Gaining a complete understanding of transmission risk factors will assist in efforts to reduce new HIV infections, especially within the disproportionally affected population of men who have sex with men (MSM). We recently reported that the fecal microbiota of MSM elevates immune activation in gnotobiotic mice and enhances HIV infection in vitro over that of fecal microbiota from men who have sex with women. We also demonstrated elevation of the gut homing marker CD103 (integrin αE) on CD4+ T cells by MSM-microbiota. Here we provide additional evidence that the gut microbiota is a risk factor for HIV transmission in MSM by showing elevated frequencies of the HIV co-receptor CCR5 on CD4+ T cells in human rectosigmoid colon biopsies. We discuss our interest in specific MSM-associated bacteria and propose the influx of CD103+ and CCR5+ CD4+ T cells into the colon as a potential link between the MSM microbiota and HIV transmission.

Men who have sex with men (MSM) have differences in immune activation and gut microbiome composition compared with men who have sex with women (MSW), even in the absence of HIV infection. Gut microbiome differences associated with HIV itself when controlling for MSM, as assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing, are relatively subtle. Understanding whether gut microbiome composition impacts immune activation in HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM has important implications since immune activation has been associated with HIV acquisition risk and disease progression. To investigate the effects of MSM and HIV-associated gut microbiota on immune activation, we transplanted feces from HIV-negative MSW, HIV-negative MSM, and HIV-positive untreated MSM to gnotobiotic mice. Following transplant, 16S rRNA gene sequencing determined that the microbiomes of MSM and MSW maintained distinct compositions in mice and that specific microbial differences between MSM and MSW were replicated. Immunologically, HIV-negative MSM donors had higher frequencies of blood CD38+ HLADR+ and CD103+ T cells and their fecal recipients had higher frequencies of gut CD69+ and CD103+ T cells, compared with HIV-negative MSW donors and recipients, respectively. Significant microbiome differences were not detected between HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM in this small donor cohort, and immune differences between their recipients were trending but not statistically significant. A larger donor cohort may therefore be needed to detect immune-modulating microbes associated with HIV. To investigate whether our findings in mice could have implications for HIV replication, we infected primary human lamina propria cells stimulated with isolated fecal microbiota, and found that microbiota from MSM stimulated higher frequencies of HIV-infected cells than microbiota from MSW. Finally, we identified several microbes that correlated with immune readouts in both fecal recipients and donors, and with in vitro HIV infection, which suggests a role for gut microbiota in immune activation and potentially HIV acquisition in MSM.

GV-TH-01, a Phase 1 open-label trial of a DNA prime—Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) boost vaccine (GOVX-B11), was undertaken in HIV infected participants on antiretroviral treatment (ART) to evaluate safety and vaccine-elicited T cell responses, and explore the ability of elicited CD8+ T cells to control viral rebound during analytical treatment interruption (TI). Nine men who began antiretroviral therapy (ART) within 18 months of seroconversion and had sustained plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 6 months were enrolled. Median age was 38 years, median pre-ART HIV-1 RNA was 140,000 copies/ml and mean baseline CD4 count was 755/μl. Two DNA, followed by 2 MVA, inoculations were given 8 weeks apart. Eight subjects completed all vaccinations and TI. Clinical and laboratory adverse events were generally mild, with no serious or grade 4 events. Only reactogenicity events were considered related to study drug. No treatment emergent viral resistance was seen. The vaccinations did not reduce viral reservoirs and virus re-emerged in all participants during TI, with a median time to re-emergence of 4 weeks. Eight of 9 participants had CD8+ T cells that could be stimulated by vaccine-matched Gag peptides prior to vaccination. Vaccinations boosted these responses as well as eliciting previously undetected CD8+ responses. Elicited T cells did not display signs of exhaustion. During TI, temporal patterns of viral re-emergence and Gag-specific CD8+ T cell expansion suggested that vaccine-specific CD8+ T cells had been stimulated by re-emergent virus in only 2 of 8 participants. In these 2, transient decreases in viremia were associated with Gag selection in known CD8+ T cell epitopes. We hypothesize that escape mutations, already archived in the viral reservoir, plus a poor ability of CD8+ T cells to traffic to and control virus at sites of re-emergence, limited the therapeutic efficacy of the DNA/MVA vaccine. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT01378156

