The behavioral summarized evaluation scales, the BSE and its revised version the BSE-R, were developed and validated in the 1980-1990s. The BSE-R is still used daily by clinical teams in France and foreign countries, and it is recommended by the French Health Authority (2018). Having taken into account knowledge improvement in neurodevelopment and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and the importance of observation by relatives in ecological context, the second version of the BSE was developed. This paper presents the construction and the validation study of the second version of the behavioral summarized evaluation scale, the BSE2 and the BSE2-P rated by parents.Construct validity of the BSE2 scale has been studied in a population of 244 children and adolescents with ASD according to DSM-5 criteria, aged from 30 months to 18 years. Discriminant validity has been analyzed using a population of 86 patients of the same age, with neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) without comorbidity of ASD.BSE2 comprises 30 items and is a two-dimensional scale as was BSE-R. Both dimensions, labelled "Interaction" (11 items) and "Modulation" (11 items), accounted for 41.7 % of the total variance. They describe autism severity and are in accordance with the two DSM-5 dimensions. Internal consistency (0.927 and 0.850 respectively) and inter-rater reliability (0.932 and 0.897 respectively) are good or excellent for both dimensions. Sensibility and specificity (0.758 and 0.767 respectively) range BSE2 among the tools with good psychometric properties. The parent version, BSE2-P, dedicated to ecological context is easily rated by parents.BSE2 scale for children and adolescents is a clinical tool with good psychometric properties. Its two-dimensional structure is in accordance with DSM-5 criteria. This scale covers all spectrum of ASD clinical forms in both children and adolescents. It can be used to identify ASD in complex neurodevelopmental disorders with several comorbidities and can help to distinguish autism symptomatology from other neurodevelopmental diagnoses. Furthermore, this scale allows to expand the rating context, involving parents to define and adjust the individualized therapeutic project. Thus the BSE2 is a valuable clinical tool for practitioners for both diagnosis and follow-up.

Adaptation to the sensory environment is essential in everyday life, to anticipate future events and quickly detect and respond to changes; and to distinguish vocal variations in congeners, for communication. The aim of the current study was to explore the effects of the nature (vocal/non-vocal) of the information to be encoded, on the establishment of auditory regularities. In electrophysiology, neural adaptation is measured by the 'Repetition Positivity' (RP), which refers to an increase in positive potential, with the increasing number of repetitions of a same stimulus. The RP results from the combined variation of several ERP components; the P1, the first positivity (∼100 ms) may reflect the onset of repetition effects. We recorded auditory evoked potentials during a roving paradigm in which trains of 4, 8 or 16 repetitions of the same stimulus were presented. Sequences of vocal and non-vocal complex stimuli were delivered, to study the influence of the type of stimulation on the characteristics of the brain responses. The P1 to each train length, and the RP responses were recorded between 90 and 200 ms, reflecting adaptation for both vocal and non-vocal stimuli. RP was not different between vocal and non-vocal sequences (in latency, amplitude and spatial organization) and was found to be similar to that found in previous studies using pure tones, suggesting that the repetition suppression phenomena is somehow independent of the nature of the stimulus. However, results showed faster stabilization of the P1 amplitude for non-vocal stimuli than for vocal stimuli, which require more repetitions. This revealed different dynamics for the establishment of regularity encoding for non-vocal and vocal stimuli, indicating that the richness of vocal sounds may require further processing before full neural adaptation occurs.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder whose pathophysiological mechanisms are still unclear. Hypotheses suggest a role for glutamate dysfunctions in ASD development, but clinical studies investigating brain and peripheral glutamate levels showed heterogenous results leading to hypo- and hyper-glutamatergic hypotheses of ASD. Recently, studies proposed the implication of elevated mGluR5 densities in brain areas in the pathophysiology of ASD. Thus, our objective was to characterize glutamate dysfunctions in adult subjects with ASD by quantifying (1) glutamate levels in the cingulate cortex and periphery using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and metabolomics, and (2) mGluR5 brain density in this population and in a validated animal model of ASD (prenatal exposure to valproate) at developmental stages corresponding to childhood and adolescence in humans using positron emission tomography. No modifications in cingulate Glu levels were observed between individuals with ASD and controls further supporting the difficulty to evaluate modifications in excitatory transmission using spectroscopy in this population, and the complexity of its glutamate-related changes. Our imaging results showed an overall increased density in mGluR5 in adults with ASD, that was only observed mostly subcortically in adolescent male rats prenatally exposed to valproic acid, and not detected in the stage corresponding to childhood in the same animals. This suggest that clinical changes in mGluR5 density could reflect the adaptation of the glutamatergic dysfunctions occurring earlier rather than being key to the pathophysiology of ASD.

