients, 5%). Median OS for the entire cohort was 1.8 years. 26 patients (16.8%) received alloSCT. Number of cycles completed correlated with improved OS (p<0.001). Among patients who completed 4 cycles, median OS was 4.8 years (95% CI 1.8-NR) in those who received Ara-C at a dose of ≥2gm/m2 versus 2.7 years (95% CI 1.9, 5.3) in those who received Ara-C at <2gm/m2. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS with ≥2gm/m2 at 4 cycles was 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9; p=0.02). In the group of patients who received 4 cycles median RFS was 1.71 years (95% CI 1.29-5.18) at ≥2gm/m2 versus 1.56 years (95% CI 1.28-2.37 ) at <2gm/m2. HR was 0.7 (95% CI 0.4-1.1; p=0.16). Conclusions: Cytarabine consolidation in patients ≥60 years with AML is safe and feasible. Neurotoxicity was rare, especially at reduced dose. We observed improved OS after completing the full 4-cycle Ara-C consolidation regimen. Similarly, there were improved outcomes with median Ara-C dose ≥2gm/m2 per cycle for those who received 4 cycles. RFS was not statistically different in our limited sample which might be suggestive of a similar leukemia-free survival at both higher and lower dose of Ara-C. We plan to further analyze the characteristics of patients who derived most benefit from higher dose of Ara-C.

Background: Chromosomal rearrangements involving the KMT2A gene and mutations involving the nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene have been associated with response to menin inhibitors in multiple studies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients characterized by these genetic alterations. Both alterations are more common in younger AML patients and those with NPM1 mutations historically perform better. However, the prevalence and outcomes of older (≥60 years) AML patients with these alterations who are treated with current therapies is less well understood. We present results from the Beat AML Master Trial (BAMT) that analyze the outcomes of this large, but less common subset of patients in an older AML population. Methods: Patients were consented and enrolled on this precision medicine-based Beat AML Master Trial (NCT03013998) from November 2016 to June 2024. Patients were included in this analysis if they harbor either the classic NPM1 mutation or a KMT2A rearrangement (over 10 different gene partners). Additionally, 2 patients with a NUP98 rearrangement were included with the KMT2A cohort as they are known to have similar biology in terms of menin dependence. These patients were treated with the following therapies: a sub-study specific targeted therapy for the dominant clone, venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven/HMA), intensive chemotherapy (IC), alternative non-intensive therapy (NIT), or no therapy. Clinical/genetic characteristics and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed in each group separately. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from master consent and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 1096 AML patients enrolled on the BAMT, 246 patients had either an NPM1 (N=207, 18.9%) or KMT2A (N=39, 3.6%) genetic alteration. The baseline characteristics for the NPM1 cohort were median age 72 years (range: 60-92), 50% female, and ECOG performance status: 0-16%, 1-58%, 2-25% and 3-1%. Additional disease characteristics include treatment related AML at 11% and complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities) at 3%. Median OS for the entire NPM1 cohort was 18.4 months (95% CI: 14.2-24.7). Patients were treated on a sub-study (35%), Ven/HMA (19%), IC (26%), NIT (8%) or no treatment (9%). Between treatment groups, median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 12.8-31.7) for those treated on a sub-study, 22 months (95% CI: 12.6-not reached (NR)) for Ven/HMA, 41.6 months (95% CI: 18.2-NR) for IC, and 6.3 months (95% CI: 1.3-23) for NIT, which was significantly different (p<0.0001). The baseline characteristics for the KMT2A cohort were median age 69 years (range: 60-88), 44% female, and ECOG performance status: 0-19%, 1-45%, 2-35% and 3-0%. Treatment related AML occurred in 23% of patients and complex karyotype in 31%. Median OS for the KMT2A cohort was 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.6-31.6). Patients were treated on a sub-study (38%), Ven/HMA (15%), IC (15%), NIT (15%), or no treatment (5%). Between treatment groups, median OS was 31.6 months (95% CI: 3.2-NR) for sub-study, 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-NR) for Ven/HMA, 12.7 months (95% CI: 4.9-NR) for IC, and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-NR) for NIT, which was also significantly different (p<0.0001). Conclusions: In this cohort of older AML patients who possess NPM1 or KMT2A mutations, initial demographics and clinical characteristics upon presentation are as expected. Within each cohort and depending on the type of therapy received, there were interesting differences in survival. Median OS was the highest for the NPM1 cohort that received IC while the KMT2A cohort had the highest median OS when enrolled on a KMT2A targeted sub-study; a finding that supports precision-based medicine for this high-risk KMT2A group characterized by poor outcomes. As menin inhibitor combinations with induction chemotherapy or Ven/HMA move to the frontline setting, we anticipate seeing significant improvement in outcomes for AML patients in both of these genomic subsets. Further multivariable analysis will be performed to validate treatment effect on OS. Our analyses for these two cohorts also provide valuable outcome benchmarks for the design of future precision oncology studies that seek to improve survival in these subsets of older AML patients.

