Bioequivalence testing of transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) has always been a subject of high concern for generic companies due to the formulation complexity and the fact that they are subtle to even minor manufacturing differences and hence should be clearly qualified in terms of quality, safety and efficacy. In recent times bioequivalence testing of transdermal patches has gained a global attention and many regulatory authorities worldwide have issued recommendations to set specific framework for demonstrating equivalence between two products. These current regulatory procedures demand a complete characterization of the generic formulation in terms of its physicochemical sameness, pharmacokinetics disposition, residual content and/or skin irritation/sensitization testing with respect to the reference formulation. This paper intends to highlight critical in vitro tests in assessing the therapeutic equivalence of products and also outlines their valuable applications in generic product success. Understanding these critical in vitro parameters can probably help to decode the complex bioequivalence outcomes, directing the generic companies to optimize the formulation design in reduced time intervals. It is difficult to summarize a common platform which covers all possible transdermal products; hence few case studies based on this approach has been presented in this review.

The topic of bioequivalence evaluation of nanoparticulate intravenous formulations is one that has been intensely debated in recent times since the release of the specific recommendations by many regulatory authorities worldwide. Product specific bioequivalence guidelines for many of the nanoparticulate systems where therapeutic molecules are directly coupled (human albumin bound paclitaxel nanosuspension), functionalized (iron- carbohydrate preparations) or entrapped/coated to a carrier (doxorubicin liposomal formulations), have been approved by the drug regulatory agencies. These current regulatory procedures include complete characterization of the generic formulation in terms of its physicochemical characteristics, pharmacokinetics disposition and/or non clinical testing with respect to the reference formulation. The concept of in vitro equivalency is emerging as a valuable tool in these guidances as generic product differing in in vitro parameters can result in a different biopharmaceutical profile with respect to pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. Furthermore, in case of systems with entrapped drug, classical pharmacokinetic parameters alone may only ensure the equivalent clearance of test and reference product from systemic circulation but may fail to detect the extent to which the nanoparticles are taken up by different target organs and, consequently, the safety and efficacy effects. Hence, additional tissue distribution study in preclinical study models has reflected in recent guidances. Understanding and interpretation of these regulatory requirements thus presents most critical component of a generic product development cycle. This article reviews these current regulatory procedures with special emphasis on in vitro population bioequivalence (POP BE) and preclinical testing of generic formulations.

Colon targeted dosage forms have been extensively studied for the localized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These dosage forms not only improve the therapeutic efficacy but also reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions and hence improve the patient compliance. However, complex and highly variable gastro intestinal physiology limits the clinical success of these dosage forms. Biopharmaceutical characteristics of these dosage forms play a key role in rapid formulation development and ensure the clinical success. The complexity in product development and clinical success of colon targeted dosage forms are based on the biopharmaceutical characteristics such as physicochemical properties of drug substances, pharmaceutical characteristics of dosage form, physiological conditions and pharmacokinetic properties of drug substances as well as drug products. Various in vitro and in vivo techniques have been employed in past to characterize the biopharmaceutical properties of colon targeted dosage forms. This review focuses on the factors influencing the biopharmaceutical performances of the dosage forms, in vitro characterization techniques and in vivo studies.