Abstract Aim This observational and repeated measures study assesses the impact of the first, most restrictive, COVID‐19 lockdown in France on children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their families. Method During the first COVID‐19 lockdown, families of ASD children enrolled in the day‐care centre of the child and adolescent psychiatry department of the Tours University Hospital were contacted weekly. A total of 95 parents took part in this study between the 18th of March and the 8th of May 2020. Advice and personalized support materials were provided by professionals involved in children's care. Questions regarding clinical outcomes were addressed to parents, and their assessments were reported on a 5‐point Likert scale. Two time points were considered: the first 3 weeks and the three last weeks of the lockdown period. Results No difference was highlighted between clinical scores collected at the beginning and at the end of the lockdown. No effect of intellectual disability, accommodation type (house or apartment) or parental status was observed. The reasons for the relatively minor impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown observed in this study are discussed. Conclusions Individualized and regular support provided by caregivers, familiar with ASD children's clinical specificities, in the context of a trusted relationship with parents may have contributed to the stability of this population. This ‘tailor‐made’ approach should be promoted, in order to help support families of ASD children in this challenging period.

Background: For hearing-impaired individuals, hearing aids are clinically fit according to subjective measures of threshold and loudness. The goal of this study was to evaluate objective measures of loudness perception that might benefit hearing aid fitting. Method: Seventeen adult hearing aid users and 17 normal-hearing adults participated in the study. Outcome measures including categorical loudness scaling, cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs), and pupillometry. Stimuli were 1-kHz tone bursts presented at 40, 60, and 80 dBA. Results: Categorical loudness scaling showed that loudness significantly increased with intensity for all participants (p < 0.05). For CAEPs, high intensity was associated with greater P1, N1, and P2 peak amplitude for all listeners (p < 0.05); a significant but small effect of hearing aid amplification was observed. For all participants, pupillometry showed significant effects of high intensity on pupil dilation (p < 0.05); there was no significant effect of hearing aid amplification. A Focused Principal Component analysis revealed significant correlations between subjective loudness and some of the objective measures. Conclusion: The present data suggest that intensity had a significant impact on loudness perception, CAEPs, and pupil response. The correlations suggest that pupillometry and/or CAEPs may be useful in determining comfortable amplification for hearing aids.

OBJECTIVES:The behavioral summarized evaluation scales, the BSE and its revised version the BSE-R, were developed and validated in the 1980-1990s. The BSE-R is still used daily by clinical teams in France and foreign countries, and it is recommended by the French Health Authority (2018). Having taken into account knowledge improvement in neurodevelopment and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and the importance of observation by relatives in ecological context, the second version of the BSE was developed. This paper presents the construction and the validation study of the second version of the behavioral summarized evaluation scale, the BSE2 and the BSE2-P rated by parents. METHODS:Construct validity of the BSE2 scale has been studied in a population of 244 children and adolescents with ASD according to DSM-5 criteria, aged from 30 months to 18 years. Discriminant validity has been analyzed using a population of 86 patients of the same age, with neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) without comorbidity of ASD. RESULTS:BSE2 comprises 30 items and is a two-dimensional scale as was BSE-R. Both dimensions, labelled "Interaction" (11 items) and "Modulation" (11 items), accounted for 41.7 % of the total variance. They describe autism severity and are in accordance with the two DSM-5 dimensions. Internal consistency (0.927 and 0.850 respectively) and inter-rater reliability (0.932 and 0.897 respectively) are good or excellent for both dimensions. Sensibility and specificity (0.758 and 0.767 respectively) range BSE2 among the tools with good psychometric properties. The parent version, BSE2-P, dedicated to ecological context is easily rated by parents. CONCLUSIONS:BSE2 scale for children and adolescents is a clinical tool with good psychometric properties. Its two-dimensional structure is in accordance with DSM-5 criteria. This scale covers all spectrum of ASD clinical forms in both children and adolescents. It can be used to identify ASD in complex neurodevelopmental disorders with several comorbidities and can help to distinguish autism symptomatology from other neurodevelopmental diagnoses. Furthermore, this scale allows to expand the rating context, involving parents to define and adjust the individualized therapeutic project. Thus the BSE2 is a valuable clinical tool for practitioners for both diagnosis and follow-up.

