Abstract This case shows the use of ultrasound guidance to optimize non-invasive mechanical ventilation for a 62-year-old patient with a complex medical history. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was used to assess diaphragmatic function and hemodynamics, leading to adjustments in ventilator setting. The approach improved gas exchange, resolved respiratory acidosis, and enhanced hemodynamics, providing a promising strategy for ventilator management in complex clinical cases. Keywords: Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, Point-of-Care Ultrasound, Diaphragmatic Ultrasound, Focused Echocardiography, Ventilator-Induced Diaphragmatic Dysfunction, Hemodynamics.

Background and Objective The optimal management of unclassifiable Interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to describe pulmonary function trajectories for patients treated with immunomodulatory therapy and for untreated patients. Methods Clinical information and treatment data were obtained retrospectively at two ILD centres. Pulmonary function data were analysed using (1) mixed effects linear regression models with and without clinical covariates and (2) propensity score matching using gender, age, physiology (GAP) stage, smoking and presence of ground glass opacities. Results Sixty-five percent of the 249 patients included received corticosteroids and/or other immunomodulators. Treated patients had lower forced vital capacity (FVC) (72% vs. 83% predicted) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) (44% vs. 60% predicted). In mixed effects linear regression, the adjusted change in FVC was -0.22%, [-0.34; -0.11], and -0.15% [-0.28;-0.012] for DLco. The difference in pulmonary function decline between treated and untreated patients was insignificant, -0.082% per month, [-0.28; 0.11], p = 0.10 for FVC and -0.14% per month, [-0.36; 0.079], p = 0.15, for DLco. In propensity score matched analysis, the difference in change in FVC was 0.039% per month, p = 0.12, and for DLco, 0.0085% per month, p = 0.7. Conclusion The pulmonary function trajectories for treated and untreated patients were parallel, despite treated patients having more severe disease at baseline. The persisting differences between the groups suggest no overall effect, although improvement or stabilization may be seen in some patients. Prospective studies are needed to define subsets of patients with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease and their optimal management.

Comorbidities significantly influence the clinical course of progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). However, the prevalence and their prognostic impact is not yet fully understood. The identification and treatment of comorbidities may have a clinically significant impact on overall outcome for patients with ILDs. This chapter will focus on the current status of research on comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), since this is to date the most analyzed of the progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

OBJECTIVES:The classification interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) includes patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with autoimmune characteristics insufficient to reach classification criteria for a specific autoimmune disease (SAD). These criteria are divided into three domains: clinical, serological and morphological. The latter domain does not include the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, which is deemed not to be significantly associated with SAD. Therefore, the enrolment of these patients is more difficult, requiring at least one item from both of the other domains. The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate of progression towards SAD of a cohort of UIP patients satisfying only one IPAF domain (we called this group "UIPAF") compared with classic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).METHODS:We prospectively enrolled IPF patients with radiologic and/or histologic UIP pattern, followed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists from January 2017 to January 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.RESULTS:We enrolled 190 IPF patients, 38 (20%) of whom were classified as UIPAF. IPF and UIPAF patients were similar for general characteristics, severity and prognosis, at presentation and at annual check-up. However, 28.9% of UIPAF patients progressed towards SAD, compared with 2% of IPF patients (χ2=30.4, p≤0.0001).CONCLUSIONS:The association between a single clinical or serological domain of IPAF and UIP pattern is predictive for the development of a SAD if compared with isolated UIP. ILD can be the first manifestation of SAD, even with a UIP pattern, therefore, the morphological domain of IPAF criteria could be removed.

In this study, it was found that myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) improved the recognition of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The objective of this study is to propose a clinical method to evaluate myalgia in respiratory settings as a possible tool for the recognition of MSA/MAA positivity in ILD patients. We prospectively enrolled 167 ILD patients with suspected myositis, of which 63 had myalgia evoked at specific points (M+ILD+). We also enrolled in a 174 patients with only myalgia (M+ILD-) in a rheumatological setting. The patients were assessed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists and were tested for autoantibodies. M+ILD+ patients were positive for at least one MAA/MSA in 68.3% of cases, as were M-ILD+ patients in 48.1% of cases and M+ILD- patients in 17.2% of cases (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). A diagnosis of IIM was made in 39.7% of M+ILD+ patients and in 23.1% of the M-ILD+ group (p = 0.02). Myalgia was significantly associated with positivity for MSA/MAAs in ILD patients (p = 0.01, X-2: 6.47). In conclusion, myalgia in ILD patients with suspected myositis is associated with MSA/MAA positivity, and could support a diagnosis of IIM. A significant proportion of M+ILD- patients also had MSA/MAA positivity, a phenomenon warranting further study to evaluate its clinical meaning.