Background: Treatment options for older, less fit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients continue to be challenging, with toxicities and limited efficacy. The combination therapy of azacitidine (Aza) and the bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven) showed superior benefit in response rates and overall survival compared to Aza alone, leading to the combination's FDA approval in newly diagnosed AML patients ≥ 75 years and younger patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. While Ven-Aza is a very effective and potent therapy, the 28-day continuous dosing of Ven combined with 7 days of Aza resulted in interrupted dosing or shortened dosing schedules due to persistent cytopenias in more than 50% of treated patients in the VIALE-A trial and subsequent real-world data. Furthermore, investigation of novel agents in combination with Ven-Aza has been challenging due to prolonged cytopenias even when monotherapy with the new agent shows no myelosuppression. Given that Ven-Aza is not curative, successful integration of other agents with this standard of care remains important in AML. The growing knowledge of Ven-Aza toxicities prompted attention to developing a safer dosing regimen while maintaining similar efficacy. Our study will examine the FDA label of 28 days of Ven, versus 14 days, in combination with Aza for newly diagnosed AML patients ≥ 60 years who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective of this study is to compare complete remission (CR) rates with an abbreviated schedule of Ven (14 days) versus the current package insert approved schedule (28 days). We hypothesize that reducing the dosing duration of Ven would reduce the associated toxicities while maintaining a comparable response rate. Study Design and Methods: This protocol is a sub-study of the Beat AML Master Trial (NCT03013998) in which untreated AML patients age ≥ 60 are assigned an investigational therapy based on cytogenetic and central genomic analysis. Patients are randomized onto Arm A (28-day Ven-Aza schedule) or Arm B (14-day Ven-Aza schedule) stratified by age (60-74 vs. 75+ years). The primary objective is to determine the complete remission (CR) rate of patients treated in each randomized arm for up to 2 cycles. The secondary objectives will include assessments of composite complete remission (CR, CR with hematologic improvement, CR with incomplete count recovery), duration of remission, survival, and incidence of treatment-related and non-related toxicities. Additionally, the overall incidence of febrile neutropenia, grade ≥3 infections, transfusions, days of hospitalization and time to neutrophil recovery will be determined. In both arms of the study, patients will be assessed for response at day 21-28 of cycles 1 and 2. Patients who have marrow remission (< 5% blasts) will wait for count recovery of absolute neutrophil count ≥ 0.5x10 9/L and platelets ≥ 50x10 9/L before initiating the next cycle of therapy. Patients will then be followed for survival. With the exception of the Ven dosing schedule (14 vs. 28 days), the FDA approved package insert for Ven, including dose modifications for concurrent azole therapy, will be followed in both arms. The intent of the analysis is to demonstrate that the 14-day Ven-Aza regimen is at least as effective as the standard 28-day regimen. A total of 166 patients (83 per group) will provide 80% power to detect a 10% non-inferiority margin at the one-sided 5% significance level, assuming that the CR rate is 36% for the 28-day regimen, as observed in VIALE-A, and 25% higher (45%) for the 14-day regimen. In addition to assessing the frequency of adverse events such as cytopenias, safety monitoring will include an assessment of response rates after at least 25% of patients have completed 2 cycles of treatment, with consideration for stopping the study if data suggest the 14-day regimen is inferior to the standard regimen. Correlative studies will include measurement of MRD and a focus on identifying properties of leukemic cells that respond, do not respond and become resistant to therapy.

While the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk classification reliably predicts outcomes in younger patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, it is unclear whether it applies to adults ≥ 60 years treated with lower-intensity treatment (LIT). We aimed to test the prognostic impact of ELN risk in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML ≥ 60 years given LIT and to further refine risk stratification for these patients. A total of 595 patients were included: 11% had favorable-risk, 11% had intermediate-risk, and 78% had adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN. ELN risk was prognostic for overall survival (OS) (P<0.001) but did not stratify favorable-risk from intermediate-risk (P=0.71). Within adverse-risk AML, the impact of additional molecular abnormalities was further evaluated. Multivariable analysis was performed on a training set (N=316) and identified IDH2 mutation as an independent favorable prognostic factor, and KRAS, MLL2, and TP53 mutations as unfavorable (P<0.05). A "mutation-score" was calculated for each combination of these mutations, assigning adverse-risk patients into two risk groups: -1 to 0 points ("Beat-AML-intermediate") vs 1+ points ("Beat-AML-adverse"). In the final refined risk classification, the ELN favorable- and intermediate-risk groups were combined into a newly defined "Beat-AML-favorable-risk", in addition to mutation scoring within the ELN adverse-risk. This approach redefines risk for older ND AML and proposes refined Beat-AML-favorable- (22%), Beat-AML-intermediate- (41%), and Beat-AML-adverse-risk (37%) groups with improved discrimination for OS (2-year OS: 48% vs 33% vs 11%, respectively, P<0.001; C-index: 0.60 vs 0.55 for ELN), providing patients and providers additional information for treatment decision-making.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients has a poor prognosis, low complete remission (CR) rates, and poor overall survival (OS). Preclinical studies have shown synergistic effects of epigenetic priming with hypomethylating agents followed by cytarabine. Based on these data, we hypothesized that an induction regimen using epigenetic priming with decitabine, followed by cytarabine would be effective and safe in older patients with previously untreated AML. Here, we conducted a phase 2 trial in which older patients with previously untreated AML received an induction regimen consisting of 1 or 2 courses of decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) for 5 days followed by cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion for 5 days. Forty-four patients (median age 76 years) were enrolled, and CR/CRi was achieved by 26 patients (59% of all patients, 66.7% of evaluable patients). Fourteen of 21 (66.7%) patients with adverse cytogenetics achieved CR including six out of seven evaluable patients with TP53 mutations. The 4- and 8-week mortality rates were 2.3% and 9.1%, respectively, with median OS of 10.7 months. These results suggest epigenetic priming with decitabine followed by cytarabine should be considered as an option for first-line therapy in older patients with AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT01829503.

