Rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) have been reported after AZD1222. Anti-platelet factor-4 (PF4) antibodies were observed in patients following presentation of TTS, however it is unclear if AZD1222 was responsible for inducing production of anti-PF4. Paired samples (baseline and day-15) from a phase 3 trial of AZD1222 vs placebo were analyzed for anti-PF4 levels; 19/1727 (1.1%, AZD1222) vs 7/857 (0.8%, placebo) participants were anti-PF4-IgG-negative at baseline but had moderate Day-15 levels ( P = 0.676) and 0/35 and 1/20 (5.0%) had moderate levels at baseline but high Day-15 levels. These data indicate that AZD1222 does not induce a clinically relevant general increase in anti-PF4 IgG.

Background and Purpose:In patients with acute mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, the THALES trial (Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated With Ticagrelor and Aspirin for Prevention of Stroke and Death) demonstrated that when added to aspirin, ticagrelor reduced stroke or death but increased risk of severe hemorrhage compared with placebo. The primary efficacy outcome of THALES included hemorrhagic stroke and death, events also counted in the primary safety outcome. We sought to disentangle risk and benefit, assess their relative impact, and attempt to identify subgroups with disproportionate risk or benefit.Methods:In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of patients with mild-to-moderate acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, patients were randomized within 24 hours after symptom onset to a 30-day regimen of either ticagrelor plus aspirin or matching placebo plus aspirin. For the present analyses, we defined the efficacy outcome, major ischemic events, as the composite of ischemic stroke or nonhemorrhagic death, and defined the safety outcome, major hemorrhage, as intracranial hemorrhage or hemorrhagic death. Net clinical impact was defined as the combination of these 2 end points.Results:In 11 016 patients (5523 ticagrelor-aspirin and 5493 aspirin), a major ischemic event occurred in 294 patients (5.3%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 359 patients (6.5%) in the aspirin group (absolute risk reduction 1.19% [95% CI, 0.31%–2.07%]). Major hemorrhage occurred in 22 patients (0.4%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 6 patients (0.1%) in the aspirin group (absolute risk increase 0.29% [95% CI, 0.10%–0.48%]). Net clinical impact favored ticagrelor-aspirin (absolute risk reduction 0.97% [95% CI, 0.08%–1.87%]). Findings were similar when different thresholds for disability were applied and over a range of predefined subgroups.Conclusions:In patients with mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, ischemic benefits of 30-day treatment with ticagrelor-aspirin outweigh risks of hemorrhage.Registration:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03354429.

Introduction: In the THALES trial, ticagrelor and aspirin was superior to aspirin alone in reducing the primary endpoint of stroke or death, and subsequent disabling strokes, but increased risk of bleeding, as expected for dual antiplatelet therapy. Aim: Present the bleeding profile of ticagrelor in combination with aspirin in patients with acute cerebrovascular events. Methods: The THALES trial randomized patients with non-cardioembolic, non-severe ischemic stroke (NIHSS≤5) or high-risk TIA to ticagrelor (180mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 90mg twice daily until day 30) or placebo within 24h of symptom onset in 28 countries. All patients received aspirin 300-325mg on day 1 followed by 75-100mg daily until day 30. Primary safety endpoint was time to severe bleeding, defined by GUSTO criteria, within 30 days. Analyses were by intention to treat. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03354429). Results: Among 11016 patients randomized, 28 (0.5%) in the ticagrelor+aspirin group (T+A) and 7 (0.1%) in the aspirin group (A) had a severe bleeding event; HR 3.99 (1.74-9.14); p=0.001. Among these, 22 (0.4%) (T+A) vs 6 (0.1%) (A) were fatal or intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) and 6 (0.1%) (T+A) vs 1 (<0.1%) (A) non-fatal events with hemodynamic compromise. ICHs included 10 (0.2%) (T+A) vs 2 (<0.1%) (A) hemorrhagic strokes and 4 (0.1%) (T+A) vs 2 (<0.1%) (A) symptomatic haemorrhagic transformations of ischemic stroke and other ICHs. Most severe bleeding events were spontaneous; 1 (T+A) and 2 (A) were traumatic and 1 in each treatment group were procedural. No predefined subgroup was associated with severe bleeding risk though analyses were limited by a small number of events. Moderate/severe bleeding events occurred in 36 (0.7%) (T+A) vs 11 (0.2%) (A) patients. Bleeding leading to discontinuation occurred in 152 (2.8%) (T+A) vs 32 (0.6%) (A) patients. Conclusion: While the rate of severe bleeding in the patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA was low, patients randomized to receive ticagrelor more often experienced severe bleeding events. No subgroup with different bleeding risk could be identified. Given the high risk of disability following a subsequent stroke, the benefit of adding ticagrelor to aspirin in reducing subsequent stroke appears to outweigh the risk of bleeding.