Background Comorbidities are common in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) and have an important association with survival, but the frequency and prognostic impact of comorbidities in unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (uILD) remains elusive. We aimed to describe the prevalence of comorbidities and assess the impact on survival in patients with uILD. Furthermore, we aimed to identify and characterize potential phenotypes based on clusters of comorbidities and examine their association with disease progression and survival. Methods Incident patients diagnosed with uILD were identified at two ILD referral centers in Denmark and Germany from 2003 to 2018. The diagnosis uILD was based on multidisciplinary team meetings. Clinical characteristics and comorbidities were extracted from ILD registries and patient case files. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression analyses, disease progression was analyzed by linear mixed effects models, and clusters of comorbidities were analyzed using self-organizing maps. Results A total of 249 patients with uILD were identified. The cohort was dominated by males (60%), former (49%) or current (15%) smokers, median age was 70 years, mean FVC was 75.9% predicted, and mean DLCO was 49.9% predicted. One-year survival was 89% and three-year survival was 73%. Eighty-five percent of the patients had ≥ 1 comorbidities, 33% had ≥ 3 comorbidities and 9% had ≥ 5 comorbidities. The only comorbidity associated with excess mortality was dyslipidemia. No association between survival and number of comorbidities or the Charlson comorbidity index was observed. Three clusters with different comorbidities profiles and clinical characteristics were identified. A significant annual decline in FVC and DLCO % predicted was observed in cluster 1 and 2, but not in cluster 3. No difference in mortality was observed between the clusters. Conclusions The comorbidity burden in uILD is lower than reported in other types of ILD and the impact of comorbidities on mortality needs further clarification. Three clusters with distinct comorbidity profiles were identified and could represent specific phenotypes. No difference in mortality was observed between clusters, but slower disease progression was observed in cluster 3. Better understanding of disease behavior and mortality will require further studies of subgroups of uILD with longer observation time.

