ABSTRACT:Androgens play an important role in prostate cancer development and progression. Androgen action is mediated through the androgen receptor (AR), a ligand-dependent DNA-binding transcription factor. AR is arguably the most important target for prostate cancer treatment. Current USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AR inhibitors target the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and have exhibited efficacy in prostate cancer patients, particularly when used in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. Unfortunately, patients treated with the currently approved AR-targeting agents develop resistance and relapse with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The major mechanism leading to CRPC involves reactivation of AR signaling mainly through AR gene amplification, mutation, and/or splice variants. To effectively inhibit the reactivated AR signaling, new approaches to target AR are being actively explored. These new approaches include novel small molecule inhibitors targeting various domains of AR and agents that can degrade AR. The present review provides a summary of the existing FDA-approved AR antagonists and the current development of some of the AR targeting agents.
Supplementary Figure from (+)-JJ-74–138 is a Novel Noncompetitive Androgen Receptor Antagonist
The androgen receptor (AR) is a key regulator of the growth and proliferation of prostate cancer. The majority of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) growth is still dependent on AR activity. The AR need to be in the nucleus to exert its biological action as a transcription factor. As such, defining the mechanisms that regulate the subcellular localization of AR are important. Previously it was believed that AR was imported into the nucleus in a ligand-dependent manner and subsequently exported out of the nucleus upon ligand withdrawal. Recent evidence has challenged this decades-old paradigm and showed that the AR is degraded, not exported, in the nucleus. This review discusses the current understanding of how AR nucleocytoplasmic localization is regulated by import and through nuclear degradation.
The androgen receptor (AR) remains to be a key target for the treatment of prostate cancer, including the majority of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). AR is stabilized in CRPC and the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a major role in AR degradation. Targeting AR for degradation provides a potential approach to overcome the resistance of CRPC to current AR antagonists, including the next generation AR signaling inhibitors. Different types of AR degraders have been developed, including the proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), selective AR degraders (SARDs), and novel AR degraders, with several AR PROTACs currently in clinical trials. The present mini-review discusses the regulation of AR degradation by the UPS, the potential role of a novel nuclear degradation signal in AR, and different types of AR degraders.
AbstractIdentification of novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonists may lead to urgently needed new treatments for patients with prostate cancer resistant to current AR antagonists. AR is presently the main target for treating prostate cancer. Clinically approved AR antagonists compete with dihydrotestosterone (DHT) for binding to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of AR, and patients eventually develop resistance to these treatments. One approach to overcoming resistance is to discover compounds that inhibit AR in alternative ways. Our lab previously identified a small molecule, JJ-450, that is capable of inhibiting AR lacking LBD. To optimize the efficacy of this class of inhibitors, we developed structural analogues of JJ-450 and identified (+)-JJ-74–138 as a promising candidate. Here, we show that (+)-JJ-74–138 is more potent than JJ-450 in the inhibition of androgen-independent AR activity in enzalutamide-resistant LN95 cells. Further studies showed (+)-JJ-74–138 inhibition of castration-resistant PSA expression in all tested castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells. (+)-JJ-74–138 inhibited mRNA expression of AR and ARv7 target genes and reduced AR level in the nucleus in the absence of androgens. Also, this analogue noncompetitively inhibited androgen-stimulated AR activity in C4–2, LN95, and 22Rv1 CRPC cells. At low dosages, (+)-JJ-74–138 inhibited the proliferation of enzalutamide-resistant AR-positive LN95 and 22Rv1 cells, but not AR-negative PC3 and DU145 cells. A surface plasmon resonance assay detected (+)-JJ-74–138 binding to AR and a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay indicated (+)-JJ-74–138 inhibited AR binding to androgen response elements. In addition, (+)-JJ-74–138 inhibited 22Rv1 xenograft tumor growth. Our observations suggest that (+)-JJ-74–138 is a novel noncompetitive AR antagonist capable of inhibiting enzalutamide-resistant CRPC.
This mini-review covers the classical model of androgen receptor (AR) nucleocytoplasmic trafficking and provides an overview of new data that updates the existing paradigm. The classical model of androgen receptor trafficking involves AR translocating to the nucleus in the presence of androgens and subsequently being exported back to the cytoplasm following the withdrawal of androgens. New data challenges and updates the fate of nuclear AR. In the updated model, the AR can be imported into the nucleus in the absence of androgens and nuclear AR is degraded, not exported. Further, androgens can enhance AR nuclear import and inhibit AR degradation in the nucleus; androgen withdrawal causes nuclear AR degradation, but not export. Enhanced androgen-independent AR nuclear localization and AR nuclear stability may be a hallmark of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Further characterization of AR trafficking may aid in the development of new therapies for patients with CRPC.
Nuclear localization of the androgen receptor (AR) is necessary for its activation as a transcription factor. Defining the mechanisms regulating AR nuclear localization in androgen-sensitive cells and how these mechanisms are dysregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells is fundamentally important and clinically relevant. According to the classical model of AR intracellular trafficking, androgens induce AR nuclear import and androgen withdrawal causes AR nuclear export. The present study has led to an updated model that AR could be imported in the absence of androgens, ubiquitinated, and degraded in the nucleus. Androgen withdrawal caused nuclear AR degradation, but not export. In comparison with their parental androgen-sensitive LNCaP prostate cancer cells, castration-resistant C4-2 cells exhibited reduced nuclear AR polyubiquitination and increased nuclear AR level. We previously identified 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-a] imidazole (CPPI) in a high-throughput screen for its inhibition of androgen-independent AR nuclear localization in CRPC cells. The current study shows that CPPI is a competitive AR antagonist capable of enhancing AR interaction with its E3 ligase MDM2 and degradation of AR in the nuclei of CRPC cells. Also, CPPI blocked androgen-independent AR nuclear import. Overall, these findings suggest the feasibility of targeting androgen-independent AR nuclear import and stabilization, two necessary steps leading to AR nuclear localization and activation in CRPC cells, with small molecule inhibitors.