Background: The addition of midostaurin (M), an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, to intensive chemotherapy (IC) prolongs survival in newly diagnosed (ND) FLT3 mutated (m) AML. It is not known if there is a benefit to more potent and selective FLT3 inhibitors. Among these is Gilteritinib (G), now approved as a single agent in relapsed/refractory FLT3m AML. Combined with IC, G also leads to high measurable residual disease (MRD)negative (-) composite complete remission (CRc) in FLT3 Internal Tandem Duplication (ITD)m AML. The aim of the PrECOG 0905 study was to compare FLT3m clearance and CRc rates of G vs M with IC in adults with ND FLT3m AML. Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial comparing G to M in combination with IC during induction and consolidation in ND AML pts with centrally PCR detected FLT3 ITD or TKD mutations. Pts age 18-70 with non M3 AML and no known core binding factor rearrangement were eligible. Pts were stratified by mutation type (TKD only vs. ITD (+/- TKD)), NPM1 mutation status, and FLT3-ITD allelic ratio. Induction consisted of cytarabine 100 mg/m2 by continuous infusion daily, on day (d) 1-7 and daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on d 1-3. G 120 mg daily or M 50 mg twice daily was given orally on d8-21. Consolidation (up to 4 cycles) began within 60 d of induction with Cytarabine (1.5-3 g/m2 IV) X 6 doses and G or M (as per randomization) on d8-21. Pts could proceed to transplant (HCT) at any time. Maintenance was not included. The primary outcome was FLT3m MRD (-) CRc after induction. MRD for TKD mutations was tested by PCR (sensitivity 10-2); ITD MRD was tested by amplicon-based NGS (sensitivity 10-4). Safety and efficacy were analyzed in all eligible pts who received treatment. Secondary endpoints included comparison of CRc, MRD by flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-3), and survival. Results: From 11/2019 to 11/2022, 722 pts were screened at 37 centers, 180 pts randomized, and 177 pts (58% female, 77% white, 8.5% black, 8.5% hispanic) treated on the G (n=90) or M (n=87) arm. Median age was 54, with 27.7% > age 60. FLT3-ITD was present in 80% in the G arm and 78.2% in the M arm. Of those with FLT3-ITD, NPM1 was detected in 56.9% pts in G arm and 58.8% in M arm. 24.4% G and 20.7% M pts had co-occuring FLT3-ITD, NPM1 and DNMT3A mutations. Adverse karyotype was seen in 3.4% G and 9.3% M while 10% G and 13.8% M were ELN 2022 adverse risk. For pts on G arm, 85.6% achieved CRc compared to 72.4% for M (p=0.042). 5 (5.6%) pts on G arm and 6 (6.9%) on M arm received 2 cycles in induction. Post induction, the FLT3m- CRc rate was 40% for G vs 47.1% for M (p=0.366). FLT3-TKD only mutated pts achieved CRc in 88.9 % with G and 63.2% with M and FLT3m- CRc in 72.2% and 63.2% respectively. FLT3-ITDm (+/- TKDm) pts achieved CRc/FLT3m- CRc in 84.7%/31.9% with G and 75%/42.6% with M, respectively. In pts with FLT3-ITD, NPM1 and DNMT3A mutations, 95.5% G and 72.2% M achieved CRc and 50% G vs 33.3% on M achieved FLT3m- CRc. Flow cytometry MRD negative CRc was documented in 64.4% on G arm and 59.8% on M arm after induction (p=0.539). On G arm 67 (74%) patients received at least one cycle of consolidation compared to 53 (61%) pts on M arm. On exploratory analysis, 54 (66%) G and 40 (46%) M were reported to proceed to HCT in first remission. FLT3m testing was done post consolidation cycle 1 in 27 pts in FLT3m+ CRc after induction and 15/18 (83%) on G and 4/9 (44.4%) on M converted to FLT3m-. On multivariate logistic regression analysis for FLT3m-CRc post-induction, FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, NPM1m, WBC and hemoglobin at baseline were significant at the 0.10 two-sided level, while treatment arm, and 2017 ELN risk were not. There were no deaths from treatment-related (TR) adverse events (TRAEs) while grade >=3 TRAE was reported in 73%G vs 70% M during induction and 79%G vs 73%M pts during consolidation. Conclusion: Induction therapy with daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 X 3 days, cytarabine 100 mg/m2 and gilteritinib results in an excellent CRc rate with no TR deaths in pts with ND FLT3m AML up to age 70. Compared to M, G increased the CRc but not the FLT3m- CRc rate after induction. More post induction FLT3m+CRc pts who received G became FLT3m- after consolidation cycle 1 and more G pts succeeded in proceeding to HCT. Future survival data will help evaluate the clinical impact of G and MRD assessments in ND FLT3mAML. Larger studies will be needed to establish most predictive timing of MRD and for definitive comparisons of these drugs in patients with specific mutation profiles ( ie TKD, ITD/NPM1/DNMT3).

Background: The BeatAML Master Trial (BAMT) began in 2016 with a goal of determining the feasibility of a precision-medicine approach in treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults ≥ 60 years of age where outcomes are poor. At the time, standard of care (SOC) for older patients with AML was intensive 7+3 chemotherapy (cytarabine + daunorubicin) if fit and hypomethylating agents (HMA: azacitidine or decitabine) if unfit. Besides confirming the feasibility, the early results (2019) from the Master Trial suggested that patients who received therapy on one of the sub-studies had a lower early death rate and superior overall survival compared to patients receiving off-protocol SOC, which was primarily single-agent HMA at the time. Since then, the 2019 approval of venetoclax (ven) + azacitidine for older unfit AML patients has been transformative and emerged as the SOC. Using data from the BAMT from 2016-2024, we suggest that knowing the comprehensive genomic profile of AML at the time of diagnosis is still beneficial in determining therapy that would lead to the optimal outcome and that development of targeted therapies and combination regimens with ven/HMA is still needed. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 1096 patients who consented and enrolled on the BAMT (NCT03013998) from Nov 2016 through Jun 2024. Patients ≥ 60 years with newly diagnosed AML were included. Patients underwent therapy on a BeatAML sub-study based on their genetics (N=433) or treatment off-protocol (N=663). We divided the patients according to what therapy they received: (1) Non-Intensive (Off-Protocol, N=121), (2) Ven/HMA (Off-Protocol, N=234), (3) Non-Intensive (Sub-Study, N=407), (4) Intensive (Sub-Study, N=26), and (5) Intensive (Off-Protocol, N=155). 94 patients received no treatment and 59 were unknown. Non-intensive therapies included primarily targeted agents or non-ven combinations. We analyzed baseline characteristics and demographics, overall survival (OS), and the impact of allogenic stem cell transplant (SCT). OS, using Kaplan-Meier method, was measured from the start of therapy to all-cause death, censoring patients at last follow-up. Results: Characteristics and demographics were similar between Groups 1, 2 and 3. Group 4 and 5 were treated with intensive chemotherapy and their characteristics are reflective of younger/fit patients appropriate for the intensive regimen. Groups 4 and 5 also had the longest median OS (mOS) of 40.2 months (95% CI: 13.9-not reached (NR)) and 42.3 months (95% CI: 25.1-NR) respectively. Group 3, which included patients treated with a non-intensive, targeted therapy on a sub-study, had an mOS of 14.0 months (95% CI: 12.3-16.7), which was similar to Group 2, treated with Ven/HMA, that had an mOS of 13.2 months (95% CI: 10.9-16.3). Lastly, patients in Group 1, who were treated primarily with HMA monotherapy, did poorly in comparison, with an mOS of 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.3-10.1). Additionally, we looked at the cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of SCT. The CIR in 12 months of Group 1 was 9.8% (95% CI: 6.9-13.4), Group 2: 5.4% (95% CI: 2.2-10.7), Group 3 and 4 combined: 35.0% (95% CI: 628.1-42.1), and Group 5: 13.1% (95% CI: 6.9-13.4). In a multi-variable analysis, after adjusting for typical favorable risk factors like NPM1 mutations and core binding factor, SCT was highly significant (p<0.0001) in improving OS with a hazard ratio of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.16-0.32), and Group 3 performed similarly to Group 2 (p=0.20). Conclusions: First, our results suggest that it is clinically relevant to correctly identify whether an intensive chemotherapy, targeted-therapy, or ven/HMA regimen is best suited for older AML patients, for which a precision-medicine trial is ideal for. Secondly, in this group of patients, our results show that patients treated with a non-intensive targeted therapy (Group 3) has a similar mOS to those treated with ven/HMA (Group 2). Especially after controlling for patient characteristics, patients in Group 2 performed similar to those in Group 3 (p=0.20). Patients in Group 3 were treated on Beat AML sub-studies which included targeted therapy alone or with non-venetoclax combinations, which is a strong rationale for continued development of targeted agents to optimize toxicity and quality of life with similar survival. Lastly, this data also supports the need to improve the ven/HMA SOC by developing combination regimens with targeted agents to further improve outcomes.