Excessive or persistent programmed death 1 (PD-1) expression on virus-or tumor-specific T cells during chronic viral infection or malignancy has been associated with impaired immune control. To assess the role of the PD-1 pathway in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), we examined PD-1 expression and maturation phenotype on T cells from 42 patients early (day 55 to 85) after cord blood (CB), matched unrelated donor, and matched related donor transplantation. Expression of PD-1 on CD4(+)T cells was significantly elevated in all transplantation types, with the highest level observed in CB subjects. Elevated PD-1 expression on CD4(+) T cells early after transplantation was observed in nonsurvivors (median, 40.2%; range, 15.1 to 86.1) compared with survivors (median, 23.6%; range, 8.4 to 55.2; P= .001), indicating its association with increased risk for mortality, especially with CB transplantations, where PD-1 was increased in nonsurvivors (median, 64.6%; range, 36.5 to 86.1) compared with survivors (median, 34.1%; range, 15.9 to 55.2; P= .01). Furthermore, T cell subset analysis revealed that PD-1 expression was further elevated on CD4(+) T central memory in nonsurvivors (median, 49.8%; range, 15.1 to 83.4) compared with survivors (median, 24.8%; range, 8.9 to 71.3; P= .002) and on T effector memory cells in nonsurvivors (median, 69.1%; range, 24.7 to 92.6) compared with survivors (median, 43.7%; range, 13.9 to 96.5; P= .0003). Our findings suggest that elevation of PD-1 expression on CD4(+)T cells is associated with mortality in CB and possibly all SCT recipients. (C) 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

In this study, we used the rhesus macaque model to determine the impact that AMD3100 has on lymphocyte mobilization, both alone and in combination with G-CSF. Our results indicate that, unlike G-CSF, AMD3100 substantially mobilizes both B and T lymphocytes into the peripheral blood. This led to significant increases in the peripheral blood content of both effector and regulatory T-cell populations, which translated into greater accumulation of these cells in the resulting leukapheresis products. Notably, CD4(+)/CD25(high)/CD127(low)/FoxP3(+) Tregs were efficiently mobilized with AMD3100-containing regimens, with as much as a 4.0-fold enrichment in the leukapheresis product compared with G-CSF alone. CD8(+) T cells were mobilized to a greater extent than CD4(+) T cells, with accumulation of 3.7 ± 0.4-fold more total CD8+ T cells and 6.2 ± 0.4-fold more CD8(+) effector memory T cells in the leukapheresis product compared with G-CSF alone. Given that effector memory T-cell subpopulations may mediate less GVHD compared with other effector T-cell populations and that Tregs are protective against GVHD, our results indicate that AMD3100 may mobilize a GVHD-protective T-cell repertoire, which would be of benefit in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Abstract Abstract 350 Introduction: Leukapheresis is a widely utilized modality for collecting hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). While collection of CD34+ cells with stem-cell activity is the primary goal of most mobilization and leukapheresis procedures, these cells only represent ∼1% of most leukapheresis products. The profile of the non-CD34+ cells is likely influenced by the choice of mobilization strategy, and has the potential to profoundly impact the post-transplant immune milieu of the transplant recipient. Two of the most critical of the CD34-negative cell populations that are collected during leukapheresis include effector and regulatory T cells. Thus, in evaluating mobilization regimens, the impact on these regimens on the mobilization of each of these T cell populations into the peripheral blood should be rigorously evaluated. Methods: We used a rhesus macaque model to determine the impact that mobilization with AMD3100 (a.k.a., Plerixafor or Mozobil®)+ G-CSF (“A+G”) had on peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cell populations as well as on FoxP3+/CD4+ T cells. Three rhesus macaques were mobilized with 10ug/kg SQ of G-CSF for five consecutive days prior to leukapheresis. AMD3100 was administered at 1mg/kg SQ in combination with the last dose of G-CSF two hours prior to leukapheresis. Leukapheresis procedures were performed for two hours using a modified CS3000 Plus cell separator. A peripheral blood sample was taken before cytokine