Purpose Ticagrelor and dapagliflozin can suppress the activation of the NOD-like receptor 3 (NLRP3)-inflammasome and activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). The anti-inflammatory effects of dapagliflozin has been shown to depend on AMPK activation. Dapagliflozin and ticagrelor have been shown to have additive effects on the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy in BTBR ob/ob mice with type-2 diabetes. We assessed whether dapagliflozin and ticagrelor have additive effects on the activation of the NLRP3-inflammasome and the progression of diabetic nephropathy in mice with type-2 diabetes. Methods Eight-week-old BTBR received either no-drug, dapagliflozin (1.5 mg/kg/d), ticagrelor (100 mg/kg/d), or their combination for 12 weeks. Blood was assessed weekly for glucose and urine for glucose and albumin. After 12 weeks, blood creatinine, cystatin C, inflammasome activation, and insulin were assessed by ELISA. Renal cortex samples were assessed by hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff staining. RT-PCR and immunoblotting were used to evaluate fibrosis and the activation of Akt, AMPK and the inflammasome. Results Both ticagrelor and dapagliflozin reduced serum creatinine and cystatin C levels and urinary albumin. Both drugs attenuated the increase in glomerular area and mesangial matrix index. Both drugs decreased collagen-1 and collagen-3 expression and the activation of the NLRP3-inflammasome. Both drugs increased P-AMPK levels, but only dapagliflozin increased P-Akt levels. Overall, the protective effects of dapagliflozin and ticagrelor were additive. Conclusions Dapagliflozin and ticagrelor attenuated the progression of diabetic nephropathy in BTBR ob/ob mice with additive effects of the combination. This was associated with AMPK activation and reduced activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, whereas only dapagliflozin increased Akt activation.

Ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, and dapagliflozin, a sodium–glucose-cotransporter-2 inhibitor, suppress the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. The anti-inflammatory effects of dapagliflozin depend on AMPK activation. Also, ticagrelor can activate AMPK. We assessed whether dapagliflozin and ticagrelor have additive effects in attenuating the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy in T2DM mice. Eight-week-old BTBR and wild-type mice received no drug, dapagliflozin (1.5 mg/kg/day), ticagrelor (100 mg/kg/day), or their combination for 12 weeks. Heart function was evaluated by echocardiography and heart tissue samples were assessed for fibrosis, apoptosis, qRT-PCR, and immunoblotting. Both drugs attenuated the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy as evident by improvements in left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction, which were further improved by the combination. Both drugs attenuated the activation of the NOD-like receptor 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and fibrosis. The effect of the combination was significantly greater than each drug alone on myocardial tissue necrotic factorα (TNFα) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, suggesting additive effects. The combination had also a greater effect on ASC, collagen-1, and collagen-3 mRNA levels than each drug alone. While both drugs activated adenosine mono-phosphate kinase (AMPK), only dapagliflozin activated mTOR and increased RICTOR levels. Moreover, only dapagliflozin decreased myocardial BNP and Caspase-1 mRNA levels, and the effects of dapagliflozin on NLRP3 and collagen-3 mRNA levels were significantly greater than those of ticagrelor. Both dapagliflozin and ticagrelor attenuated the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy, the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, and fibrosis in BTBR mice with additive effects of the combination. While both dapagliflozin and ticagrelor activated AMPK, only dapagliflozin activated mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) in hearts of BTBR mice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:We assessed the effects of ticagrelor, aspirin and prasugrel, started 7days after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury on remodeling, inflammation and fibrosis in the rat. We examined whether ticagrelor can affect the number of progenitor cells in the border zone. Ticagrelor, started 24h after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, attenuates the decrease in heart function and adverse remodeling, an effect which is blocked by aspirin.METHODS:Rats underwent 40min ischemia followed by reperfusion. Oral dosing with vehicle, ticagrelor (300mg/kg/d), aspirin (20mg/kg/d), their combination or prasugrel (15mg/kg/d) started 7days after infarction. Echocardiography was used to assess systolic function. Heart tissue were analyzed by rt-PCR, immunoblotting, ELISA and immunohistochemistry 2weeks after infarction.RESULTS:Both ticagrelor and aspirin attenuated the decrease in systolic function and remodeling, an effect that was blocked by their combination. Ticagrelor and aspirin attenuated the increase in ANP, BNP, collagen-I and collagen-III. Again, the effect was blocked by their combination. Ticagrelor increased c-Kit, Sca-1, Ki-67, CD34, attenuated the decrease in CD105 mRNA levels, and attenuated the increase in CD31, whereas aspirin increased Ki-67, suppressed the increase in CD31 and attenuated the decrease in CD105 mRNA levels. Prasugrel did not display any effects.CONCLUSION:Ticagrelor attenuated adverse remodeling and deterioration of left ventricular systolic function despite starting treatment after the myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury is completed. Aspirin had similar effects; however, when combined with ticagrelor, the protective effects were significantly attenuated. Ticagrelor increased the levels of several markers of stem cells and regeneration, suggesting cardiac healing by recruiting regenerative cells into the infarct.

