Purpose/Objective:While our department is heavily invested in computer-based treatment planning, we historically relied on paper-based charts for management of Radiation Oncology patients. In early 2009, we initiated the process of conversion to an electronic medical record (EMR) eliminating the need for paper charts. Key goals included the ability to readily access information wherever and whenever needed, without compromising safety, treatment quality, confidentiality, or productivity.Methodology: In February, 2009, we formed a multi-disciplinary team of Radiation Oncology physicians, nurses, therapists, administrators, physicists/dosimetrists, and information technology (IT) specialists, along with staff from the Duke Health System IT department. The team identified all existing processes and associated information/reports, established the framework for the EMR system and generated, tested and implemented specific EMR processes.Results:Two broad classes of information were identified: information which must be readily accessed by anyone in the health system versus that used solely within the Radiation Oncology department. Examples of the former are consultation reports, weekly treatment check notes, and treatment summaries; the latter includes treatment plans, daily therapy records, and quality assurance reports. To manage the former, we utilized the enterprise wide system, which required an intensive effort to design and implement procedures to export information from Radiation Oncology into that system. To manage "Radiation Oncology" data, we used our existing system (ARIA, Varian Medical Systems.) The ability to access both systems simultaneously from a single workstation (WS) was essential, requiring new WS and modified software. As of January, 2010, all new treatments were managed solely with an EMR. We find that an EMR makes information more widely accessible and does not compromise patient safety, treatment quality, or confidentiality. However, compared to paper charts, time required by clinicians to access/enter patient information has substantially increased. While productivity is improving with experience, substantial growth will require better integration of the system components, decreased access times, and improved user interfaces. $127K was spent on new hardware and software; elimination of paper yields projected savings of $21 K/year. One year after conversion to an EMR, more than 90% of department staff favored the EMR over the previous paper charts.Conclusion: Successful implementation of a Radiation Oncology EMR required not only the effort and commitment of all functions of the department, but support from senior health system management, corporate IT, and vendors. Realization of the full benefits of an EMR will require experience, faster/better integrated software, and continual improvement in underlying clinical processes.
Purpose: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon but lethal malignancy. We analyzed the role of definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated at a single institution.Methods and Materials: This retrospective analysis included 37 patients who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy and/or brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, and univariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of patient- and treatment-related factors on clinical outcomes.Results: Twenty-three patients received EBRT alone, 8 patients received EBRT plus BT, and 6 patients received BT alone (median follow-up of 14 months). Two patients were alive without evidence of recurrence at the time of analysis. Actuarial OS and LC rates at 1 year were 59% and 90%, respectively, and 22% and 71%, respectively, at 2 years. Two patients lived beyond 5 years without evidence of recurrence. On univariate analysis, EBRT with or without BT improved LC compared to BT alone (97% vs. 56% at 1 year; 75% vs. 56% at 2 years; p = 0.096). Patients who received EBRT alone vs. BT alone also had improved LC (96% vs. 56% at 1 year; 80% vs. 56% at 2 years; p = 0.113). Age, gender, tumor location (proximal vs. distal), histologic differentiation, EBRT dose (<= or >50 Gy), EBRT planning method (two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional), and chemotherapy were not associated with patient outcomes.Conclusions: Patients with locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have poor survival. Long-term survival is rare. The majority of patients treated with EBRT had local control at the time of death, suggesting that symptoms due to the local tumor effect might be effectively controlled with radiation therapy, and EBRT is an important element of treatment. Novel treatment approaches are indicated in the therapy for this disease. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Background and purpose Chest wall recurrences of breast cancer are a therapeutic challenge and durable local control is difficult to achieve. Our objective was to determine the local progression free survival (LPFS) and toxicity of thermochemoradiotherapy (ThChRT) for chest wall recurrence. Methods Twenty-seven patients received ThChRT for chest wall failure from 2/1995 to 6/2007 and make up this retrospective series. All received concurrent superficial hyperthermia twice weekly (median 8 sessions), chemotherapy (capecitabine in 21, vinorelbine in 2, and paclitaxel in 4), and radiation (median 45 Gy). Patients were followed up every 1.5–3 months and responses were graded with RECIST criteria and toxicities with the NCI CTC v4.0. Results Twenty-three (85%) patients were previously irradiated (median 60.4 Gy) and 22 (81%) patients received prior chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 11 months. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 16/20 (80%) of patients with follow-up data, and 1 year LPFS was 76%. Overall survival was 23 months for patients with CR, and 5.4 months in patients achieving a partial response (PR) (p = 0.01). Twenty-two patients experienced acute grade 1/2 treatment related toxicities, primarily moist desquamation. Two patients experienced 3rd degree burns; all resolved with conservative measures. Conclusions ThChRT offers durable palliation and prolonged LPFS with tolerable acute toxicity, especially if CR is achieved.