BACKGROUND. Anatomic redundancy between phases can be used to achieve denoising of multiphase CT examinations. A limitation of iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques is that they generally require use of CT projection data. A frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm applies denoising to the multiphase CT images themselves. This method does not require knowledge of the acquisition process or integration into the reconstruction system of the scanner, and it can be implemented as a supplement to commercially available IR algorithms. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study is to compare radiologists' performance for low-contrast and high-contrast diagnostic tasks (i.e., tasks for which differences in CT attenuation between the imaging target and its anatomic background are subtle or large, respectively) evaluated on multiphase abdominal CT between routine-dose images and radiation dose-reduced images processed by a frequency-split multiband-filtration denoising algorithm. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 47 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for known or suspected liver metastases (a low-contrast task) and 45 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for pancreatic cancer staging (a high-contrast task). Radiation dose-reduced images corresponding to dose reduction of 50% or more were created using a validated noise insertion technique and then underwent denoising using the frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm. Images were independently evaluated in multiple sessions by different groups of abdominal radiologists for each task (three readers in the low-contrast arm and four readers in the high-contrast arm). The noninferiority of denoised radiation dose-reduced images to routine-dose images was assessed using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) figure-of-merit (FOM; limit of noninferiority, -0.10) for liver metastases detection and using the Cohen kappa statistic and reader confidence scores (100-point scale) for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion. RESULTS. For liver metastases detection, the JAFROC FOM for denoised radiation dose-reduced images was 0.644 (95% CI, 0.510-0.778), and that for routine-dose images was 0.668 (95% CI, 0.543-0.792; estimated difference, -0.024 [95% CI, -0.084 to 0.037]). Intraobserver agreement for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion was substantial to near perfect when the two image sets were compared (κ = 0.53-1.00); the 95% CIs of all differences in confidence scores between image sets contained zero. CONCLUSION. Multiphase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images with a radiation dose reduction of 50% or greater that undergo denoising by a frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm yield performance similar to that of routine-dose images for detection of liver metastases and vascular staging of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. The image-based denoising algorithm facilitates radiation dose reduction of multiphase examinations for both low- and high-contrast diagnostic tasks without requiring manufacturer-specific hardware or software.

Objective This study aims to determine if low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography performed after a fixed delay or test bolus acquisition demonstrates high concordance with clinical computed tomography angiography (using a routine amount of iodinated contrast) to display lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. Methods After informed consent, low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography examination (using either a fixed delay or test bolus) using 50 ml of iodine contrast media was performed. A subsequent clinical computed tomography angiography using standard iodine dose (115 or 145 ml) served as the reference standard. A vascular radiologist reviewed dynamic and clinical computed tomography angiography images to categorize the lumen into “not opacified”, “<50% stenosis”, “ 50 ̶70% stenosis”, “>70% stenosis”, and “occluded” for seven arterial segments in each lower extremity. Concordance between low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography and the routine iodine reference standard was calculated. The clinical utility of 4D volume-rendered images was also evaluated. Results Sixty-eight patients (average age 66.1 ± 12.3 years, male; female = 49: 19) were enrolled, with 34 patients each undergoing low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography using fixed delay and test bolus techniques, respectively. One patient assigned to the test bolus group did not undergo low iodine computed tomography angiography due to unavailable delayed time. The fixed delay was 13 s, with test bolus acquisition resulting in a mean variable delay prior to image acquisition of 19.5 s (range; 8–32 s). Run-off to the ankle was observed using low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography following fixed delay and test bolus acquisition in 76.4% (26/34) and 100% (33/33) of patients, respectively (p = 0.005). Considering extremities with run-off to the ankle and without severe artifact, the concordance rate between low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography and the routine iodine reference standard was 86.8% (310/357) using fixed delay and 97.9% (425/434) using test bolus (p < 0.001). 4D volume-rendered images using fixed delay and test bolus demonstrated asymmetric flow in 57.7% (15/26) and 58.1% (18/31) (p = 0.978) of patients, and collateral blood flow in 11.5% (3/26) and 22.6% (7/31) of patients (p = 0.319), respectively. Conclusion Low iodine dynamic computed tomography angiography with test bolus acquisition has a high concordance with routine peripheral computed tomography angiography performed with standard iodine dose, resulting in improved run-off to the ankle compared to dynamic computed tomography angiography performed after a fixed delay. This method is useful for minimizing iodine dose in patients at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy. 4D volume-rendered computed tomography angiography images provide useful dynamic information.