Accurate determination of in vivo circulating concentrations of extracellular adenosine in blood samples is challenging due to the rapid formation and rapid clearance of adenosine in blood. A blood collection protocol was developed based on direct sampling of venous blood into, and instant mixing with, a STOP solution developed to conserve in vivo adenosine concentrations by completely preventing both its formation and clearance in collected blood. Stable isotope labeled AMP and adenosine spiked into blood ex vivo were used in combination with mass spectrometry to evaluate conservation of adenosine and prevention of its formation. A number of approved drugs, including the P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor, have been described to increase extracellular adenosine. This may contribute to its clinical profile, highlighting the importance of accurate measurement of in vivo adenosine concentrations.A high sensitive ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem- mass spectrometry (UPLC-tandem-MS) analytical method for plasma adenosine was developed and validated with a lower limit of quantification of 2 nmol/L. The method demonstrated plasma adenosine stability during sample processing and analytical method performance relevant to human blood samples. The final STOP solution proved able to conserve exogenous adenosine and to prevent adenosine formation from exogenous AMP added in vitro to human blood over 15 minutes. The mean endogenous adenosine concentration in plasma prepared from venous blood collected from 10 healthy volunteers was 13 ± 7 nmol/L. Finally, the method was used to demonstrate the previously described concentration-dependent ability of ticagrelor to conserve extracellular adenosine at clinically relevant exposures. In conclusion, we report an optimized sampling protocol and a validated analytical method for accurate measurement of in vivo circulating adenosine concentrations in human blood, suitable for use in clinical trials.

Ticagrelor, a P2Y12 antagonist, is approved for prevention of thromboembolic events. MEDI2452 is a potential reversal agent for ticagrelor and ticagrelor active metabolite (TAM). The total plasma exposure of ticagrelor and TAM in patients are roughly 0.5-1 and 0.2-0.5 μmol/L, respectively. Both have similar high potency vs. P2Y12 (Ki 2 nmol/L) but are plasma protein-bound to 99.8% and only the 0.2% free fraction is able to inhibit the P2Y12 receptor. Thus, for unbound concentration measurements to be a proof of mechanism biomarker for MEDI2452 a very high sensitivity is required. Using established techniques as equilibrium dialysis and LC-MS/MS, made it possible to evaluate the efficacy of the reversal agent by measuring reduction of unbound concentration of ticagrelor in the presence of MEDI2452. With challenges such as ultra-low concentrations, small sample volumes, recovery issues and adsorption to plastic we managed to develop a highly sensitive assay for determining unbound concentration levels of ticagrelor and TAM in plasma with a quantification limit of 30 pmol/L and 45 pmol/L, respectively. With this method we were able to detect close to a 100-fold MEDI2452 mediated reduction in the unbound concentration of both ticagrelor and TAM. The assay provided proof of mechanism as MEDI2452 concentration- and dose-dependently eliminated unbound concentration of ticagrelor and reversed its antiplatelet activity in preclinical models and will support future development of MEDI2452.

Essentials MEDI2452 is a specific antidote of the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor. Hemostatic effects of MEDI2452 were evaluated in pigs treated with ticagrelor and aspirin. MEDI2452 eliminated free ticagrelor within 5 min and gradually normalized platelet aggregation. Improvements in blood pressure (significant) and in blood‐loss and survival (non‐significant) were observed.

We explored the effects of rosuvastatin, aspirin, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel, alone or in combinations on the progression of atherosclerosis and inflammasome activation in diabetic mice. Statins and ticagrelor increase the production of 15-epi-lipoxin A4 via cyclooxygenase-2. Aspirin alone increases 15-epi-lipoxin A4, but when combined with statins, cyclooxygenase-2 is completely blocked.

Background: Antiplatelet agents increase bleeding risk. Few data on hemostatic benefits of platelet transfusion exist. Objective: To assess the effect of autologous platelet transfusion on ticagrelor-mediated and clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition in a single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study (NCT01744288). Methods: Forty-four healthy subjects received ticagrelor (180 mg) or clopidogrel (600 mg; two functional CYP2C19 alleles [*1 or *17] required) with or without platelet transfusion (14-day washout). Subjects received one autologous platelet apheresis unit (approximately six pooled donor platelet units) 24 h (n = 15) or 48 h (n = 13) after ticagrelor or 48 h after clopidogrel (n = 16). Platelet apheresis was conducted 72 h before transfusion. Aspirin (81 mg per day) was taken from after apheresis until 24 h before transfusion. P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) and inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) induced by ADP were measured. Results: Mean age and body mass index were 30 years (standard deviation [SD] 6 years) and 26.9 kg m(-2) (SD 4.0 kg m(-2)), respectively; 98% of subjects were men, and 39 of 44 completed treatment. Platelet transfusion 24 h after ticagrelor had minimal effects on IPA or PRU values within 48 h after transfusion. Platelet transfusion 48 h after ticagrelor also had minimal effects on IPA or PRU values at most post-transfusion times. Platelet transfusion 48 h after clopidogrel, versus no transfusion, had a small reversing effect on IPA (24 h, 36 h, and 48 h) and PRU values (12 h, 24 h, and 36 h) after transfusion. Conclusions: Autologous platelet transfusion is unlikely to be of clinical benefit in reversing the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor. The clinical relevance of the small effects seen with clopidogrel is unknown.

Ticagrelor is a potent antagonist of the P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12R) and consequently an inhibitor of platelet activity effective in the treatment of atherothrombosis. Here, we sought to further characterize its molecular mechanism of action. Initial studies showed that ticagrelor promoted a greater inhibition of adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)-induced Ca2+ release in washed platelets vs other P2Y12R antagonists. This additional effect of ticagrelor beyond P2Y12R antagonism was in part as a consequence of ticagrelor inhibiting the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) on platelets, leading to accumulation of extracellular adenosine and activation of Gs-coupled adenosine A2A receptors. This contributed to an increase in basal cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P). In addition, ticagrelor increased platelet cAMP and VASP-P in the absence of ADP in an adenosine receptor-independent manner. We hypothesized that this increase originated from a direct effect on basal agonist-independent P2Y12R signaling, and this was validated in 1321N1 cells stably transfected with human P2Y12R. In these cells, ticagrelor blocked the constitutive agonist-independent activity of the P2Y12R, limiting basal Gi-coupled signaling and thereby increasing cAMP levels. These data suggest that ticagrelor has the pharmacological profile of an inverse agonist. Based on our results showing insurmountable inhibition of ADP-induced Ca2+ release and forskolin-induced cAMP, the mode of antagonism of ticagrelor also appears noncompetitive, at least functionally. In summary, our studies describe 2 novel modes of action of ticagrelor, inhibition of platelet ENT1 and inverse agonism at the P2Y12R that contribute to its effective inhibition of platelet activation.

Summary Ticagrelor is an antagonist of the platelet P2Y12 receptor for ADP, approved for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Previous studies showed that ticagrelor has no significant activity versus P1 receptors for adenosine and other known P2Y receptors, with the exception of P2Y13, which was not tested. The P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor has been shown to also inhibit P2Y13 and to decrease the P2Y13-regulated capacity of megakaryocytes to produce pro-platelets. We tested whether or not ticagrelor inhibits P2Y13 signalling and function. The in vitro effects of ticagrelor, its active (TAM) and inactive (TIM) metabolites, cangrelor and the P2Y13 antagonist MRS2211 were tested in two experimental models: 1) a label-free cellular response assay in P2Y13-transfected HEK293 T-REx cells; and 2) pro-platelet formation by human megakaryocytes in culture. Ticagrelor, TAM, cangrelor and MRS2211, but not TIM, inhibited the cellular responses in P2Y13-transfected cells. In contrast, only MRS2211 and cangrelor, confirming previous results, inhibited pro-platelet formation by megakaryocytes in vitro. The platelet count of patients randomised to treatment with ticagrelor in the PLATO trial did not change during treatment and was comparable to those of patients randomised to clopidogrel. In conclusion, ticagrelor and TAM act as P2Y13 antagonists in a transfected cell system in vitro but this does not translate into any impact on pro-platelet formation in vitro or altered platelet count in patients.