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the potential to reduce toxicities associated with chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of anal cancer. This study reports the results of using IMRT in the treatment of anal cancer.Records of patients with anal malignancies treated with IMRT at Duke University were reviewed. Acute toxicity was graded using the NCI CTCAEv3.0 scale. Overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), local-regional control (LRC) and colostomy-free survival (CFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Forty-seven patients with anal malignancy (89% canal, 11% perianal skin) were treated with IMRT between August 2006 and September 2008. Median follow-up was 14 months (19 months for SCC patients). Median radiation dose was 54 Gy. Eight patients (18%) required treatment breaks lasting a median of 5 days (range, 2-7 days). Toxicity rates were as follows: Grade 4: leukopenia (7%), thrombocytopenia (2%); Grade 3: leukopenia (18%), diarrhea (9%), and anemia (4%); Grade 2: skin (93%), diarrhea (24%), and leukopenia (24%). The 2-year actuarial overall OS, MFS, LRC, and CFS rates were 85%, 78%, 90% and 82%, respectively. For SCC patients, the 2-year OS, MFS, LRC, and CFS rates were 100%, 100%, 95%, and 91%, respectively.IMRT-based chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer results in significant reductions in normal tissue dose and acute toxicities versus historic controls treated without IMRT, leading to reduced rates of toxicity-related treatment interruption. Early disease-related outcomes seem encouraging. IMRT is emerging as a standard therapy for anal cancer.
Purpose: To assess the correlation of postimplant dosimetric quantifiers with biochemical control of prostate cancer after low dose rate brachytherapy.Methods and Materials: The biologically effective dose (BED), dose in Gray (Gy) to 90% of prostate (D-90), and percent volume of the prostate receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V-100) were calculated from the postimplant dose volume histogram for 140 patients undergoing low dose rate prostate brachytherapy from 1997 to 2003 at Durham Regional Hospital and the Durham VA Medical Center (Durham, NC).Results: The median follow-up was 50 months. There was a 7% biochemical failure rate (10 of 140), and 91% of patients (127 of 140) were alive at last clinical follow-up. The median BED was 148 Gy (range, 46-218 Gy). The median D-90 was 139 Gy (range, 45-203 Gy). The median V-100 was 85% (range, 44-100%). The overall 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRES) rate was 90.1%. On univariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, no pretreatment characteristic (Gleason score sum, age, baseline prostate-specific antigen, or clinical stage) was predictive of bRFS. The BED, D-90, and V-100 were all highly correlated (Pearson coefficients >92%), and all were strongly correlated with bRFS. Using the Youden method, we identified the following cut points for predicting freedom from biochemical failure: D-90 >= 110 Gy, V-100 >= 74%, and BED >= 115 Gy. None of the covariates significantly predicted overall survival.Conclusions: We observed significant correlation between BED, D-90, and V-100 with bRES. The BED is at least as predictive of bRFS as D-90 or V-100. Dosimetric quantifiers that account for heterogeneity in tumor location and dose distribution, tumor repopulation, and survival probability of tumor clonogens should be investigated. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
Purpose: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy. Despite radical resection, survival remains poor, with high rates of local and distant failure. To clarity the role of radiotherapy with chemotherapy, we performed a retrospective analysis of resected patients who had undergone chemoradiotherapy.Methods and Materials: A total of 45 patients (13 with proximal and 32 with distal disease) underwent resection plus radiotherapy (median dose, 50.4 Gy). All but 1 patient received concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 30 months for all patients and 40 months for survivors.Results: Of the 45 patients, 33 underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and 12 were treated neoadjuvantly. The 5-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and locoregional control rates were 33%, 37%, 42%, and 78%, respectively. The median survival was 34 months. No patient died perioperatively. Patient age <= 60 years and perineural involvement adversely affected survival on univariate analysis. Patients undergoing R0 resection had a significantly improved rate of local control but no survival advantage. Despite having more advanced disease at presentation, patients treated neoadjuvantly had a longer survival (5-year survival 53% vs. 23%, p = 0.16) and similar rates of Grade 2-3 surgical morbidity (16% vs. 33%, p = 0.24) compared with those treated in the postoperative setting.Conclusion: These study results suggest a possible local control benefit from chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery in patients with advanced, resected biliary cancer. Furthermore, our results suggest that a treatment strategy that includes preoperative chemoradiotherapy might result in improved tumor resectability with similar surgical morbidity compared with patients treated postoperatively, as well as potentially improved survival outcomes. Distant failure remains a significant failure pattern, suggesting the need for more effective systemic therapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