Background: Almost one-third of fibrosing ILD (fILDs) have a clinical disease behavior similar to IPF, demonstrating a progressive phenotype (PF-ILD). However, there are no globally accepted criteria on the definition of a progressive phenotype in non-IPF fILD yet. Four different definitions have been used; however, no internationally accepted definition currently exists. Research Question: To compare the clinical and functional characteristics of progressive fILD according to the currently available definitions. Study design and methods: Cases of fILD were identified retrospectively from the database of the tertiary referral center for ILD in Heidelberg. Lung function, clinical signs of progression, and radiological changes were evaluated. Patients with fILD were considered to have progression according to each of the four available definitions: Cottin (CO), RELIEF (RE), INBUILD (IN), and UILD study. Lung function changes, expressed as mean absolute decline of FVC%, were reported every 3 months following diagnosis and analyzed in the context of each definition. Survival was also analyzed. Results: A total of 566 patients with non-IPF fILD were included in the analysis. Applying CO-, RE-, IN-, and UILD-definitions, 232 (41%), 183 (32%), 274 (48%), and 174 (31%) patients were defined as PF-ILD, respectively. RE- and UILD-criteria were the most stringent, with only 32 and 31% patients defined as progressive, while IN- was the most broad, with almost 50% of patients defined as progressive. CO- definition was in-between, classifying 41% as progressive. PF ILD patients with a UILD definition had worse prognosis. Interpretation: Depending on the definition used, the existing criteria identify different groups of patients with progressive fILD, and this may have important prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Timely and accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is challenging, requiring specific tests including chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and limited by access to specialist centres with a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Here we describe PerFECT 2.0, an Italian web-based platform designed to create a network between tertiary centres with an MDT (hubs) and secondary centres (spokes), aiming to facilitate the diagnosis of IPF. PerFECT 2.0 went live on 1 November 2016. Spoke centres submit anonymised documentation (HRCT images, pathological samples, clinical data) for a second opinion on the potential diagnosis of IPF from a hub centre. HRCT images are quickly uploaded, with patient-identifying information automatically removed. The hub centre views documentation online (no downloads allowed), makes any further information requests, then returns their second opinion as free text. An e-learning area contains educational material and simulated training clinical cases. Metrics were collected for 2017–2019; a user survey was conducted from 30 June–31 July 2020. Ten hub centres and 137 spoke centres have registered. The requests for a second opinion numbered 251 in 2017, 270 in 2018 and 265 in 2019 (overall mean 19.9 requests per month). The proportion of requests answered was 100.0% (251) in 2017, 100.0% (270) in 2018 and 97.7% (259) in 2019. The mean response time was 15.7 days. In the user survey, of nine hub responders and 19 spoke responders, 78% and 74%, respectively, reported that the platform is easy to use, and 100% and 89%, respectively, would recommend the platform to colleagues. The PerFECT 2.0 web-based platform has created a network that enables secondary centres to gain quick and easy access to a second opinion from a tertiary centre with an MDT through online evaluation of anonymised documentation, thereby facilitating and supporting the timely and accurate diagnosis of IPF.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), tools to assess patient self-report of health status, are now increasingly used in research, care and policymaking. While there are two well-developed disease-specific PROMs for interstitial lung diseases (ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), many unmet and urgent needs remain. In December 2019, 64 international ILD experts convened in Erice, Italy to deliberate on many topics, including PROMs in ILD. This review summarises the history of PROMs in ILD, shortcomings of the existing tools, challenges of development, validation and implementation of their use in clinical trials, and the discussion held during the meeting. Development of disease-specific PROMs for ILD including IPF with robust methodology and validation in concordance with guidance from regulatory authorities have increased user confidence in PROMs. Minimal clinically important difference for bidirectional changes may need to be developed. Cross-cultural validation and linguistic adaptations are necessary in addition to robust psychometric properties for effective PROM use in multinational clinical trials. PROM burden of use should be reduced through appropriate use of digital technologies and computerised adaptive testing. Active patient engagement in all stages from development, testing, choosing and implementation of PROMs can help improve probability of success and further growth.

This study aims to assess the peripheral blood cell count “signature” of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to discriminate promptly between COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We designed a retrospective case-control study, enrolling 525 patients (283 COVID-19 and 242 with CAP). All patients had a fever and at least one of the following signs: cough, chest pain, or dyspnea. We excluded patients treated with immunosuppressants, steroids, or affected by diseases known to modify blood cell count. COVID-19 patients showed a significant reduction in white blood cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils) and platelets. We studied these parameters univariately, combined the significant ones in a multivariate model (AUROC 0.86, Nagelkerke PSEUDO-R2 0.5, Hosmer–Lemeshow p-value 0.9) and examined its discriminative performance in an internally-randomized validation cohort (AUROC 0.84). The cut-off selected according to Youden’s Index (−0.13) showed a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 72% in the training cohort, and a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 73% in the validation cohort. In addition, we determined the probability of having COVID-19 pneumonia for each Model for possible Early COvid-19 Recognition (MECOR) Score value. In conclusion, our model could provide a simple, rapid, and cheap tool for prompt COVID-19 diagnostic triage in patients with CAP. The actual effectiveness should be evaluated in further, prospective studies also involving COVID-19 patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs.

