The 143 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) of the world constitute 80% of the world's population or roughly 5.86 billion people with much variation in geography, culture, literacy, financial resources, access to health care, insurance penetration, and healthcare regulation. Unfortunately, their burden of cardiovascular disease in general and acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in particular is increasing at an unprecedented rate. Compounding the problem, outcomes remain suboptimal because of a lack of awareness and a severe paucity of resources. Guideline-based treatment has dramatically improved the outcomes of STEMI in high-income countries. However, no such focused recommendations exist for LMICs, and the unique challenges in LMICs make directly implementing Western guidelines unfeasible. Thus, structured solutions tailored to their individual, local needs, and resources are a vital need. With this in mind, a multicountry collaboration of investigators interested in LMIC STEMI care have tried to create a consensus document that extracts transferable elements from Western guidelines and couples them with local realities gathered from expert experience. It outlines general operating principles for LMICs focused best practices and is intended to create the broad outlines of implementable, resource-appropriate paradigms for management of STEMI in LMICs. Although this document is focused primarily on governments and organizations involved with improvement in STEMI care in LMICs, it also provides some specific targeted information for the frontline clinicians to allow standardized care pathways and improved outcomes.

![Figure][1] ![Figure][1] ![Figure][1] ![Figure][1] Being patient-centered is a core value of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)—the safety and needs of cardiovascular patients are central to everything we do. When policies and procedures hinder the ability of

![Figure][1] ![Figure][1] For years now, prior authorization has been impeding patient access and burdening cardiovascular practice management. However, cardiovascular professionals are no strangers to practice challenges, particularly after weathering an incredible amount of change

![Figure][1] If I could pinpoint a common denominator to weave the successes and progress achieved by the American College of Cardiology’s (ACC’s) state chapters and Board of Governors (BOG) together in the last year, it would be the practice of collaboration. Collaboration—or

![Figure][1] The American College of Cardiology’s (ACC) member volunteers are the College's greatest strength when it comes to achieving strategic priorities and realizing its mission of transforming cardiovascular care and improving heart health. College leaders have long recognized that

![Figure][1] The path to leadership at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) is well worn by those leaders who came before, those men and women who led our organization through its many growth spurts and changes, both internally and externally, as the economy and health care landscape

![Figure][1] The American College of Cardiology (ACC) started producing appropriate use criteria (AUC) in 2005 with the goal of providing a practical standard to address variability, while helping cardiovascular professionals define “when to do” and “how often to do” a given

![Figure][1] ![Figure][1] The complex situation presented by the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM’s) changes in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements continues to be a top-of-mind issue for American College of Cardiology (ACC) leadership, staff, and most

![Figure][1] Unless you are part of the 5% of cardiologists who noted in a recent College-wide survey that they are “not at all familiar” with the new Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements from the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), you have undoubtedly heard about

![Figure][1] Do you have an electronic health record (EHR/EMR)? Does your office EHR talk to your hospital EHR? Does it communicate with a referring physician? Has your EHR made your life easier, or has its presence made your work more challenging? Do you think it has enhanced your ability

![Figure][1] I think we collectively strive to continue to learn and grow as a profession. Lifelong learning is woven into the very fabric of what we do. I remember when I first began training, beta-blockers were contraindicated in systolic heart failure, we did not call it “heart failure

The mission of the American College of Cardiology is "to transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health." Cardiovascular team-based care is a paradigm for practice that can transform care, improve heart health, and help meet the demands of the future. One strategic goal of the College is to help members successfully transition their clinical practices to the future, with all its complexity, challenges, and opportunities. The ACC's strategic plan is aligned with the triple aim of improved care, improved population health, and lower costs per capita. The traditional understanding of quality, access, and cost is that you cannot improve one component without diminishing the others. With cardiovascular team-based care, it is possible to achieve the triple aim of improving quality, access, and cost simultaneously to also improve cardiovascular health. Striving to serve the best interests of patients is the true north of our guiding principles. Cardiovascular team-based care is a model that can improve care coordination and communication and allow each team member to focus more on the quality of care. In addition, the cardiovascular team-based care model increases access to cardiovascular care and allows expansion of services to populations and geographic areas that are currently underserved. This document will increase awareness of the important components of cardiovascular team-based care and create an opportunity for more discussion about the most creative and effective means of implementing it. We hope that this document will stimulate further discussions and activities within the ACC and beyond about team-based care. We have identified areas that need improvement, specifically in APP education and state regulation. The document encourages the exploration of collaborative care models that should enable team members to optimize their education, training, experience, and talent. Improved team leadership, coordination, collaboration, engagement, and efficiency will enable the delivery of higher-value care to the betterment of our patients and society.

![Figure][1] ![Figure][1] The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and cardiovascular specialists around the world have long focused on secondary prevention. However, with the burden of cardiovascular disease set to increase 57% worldwide by 2020 and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs)