Inherited retinal dystrophies and optic neuropathies (IRD) are the most frequent cause for vision loss in the working age. The huge variability of phenotypes and initial clinical presentation frequently delay the ophthalmologic diagnosis. The most frequent phenotypes are retinitis pigmentosa, macular dystrophies, cone-rod dystrophies and syndromes associated with IRDs. Causative gene variants have been identified in more than 300 genes, with a frequency variation between different ethnicities. In this series of 1 914 patients seen in Germany between 1995 and 2024, in 47.4 % of families the genetic background could be solved. Even with a common genotype, the phenotype can be variable. Genetic diagnostic testing is important for the correct diagnosis, for patient selection for current or future therapies, but also from the patient perspective.
ZusammenfassungExogen bedingte Retinopathien werden am häufigsten durch externe Stimulanzien, seltener durch unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen systemisch oder intravitreal eingesetzter Medikamente und noch seltener durch Impfungen oder die Einwirkung von Lichtstrahlung verursacht. Die Kenntnis exogener Ursachen und ihre mögliche Symptomatik ist zur Prophylaxe oder zur Früherkennung schädigender Wirkungen und zur adäquaten Beratung der Patienten wichtig.
Objective: The clinical presentation of inherited retinal dystrophies associated with pathogenic variants in PRPH2 is highly variable. Here we present bilateral sector macular dystrophy as a novel clinical phenotype. Methods and analysis: Ophthalmologic examination, detailed retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography, fundus and near-infrared autofluorescence and molecular genetic testing were performed on a 30-year-old female. Results: The patient reported the onset of subjective visual disturbances 4.5 months prior to our first examination. Clinical examination and retinal imaging revealed bilateral sharply demarcated paracentral lesions in the temporal lower macula and otherwise normal retinal findings. Patient history revealed no medication or other possible causes for these unusual retinal lesions. Molecular genetic testing revealed a heterozygous c.623G>A variation (p.(Gly208Asp)) in the PRPH2 gene. Conclusions: Bilateral sectoral macular dystrophy has not been reported previously in any inherited retinal dystrophy. This feature adds to the wide spectrum of PRPH2-associated clinical presentations.
Near-infrared autofluorescence (NIA) is a non-invasive retinal imaging technique used to examine the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) based on the autofluorescence of melanin. Melanin has several functions within RPE cells. It serves as a protective antioxidative factor and is involved in the phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments. Disorders affecting the photoreceptor–RPE complex result in alterations of RPE cells which are detectable by alterations of NIA. NIA allows us to detect early alterations in various chorioretinal disorders, frequently before they are ophthalmoscopically visible and often prior to alterations in lipofuscin-associated fundus autofluorescence (FAF) or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Although NIA and FAF relate to disorders affecting the RPE, the findings for both imaging methods differ and the area involved has been demonstrated to be larger in NIA compared to FAF in several disorders, especially inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs), indicating that NIA detects earlier alterations compared to FAF. Foveal alterations can be much more easily detected using NIA compared to FAF. A reduced subfoveal NIA intensity is the earliest sign of autosomal dominant Best disease, when FAF and OCT are still normal. In other IRDs, a preserved subfoveal NIA intensity is associated with good visual acuity. So far, the current knowledge on NIA in IRD has been presented in multiple separate publications but has not been summarized in an overview. This review presents the current knowledge on NIA in IRD and demonstrates NIA biomarkers.
Near-infrared autofluorescence (NIA) is a non-invasive retinal imaging technique for examination of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) based on the autofluorescence of melanin. Melanin has several functions within the RPE cells, in one of them it serves as a protective antioxidative factor within the RPE cells and is involved in the phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments. Disorders that affect the photoreceptor-RPE complex result in alterations of RPE cells which are detectable by alterations of NIA. Therefore, NIA allows to detect early alterations in inherited and acquired chorioretinal disorders, frequently prior to ophthalmoscopical visualisation and often prior to alterations in lipofuscin associated fundus autofluorescence (FAF) or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Although NIA and FAF relate to disorders affecting the RPE, findings between both imaging methods differ and the area involved has been demonstrated to be larger in NIA compared to FAF in several disorders (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, ABCA4-gene associated Stargardt disease and cone-rod dystrophy, light damage), indicating that NIA detects earlier alterations compared to FAF. In addition, due to the absence of blue-light filtering which limits foveal visualisation in FAF, foveal alterations can be much better detected using NIA. A reduced subfoveal NIA intensity is the earliest sign of autosomal dominant BEST1-associated disease, when FAF and OCT are still normal. In other disorders, a normal subfoveal NIA intensity is associated with good visual acuity. This review summarizes the present knowledge on NIA and demonstrates biomarkers for various chorioretinal disorders.
ZusammenfassungDie Nahinfrarot-Autofluoreszenz (NIA) ist ein nicht-invasives Verfahren zur Untersuchung des retinalen Pigmentepithels (RPE) basierend auf der Darstellung des antioxidativen Schutzfaktors Melanin in den RPE-Zellen. Die NIA verbessert die Früherkennung chorioretinaler Erkrankungen, da bei vielen dieser Erkrankungen mit der NIA Strukturveränderungen des RPE nachweisbar sind, bevor sich in anderen Untersuchungen Krankheitszeichen erkennen lassen.
Near-infrared autofluorescence (NIA) is a non-invasive retinal imaging technique for examination of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) based on the autofluorescence of melanin. Melanin has several functions within the RPE cells, in one of them it serves as a protective antioxidative factor within the RPE cells and is involved in the phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments. Disorders that affect the photoreceptor-RPE complex result in alterations of RPE cells which are detectable by alterations of NIA. Therefore, NIA allows to detect early alterations in inherited and acquired chorioretinal disorders, frequently prior to ophthalmoscopical visualisation and often prior to alterations in lipofuscin associated fundus autofluorescence (FAF) or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Although NIA and FAF relate to disorders affecting the RPE, findings between both imaging methods differ and the area involved has been demonstrated to be larger in NIA compared to FAF in several disorders (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, ABCA4-gene associated Stargardt disease and cone-rod dystrophy, light damage), indicating that NIA detects earlier alterations compared to FAF. In addition, due to the absence of blue-light filtering which limits foveal visualisation in FAF, foveal alterations can be much better detected using NIA. A reduced subfoveal NIA intensity is the earliest sign of autosomal dominant BEST1-associated disease, when FAF and OCT are still normal. In other disorders, a normal subfoveal NIA intensity is associated with good visual acuity. This review summarizes the present knowledge on NIA and demonstrates biomarkers for various chorioretinal disorders.
When acetic acid-urea polyacrylamide gels with or without Triton X-100 were immersed in 0.1 m Na picrate, pH 7, to which 14 vol Coomassie blue staining solution (0.2% in 45% methanol, 10% acetic acid, 45% water) was added, proteins stained rapidly (within a few minutes in gels without Triton and within an hour in gels with Triton) with little or no background staining. Thus protein bands could be observed in a single step with no destaining. The picrate-Coomassie blue method fixed and stained a small peptide (bradykinin, nine amino acids) that was not observed in gels stained with fast green, silver, or Coomassie blue following fixation in 50% trichloroacetic acid. The picrate-Coomassie blue method gave high-contrast bands suitable for densitometry. Gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate were also stained by the picrate-Coomassie blue method if they were first washed briefly (1 h) in 45% methanol, 10% acetic acid, 45% water, presumably to remove the detergent. These gels also stained rapidly with almost no background.
Aim: With a need to expand the monitoring options in therapeutic clinical trials, we evaluated the additional information provided by wide-field optical coherence tomography (W-OCT) compared to conventional macular volume scan OCT (M-OCT) in ABCA4 gene-associated inherited retinal dystrophies (ABCA4-IRD).
Toxic retinopathies are most frequently induced by external stimulants (e.g. nicotine, poppers, methanol) and are less frequently undesired side effects of systemic drugs (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, ethambutol, MEK, ERK, FLT3 or checkpoint inhibitors, didanosine, pentosan polysulfate sodium) or intravitreally applied drugs. The clinical symptoms of undesired side effects of drugs are often similar to retinal diseases from other causes, which interferes with the recognition of the undesired side effects of drugs. Clinical findings, pathophysiological mechanisms and if advisable strategies for screening are discussed. The focus is on the presentation of confirmed undesirable side effects with established associations for medications which have long been approved. For novel medications, in addition potential but not proven associations are presented to facilitate the recognition of additional cases with side effects for these medications.
An early diagnosis, differential diagnosis and possible decision about therapeutic interventions has considerable consequences for the personal and social life of patients affected with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD). For the ophthalmologist, the clinical heterogeneity interferes with a simple diagnostic approach. The present review suggests a structured clinical approach for the ophthalmological diagnosis of IRD and discusses the relevance of different methods for diagnosis, differential diagnosis and the evaluation of progression. A detailed history should be followed by non-invasive retinal imaging. An early diagnosis prior to visible fundus alterations is facilitated by combining optical coherence tomography, fundus and near-infrared autofluorescence. Spectral reflectance photography, OCT angiography and fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy are helpful in the early diagnosis of specific IRD. If retinal imaging is not sufficient for a diagnosis the multifocal electroretinogram is useful for early diagnosis and full-field electroretinogram for differential diagnosis of IRD. Patients should be referred to specialised IRD-centres for differential diagnosis and possible treatment.
ZusammenfassungFür Patienten mit hereditären Netzhautdystrophien (auf Englisch: inherited retinal dystrophies, IRD) ist die Früherkennung, Differenzialdiagnose und mögliche Therapieentscheidung von erheblicher persönlicher und sozialer Bedeutung. Für den Augenarzt kann dies aufgrund der Heterogenität der Erkrankungen und Verläufe sowie der Seltenheit der IRD eine Herausforderung sein. Die vorliegende Übersicht empfiehlt eine zielorientierte klinisch-ophthalmologische Diagnostik bei Verdacht auf IRD mit einer Bewertung der Relevanz der einzelnen Methoden und ihrer Kombination für Diagnose, Differenzialdiagnose und Beurteilung der Progression im Verlauf. Nach einer umfassenden Anamnese ist initial die Kombination von optischer Kohärenztomografie (OCT), Fundus- und Nahinfrarot-Autofluoreszenz zur Frühdiagnose einer IRD ggf. vor ophthalmoskopisch sichtbaren Läsionen sinnvoll. Spektrale Reflexionsfotografie, OCT-Angiografie und Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Ophthalmoscopy sind bei einzelnen IRD hilfreich. Erlaubt die retinale Bildgebung keine sichere Diagnose, ist das multifokale Elektroretinogramm zur Frühdiagnose und das Ganzfeld-Elektroretinogramm zur Differenzialdiagnose von IRD geeignet. Eine Vorstellung in Schwerpunktzentren für IRD zur Differenzialdiagnostik und Therapie ist empfehlenswert.