9004 Background. The RAMES Study (EudraCT Number 2016-001132-36) is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase II trial exploring the efficacy and the safety of the addition of ramucirumab to gemcitabine as the second-line treatment in MPM patients (pts) after platinum/pemetrexed regimens. Methods. The pts were assigned (1:1) to receive Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 i v on days 1 and 8 every 21 days with Placebo (Arm A) or Ramucirumab 10 mg/kg i v on day 1, of a 21-day cycle (Arm B), until tolerability or progressive disease. Pts was stratified by ECOG/PS (0-1 vs 2), age (≤ 70 vs > 70 yrs), histology (epithelioid vs non-epithelioid) and time to progression (TTP) after first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Assuming a proportion of OS equal to 40% at 1 year in arm A, a 12% absolute improvement in OS at 1 yrs was expected in Arm B (hazard ratio = 0.70).114 events (156 subjects) are required for a one-sided log-rank test with α = 0.15 to have 80% power. Results. From December 2016 to July 2018, 164 pts were randomized, 81 pts in Arm A and 80 Arm B; 3 pts were randomized but not treated. Characteristics of pts were: median age 69 yrs (44-81), males 119 (73.9%), females 42 (26.1%); ECOG/PS0 96 (59.6%) ECOG/PS1-2 65 (40.4%); histotype epithelioid 132 (81.9%), non-epithelioid 29 (18.1%); stage III 98 (60.7%), stage IV 60 (37.3%), 3 (2.0%) missing; asbestos exposure assessed 80 (49.7%). Median of courses was 3.50 in Arm A and 7.50 in Arm B. OS was significantly longer in Arm B with median 13.8 mths (70% CI 12.7-14.4) vs Arm A with 7.5 mths (70% CI 6.9-8.9), HR 0.71 (70% CI 0.59-0.85, p = 0.057). OS at 6 and 12 mths was in Arm A 63.9% and 33.9%, and in Arm B 74.7% and 56.5%, respectively. In Arm B OS was not correlated to TTP at first-line therapy (13.6 mths in TTP ≤6 mths and 13.9 mths in TTP > 6 mths) and histotypes (13.8 months in the epithelioid and 13.0 months in non-epithelioid). No significant differences in thromboembolism G3-4 events were observed in Arm A vs Arm B (p= 0.64). None hypertension G3-4 was reported in Arm A vs 5 pts (6.3%) in Arm B (p= 0.022). No significant differences in G3-4 haematological toxicities between the two arms were reported. Conclusion: In the RAMES Study the addition of Ramucirumab to Gemcitabine significantly improved OS regardless of age of pts, tumor histotype and TTP at the first-line treatment. Gemcitabine plus Ramucirumab can be considered a manageable regimen in second-line treatment of advanced MPM pts. Clinical trial information: NTC03560973.

Purpose: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer. Data are not available in prospective trials on correlations between genetic alterations and outcomes of therapies. In this study, we assessed the genetic profile of MPM patients (pts) in tissue samples. Patients and Methods: From December 2016 to July 2018 (end of enrolment), 164 pts were enrolled. We evaluated by targeted sequencing the mutational profile of a panel of 34 genes: ACTB, ACTG1, ACTG2, ACTR1A, BAP1, CDH8, CDK4, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, COL3A1, COL5A2, CUL1, DHFR, GOT1, KDR, KIT, MXRA5, NF2, NFRKB, NKX6-2, NOD2, PCBD2, PDZK1IP1, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PSMD13, RAPGEF6, RDX, SETDB1, TAOK1, TP53, TXNRD1, UQCRC1, XRCC6. Genetic profiling was correlated with clinical and pathological variables. Results: Overall, 110 pts (67%) from both treatment arms had samples available for molecular analysis. Median age was 63 years (45–81), 25.5% (n = 28) were females, and 74.5% (n = 82) were males. Tumor histotype was 81.8% (n = 90) epithelioid and 18.2% (n = 20) non-epithelioid; 28.5% of the tumors (n = 42) were stage IV, 71.5% (n = 68) were stage III. Targeted sequencing of tissue specimens identified 275 functional somatic mutations in the 34 genes analyzed. The number of mutated genes was positively associated with higher stage and metastatic disease (p = 0.025). RDX (42%), MXRA5 (23%), BAP1 (14%), and NF2 (11%) were the most frequently mutated genes. Mutations in RAPGEF6 (p = 0.03) and ACTG1 (p = 0.02) were associated with the non-epithelioid subtype, and mutations in BAP1 (p = 0.04) were related to progression-free survival (PFS) > 6 months. Conclusions: In the Ramucirumab Mesothelioma clinical trial (RAMES), mutation of the gene BAP1 is related to a prolonged PFS for patients treated with platinum/pemetrexed regimens (p = 0.04).