Unusual behaviors and brain activity to socio-emotional stimuli have been reported in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Atypical reactivity to change and intolerance of uncertainty are also present, but little is known on their possible impact on facial expression processing in autism. The visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) is an electrophysiological response automatically elicited by changing events such as deviant emotional faces presented among regular neutral faces. While vMMN has been found altered in ASD in response to low-level changes in simple stimuli, no study has investigated this response to visual social stimuli. Here two deviant expressions were presented, neutral and angry, embedded in a sequence of repetitive neutral stimuli. vMMN peak analyses were performed for latency and amplitude in early and late time windows. The ASD group presented smaller amplitude of the late vMMN to both neutral and emotional deviants compared to the typically developed adults (TD) group, and only the TD group presented a sustained activity related to emotional change (i.e., angry deviant). Source reconstruction of the vMMNs further revealed that any change processing elicited a reduced activity in ASD group compared to TD in the saliency network, while the specific processing emotional change elicited activity in the temporal region and in the insula. This study confirms atypical change processing in ASD and points to a specific difficulty in the processing of emotional changes, potentially playing a crucial role in social interaction deficits. Nevertheless, these results require to be further replicated with a greater sample size and generalized to other emotional expressions.

Background: Deficit in social communication is a core feature in Autism Spectrum Disorder but remains poorly assessed in classical clinical practice, especially in adult populations. This gap between needs and practice is partly due to a lack of standardized evaluation tools. The multicentric Research group in psychiatry GDR3557 (Institut de Psychiatrie) developed a new battery for social cognitive evaluation named “ClaCoS,” which allows testing the main components of social cognition: Emotion Recognition, Theory of Mind, Attributional Style, and Social Perception and Knowledge. It further provides an assessment of subjective complaints in social cognition. Methods: We compared the social cognition abilities of 45 adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder without intellectual disability and 45 neurotypically developed volunteers using the “ClaCoS” battery, in order to determine its relevance in the evaluation of social cognition impairments in autism. A correlational approach allowed us to test the links between subjective complaints and objectively measured impairments for the different components of social cognition. Results: As expected, the Autism Spectrum Disorder group showed deficits in all four components of social cognition. Moreover, they reported greater subjective complaints than controls regarding their social abilities, correlated to the neuropsychological assessments. Conclusion: The “ClaCoS” battery is an interesting tool allowing to assess social impairments in autism and to specify the altered components, for a better adjustment of tailored social cognition training programs. Our results further suggest that people with Autism Spectrum Disorder have a good social cognitive insight, i.e., awareness into social cognitive functioning, and may thus benefit from social cognitive training tools.