Purpose: To compare preoperative chemotherapy (ChT) and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) in operable Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods and Materials: This retrospective study analyzed all patients with pathologically confirmed Stage III (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer who initiated preoperative ChT or ChT-RT at Duke University between 1995 and 2006. Mediastinal pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were compared using a chi-square test. The actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was also performed.Results: A total of 101 patients who initiated preoperative therapy with planned resection were identified. The median follow-up was 20 months for all patients and 38 months for survivors. The mediastinal lymph nodes were reassessed after preoperative therapy in 88 patients (87%). Within this group, a mediastinal pCR was achieved in 35% after preoperative ChT vs. 65% after preoperative ChT-RT (p = 0.01). Resection was performed in 69% after ChT and 84% after ChT-RT (p = 0.1). For all patients, the overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rate at 3 years was 40%, 27%, and 66%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical endpoints; between the ChT and ChT-RT subgroups. On multivariate analysis, a mediastinal pCR was associated with improved disease-free survival (p = 0.03) and local control (p = 0.03), but not overall survival (p = 0.86).Conclusion: Preoperative ChT-RT was associated with higher mediastinal pCR rates but not improved survival. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
Purpose: To report patterns of disease recurrence after resection of adenocarcinoma of the duodenum and compare outcomes between patients undergoing surgery only vs. surgery with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CT-RT).Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing potentially curative therapy for adenocarcinoma of the duodenum at Duke University Medical Center and affiliated hospitals between 1975 and 2005. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate regression analysis evaluated the effect of CT-RT on clinical endpoints.Results: Thirty-two patients were identified (23 M, 9 F). Median age was 60 years (range, 32-77 years). Surgery alone was performed in 16 patients. An additional 16 patients received either preoperative (n = 11) or postoperative (n = 5) CT-RT. Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54 Gy). All patients treated with RT also received concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based CT. Two patients treated preoperatively had a pathologic complete response (18%), and none had involved lymph nodes at resection. Five-year OS, DFS, and LC for the entire group were 48%, 47%, and 55 respectively. Five-year survival did not differ between patients receiving CT-RT vs. surgery alone (57% vs. 44%, p = 0.42). However, in patients undergoing R0 resection, CT-RT appeared to improve OS (5-year 83% vs. 53%,p = 0.07).Conclusions: Local failure after surgery alone is high. Given the patterns of relapse with surgery alone and favorable outcomes in patients undergoing complete resection with CT-RT, the use of CT-RT in selected patients should be considered. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
Purpose: To compare a neoadjuvant regimen of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) with paclitaxel-based regimens and RT in the management of operable esophageal (EC)/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.Methods and Materials: All patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and RT for EC/GEJ cancer at Duke University between January 1995 and December 2004 were included. Clinical end points were compared for patients receiving paclitaxel-based regimens (TAX) vs. alternative regimens (non-TAX). Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-square analysis was performed to test the effect of TAX on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and toxicity.Results: A total of 109 patients received CT-RT followed by esophagectomy (95 M; 14 F). Median RT dose was 45 Gy (range, 36-66 Gy). The TAX and non-TAX groups comprised 47% and 53% of patients, respectively. Most (83%) TAX patients received three drug regimens including platinum and a fluoropyrimidine. In the non-TAX group, 89% of the patients received cisplatin and 5-FU. The remainder received 5-FU or capecitabine alone. Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 41% of patients receiving TAX vs. 24% of those receiving non-TAX (p =0.19). Overall pCR rate was 39% (39% with TAX vs. 40% with non-TAX,p = 0.9). Overall LC, DFS, and OS at 3 years were 80%, 34%, and 37%, respectively. At 3 years, there were no differences in LC (75% vs. 85%, p = 0.33) or OS (37% vs. 37 %, p = 0.32) between TAX and non-TAX groups.Conclusions: In this large experience, paclitaxel-containing regimens did not improve pCR rates or clinical end points compared to non-paclitaxel-containing regimens. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
To determine the timing and patterns of late recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) alone or RP plus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Between 1970 and 1983, 159 patients underwent RP for newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and were found to have positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension and/or seminal vesicle invasion. Of these, 46 received adjuvant RT and 113 did not. The RT group generally received 45-50 Gy to the whole pelvis, then a boost to the prostate bed (total dose of 55-65 Gy). In the RP group, 62% received neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation vs 17% in the RT group. Patients were analyzed with respect to timing and patterns of failure. Only one patient was lost to follow-up. The median follow-up for surviving patients was nearly 20 years. The median time to failure in the surgery group was 7.5 vs 14.7 years in the RT group (P=0.1). Late recurrences were less common in the surgery group than the RT group (9 and 1% at 10 and 15 years, respectively vs 17 and 9%). In contrast to recurrences, nearly half of deaths from prostate cancer occurred more than 10 years after treatment. Deaths from prostate cancer represented 55% of all deaths in these patients. Recurrences beyond 10 years after RP in this group of patients were relatively uncommon. Despite its long natural history, death from prostate cancer was the most common cause of mortality in this population with locally advanced tumors, reflecting the need for more effective therapy.