Background: Mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) are recurrent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the prevalence increases with age. The prognostic impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations remains controversial. IDH inhibitors are small molecules that bind within the IDH enzymatic active site, blocking aberrant 2-hydroxyglutarate production and inducing myeloid differentiation. While they can lead to differentiation syndrome, they generally have a more favorable side-effect profile, making them an attractive option for older patients. We aimed to describe the prevalence and prognostic impact of IDH mutations in newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients ≥ 60 years in a large cohort of patients treated on a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society-sponsored trial. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational analysis including patients ≥ 60 years with ND AML who were enrolled on the Beat AML clinical trial (NCT03013998) before May 10, 2023. Patients were treated with a variety of treatment regimens. Cytogenetic analysis and next-generation sequencing (FoundationOne®Heme) were obtained. Mutations were considered present at any detectable VAF. Cox proportional hazard models were used to describe the relative risk of each variable on death over time from the date of trial inclusion. Results: A total of 1023 patients with ND AML were identified. Patients had a median age of 72 (range 60-92) years and the majority were non-Hispanic White (83.2%), and male (57.6%). Ninety-nine (9.7%) patients were IDH1MUT, 193 (18.9%) patients were IDH2MUT including 10 (1.0%) patients with a co-occurring IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations. Both IDH1MUT and IDH2MUT were associated with 2022 ELN favorable-risk (26.3% and 22.3% for IDH1 and IDH2 respectively, vs 15.5% overall (P<0.001)). IDH1MUT significantly co-occurred with DNMT3AMUT (42.4%), NPM1MUT (44.4%) and less frequently with TP53MUT (10.1%) (P<0.001 for all). IDH2MUT was associated with DNMT3AMUT (35.8%), NPM1MUT (31.1%), SRSF2MUT (38.3%), and less frequently with TET2MUT (6.7%) and TP53MUT (9.3%) (P<0.001 for all). Normal karyotype was higher in IDH1MUT (P<0.001) and IDH2MUT (P<0.001), whereas complex karyotype (P<0.001 for both) and core-binding factor AML (P=0.047, P=0.015) were lower in IDH1MUT and IDH2MUT. To evaluate the impact of IDH mutations in patients ≥ 60 years, we focused on patients evaluable for outcome treated with lower-intensity therapy (LIT) (N=674), and intensive chemotherapy (IC) (N=178), separately. Among the LIT treated patients, 96 patients received treatment with an IDH inhibitor, and 237 patients received a hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus venetoclax. For patients treated with LIT, the hazard ratios (HRs) of death over time were 0.58 [95% CI 0.47-0.72; P<0.002], 0.81 [95% CI 0.59-1.13; P=0.214] and 0.56 [95% CI 0.44-0.72; P<0.001] for IDHMUT, IDH1MUT, IDH2MUT respectively. Among patients receiving IC, the HRs were 1.05 [95% CI 0.68-1.69; P=0.777], 0.70 [95% CI 0.31-1.61; P=0.406] and 1.27 [95% CI 0.77-2.1; P=0.352] for IDHMUT, IDH1MUT, and IDH2MUT respectively. The HR of death for IDH1MUT patients treated with LIT with the addition of an IDH1 inhibitor (N=24) was significantly lower (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.24-0.92; P=0.027] vs IDH1MUT patients treated without an IDH1 inhibitor, while an IDH2 inhibitor did not change survivial outcomes in patients with IDH2MUT (N=71). Discussion: To our knowledge this is the largest retrospective study characterizing the prevalence of IDH mutations in patients ≥ 60 years with AML. We demonstrated that IDH mutations were detected in ~27% of older patients with AML. Although there could have been selection bias as the Beat AML study had separate IDHMUT study arms, these findings are concordant with other studies showing an increase in frequency of IDH mutations with age. IDH2MUT was associated with a lower HR of death among patients treated with LIT, which was not seen in patients receiving IC. The high prevalence of IDH mutations suggests that IDH inhibitors used as single agents or in combination with lower-intensity therapies are an important class of drugs for this older patient population as they are generally well tolerated, that need further investigation.