Early intervention programs positively affect key behaviors for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, most of these programs do not target children with severe autistic symptomatology associated with intellectual disability (ID). This study aimed to investigate the psychological and clinical outcomes of children with severe autism and ID enrolled in the Tailored and Inclusive Program for Autism—Tours (TIPA-T). The first step of the TIPA-T is the Exchange and Development Therapy (EDT): an individual neurofunctional intervention consisting of one-to-one exchanges between a child and a therapist taking place in a pared-down environment. It aims to rehabilitate psychophysiological abilities at the roots of social communication through structured sequences of “social play.” Cognitive and socio-emotional skills and general development were evaluated with the Social Cognitive Evaluation Battery scale and the Brunet–Lézine Scale—Revised, respectively, before and after 9 months of intervention in 32 children with ASD and ID. Autistic symptomatology was evaluated with the Behavior Summarized Evaluation—Revised scale at five time-points in a subset of 14 children, both in individual and group settings. Statistically significant post-intervention improvements were found in cognitive and socio-emotional skills. All but one child showed improvements in at least one social domain, and 78% of children gained one level in at least four social domains. Twenty-nine children improved in cognitive domains, with 66% of children improving in at least three cognitive domains. Autistic symptomatology evaluated in one-to-one settings significantly decreased with therapy; this reduction was observed in more than 85% of children. In group settings, autistic symptomatology also decreased in more than 60% of children. Global developmental age significantly increased by 3.8 months. The TIPA-T, including EDT in particular, improves socio-emotional skills of most children with ASD and reduces autistic symptomatology, yet with heterogeneous outcomes profiles, in line with the strong heterogeneity of profiles observed in ASD. At the group level, this study highlights the benefits of the TIPA-T for children with severe autism and associated ID. Assessment of autistic core symptoms showed an improvement of social interaction, both in one-to-one and group evaluations, demonstrating the generalizability of the skills learned during the EDT.

Early intervention programs positively affect key behaviours for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Yet, most of these programs do not target children with severe autistic symptomatology associated with intellectual disability (ID).The aim of this study was to investigate psychological and clinical outcomes of children with severe autism and ID enrolled in the Tailored and Inclusive Program for Autism - Tours (TIPA-T). The first step of the TIPA-T is the Exchange and Development Therapy (EDT): an individual neurofunctional intervention, consisting of one-to-one exchanges between a child and a therapist taking place in a pared-down environment. It aims to rehabilitate psychophysiological abilities at the roots of social communication, through structured sequences of “social play”.Cognitive and socio-emotional skills and general development were evaluated with the Social Cognitive Evaluation Battery (SCEB) scale and the Brunet-Lézine scale-Revised, respectively, before and after 9 months of intervention in 32 children with ASD and ID. Autistic symptomatology was evaluated with the Behavior Summarized Evaluation-Revised (BSE-R) scale at 5 time-points in a subset of 14 children, both in individual and group settings. Statistically significant post-intervention improvements were found in cognitive and socio-emotional skills. All but one child showed improvements in at least one social domains, and 78% of children gained one-level in at least 4 social domains. 29 children improved in cognitive domains with 66% of children improving in at least 3 cognitive domains. Autistic symptomatology evaluated in one-to-one settings significantly decreased with therapy; this reduction was observed in more than 85% of children. In group settings, autistic symptomatology also decreased in more than 60% of children. Global developmental age significantly increased by 3.8 months.The TIPA-T, including EDT in particular, improves socio-emotional skills of most children with ASD and reduces autistic symptomatology; yet, with heterogeneous outcomes profiles, in line with the strong heterogeneity of profiles observed in ASD. At the group level, this study highlights the benefits of the TIPA-T for children with severe autism and associated ID. Assessment of autistic core symptoms showed an improvement of social interaction, both in one-to-one and group evaluations, demonstrating the generalizability of the skills learned during the EDT.

Language-related change-detection processes are often investigated using syllables that are very simple in terms of phonological structure. However, phonological complexity is known to be challenging for young typically developing children and pathological populations. We investigated brain correlates of phonological processing and their age-related changes with a passive change-detection protocol including stimuli of varying phonological complexity, which allowed comparing responses to simple and complex phonological deviancies. Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Late Discriminative Negativity (LDN) responses were recorded in both school-age children (n = 22) and adults (n = 24). MMN was similar for simple and complex phonological deviancy in both groups, whereas LDN appeared to be modulated by phonological complexity, albeit with different patterns according to age. In response to complex phonological change, children displayed a larger LDN response with a typical fronto-central scalp distribution, while adults showed an additional right-posterior activity but no larger amplitude than for simple change. Thus, LDN appears to be a good electrophysiological index of phonological complexity processing. This study validated the use of the LDN through this protocol for the investigation of phonological complexity processing throughout the development.