Background: Acute exacerbations (AE) of ILD are associated with a detrimental outcome. Data suggest an association of AE-ILD with a stimulation of the immune system. We therefore assessed a potential role of IgG4 as a predictive biomarker for AE-ILD. Methods: The database of our tertiary referral center for ILD was reviewed for IPF and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) patients (pts) with available data on IgG4. Clinical, and radiological data were retrospectively analyzed. Through ROC analysis a threshold value of IgG4=1.25 g/L was used as the best cut-off point to graph Kaplan-Meier curves for time to first AE. Results: 170 IPF and 172 cHP pts were identified with a mean age of 71.7 years and 66.7 years; FVC 77.4% and 71.1%; DLCO 44.3% and 46.6%. Mean IgG4 values were: 1.00 and 0.95 g/L, and 25.8% of IPF and 18.5% of cHP demonstrated IgG4≥1.25 g/L. Median time to first AE was 366 days in IPF (20.1% of pts, annual incidence 6.7%) and 303 days in cHP(15% of pts,8.6% annual incidence). IPF pts with IgG4≥1.25 g/L had a significant shorter time to first AE (p=0.002), which was similar in cHP patients by trend (p=0.058)(figure). Conclusions: IgG4 may serve as a predictive biomarker for the risk of AE in IPF and cHP. We also suppose that the analysis of biopsy material for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates may be useful to differentiate pts at major risk of AE. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results in large cohorts.

Background: Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases other than IPF can develop a progressive phenotype (PF-ILD). While recent clinical trials have gained significant insights into management aspects for PF-ILD, different definitions were applied. We therefore aimed to compare patient cohorts according to these definitions and associated outcomes Methods: 587 fILDs with a follow up > 24 months were identified at our tertiary ILD referral Center. Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed retrospectively and categorized as PF-ILD according to INBUILD (IN), RELIEF (RE) and Cottin (CO; ERR 2018). Results: Patients had HP (39%), iNSIP (13%), uILD (22%), CTD-ILD (24%), and others (1%). 53.4% were male, mean age 65±11.8 years, mean FVC% 72.8±2, mean DLCO% 47.3±1. The percentage of PF-ILD differed according to the 3 criteria (CO, RE, IN) (41%, 32%, 48%, fig). Acute exacerbations occurred more frequently in PF-ILD (25.6%, 23.9%, 24.9%) than in non PF-ILD (p<0.01). Hospitalizations were frequent with 36%, 28%, 38.7% and death occurred in 18.4%, 17%, 17% of PF-ILD. CO and IN criteria identified PF-ILD with similar lung function decline over >12 months while RELIEF identified a worse cohort. Conclusions: This study reveals that the categorization as PF-ILD differs between definitions which has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and international accepted criteria for PF-ILD have to be defined.

The approvals of nintedanib and pirfenidone changed the treatment paradigm in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and increased our understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms. Nonetheless, many challenges and unmet needs remain in the management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. This review describes how the nintedanib clinical programme has helped to address some of these challenges. Data from this programme have informed changes to the IPF diagnostic guidelines, the timing of treatment initiation, and the assessment of disease progression. The use of nintedanib to treat patients with advanced lung function impairment, concomitant emphysema, patients awaiting lung transplantation and patients with IPF and lung cancer is discussed. The long-term use of nintedanib and an up-to-date summary of nintedanib in clinical practice are discussed. Directions for future research, namely emerging therapeutic options, precision medicine and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, are described. Further developments in these areas should continue to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction: Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) patients (pts) with insufficient characteristics to reach criteria for Specific Autoimmune Disease (SAD) are classified as Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF). These criteria do not include Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) pattern in the morphological domain. We recently demonstrated a similar rate of progression to SAD between IPAF and a cohort of UIP-ILD in which only one of the other two domains (clinical/serological) was satisfied. We named this group “UIPAF” (Sambataro G. et al, Chest 2020). Aim: to analyze the clinical presentation and evolution of a cohort of UIPAF compared to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). Methods: our ILD database was retrospectively reviewed for UIPAF and IPF pts. All pts between Jan-2017 and Jan-2019 were evaluated by rheumatologists and pulmonologists. A follow-up time of 1-year was required. Pts with SAD or IPAF were excluded. Results: 22 UIPAF and 78 IPF pts were studied. No differences were found in lung function, progression and mortality (table). Five UIPAF pts developed SAD within 1-year:2 Rheumatoid Arthritis, 1 Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, 1 Polymyositis and 1 Systemic Sclerosis; no one within IPF pts (p=0.0001). Conclusions: UIPAF and IPF pts look indistinguishable for clinical presentation and outcome even if UIPAF have a higher probability to become a SAD. Progression of UIPAF is similar to “classic” IPAF, therefore the presence of a “morphological domain” in IPAF criteria need to be discussed.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate histogram-based quantitative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) indexes in the assessment of lung cancer (LC) development in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients. Materials and Methods: From IPF databases of 2 national respiratory centers, we retrospectively studied patients with and without LC development-respectively, divided into Group A (n=16) and Group B (n=33). The extent of fibrotic disease was quantified on baseline and follow-up HRCT examinations using kurtosis, skewness, percentage of high attenuation area (HAA%), and percentage of fibrotic area (FA%). These indexes were compared between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. In the prediction of LC development, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess threshold values of HRCT indexes. Results: At baseline, no difference was reported among groups for kurtosis, skewness, HAA%, and FA%, with P-values of 0.0881, 0.0606, 0.0578, and 0.0606, respectively. On follow-up, significant differences were reported, with P-values of 0.0174 for kurtosis, 0.0313 for skewness, 0.0297 for HAA%, and 0.0407 for FA%. On baseline HRCT, in the prediction of LC development, receiver operating characteristic analysis reported sensibility and specificity of 87.5% and 45.45% for kurtosis, 68.75% and 63.64% for skewness, 81.25% and 54.55% for FA%, and 75% and 60.61% for HAA%. Conclusions: LC development is associated with progression of fibrosis; at baseline, FA% and HAA% reported more convenient sensitivity/specificity ratios in the prediction of LC development.