Background. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disease that occurs primarily in older adults with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis. Most studies that characterize the genomic landscape of AML include younger adults with the majority of patients being younger than 60 years of age. We aimed to study the mutational landscape of newly diagnosed AML patients aged 60 years or older. Methods.Samples were collected from the multi-center Beat AML Master Trial (Burd, Nat Med 2020). Patients were enrolled between 2016 and 2023. Informed consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients diagnosed with non-APL AML and who were aged ≥ 60 years old were included. Patients underwent bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, cytogenetic analysis, FLT3-ITD ratio assessment (LeukoStrat CDx FLT3 Mutation Assay, Invivoscribe) and next generation sequencing (NGS) using FoundationOne®Heme(Foundation Medicine) to interrogate the entire coding region of 406 genes and select introns of 31 genes involved in rearrangements, as well as RNA sequencing to interrogate 265 genes known to be somatically altered in human hematological malignancies. The presence of multiple hotspot mutations within one gene in an individual patient was counted as one gene mutation. Patterns of co-occurrence between gene mutations were calculated using the Phi correlation coefficient. Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software. P<0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results. A total of 1088 newly diagnosed AML patients were identified, of whom 1032 were 60 years or older. Patients had a median age of 72 years at time of diagnosis (range 60-92 years). Forty-two percent of the patients were female, most patients were non-Hispanic and 79% were Caucasian. NGS data were available for 1024 patients and mutations were identified in 461 different genes. Patients had a median number of 11.0 mutations (range 3.0 to 28.0). The most frequently mutated genes were DNMT3A (n=257; 25.1%), TP53(n=255; 24.9%), TET2 (n=243; 23.7%), RUNX1 (n=225; 22.0%), SRSF2 (n=221; 21.6%), ASXL1 (n=216; 21.1%), NPM1 (n=206; 20.1%), FLT3 (n=205; 20.0%), IDH2 (n=190; 18.6%), NRAS (n=208; 16.9%), PTPN11(n=104; 10.2%), STAG2 (n=101, 9.9% and IDH1 (n=99; 9.7%) (Figure 1A). FLT3-ITD was present in 98 (12.1%) of the 810 patients who were tested. Strongest significant co-occurrence was found between FLT3and NPM1 (n=103), STAG2 and ASXL1 (n=63), ASXL1 and RUNX1 (n=92), ASXL1 and SRSF2 (n=88), RUNX1 and SRSF2 (n=94), STAG2 and SRSF2 (n=51) and DNMT3A and NPM1 (n=92) (p<0.01). Pairwise negative correlations were observed between TP53 and NPM1 (n=6), TP53 and SRSF2 (n=17), and between NPM1 and RUNX1 (n=6) (p<0.01) (Figure 1B). The cytogenetic profiles and the full genomic landscape will be presented during the ASH meeting. Discussion. This is the largest study investigating the mutational profile in older adults with AML aged 60 years and older. Due to the 7-day screening period of the Beat AML study, patient selection was biased towards less-rapidly proliferative AML. We showed that the pattern of gene mutations was markedly different from other studies in AML that mainly included younger AML patients (Papaemmanuil, NEJM 2016; TCGA, NEJM 2013 ). The frequency of mutated TP53 was substantially higher in older AML patients, as was the occurrence of myelodysplasia-related gene mutations (e.g., SRSF2, RUNX1, ASXL1, STAG2, U2AF1, and SF3B1) and gene mutations in IDH1, IDH2 and TET2. In contrast, NPM1 mutation was less frequently mutated in older AML patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a large proportion (46%) of the AML patients older than 60 years of age do have a mutation that is potentially targetable for treatment ( FLT3 IDH1 IDH2 and NPM1). The high incidence of mutated TP53 and MDS-related gene mutations underscores the increased incidence of high-risk AML and the need for innovative personalized therapies in this older age group. Figure 1. A. Co-occurrence of the 15 most frequently mutated genes, and B. co-correlation between the 15 most frequently mutated genes. Blue indicates positive correlation, red indicated negative correlation. Only significant correlations (p<0.01) are shown.

Background: GILT is a potent oral selective FLT3 kinase inhibitor ( FLT3i) approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3 mutated ( FLT3m) AML. However, the optimal combination in older, newly diagnosed (ND) FLT3m AML patients is unknown. GILT in combination with azacitidine (AZA) had higher initial response rates, but did not improve overall survival (OS), compared to placebo in the LACEWING trial (Wang et al. Blood 2021). GILT followed by decitabine (DEC) was also tested and found to be safe, but the efficacy did not meet pre-determined criteria (NCT03013998, S8 Group 1). In the interim, VEN + AZA/DEC emerged as the new standard of care for older/unfit patients with AML (DiNardo et al. NEJM 2020). Thus, the Beat AML S8 study was amended to assess the safety and efficacy of GILT in combination with DEC and VEN in newly diagnosed FLT3m AML patients aged ≥60 years (NCT03013998, S8 Group 2). Methods: The S8 Group 2 sub-study was part of the multicenter (15 sites) Beat AML Master Trial. Key eligibility criteria included ND FLT3m AML patients aged ≥60 years who are not able to receive intensive induction chemotherapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. A conventional 3+3 design was used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GILT+DEC+VEN. Patients were treated with GILT at three dose levels (DL). During induction, treatment consisted of GILT 120mg/day on days 1-7 then 80mg/day on days 8-28 for dose level 1 (DL1), or on days 8-21 (DL-1), or on days 8-14 (DL-2). All patients received DEC at 20mg/m 2 on days 8-12, and VEN at 400mg/day (or at 100mg/day if concomitant antifungal) on days 8-28. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) or CR with hematologic improvement (CRh) received GILT 80mg/day on days 1-15 (DL1) or days 1-7 (DL-1, DL-2), DEC on days 1-5 (All DLs), and VEN on days 1-15 (DL1, DL-1) or days 1-10 (DL-2) for an additional 12 consolidation cycles. The primary end point was to determine the tolerability and toxicity of GILT in combination with DEC and VEN. Secondary end point was the composite CR (CRc: CR/CRh) rate. Response was assessed using modified 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) AML criteria. Results: Between 10/22/2020 and 6/13/2022, 19 patients were consented, of whom 18 started treatment and were included in the analysis. The median age was 73 and baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The first 2 patients treated at DL1 both experienced hematologic dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with persistently low absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Therefore, the GILT dose was de-escalated to DL-1, where 8 patients were enrolled and treated. Among the 6 evaluable patients on DL-1, DLTs occurred in 2 patients; one had hematologic DLT and the other had failure to thrive. This led to dose de-escalation to DL-2. In DL-2, 2/8 patients experienced hematologic DLTs. The protocol was then amended to include DL-3 and DL-4, but the trial was closed by the sponsor due to priority transition and enrollment was halted so further dose reductions were not evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly hematologic, and 11 patients had treatment-related adverse events (TAEs), 10 of them grade 3 or higher. Median (range) time on treatment was 6 (1-25) cycles. Most common reason for treatment discontinuation were adverse event (3, 21.4%), recurrence (2, 14.3%), stem cell transplant (2, 14.3%), and death (2, 14.3%) Nine patients achieved CR, 2 patients achieved CRh and 1 patient achieved complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). The CRc rate (CR/CRh) was 61.1% (11/18, 95% CI: 38.6%-83.6%). After a median follow up of 19.7 months, the median overall survival and duration of response were not reached. One-year overall survival (OS) was 71.8% (95% CI: 44.9-87.2). Conclusion: Triplet therapy of GILT+DEC+VEN inND FLT3m AML patients ≥60 years old induced a high response rate (CRc rate 61.1%), and the median OS was not reached at time of this report (median follow-up 19.7 months). The typical dose of GILT 120mg/day with DEC+VEN was associated with significant hematology toxicities, which required multiple dose level reductions. At the reduced dose (GILT 80mg/day on days 1-7), the combination therapy was generally safe and well tolerated. A Phase 2 clinical trial sponsored by Astellas of GILT+AZA+VEN as frontline treatment for ND older patients with FLT3m AML is now enrolling (NCT05520567). Funding: this study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc.