BACKGROUND:For patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), restoration of binaural function via cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve speech understanding in noise. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses following cochlear implantation. DESIGN:Prospective longitudinal study. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. METHODS:Six adults with SSD were tested before and 12 months post-activation of the CI. Six normal hearing (NH) participants served as experimental controls. Speech understanding in noise was evaluated for various spatial conditions. Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded with /ba/ stimuli in quiet and in noise. Global field power and responses at Cz were analyzed. RESULTS:Speech understanding in noise significantly improved with the CI when speech was presented to the CI ear and noise to the normal ear (p<0.05), but remained poorer than that of NH controls (p<0.05). N1 peak amplitude measure in noise significantly increased after CI activation (p<0.05), but remained lower than that of NH controls (p<0.05) at 12 months. After 12 months of CI experience, cortical responses in noise became more comparable between groups. CONCLUSION:Binaural restoration in SSD patients via cochlear implantation improved speech performance noise and cortical responses. While behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses improved, SSD-CI outcomes remained poorer than that of NH controls in most cases, suggesting only partial restoration of binaural hearing.

Presentation graphique du profil sensori-psychomoteur a l'Echelle des Particularites Sensori-psychomotrices dans l'Autisme (EPSA)

Objective: To assess the impact of rehabilitation systems (CROS: Contralateral Routing of Signal; BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid; CI: cochlear implant) on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) and auditory performance in unilateral hearing loss. Subjects and method: Twenty-one adults with unilateral hearing loss, using CROS (n = 6), BAHA (n = 6) or CI (n = 9), were included. Seven normal-hearing subjects served as controls. CAEPs were recorded for a (/ba/) speech stimulus; for patients, tests were conducted with and without their auditory rehabilitation. Amplitude and latency of the various CAEP components of the global field power (GFP) were measured, and scalp potential fields were mapped. Behavioral assessment used sentence recognition in noise, withand without spatial cues. Results: Only CI induced N1 peak amplitude change (P < 0.05). CI and CROS increased polarity inversion amplitude in the contralateral ear, and frontocentral negativity on the scalp potential map. CI improved understanding when speech was presented to the implanted ear and noise to the healthy ear, and vice-versa. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation had the greatest impact on CAEP morphology and auditory performance. A longitudinal study could analyze progression of cortical reorganization. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Introduction. Psychomotor impairments in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) have frequently been described in scientific literature. Such deficits impact upon the development of social motor function and interfere with the ability to adjust to everyday life. The inclusion of sensory-motor signs in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) confirms their importance in the diagnosis of ASD. Previous literature has shown the presence precocity of these signs, sometimes before the alteration of the social communication. To our knowledge, there are no existing clinical tools to measure sensory psychomotor deficit, specifically in ASD. The current paper presents the construction and validation of a new scale, designed to evaluate sensory-psychomotor signs in Autism: 'the Sensory-psychomotor Particularities Scale in Autism' (SPSA). Method. The scale is composed of 160 items describing common sensory-psychomotor signs in autism. These items are grouped into 20 variables: touch, nociception, vestibular sensitivity, proprioceptive sensitivity, vision, auditory, multimodality, tone, posture, balance, global coordination, manual dexterity, body schema, bodily self-consciousness, relational adjustment, emotional expression, use of objects, space, time and tonico-emotional regulation. For each item, the psychomotor therapist evaluated sensoripsychomotor signs according to a five-level Likert scale (0 = "the sign is never expressed by the person", 1 = "weakly expressed", 2 = "moderately expressed", 3 = "severely expressed" and 4 = "the sign is very characteristic of the person and very severely expressed"). This is completed by a family interview in order to assess the impact of these signs on everyday situations. The study included 111 children with autism. The presence of neurological and genetic diseases was exclusion criteria. For each child, a global developmental evaluation was carried out by an expert clinical team specializing in ASD. Standardized clinical tools were used: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Behavior Summarized Evaluation scale (BSE-R), Repeated and Restricted Behavior scale (RRB), Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC), Motor Development Rating scale (MDR), Sensory Profile (SP). Developmental quotients (DQ) were evaluated using various tests depending on age and ability. Results.- Factor analysis produced three clinically relevant factors: Fl : "sensory-emotional synchronization", F2: "multisensory integration" and F3: "motor skills": each containing a similar quantity of items. They account for roughly equal percentages of variance (18.9%, 18.0%, 16.8%, respectively). The factorial structure does not change if the 26 children with comorbid developmental coordination disorder are removed. The three factors show good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability. Fl is comprised of 6 items: touch, nociception, proprioceptive sensitivity, vision, emotional expression and tonico-emotional regulation. This factor is significantly associated with items of the Sensory Profile (touch processing, poor registration, sensory seeking). F2 is comprised of 5 items: multimodality, bodily selfconsciousness, relational adjustment, use of objects and space. This factor is associated with ADOS, BSE-R and RRB scores, and the item "touch processing" of the Sensory Profile. F3 is comprised of 4 items: tone, posture, global coordination, manual dexterity. This factor is associated with the M-ABC, the MDR and the item "low endurance" of the Sensory Profile. Conclusion.- The SPSA is a relevant clinical tool to assess the severity of sensory-psychomotor clinical signs in order to describe the individual profiles of children with ASD. It represents a critical step in advancing knowledge of the complex and heterogeneous pattern of psychomotor development in autism. It could make a valuable contribution to the field, both in research and clinical practice. (C) 2019 L'Encephale, Paris.