therapy, just prior to leukapheresis following mobilization, one hour during leukapheresis, and at the end of the procedure. These samples were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry using a BD LSRII flow cytometer. Results: Bulk, effector, and regulatory T cell subpopulations were analyzed flow cytometrically. The proportion of total CD3+ T cells remained stable during mobilization and apheresis: Thus, CD3+ T cells represented 77% of peripheral blood lymphocytes prior to mobilization, and 69% post-apheresis). The balance of CD4+ to CD8+ T cells was also relatively stable. Thus, for one of the three animals tested, the CD4+ and CD8+ proportions remained unchanged after apheresis. For two animals, the average CD4+ % decreased from 67% prior to mobilization to 52% post-apheresis. In these two animals, there was a reciprocal increase in the % of CD3+ T cells that were CD8+ (28% pre-G+A to 40% post-apheresis). The CD28+/CD95- naïve (Tn), CD28+/CD95+ central memory (Tcm) and CD28-/CD95+ effector memory (Tem) subpopulation balance of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was also determined, by comparing the relative percentages of each subpopulation post-apheresis with their relative percentages prior to mobilization. Compared to their pre-G+A percentages, the post-apheresis CD4+ percentages of Tn, Tcm and Tem were 92%, 93% and 160%, respectively. Thus, the relative proportions of Tn and Tcm CD4+ cells decreased post-apheresis, while the relative proportion of CD4+ Tem increased compared to cytokine administration. For CD8+ T cell subpopulations, the post-apheresis proportions of Tn, Tcm, and Tem compared to their pre-G-CSF proportions were 99%, 70% and 130%, respectively–thus demonstrating the same direction of change as observed for CD4+ T cells. The most striking change in T cell subpopulations occurred in the CD4+/FoxP3+ compartment. The proportion of CD4+ T cells expressing FoxP3 increased by an average of 600% when post-apheresis samples were compared to pre-mobilization samples (FoxP3+ cells were 9.6% of CD4+ T cells post-apheresis versus 1.5% pre-GCSF). An average of 32% of these FoxP3+ CD4+ T cells expressed high levels of CXCR4. CXCR4 expression has been previously documented on human FoxP3+ T cells (Zou et al., Cancer Res, 2004), but this is the first observation of high level expression of CXCR4 on macaque FoxP3+ CD4 T cells, or of their ability to be efficiently mobilized with AMD3100. Discussion: These results suggest that treatment with AMD3100 and G-CSF may mobilize T cell subsets into the peripheral blood that could have beneficial effects during allo-transplantation. The combination of an increase in Tem cells, which have been observed to have decreased ability to cause GvHD (Zheng et al., Blood 2008), along with FoxP3+/CD4+ T cells, which may have regulatory functions, suggests that A+G mobilization could produce an apheresis product with a beneficial CD34-negative cell profile for allogeneic transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

We have developed a major histocompatibility complex-defined primate model of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and have determined the effect that CD28/CD40-directed costimulation blockade and sirolimus have on this disease. Severe GVHD developed after haploidentical transplantation without prophylaxis, characterized by rapid clinical decline and widespread T-cell infiltration and organ damage. Mechanistic analysis showed activation and possible counter-regulation, with rapid T-cell expansion and accumulation of CD8(+) and CD4(+) granzyme B(+) effector cells and FoxP3(pos)/CD27(high)/CD25(pos)/CD127(low) CD4(+) T cells. CD8(+) cells down-regulated CD127 and BCl-2 and up-regulated Ki-67, consistent with a highly activated, proliferative profile. A cytokine storm also occurred, with GVHD-specific secretion of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-18, and CCL4. Costimulation Blockade and Sirolimus (CoBS) resulted in striking protection against GVHD. At the 30-day primary endpoint, CoBS-treated recipients showed 100% survival compared with no survival in untreated recipients. CoBS treatment resulted in survival, increasing from 11.6 to 62 days (P < .01) with blunting of T-cell expansion and activation. Some CoBS-treated animals did eventually develop GVHD, with both clinical and histopathologic evidence of smoldering disease. The reservoir of CoBS-resistant breakthrough immune activation included secretion of interferon-γ, IL-2, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and IL-12/IL-23 and proliferation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin-resistant CD28(-) CD8(+) T cells, suggesting adjuvant treatments targeting this subpopulation will be needed for full disease control.