Background: Frontline and relapsed /refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients carrying fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 [FLT3]-mutations (FLT3 mut+) benefit from FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) that have emerged as active therapeutic agents for this subset of AML encompassing up to 30-40% of all AML cases. The FLT3i gilteritinib, as monotherapy for R/R AML pts, has improved outcomes but the duration of remission achieved is transient and often brief. The Phase 3 randomized ADMIRAL trial of gilteritinib demonstrated a 20% CR rate and 2.8 months event-free-survival (EFS) (Perl, et al., NEJM 2019). The development of new targeted agents which synergize with FLT3 inhibitors, and ideally also inhibit the emergence of resistance, is therefore a major medical need in AML. Iadademstat (iada/ORY-1001) is a specific, oral, potent, covalent inhibitor of the epigenetic Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDMA1) enzyme. Epigenetic dysregulation is a hallmark of AML. Up to 70% of recurring mutations in AML patients target epigenetic regulators of gene expression, resulting in myeloid differentiation blockade and enhanced leukemic stem cell renewal, underscoring the potential of epigenetic therapies to change the natural history of the disease. Preclinically, iada produces striking synergy with FLT3is, particularly gilteritinib in FLT3 wild-type and FLT3 mut+ AML cells and in derived cell lines resistant to venetoclax, azacitidine and other FLT3is (Sacilotto et al., 2022 Eur J. of Cancer 174S1). The novel MOAs generating this synergy in combinations include activation of a pro-differentiating epigenetic transcriptional program with simultaneous suppression of MYC-driven target genes (Yashar, et al. 2023, Mol. Cancer Res). The recently completed Phase 2 study of iada in combination with azacitidine (ALICE) produced a high rate of composite remission, including complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (mostly MRD negative), as well as durable responses, in treatment naïve, unfit AML patients (pts), without exacerbating the toxicity profile of azacitidine (Salamero et al., 2022, Blood S1). The FRIDA study (NCT05546580) aims to establish the safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of iada plus gilteritinib in FLT3 mut+ R/R AML. Methods: Adult pts with body weight ≥50 Kg and ECOG 0-2, with FLT3 mut+ R/R AML, after no more than 2 prior lines of therapy, are enrolling. Certain patients with prior exposure to FLT3is including gilteritinib may be eligible. Up to 18 pts, in a 3+3 escalation phase, will receive iada at doses of 75 to 150 ug, orally, in 5 days ON - 2 days OFF schedule, with continuous gilteritinib, at 120 mg/day orally. In the expansion phase, up to 14 pts at the selected safe and pharmacologically active dose/s (determined based on all available data from escalation pts including PK, target engagement (TE), safety, tolerability, and emerging activity) will be enrolled. Primary endpoints of the study are safety and RP2D determination, based on the same 5 criteria outlined above. Bayesian posterior probability efficacy monitoring will be performed periodically for each dose cohort in the expansion phase. Bayesian efficacy futility and early stopping boundary will be applied during the monitoring. Posterior probability criterion (Prob (CR>0.3) ≥ 0.60) at the end of the study will warrant additional development. The safety of the combination treatment will also be continuously evaluated during expansion following a Bayesian design stopping rule.Secondary endpoints include overall survival, EFS, CR, CR/CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), overall response rates, time to response, duration of response, and transfusion rate. Exploratory endpoints include measurable residual disease and gene mutational analysis. At the time of the submission, FRIDA is enrolling a second dose level cohort in escalation phase and plans to have the 15 sites open to accrual in the US by the end of 2023. Additional sites will be added for a subsequent randomized controlled double-blinded FRIDA 2 study to assess the efficacy of the iada and gilteritinib combination in R/R FLT3 mut+ AML.

