Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) enables hematopoietic reconstitution through donor stem cells matched at essential HLA loci. While it offers potential for a graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect through elimination of residual malignant cells, it also carries the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) due to the recognition of healthy tissues. We identified two groups of HLA-II restricted antigens with distinct behavior towards HLA-DM. DM-resistant antigens are presented when HLA-DM is expressed. In contrast, DM-sensitive antigens require inhibition of HLA-DM by HLA-DO. Because HLA-DO expression is confined to hematopoietic antigen-presenting cells, DM-sensitive antigens cannot be presented on non-hematopoietic tissues, even under inflammatory conditions. Since HLA-DP is frequently mismatched in unrelated donor transplants, we hypothesized that CD4+ T cells targeting DM-sensitive antigens in a mismatched HLA-DP allele could be an ideal way to achieve GvL effect without inducing GvHD. Methods: To identify T cells recognizing DM-sensitive antigens, isolated CD4⁺ T cells from an HLA-DP–mismatched donor were co-cultured with HeLa cells expressing invariant chain (li) and one of the five most common HLA-DP molecules in the Caucasian population (DPB1*01:01, *02:01, *03:01, 04:01, 04:02). Activated T cells were isolated based on expression of CD137 and clonally expanded. Reactivity of T-cell clones against HeLa + Ii ± HLA-DP ± HLA-DM, malignant hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell lines, EBV-infected B cells, and primary AML blasts was characterized, along with cytotoxicity and cytokine profiles. T-cell receptors (TCR) of T-cell clones with the most favorable characteristics were sequenced in order to generate TCR-engineered T cells. TCR reexpression was achieved by orthotopic T-cell receptor replacement (OTR) using CRISPR. Results: Of 105 T-cell clones from nine donors, 79 targeted DM-sensitive and 26 DM-resistant antigens, distinguished by their reactivity in presence of HLA-DM. T-cell clones directed against DM-sensitive antigens did not recognize non-hematopoietic cells, even under inflammatory conditions. In contrast, HLA-DO positive malignant hematopoietic cell lines and primary AML blasts were recognized by T-cell clones targeting DM-sensitive antigens, indicating potential leukemia-specificity. Testing against cell lines from various donors suggests that antigen recognition by T cells was independent of donor-specificity, but rather directed against the mismatched HLA-DP possibly complexed with a monomorphic peptide. Across all experimental conditions, the recognition profile (sensitive or resistant) remained consistent regardless of target cell concentration. Donor-dependent cytotoxicity for isolated T-cell clones was observed and mainly mediated by Granzyme A and B. Extended cytokine analysis revealed secretion of INF-γ, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-6, accompanied by lower levels of IL-4. After reexpression, TCR-engineered T cells demonstrated high functionality as shown by IFN-γ ELISA and activation marker analysis via flow cytometry. Conclusion: We show feasibility to identify T cells directed against DM-sensitive antigens presented in mismatched HLA-DP alleles recognizing malignant hematopoietic cells, which in future may contribute to the development of GvL directed T-cell therapies with reduced risk of GvHD.

Background/objectives: MDG1011 is a Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME)-specific autologous T cell receptor (TCR) T cell therapy for HLA-A*02:01-positive patients. Data from the first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial, CD-TCR-001, are reported here regarding treatment feasibility, safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of MDG1011 in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Nine of thirteen enrolled patients received MDG1011 at dose levels ranging from 0.1 to 5 × 106 TCR-T cells per kg body weight. In addition to clinical assessments, immune monitoring of cytokines associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), presence and persistence of MDG1011, and changes in levels of PRAME mRNA were used to assess safety and potential biological activity at defined time points. Results: The treatment was well tolerated. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and the most common serious adverse events were associated with lymphodepleting chemotherapy and/or disease progression. Various parameters, such as measurable clinical responses in two patients, the occurrence of CRS in two additional patients, and reductions in PRAME mRNA levels in bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) in seven patients, served as signs of the clinical and biological activity of MDG1011 TCR-T therapy. Conclusions: Patients enrolled in the phase 1 part of CD-TCR-001 displayed signs of potential clinical and biological activity of MDG1011 among the small number of patients studied. Advanced disease stage and rapid progression in the r/r AML patients limited clinical impact. The acceptable safety profile of MDG1011 merits further investigation of this TCR-T therapy, potentially in patients at an earlier stage of their disease and with lower tumor burden.

D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) accumulates in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and in other malignancies. D-2-HG suppresses antitumor T-cell immunity but little is known about potential effects on non-malignant myeloid cells. Here we show that D-2-HG impairs human but not murine dendritic cell differentiation, resulting in a tolerogenic phenotype with low major histocompatibility class II expression. In line with this, IDH-mutated AML blasts exhibited lower expression of HLA-DP and were less susceptible to lysis by HLA-DP-specific T cells. Interestingly, besides its expected impact on DNA demethylation, D-2-HG reprogrammed metabolism towards increased lactate production in dendritic cells and AML. Vitamin C accelerated DNA demethylation, but only the combination of vitamin C and glycolytic inhibition lowered lactate levels and supported major histocompatibility complex class II expression. Our results indicate an unexpected link between the immunosuppressive metabolites 2-HG and lactic acid and suggest a potentially novel therapeutic strategy with combinations of anti-glycolytic drugs and epigenetic modulators (hypomethylating agents) or other therapeutics for the treatment of AML.