PURPOSE:After surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer, local/regional recurrence is observed in 20% to 50% of patients, often without evidence of distant metastases. This retrospective study evaluates the utility of salvage radiation therapy in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Between 1991 and 2003, 29 consecutive patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy (N=14) or chemoradiotherapy (N=15) for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection at Duke University Medical Center. The median time from date of surgery to date of recurrence was 18 months (range, 2-151). At the time of recurrence, most patients had mediastinal adenopathy (N=19), but seven patients had disease confined to the surgical stump and three had hilar adenopathy with (N=2) or without (N=1) a stump recurrence. The median radiation therapy dose was 66 Gy (range, 46-74). Local control and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A univariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of several patient- and treatment-related factors on local control and overall survival. RESULTS:Median survival after radiation therapy was 17 months. Of the 29 patients, five are alive without evidence of disease 22, 28, 34, 54, and 158 months since completing radiation therapy. Actuarial local control and overall survival at 2 years were 62% and 38%, respectively. There was a trend toward improved survival with younger age and a longer disease-free interval between surgery and local recurrence, but these findings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS:Radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, produced a 2-year survival of 38% in our series of patients with local/regional recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after resection. Aggressive therapy in this population of patients is warranted.
PURPOSE:To evaluate the long-term changes in pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in patients surviving at least 2 years after definitive radiotherapy (RT) for unresectable lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Between 1992 and 2000, 277 patients were enrolled in a prospective clinical study to relate RT-induced changes in lung function with dosimetric and functional metrics. Of these, 128 received definitive RT for lung cancer, and 13 of these had follow-up PFTs for approximately >/=2 years without evidence of recurrent or progressive cancer. PFTs were obtained before RT and approximately every 6 months after RT. The results were evaluated on the basis of each study's "percentage of predicted" of normal values (i.e., adjusted for age, gender, height), and a patient's sequential examinations were compared with their initial study and a percentage of the baseline value was calculated. Follow-up PFTs were available for a median of 38 months (range 23-95). The median patient age was 65 years (range 40-74), 6 patients were men, and 10 were white. Most had Stage T2-T4 and N2-N3. The median RT dose was 71.4 Gy (range 60-73), 6 had twice-daily RT. Four patients received chemotherapy, one concurrent and three neoadjuvant. None of the patients continued to smoke after their treatment. The median pre-RT PFT results were (percentage of predicted) forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 67% (range 24-121); forced vital capacity, 72% (range 45-116); and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, 70% (range 41-129). RESULTS:At 6 months, all PFT values had declined, with some stabilization by 1 year. However, after 1 year, a gradual reduction occurred in all three parameters. Ten patients (77%) developed RT-induced respiratory symptoms (2 cough only, 8 dyspnea) at 2-21 months (median 5) after treatment. Two patients required inhalers, another required long-term steroids and oxygen. Of the 8 patients with dyspnea, 7 had an increase in symptoms beyond 2 years. No patient died of RT-induced pulmonary insufficiency. CONCLUSION:RT caused a decline in PFTs that was apparent at 6 months and continued well beyond 1 year. The continued decline in PFTs is suggestive of progressive/evolving RT-induced lung injury. "Late" pulmonary symptoms have also occurred in these patients. Because of the high mortality rate of unresectable lung cancer, few patients can be evaluated for long-term analysis. Additional studies and pooling of data from multiple institutions may help to clarify better the long-term impact of RT on pulmonary function in this subset of patients.