Background: TP-0903 is a multi-kinase inhibitor designed to target AXL, but also inhibits additional kinases relevant to the progression of AML, including those regulating the cell cycle, such as Chk1/2. Pre-clinical studies of TP-0903 and decitabine (dec) showed additive cytotoxicity in vitro and prolonged survival in mouse models of TP53-mutant (TP53m) AML, a poor prognostic sub-group of AML. Here we report the clinical and safety results from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society’s BeatAML phase 1b/2 (Ph1b/2) trial of TP-0903 in combination with dec (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03013998). Aims: To establish the recommended dose of TP-0903 combined with dec and evaluate its efficacy in newly diagnosed older AML patients with TP53 mutations and/or complex karyotype (CK). Methods: Newly diagnosed AML patients ≥60 years with TP53m and/or CK (defined as ≥3 abnormalities) were consented, screened and assigned to this Ph1b/2 study by the BeatAML Master Trial. A standard 3 + 3 design was used for Ph1b to determine the initial recommended dose of TP-0903 (Days 1-21, 37 mg/day) in combination with dec (Days 1-10, 20 mg/m2) in a 28-day cycle. Ph2 followed a Simon’s 2-stage design in which, to move onto the 2nd stage, the 1st stage required 4 or more CR responses by the end of induction therapy (up to 3 cycles) or CRh/CRi/MLFS induction responses that converted to CR by 6 cycles. Nine additional patients were treated at 37 mg during Ph2, in which further assessments of safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic data were used to amend the protocol and update the final recommended Ph2 dose of TP-0903 to 25 mg/day. Results: Of 27 total patients who started therapy with TP-0903, 15 received 37 mg and 12 received 25 mg. Two patients treated with 37 mg achieved CR and 3 achieved CRh, for a complete response (CR/CRh/CRi) rate of 33.3% (95% CI, 11.8 – 61.6). Three patients treated with 25 mg achieved CR, 1 achieved CRh, and 2 achieved CRi, for a complete response rate of 50% (95% CI, 21.1 – 78.9). Additionally, 4 patients treated with 37 mg were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative, measured by flow cytometry after 3 or 6 cycles of therapy, while only 2 patients treated with 25 mg obtained MRD- status. The median response duration for patients who achieved a complete response was 13.8 months (95%CI, 7.3 – Not Estimable (NE); median Follow-Up (FU), 16.7, 16.7 months) for those treated with 37 mg and 4.6 months (95%CI, 1.8 – NE; median FU, 4.4 months) for those treated with 25 mg. The median overall survival was 7.6 months (95%CI, 2.0 – 20.6; median FU, 17.1 months) for all patients treated at 37 mg and 7.5 months (95%CI, 1.1 – NE; median FU, 7.6 months) for those treated at 25 mg. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were similar in patients treated with 37 mg and 25 mg TP-0903. The most common events in patients treated with 37 mg were neutropenia (33.3%), thrombocytopenia (26.7%), leukopenia (20%), and anemia (13.3%). Likewise, the most common events in patients treated with 25mg were neutropenia (50%), decreased lymphocyte counts (41.7%), febrile neutropenia (33.3%), leukopenia (33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (25%). Summary/Conclusion: Although the 1st stage in the Ph2 portion of the trial was terminated early after treating only 11 patients with 25 mg TP-0903 + dec, the trial still achieved 3 of the 4 required CR responses needed to move onto the 2nd stage. Additionally, 3 other patients in this group achieved responses of CRh (1) and CRi (2). This combination regimen is encouraging, considering the high risk and poor outcome of patients with TP53m and/or CK AML.Keywords: Phase I/II, Acute myeloid leukemia, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

BackgroundPatients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutations or a complex karyotype have a poor prognosis, and hypomethylating agents are often used. The authors evaluated the efficacy of entospletinib, an oral inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase, combined with decitabine in this patient population. MethodsThis was a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 substudy of the Beat AML Master Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03013998) using a Simon two-stage design. Eligible patients aged 60 years or older who had newly diagnosed AML with mutations in TP53 with or without a complex karyotype (cohort A; n = 45) or had a complex karyotype without TP53 mutation (cohort B; n = 13) received entospletinib 400 mg twice daily with decitabine 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-10 every 28 days for up to three induction cycles, followed by up to 11 consolidation cycles, in which decitabine was reduced to days 1-5. Entospletinib maintenance was given for up to 2 years. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) and CR with hematologic improvement by up to six cycles of therapy. ResultsThe composite CR rates for cohorts A and B were 13.3% (95% confidence interval, 5.1%-26.8%) and 30.8% (95% confidence interval, 9.1%-61.4%), respectively. The median duration of response was 7.6 and 8.2 months, respectively, and the median overall survival was 6.5 and 11.5 months, respectively. The study was stopped because the futility boundary was crossed in both cohorts. ConclusionsThe combination of entospletinib and decitabine demonstrated activity and was acceptably tolerated in this patient population; however, the CR rates were low, and overall survival was short. Novel treatment strategies for older patients with TP53 mutations and complex karyotype remain an urgent need.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy in older patients (age ≥ 60) has undergone a transformation with the introduction of multiple targeted therapies, which has allowed more patients to receive therapy than before. The most successful has been the combination of venetoclax + azacitidine (VA) which generated higher overall complete response rates in phase 2 studies than would be expected with azacitidine alone, leading to accelerated FDA approval on 21Nov2018. The VIALE-A phase 3 study confirmed the improved overall survival (OS, median 14.7 versus 9.6 months) of VA, leading to full FDA approval for marketing. This retrospective analysis provides real world data on the impact of baseline clinical and genomic markers of individuals receiving intensive chemotherapy versus VA. Methods: The precision medicine Beat AML Master Trial (NCT03013998) assigns patients to biomarker specific sub-study treatments based on targeted DNA sequencing and cytogenetics. However, a large subset of patients did not enroll on a sub-study, but were followed for off-study treatment and OS. From this subset, patients enrolled onward from 21Nov2018, when VA received accelerated approval, were examined for differences in clinical/genetic characteristics and OS in those receiving venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (V/HMA), any form of intensive chemotherapy (IC), alternative non-intensive therapy (NIT), or no therapy. The genetic mutations identified in this study are characterized by a variant allele frequency of 20%+, as defined in the trial for determining the dominant clone. The method of Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate OS, and the Cox model was fit to associate patient characteristics with OS. Results: From 21Nov2018, a total of 468 AML patients consented to the Beat AML trial and did not enroll to a sub-study. Treatment was chosen by the investigator based upon available