Antiplatelet therapy is given to patients with acute coronary syndrome to reduce the risk for thrombotic events, but may increase the risk for bleeding. Ticagrelor was administered intravenously to mice. Cumulative blood loss and bleeding time were measured after cutting 5 mm of the tail, 20 min after the start of ticagrelor infusion. The tail was placed in a hemoglobin-sensitive device measuring light absorbance (abs) over time for 35 min. Activated recombinant human factor VII (rhFVIIa; NovoSeven; NovoNordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) 1 mg/kg (study 1); recombinant human prothrombin (rhFII, MEDI8111) 10 mg/kg (study 2); or vehicle was given intravenously once bleeding had commenced, within 90s after tail cut. Ticagrelor resulted in more than 98% inhibition of ex-vivo ADP-induced platelet aggregation. In study 1, the median blood loss in the ticagrelor, vehicle, and rhFVIIa groups were 909, 122, and 397 abs*s, respectively (P < 0.05 for both comparisons, including the ticagrelor group). Similar pattern was seen for bleeding time. The median bleeding time in the ticagrelor, vehicle, and rhFVIIa groups were 2003, 449, and 884s, respectively (P < 0.05 for both comparisons, including the ticagrelor group). In study 2, the median blood loss and bleeding time in the ticagrelor group were 362 abs*s and 1847s. The corresponding numbers for the vehicle and rhFII groups were 71 abs*s and 613s, and 178 abs*s and 701s, respectively (P < 0.05 for comparisons between ticagrelor and vehicle for both blood loss and bleeding time). In mice dosed to complete P2Y12 inhibition, boosting coagulation by administration of rhFVIIa or rhFII within 90s after bleeding initiation can partly reverse ticagrelor-enhanced bleeding.

Ticagrelor inhibits the equilibrative-nucleoside-transporter-1 and thereby, adenosine cell re-uptake. Ticagrelor limits infarct size (IS) in non-diabetic rats and the effect is adenosine-dependent. Statins, via ecto-5′-nucleotidase activation, also increase adenosine levels and limit IS.

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of ticagrelor administered either as crushed (in the semi-upright sitting position) or as integral (in the supine position) tablets in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

The effect and clinical benefit of P2Y 12 receptor antagonists may not be limited to platelet inhibition and the prevention of arterial thrombus formation. Potential additional effects include reduction of the pro‐inflammatory role of activated platelets and effects related to P2Y 12 receptor inhibition on other cells apart from platelets. P2Y 12 receptor antagonists, thienopyridines and ticagrelor, differ in their mode of action being prodrugs instead of direct acting and irreversibly instead of reversibly binding to P2Y 12 . These key differences may provide different potential when it comes to additional effects. In addition to P2Y 12 receptor blockade, ticagrelor is unique in having the only well‐documented additional target of inhibition, the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. The current review will address the effects of P2Y 12 receptor antagonists beyond platelets and the protection against arterial thrombosis. The discussion will include the potential for thienopyridines and ticagrelor to mediate anti‐inflammatory effects, to conserve vascular function, to affect atherosclerosis, to provide cardioprotection and to induce dyspnea.

The investigational ticagrelor-neutralizing antibody fragment, MEDI2452, is developed to rapidly and specifically reverse the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor. However, the dynamic interaction of ticagrelor, the ticagrelor active metabolite (TAM), and MEDI2452, makes pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis nontrivial and mathematical modeling becomes essential to unravel the complex behavior of this system. We propose a mechanistic PK model, including a special observation model for post-sampling equilibration, which is validated and refined using mouse in vivo data from four studies of combined ticagrelor-MEDI2452 treatment. Model predictions of free ticagrelor and TAM plasma concentrations are subsequently used to drive a pharmacodynamic (PD) model that successfully describes platelet aggregation data. Furthermore, the model indicates that MEDI2452-bound ticagrelor is primarily eliminated together with MEDI2452 in the kidneys, and not recycled to the plasma, thereby providing a possible scenario for the extrapolation to humans. We anticipate the modeling work to improve PK and PD understanding, experimental design, and translational confidence.