e14156 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy have shown survival benefits in the treatment of several ATs. However, the risk of serious side effects seems greater in certain types of tumors presenting reduced compliance with therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and clinical benefits of IT, as appraised using clinically related biomarkers of pts outside clinical trials. Methods: In this retrospective study, data were evaluated on pts in the Reggio Emilia Provincial Oncology Network who were treated for ATs using Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Ipilimumab monotherapy in clinical practice. The pts included in the study had received at least 1 dose of IT by June 2018. LDH and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were collected at baseline, antibiotic therapy (ATB) was considered during IT, and immunorelated adverse events (irAEs) were assessed with CTCAE v.4.1. Results: A total of 169 pts were examined: 78 with NSCLC, 57 with melanoma, 29 with kidney cancer, 3 with head-neck cancer and 2 with colorectal cancer. 123 pts (73%) were treated with Nivolumab, 36 (21%) with Pembrolizumab and 10 (6%) with Ipilimumab. Overall, 62 pts (37%) experienced irAES of any degree: 17/29 (59%) pts with kidney cancer presented irAES, while only 35% (20/57) and 31% (24/78) of pts with melanoma and lung cancer did, respectively. A total of 27/62 (43%) pts delayed IT due to toxicity, but only 7/62 (11%) pts discontinued treatment due to irAEs. Statistically significant increases in PFS (11 vs. 5 months, p = 0.002) and OS (19.9 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.002) were found between pts who experienced irAEs and those who did not. As previously demonstrated in other groups of pts, in the Cox regression performed for OS, a baseline value of LDH≥1.5xULN and median NLR ≥2.93 correlates with poor prognosis. Unlike what is already known, the use of ATB during IT (35% of pts) correlates with increased survival (HR 0.59; IC95% 0.37-0.94, p = 0.028). Conclusions: These data confirm the tolerability of IT in an unselected real-world population. In particular, the development of irAEs could be considered a positive predictor of outcome, but with a different incidence among MTS.