clinical and genomic data. Of these 468 patients, 62 did not receive treatment, 2 had treatment data missing, 226 were treated with V/HMA, 112 with IC, and 66 with NIT. Demographics for all patients include median age 71 (60-90), 40% female, performance status (PS) (0-20%; 1-55%; 2-22%; 3-3%), median white blood cell (WBC) 4.1 (range 0.3-298.6), complex karyotype (CK) 20.6%, core binding factor (CBF) 7.8%, KMT2A-rearranged 3.6%, NPM1-mutated (m) 15.6%, IDH2m 14.6%, TP53m 13.2%, FLT3-ITD/TKD 12.9%, and NRASm/ PTPN11m/ KRASm/ NF1m/ CBLm 23.6%. Demographics that were significantly different (p<0.01) among the three groups (V/HMA, IC, and NIT) include age (younger in IC), PS (worse in NIT), AST/ALT (worse in NIT), CBF (more in IC), CK and TP53m (less in IC). Of the 404 patients who underwent treatment with V/HMA, IC, or NIT, 208 have died with those surviving having a median follow-up of 22.3 months. Figure 1 summarizes the OS of each treatment group. The median OS (95% CI) from time of initiating therapy is 13.6 (10.9-16.8) for V/HMA, 33.8 (20.7-not reached) for IC, and 11.6 (5.2-21.3) months for NIT. Univariable analysis for OS was significant at p<0.05 for increased age, WBC, PS, hemoglobin, CBF, CK, NPM1m, TP53m, TET2m and IC versus V/HMA. Multivariable analysis was significant at p<0.05 (hazard ratio) for increased age (1.14), PS (1.83), WBC (1.08), hemoglobin (0.91), and select genomic aberrations including CBF (0.37), NPM1m (0.35), and TP53m (2.1). Conclusions: These results from a large cohort of older AML patients treated with V/HMA, IC, or NIT show that their outcome is best defined by pre-treatment clinical features previously identified including age, performance status, WBC and hemoglobin along with limited genomic characteristics including CBF, NPM1m, and TP53m. While univariate analysis of OS favored IC over V/HMA and NIT, multivariable analysis supports that this advantage was most likely due to the favorable clinical and genomic features. The OS of V/HMA patients in this cohort is similar to that in the VIALE-A registration study of VA, providing further justification for this treatment for older AML patients deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Additionally, this data supports use of the patient cohort in this study for ongoing work in understanding and/or validating biomarkers associated with survival with V/HMA.

Konstantinos Lontos ‡ , Anastasia Tsagianni , Mounzer Agha, Anastasios Raptis, Jing-Zhou Hou, Rafic Farah, Robert L. Redner, Annie Im, Kathleen A. Dorritie, Alison Sehgal , James Rossetti, Nidhi Aggarwal, Melissa Saul, William Gooding and Michael Boyiadzis UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Biostatistics Facility, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease characterized by a clonal proliferation of myeloid precursors with reduced capacity to differentiate into more mature cellular elements. The standard treatment for newly diagnosed AML has not changed appreciably over the last few decades and consists primarily of an anthracycline combined with a nucleoside analogue. Complete remission (CR) rates of 65-80% can be expected in younger patients but decrease with older age. There is no agreed standard of care for AML patients that do not respond to initial first line induction therapy. Although remission after second-line therapy may occur, the CR rate is lower. A few chemotherapy regimens have been used in patients with resistant disease with overall CR rates of 20-40%. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is an antibody drug conjugate consisting of a recombinant humanized antibody to CD33 which is linked to calicheamicin. Although GO is currently approved for induction therapy in combination with "7+3", its benefit is mostly evident in favorable risk disease (Hills et al Lancet Onc 2014) and thus its use is mostly limited in this setting. Pre-clinical data suggest that GO is most effective when it saturates CD33 which happens in low-burden disease (Van der Velden et al Leukemia 2004). Thus, we decided to proceed with a trial that incorporates gemtuzumab ozogamicin on the 2nd induction regimen for patients that did not achieve complete remission with the first. Methods This is a phase II, singe-center clinical trial of GO in combination with mitoxantrone and etoposide in patients with AML that persisted after their 1st induction regimen. The patients are eligible if they have at least 10% of blasts in their day 14 bone marrow biopsy and CD33 expression in at least 30% of leukemic blasts in the bone marrow. Patients with repeat bone marrows after day 14 showing progression of AML (>5% blasts) were also eligible. Patients also need to have ECOG performance status 0-2, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50%, GFR > 30 ml/min, AST/ALT < 2.5 x upper normal limits and total bilirubin <2 x upper normal limit. Patients that received CPX-531 for induction are excluded due to concerns for prolonged thrombocytopenia. The standard of care for our center for this patient population is 10mg/m2 of mitoxantrone on days 1-5 and 100mg/m2 of etoposide on days 1-5. Trial patients receive the same regimen and a single dose of GO 3mg/m2 (capped at 4.5mg) on day 6. The primary endpoint of the trial is complete remission rate (CR). The hypothesis is that addition of GO to mitoxantrone, and etoposide will increase our historical CR rate of 35% to 50%. The trial has a Simon's two-stage design, with an interim analysis planned after 16 evaluable patients have been enrolled. The trial plans to accrue 44 evaluable patients. This design has an alpha of 0.15 and 80% power. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related mortality. To-date we have enrolled 15 patients, 13 of them evaluable. 2 patients died from sepsis before the administration of GO. We have not recorded any episodes of VOD so far. Recruitment is continuing and this trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03839446.

Purpose Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Complications associated with CVCs are frequently encountered and contribute to morbidity and mortality. Prospective studies investigating and comparing complications of different types of CVCs in AML patients and their effects on the quality of life are limited. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study and evaluated the complications associated with the use of CVCs in adult AML patients during induction chemotherapy and evaluated quality of life outcomes as reported by the patients during and after their hospitalization. Results Fifty newly diagnosed patients with AML (median age, 59 years) who received intensive induction chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine patients (58%) had a peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed and 21 (42%) patients received a Hickmann tunneled central catheter (TCC). Three percent of cases developed catheter-related thrombosis in PICCs and no thrombosis in TCCs. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 8% of patients. CVC occlusion occurred in 44 patients (88%). The total number of occlusion events was 128; 97% of patients with PICCs and 76% of patients with TCCs ( p = 0.003). All patients reported that the use of CVC simplified their course of treatment. Most patients reported similar restrictions in activity associated with TCCs and PICCs. Conclusion The present study demonstrates that thrombosis and catheter-related bloodstream infections remain important complications of CVCs in AML patients. Occlusion rates were higher with the use of PICCs and the use of CVCs impacted the quality of life.