This article discusses a selection of the scientific presentations in the field of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) that took place at the 2019 European Respiratory Society International Congress in Madrid, Spain. There were sessions from all four groups within Assembly 12: group 12.01 "Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias", group 12.02 "ILDs/diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs) of known origin", group 12.03 "Sarcoidosis and other granulomatous ILDs/DPLDs" and group 12.04 "Rare ILDs/DPLDs". The presented studies brought cutting-edge developments on several aspects of these conditions, including pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. As many of the ILDs are individually rare, the sharing of experiences and new data that occur during the Congress are very important for physicians interested in ILDs and ILD patients alike.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and devastating disease of unknown etiology, characterized by irreversible morphological changes, ultimately leading to lung fibrosis and death. In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in understanding the pathogenesis of IPF. Moreover, we assisted to the conceptual change of the pathogenic hypothesis that currently considers IPF as a primarily fibrotic driven disease. However, despite the undeniable progress, the diagnosis of IPF remains still very complex requiring the presence of a team of experts to achieve the highest level of diagnostic confidence. The advent of antifibrotics has radically changed the treatment landscape of IPF and new promising drugs are currently under evaluation. Furthermore, a more extensive use of non-pharmacological treatments has also to be encouraged in all patients both to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life.

To evaluate the radiological findings in patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) before steroid treatment and their behavior after therapy, we retrospectively evaluated a total of 22 patients with a diagnosis of COP made by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), biopsy or clinical/radiological features, and the patients were followed between 2014 and 2018 at the hospital; the demographic data, symptoms, radiologic findings, diagnostic methods and treatment plans of patients were collected from patients' hospital records. At least two CT scans of 22 patients (16 female and six men) were evaluated, the first one before starting steroid therapy and the others after therapy. At baseline CT scans, the most common radiological finding was the presence of consolidations (18/22 patients, 81.8%); ground-glass opacities were also very common (15/25, 68.1%). The other findings were as follows: nodules and masses (5/22, 22.7%), atoll sign (4/22, 18.1%), perilobular pattern (3/22, 13.6%) and parenchymal bands (3/22, 13.6%). Two patients had a significant relapse after reducing/interrupting therapy, while three had a complete resolution and are not currently under therapy (maintenance of clinical remission with no oral corticosteroid (OCS)). In High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans after therapy, consolidations were still observable in seven patients (five in new areas of the lung-migratory infiltrates), while most of them disappeared, leaving a residual area of ground glass opacity in two patients. One patient had a residual of the perilobular pattern, with the disappearing of the other findings (consolidations and ground-glass opacities). Two patients developed a fibrosing pattern despite the therapy (9.5%). Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia tends to respond to oral corticosteroid treatment, but some patients may have a null or partial response. We highlight the behavior of this disease after proper therapy.