The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors for patients with melanoma brain metastases that can be recommended for patient selection for clinical trials. A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients irradiated for brain metastases from 1990 to 1997. Pretreatment factors analyzed for influence on survival included age, stage, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extracranial metastases, the number and location of brain lesions, disease-free interval from initial diagnosis, total dose of radiation, and number of fractions administered. Prognosis was also analyzed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analyses (RPA) classes. The data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median survival was 4 months. RPA class distribution was I-25%, II-48%, and III-28% with a median survival of 6.5, 3.5, and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0098 by log-rank test). KPS less than 70% (p = 0.0039), and the presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.03), predicted a worse prognosis on univariate analysis. Both factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. The prognosis of patients receiving radiotherapy for brain metastases is related to RPA class, the presence of extracranial metastases, and KPS. These criteria should be employed in selecting patients for aggressive protocol treatment, or for more protracted brain irradiation off protocol.
BACKGROUND:The mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R) encodes for a multifunctional receptor involved in lysosomal enzyme trafficking, fetal organogenesis, cytotoxic T cell-induced apoptosis and tumor suppression. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the M6P/IGF2R tumor suppressor gene is mutated in human head and neck cancer, and if allelic loss is associated with poor patient prognosis.METHODS:M6P/IGF2R loss of heterozygosity in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was assessed with six different gene-specific nucleotide polymorphisms. The patients studied were enrolled in a phase 3 trial of twice daily radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy; median follow-up for surviving patients is 76 months.RESULTS:M6P/IGF2R was polymorphic in 64% (56/87) of patients, and 54% (30/56) of the tumors in these informative patients had loss of heterozygosity. M6P/IGF2R loss of heterozygosity was associated with a significantly reduced 5 year relapse-free survival (23% vs. 69%, p = 0.02), locoregional control (34% vs. 75%, p = 0.03) and cause specific survival (29% vs. 75%, p = 0.02) in the patients treated with radiotherapy alone. Concomitant chemotherapy resulted in a better outcome when compared to radiotherapy alone only in those patients whose tumors had M6P/IGF2R loss of heterozygosity.CONCLUSIONS:This study provides the first evidence that M6P/IGF2R loss of heterozygosity predicts for poor therapeutic outcome in patients treated with radiotherapy alone. Our findings also indicate that head and neck cancer patients with M6P/IGF2R allelic loss benefit most from concurrent chemotherapy.
To assess if there has been increased sectioning of pathologic specimens with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), identify sources of this change, and consider the clinical consequences, pathologic data from patients who underwent initial excisional biopsies at our institution and were referred to the radiation oncology department with DCIS from 1992-2002 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred forty-four of 480 patients with DCIS were eligible for review. Specimen size was recorded as length, to the nearest 0.1 cm, in 3 dimensions. Specimen volume was approximated by the product of the 3 dimensions of the specimen. The primary endpoint was the number of microscopic sections taken from gross specimens, corrected for specimen size. Other analysis included margin status, use of a previous stereotactic needle biopsy, and whether a subsequent repeat excision was performed. Over time, there was an increase in size of the excisional biopsy specimens (mean of 49 cm3 from 1992 to 1994 and 90 cm3 from 2001 to 2002; P = 0.045). Mean numbers of slides per centimeter of specimen were 2.5, 2.7, 3.9, and 5.8 for the intervals 1992–1994, 1995–1997, 1998–2000, and 2001–2002, respectively (P < 0.001 for 1992–1997 vs. 1998–2002). Adjusting for volume, the increase over time in the number of slides per specimen was statistically significant (parameter significance, P < 0.001). For a given volume, the number of slides increased approximately 9.1% per year, on average, during the study period. The positive margin rates were 52%, 46%, 23%, and 25% from 1992 to 1994, from 1995 to 1997, from 1998 to 2000, and from 2001 to 2002, respectively. The degree of sectioning, corrected for specimen length and volume, increased over time.
Publisher Summary The chapter surveys some aspects of the Soviet computer software world and examines how computers applied in several fields enjoy a high level of official support. The chapter examines seven major areas of computer applications in the USSR. Various automated systems of management and control (ASU) are discussed. The state of computing in Soviet research and development organizations, which found themselves low on the priority list when it came to allocating computer and communications technology until the mid 1980s is also described. Computer networking is also developing very slowly in the USSR. The Ministry of Telecommunications is hostile to data communications and places various impediments in the way of organizations desiring to use the switched network for this purpose. The chapter reviews Soviet educational computing. Computer courses with a curriculum stressing the development of programming skills and “algorithmic thinking” were introduced into Soviet schools. Computer Aided Design (CAD) is the latest applications area of highest priority. The chapter emphasizes that without radical change, the Soviet software industry will be unable to satisfy domestic demand for high-quality software. The consequence is that Western software will be in great and growing demand, which raises a policy question for the United States and its software industry.