8547 Background: Since MPM is an uncommon neoplasia, its rarity has limited available data on molecular drivers. Methods: RAMES study evaluated the second-line efficacy of gemcitabine/ramucirumab treatment vs. gemcitabine/placebo. From December 2016 to July 2018 (end of enrolment), 164 patients (pts) were admitted to this study, which involved the collection of tumor samples - with diagnosis - to evaluate 34 genes by NGS (ACTB, ACTG1, ACTG2, ACTR1A, BAP1,CDH8, CDK4, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, COL3A1, COL5A2, CUL1, DHFR, GOT1, KDR, KIT, MXRA5, NF2, NFRKB, NKX6,-2, NOD2, PCBD2, PDZK1IP1, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PSMD13, RAPGEF6, RDX, SETDB1, TAOK1, TP53,TXNRD1, UQCRC1, XRCC6). We reported the results of the first 87 pts (54%): hystotype was epithelioid in 70 pts (80%), biphasic in 14 pts (16%) and sarcomatoid in 3 pts (4%). Median age was 63 years (range 45-81). 70 pts were male (80%) and 17 pts were female (20%). In the present analysis, we included 55 pts in stage III (63%), 26 pts in stage IV (30%) and 6 pts whose stage was unknown. Median first-line PFS platinum/pemetrexed therapy was for 5.75 months (I.C. 95% 4.75-6.76). PFS was ≤6 months for 40 pts (49%), and 6 months for 41 pts (51%). Results: 187 functional somatic mutations were identified. Genomic alterations/patient were 1 gene in 29 pts (33%), 3 genes in 18 pts (21%) and ≥5 genes in 2 pts (2%). The most frequent somatic mutations were RDX in 35 pts (40%), MXRA5 in 20 pts (23%), BAP1 in 13 pts (15%) and ACTG 1 in 9 pts (11%). When patients were collated by stage, the most frequent mutations were: MXRA5 in 16 pts in stage III (29%), BAP1 in 5 pts in stage IV (19%) and RDX in 16 pts in stage IV (62%). The percentage of somatic mutations in patients with PFS as first-line chemotherapy for ≤6 and >6 months was 2.2 and 1.6 (p=0.032), respectively. The most frequent mutations/patient for ≤6 and >6 months PFS were: RDX in 14 pts (35%) with PFS < 6, RDX in 19 pts (46%) with PFS >6 and MXRA5 in 11 pts (27%) with PFS >6. Conclusions: This preliminary data suggests a possible role that a genetic signature may play in distinguishing MPM with different clinical-pathological features. The results are expected to be clarified further in the second step of the study, which is ongoing. Clinical trial information: 2016-001132-36.

TPS4602 Background: Despite recent advances in drug therapy, pts with mRCC have about a 10% 5-year survival rate. Several preclinical studies have documented an increase in peripheral antitumour immunity following radiation, a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect. NIVO is an anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody that blocks tumour growth in different ways by targeting certain cells. It might work even better when combined with SBRT. The irradiated tumour cell death can enhance antitumor immunity by inducing antigen expression on tumour cells and activating lymphocytes. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the antitumour immunity of NIVO can be enhanced by SBRT. Methods: This is an ongoing phase II, single arm, multicentre study in pts with mRCC with progression disease after ≤ 2 prior anti-angiogenic therapies and with 2 or more measurable non-brain metastatic sites, at least one of which potentially suitable for treatment with SBRT. All pts will receive hypofractionated radiation at a lesion at a dose and schedule of 10 Gy/3 fractions respectively after 7 days from the first infusion of NIVO. NIVO will be given as flat dose of 240 mg in intravenous infusion beginning on day 1 every 14 days for 6 months, then switch to 480 mg q4-weekly in responding (CR, PR, SD) pts until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective is to evaluate the activity of this combination in terms of Objective Response Rate (ORR), the best response recorded on the ITT population according to RECIST v1.1. Our hypothesis is that treatment with NIVO plus SBRT compared to NIVO monotherapy can increase the ORR from 25% to 40%. Secondary endpoints are progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), ORR of irradiated and non-irradiated metastases, duration of response and safety profile. An Exploratory Project also identifies molecular basis of synergistic effect of SBRT and immunotherapy, potential mechanisms of resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. Twenty of the planned 68 pts were enrolled from July 2017 to January 2018. Study duration will be 12 months for the accrual and 36 months for the follow-up. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Num 2016-003032-20. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number 2016-003032-20.