Abstract 2549 Introduction: Given the emerging importance of sirolimus as a therapuetic for graft-versus host disease (GvHD), it is critical to rigorously define the mechanisms by which this agent impacts T cell immunity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, we have used our novel rhesus macaque model of haploidentical HSCT and GVHD to probe the mechanisms of sirolimus-mediated GvHD prevention when given as a monotherapy. The insights gained from this study will facilitate the rational design of sirolimus-containing combinatorial therapies to maximize immunosuppressive efficacy. Methods: Transplant recipients were prepared with 8Gy total body irradiation and were then infused with MHC-mismatched donor leukopheresis products(n=3, avg. 6.5×108 TNC/kg, 3.4×107 total T cells/kg). Recipients received sirolimus monotherapy (serum troughs 5–15 ng/mL) alone as post-transplant immunosuppresson. Clinical GvHD was monitored according to our standard primate GvHD scoring system and flow cytometric analysis was performed to determine the immune phenotype of sirolimus-treated recipients compared to a cohort of recipients (n= 3) that were given no GvHD immunoprophylaxis. Results: Sirolimus modestly prolonged survival after MHC-mismatched HSCT compared to no immunosuppression (>19 days versus 6.5 days in the untreated cohort, with GvHD confirmed histopathologically at the time of necropsy). We found that sirolimus significantly inhibited lymphocyte proliferation in transplant recipients: The ALC remained suppressed post-transplant (eg ALC of 0.46 × 106/mL on day 15 post-transplant versus 4.3 × 106/mL pre-transplant, with recovery of other leukocytes: WBC=5.1 × 106/mL, ANC=2.6 × 106/mL). These results suggest that sirolimus can have a profound impact on lymphocyte proliferation, inhibiting GvHD-associated lymphocyte expansion by as much as 200–300-fold compared to untreated controls. Sirolimus had a similar impact on CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulation expansion. Thus, while CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells expanded by as much as 300-fold and 2000-fold, respectively, without sirolimus, the expansion of these cells was significantly blunted with sirolimus, with maximal expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells being 4- and 3.6-fold, respectively compared to the post-transplant nadir. Sirolimus-treated recipients also better controlled the upregulation of the proliferation marker Ki-67 on CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Thus, while untreated recipients upregulated Ki-67 expression by as much as 10-fold after engraftment, (with >80-98% T cells expressing high levels of Ki-67 post-transplant versus 5–10% pre-transplant) sirolimus-treated recipients better controlled Ki-67 expression (17-40% Ki-67-high CD4+ and CD8+ T cells post-transplant). While the impact of sirolimus on T cell proliferation was profound, it failed to completely inhibit activation of T cells, as measured by both Granzyme B and CD127 expression. Thus, when effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cell cytotoxic potential was measured by determining expression levels of granzyme B, we found that sirolimus could not downregulate this key component of immune function and GvHD-mediated target organ damage: Granzyme B expression in both CD4+ and CD8+ CD28-/CD95+ effector T cells was unchanged despite sirolimus monotherapy. Down-regulation of CD127 expression, which identifies activated CD8+ T cells in both humans and rhesus macaques, also demonstrated resistance to sirolimus treatment. Thus, while a cohort of recipients that were treated with combined costimulation blockade and sirolimus maintained stable CD127 levels post-transplant, and untreated animals demonstrated total loss of CD127, up to 60% of CD8+ T cells in sirolimus-treated recipients down-regulated CD127, consistent with breakthrough activation of these cells despite mTOR inhibition. Discussion: These results indicate that while the predominant effect of sirolimus during GvHD prophylaxis is its striking ability to inhibit T cell proliferation, sirolimus-based immunosuppression spares some cellular signaling pathways which control T cell activation. These results imply that therapies that are combined with sirolimus during multimodal GvHD prophylaxis should be directed at inhibiting T cell activation rather than proliferation, in order to target non-redundant pathways of alloimmune activation during GvHD control. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.