Prior iterative reconstruction (PIR) spatially registers CT image data from multiple phases of enhancement to reduce image noise. We evaluated PIR in contrast-enhanced multiphase liver CT. Patients with archived projection CT data with proven malignant or benign liver lesions, or without lesions, by reference criteria were included. Lower-dose PIR images were reconstructed using validated noise insertion from multiphase CT exams (50% dose in 2 phases, 25% dose in 1 phase). The phase of enhancement most relevant to the diagnostic task was selected for evaluation. Four radiologists reviewed routine-dose and lower-dose PIR images, circumscribing liver lesions and rating confidence for malignancy (0 to 100) and image quality. JAFROC Figures of Merit (FOM) were calculated. 31 patients had 60 liver lesions (28 primary hepatic malignancies, 6 hepatic metastases, 26 benign lesions). Pooled JAFROC FOM for malignancy for routine-dose CT was 0.615 (95% CI 0.464, 0.767) compared to 0.662 for PIR (95% CI 0.527, 0.797). The estimated FOM difference between the routine-dose and lower-dose PIR images was + 0.047 (95% CI − 0.023, + 0.116). Pooled sensitivity/specificity for routine-dose images was 70%/68% compared to 73%/66% for lower-dose PIR. Lower-dose PIR had lower diagnostic image quality (mean 3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.0009) and sharpness (mean 2.3 vs. 2.0, p = 0.0071). PIR is a promising method to reduce radiation dose for multiphase abdominal CT, preserving observer performance despite small reductions in image quality. Further work is warranted.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to determine whether image quality was maintained when a weight-based protocol incorporating tube potential selection was used to select lower iodine contrast volumes for aortic CT angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with potentially decreased renal function underwent CTA performed with the iodinated contrast volume determined using a table incorporating different tube potentials and patient weights. The image quality of CTA examinations performed with a reduced iodine volume (hereafter known as "low-iodine CTA examinations"), internal control CTA examinations (i.e., prior examinations), and size-matched control CTA examinations was evaluated in separate reading sessions conducted by three vascular radiologists who were blinded as to the contrast volume and tube potential used. Side-by-side unblinded comparison of the examinations was also performed. Aortic attenuation and the contrast-to-noise ratio were measured. Comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS Fifty low-iodine CTA examinations, 36 internal control CTA examinations, and 50 size-matched control CTA examinations were performed. Contrast volumes were 63% lower when the protocol based on tube potential and patient weight was used (mean contrast volume, 49 mL for low-iodine CTA vs 133 mL for internal control CTA and 138 mL for size-matched control CTA). The mean volume CT dose index was 15.1 mGy for low-iodine CTA versus 18.8 mGy for internal control CTA (p < 0.001), and 15.3 mGy for low-iodine CTA versus 17.1 mGy for size-matched control CTA (p = 0.11). Of the image quality and diagnostic confidence evaluations for low-iodine CTA examinations, over 97% had acceptable image quality and diagnostic confidence for blinded (50/50) and unblinded (35/36) comparisons. Aortic attenuation was similar between groups (p = 0.13-0.71). CONCLUSION A weight-based protocol that incorporates tube potential selection allows the use of substantially lower volumes of iodinated contrast material in aortic CTA while maintaining acceptable image quality.

The purpose of this study is to identify unique imaging findings of refractory celiac disease (RCD) including Type I RCD, Type II RCD versus healed celiac disease (CD).

Our purpose is to determine the impact of CT enterography on small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) detection and biologic aggressiveness, and to identify any imaging findings that correlate with biologic aggressiveness.