e20524 Background: over the past decade, personalized management based on the molecular features of tumours in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has entered routine clinical practice. The poor performance of many advanced NSCLC patients may limit invasive biopsies. The liquid biopsy is a diagnostic procedure performed on cancer-derived material obtained in blood samples. In this abstract, we will describe our experience with liquid biopsies. Methods: In the Reggio Emilia Clinical Cancer Centrefrom March 2016 to December 2016, 42 patients with advanced NSCLC were analyzed that had had or had already started first line therapy. The liquid biopsy was repeated at each imaging response evaluation by thoracic-abdominal compound tomography (CT) scan performed every 3 months. In the liquid biopsy, the mutational status of EGFR was analyzed with real time PCR (KIT cobas EGFR mutation test v2 CE-IVD Roche); in tissue, it was evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results: 21/42 liquid biopsies were EGFR-mutated (12/21 eson 19 and 9/21 eson 21). In 3/21 (14.3%) cases, the tissue biopsies showed wild type (WT) EGFR. 6 liquid biopsies were also performed at time 0 (diagnosis). All liquid biopsies of EGFR WT remained WT during treatment and imaging evaluation. The median number of liquid biopsy tests for patients was 2 (range 1-3). In 4/21 cases, T790M was performed: 3 cases in both liquid biopsies and tissue, and 1 case in tissue but not in liquid biopsy. TKi therapy was ineffective in this patient with T790M mutation detected in tissue, but not in liquid biopsy. In all patients, the disappearance of the T790M mutation during TKi therapy was related to disease progression. In 11 cases, modification of EGFR mutation status during treatment anticipated CT scan evidence of disease progression (median = three months). Conclusions: the liquid biopsy is an excellent resource. In our experience the liquid biopsy is the sensitive method of choice during treatment of advanced NSCLC patients. EGFR modification status during TKi therapy showed advanced disease progression.

Combination chemotherapy is very active in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), although no improvement in overall survival (OS) has been done in the last 25 years, with Cisplatin-Etoposide (PE) still considered the world-wide standard, with an average median survival of about 7–8 months in patients with extended disease (ED).

BACKGROUND:Hormone therapy plays an important role in the management of breast cancer. In the past, testosterone was the most common line of hormonal therapy for this disease, but its use has been almost completely abandoned in the past 40 years. However, because of earlier reports on favorable therapeutic results, we re-evaluated its use for treatment of hormone-responsive patients who have become refractory to other lines of hormonal therapy.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Fifty-three consecutive patients with positive metastatic breast cancer who had become refractory to treatment with other hormones and whose disease was progressing, were treated with testosterone propionate, 250 mg once every two weeks, twice, and then once every four weeks until disease progression, drug toxicity, or death.RESULTS:Regression of disease was seen in 9 patients (17%; 2% complete and 15% partial). Stabilization of disease was seen in 22 patients (41.5%). In the remaining 22 patients (41,5%), the disease progressed. Median overall survival was 12 months from beginning of testosterone treatment. Hirsutism and dysphonia were noted occasionally, but were not distressing enough to mandate cessation of treatment. There was no major toxicity except for two non-fatal pulmonary emboli.CONCLUSION:Testosterone showed a significant therapeutic activity in previously hormone-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer who were no longer responding to such treatment and whose disease was progressing. These results warrant consideration of testosterone use as treatment for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and is the third most common cause of death from cancer. Sorafenib is the only drug which improves survival in first line advanced HCC. Sorafenib has been associated with several dermatologic toxicities and toxic effects have been related to a better treatment response. We report the case of a well-circumscribed panniculitis and necrotizing vasculitis due to sorafenib, appeared in disease progression in a man affected by advanced HCC.

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate sorafenib activity and safety in patients with metastatic thymic carcinoma (TC) and to correlate outcome with c-KIT and PDGFR-alpha mutational status. Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic thymic carcinoma treated with sorafenib after at least one prior line of chemotherapy were included. Objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity were evaluated. Analysis of c-KIT and PDGFR-alpha mutational status was performed retrospectively. Results: From October 2007 to August 2011, 5 patients with metastatic thymic carcinoma were evaluated. A median of 8 cycles of sorafenib (range=3-29) were administered. Two patients (40%) displayed a partial response (PR), two patients presented stable disease (SD), while one patient had progression. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 28 weeks and 92 weeks, respectively. At mutational analysis, only one patient with PR had c-KIT mutation in exon 17 and was successfully treated with sunitinib for 12 months after progression to sorafenib. No PDGFR-alpha mutations were found. Conclusion: Sorafenib activity seems independent from the c-KIT and PDGFR-alpha mutational status. After progression, sequence treatment with a different tyrosine kinase inhibitor can be considered. These results are promising and need further confirmation on larger, possibly prospective, series of patients.