BACKGROUND:Assessing medication safety in the pediatric population can take many forms, but given the shortcomings of traditional methods, there has been a shift toward leveraging real-world data to bolster these efforts. OBJECTIVES:To characterize demographics, enrollment, and health characteristics among pediatric members in the Sentinel Distributed Database (SDD). METHODS:Using administrative healthcare data from the SDD between January 1, 2000, and May 8, 2023, we used descriptive statistics to characterize the demographics, enrollment, and select health characteristics of pediatric members in the following age groups: 29 days-< 24 months (infants), 2-< 6 years (young children), 6 -< 12 years (older children), 12-< 18 years (early adolescents), and 18-21 years (late adolescents). RESULTS:Older children (6-< 12 years of age) represented the largest pediatric age group in the SDD, with over 46 million members, though there were between 27.5 and 45.4 million members in each of the other age groups as well. Estimates of common health conditions and medication use were in line with current national estimates. CONCLUSIONS:The FDA's Sentinel Distributed Database accurately captures key aspects of pediatric health and can be used as an adjunct to current methods to assess and monitor the safety of approved medical products in the pediatric United States population.
BACKGROUND:Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) inhibitors are first-line treatment among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). With time, patients tend to lose response or become intolerant, necessitating switching to small cell biologics such as tofacitinib or vedolizumab. In this real-world study of a large, geographically diverse US population of TNF-experienced patients with UC, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of newly initiating treatment with tofacitinib vs vedolizumab. METHODS:We conducted a cohort study using secondary data from a large US insurer (Anthem, Inc.). Our cohort included patients with UC newly initiating treatment with tofacitinib or vedolizumab. Patients were required to have evidence of treatment with anti-TNF inhibitors in the 6 months prior to cohort entry. The primary outcome was treatment persistence >52 weeks. Additionally, we evaluated the following secondary outcomes as additional measures of effectiveness and safety: (1) all-cause hospitalization; (2) total abdominal colectomy; (3) hospitalization for infection; (4) hospitalization for malignancy; (5) hospitalization for cardiac events; and (6) hospitalization for thromboembolic events. We used fine stratification by propensity scores to control for confounding by demographics, clinical factors, and treatment history at baseline. RESULTS:Our primary cohort included 168 new users of tofacitinib and 568 new users of vedolizumab. Tofacitinib was associated with lower treatment persistence (adjusted risked ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 -0.99). Differences in secondary measures of effectiveness or safety between tofacitinib initiators vs vedolizumab initiators were not statistically significant (all-cause hospitalization, adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.83-1.84; total abdominal colectomy, adjusted HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.93-3.44;and hospitalization for any infection, adjusted HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.83-4.52). DISCUSSION:Ulcerative colitis patients with prior anti-TNF experience initiating tofacitinib demonstrated lower treatment persistence compared with those initiating vedolizumab. This finding is in contrast to other recent studies suggesting superior effectiveness of tofacitinib. Ultimately, head-to-head randomized, controlled trials that focus on directly measured end points may be needed to best inform clinical practice.