et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Les troubles sensori-psychomoteurs font partie des signes cliniques nécessaires au diagnostic de trouble du spectre de l’autisme. Ils viennent impacter très précocement les fonctions perceptives et cognitives qui permettent la mise en place d’une communication sociale harmonieuse. Le manque d’outil clinique dans ce domaine a nécessité la création d’une nouvelle échelle : l’Échelle des Particularités Sensori-psychomotrices dans l’Autisme (EPSA). L’EPSA a pour objectif de mesurer l’intensité des atypies sensori-psychomotrices et ainsi d’objectiver des profils singuliers. L’EPSA se compose de 160 items regroupés en 20 variables : toucher, nociception, sensibilité vestibulaire, proprioception, vision, audition, multimodalité, tonus, posture, équilibre, coordination globale, motricité manuelle, schéma corporel, conscience psychocorporelle, ajustement à l’autre, expression émotionnelle, utilisation des objets, espace, temps, régulation tonico-émotionnelle. Dans une large population de 111 enfants avec TSA, l’analyse factorielle a permis d’extraire trois facteurs principaux pertinents au niveau clinique et scientifique, intitulés : « synchronisation sensori-émotionnelle », « intégration multimodale », « compétences motrices ». De plus, cette échelle présente une excellente fidélité inter-cotateurs, une bonne validité interne et externe. L’EPSA est un nouvel outil clinique, présentant de bonnes qualités psychométriques, au service du psychomotricien. Elle rend lisibles les particularités sensori-psychomotrices dans l’autisme, et ouvre ainsi de nouvelles perspectives tant pour préciser le projet thérapeutique individualisé que pour élaborer de nouvelles hypothèses de recherche.

Social cognition refers to the mental operations underlying social interactions. Given the major role of social cognitive deficits in the disability associated with severe psychiatric disorders, they therefore constitute a crucial therapeutic target. However, no easily understandable and transnosographic self-assessment scale evaluating the perceived difficulties is available. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric qualities of a new self-administered questionnaire (ACSo) assessing subjective complaints in different domains of social cognition from 89 patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders, bipolar disorders or autism. The results revealed satisfactory internal validity and test-retest properties allowing the computation of a total score along with four sub scores (attributional biases, social perception and knowledge, emotional perception and theory of mind). Moreover, the ACSo total score was correlated with other subjective assessments traditionally used in cognitive remediation practice but not with objective neuropsychological assessments of social cognition. In summary, the ACSo is of interest to complete the objective evaluation of social cognition processes with a subjective assessment adapted to people with serious mental illness or autism spectrum disorder.