Introduction: Patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are refractory to intensive frontline treatment have a dismal outcome. In case of ineligibility for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the median survival of chemo-refractory AML is about 2 months and less than 5% of these pts are alive after 1-year (retrospective analysis from the AMLSG database). To date, there is no universally accepted standard approach for the treatment of chemo-refractory AML in older pts. Several retrospective studies have assessed the role of hypomethylating agents in this patient group, but complete remission (CR) rates were disappointingly low (≤10%) when compared to first line treatment. The presented study represents a novel approach focusing on hematopoietic tissue reprogramming (i.e. anakoinosis) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02942758). Methods: The initial dose-finding phase I of the study evaluated the combination of azacitidine (AZA) 75 mg/d s.c. for 7 days, repeated every 28-days, pioglitazone 45 mg/d p.o. continuously from day 1 and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). A modified 3+3 design has been used to establish the maximum-tolerated dose of ATRA. Patients have been enrolled at an ATRA dose of 45 mg/m²/d from day 1 to day 28 and 15 mg/m²/d continuously thereafter if no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred until start of next cycle on day 29. The safety DLTs were defined as toxicities attributable to ATRA, expected or unexpected, except if these are likely associated with another cause. Eligible patients had confirmed diagnosis of AML refractory to induction therapy and were not eligible for further intensive induction therapy or were not immediate candidates for allogeneic HSCT. The severity of adverse events was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V. 4.03. The response to treatment was evaluated using standard criteria defined by the expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet and international working group (IWG) response. Results: Ten pts were enrolled in the safety-run-in phase I (one pt withdrew informed consent on day 9 of cycle 1). Among all treated pts, the median age was 67 years (range, 62-76 years), and the majority of pts (70%) had an ECOG PS of 1 (see table 1). Two pts had secondary AML; another two pts had therapy-related AML (t-AML). Eight pts had a complex karyotype. Concerning safety, hematological adverse events (AEs) were the most common toxicities observed. Because pts with baseline cytopenia were included (leukopenia n=8; 80%; thrombocytopenia n=9; 90%), occurrences of many hematological AEs began before study drug initiation and were attributed to underlying hematologic disease. Common 3°/4° AEs included neutropenia (50%), anemia (50%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and infections (40%). 50% of pts experienced a serious AE; one 5° AE (gastric hemorrhage) occurred. No DLTs were observed. Five pts discontinued the study, with progressive disease (PD) or relapse being the most common reason for discontinuation. Concerning efficacy, 3 pts (30%) achieved a CR and one pt a long-lasting stable disease (14 months). Morphologic review showed signs of differentiation of blasts in responding pts, which has already been shown in in-vitro analysis. In line with this observation, one pt demonstrated resolution of fungal pneumonia during the study. Conclusions: In summary, the low-intensity, biomodulatory regimen of low-dose AZA, pioglitazone, and ATRA demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging signals for efficacy in pts with AML refractory to standard induction chemotherapy warranting further investigation. S.T. and A.R. contributed equally to this abstract as senior co-authors. Disclosures Paschka: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Other: Travel expenses; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel expenses; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Travel expenses; Takeda: Other: Travel expenses; Sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Döhner:Celgene, Novartis, Sunesis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AROG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer: Research Funding; AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, Astex, Celator, Janssen, Jazz, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thomas:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Medigene AG: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) in the canonical “second generation” format provide two signals for inducing T cell effector functions; the primary “signal-1” is provided through the TCR CD3ζ chain and the “signal-2” through a linked costimulatory domain to augment activation. While therapy with second generation CAR T cells can induce remissions of leukemia/lymphoma in a spectacular fashion, CAR T cell persistence is frequently limited which is thought to be due to timely limited activation. Following the “three-signal” dogma for inducing a sustained T cell response, cytokines were supplemented to provide “signal-3” to CAR T cells. Recent progress in the understanding of structural biology and receptor signaling has allowed to engineer cytokines for more selective, fine-tuned stimulation of CAR T cells including an artificial autocrine loop of a transgenic cytokine, a cytokine anchored to the CAR T cell membrane or inserted into the extracellular CAR domain, and a cytokine receptor signaling moiety co-expressed with the CAR or inserted into the CAR endodomain. Here we discuss the recent strategies and options for engineering such “cytokine help intensified CAR” (CHIC) T cells for use in adoptive cell therapy.

BACKGROUND:To date, in-depth analysis of leukapheresis products as starting material for CAR T-cell manufacturing, specifically Tisagenlecleucel production, are scarce. In this study, we report on lymphapheresis data for production of Tisagenlecleucel for elderly and pretreated lymphoma patients.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:Spectra Optia from Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, was employed for apheresis using the cMNC program. Apheresis success was defined as meeting a target total nucleated cell (TNC) count of ≥2 × 109 , a CD3-positive lymphocyte count of ≥1 × 109 and an overall viability of ≥70% in the lymphapheresis product.RESULTS:Twenty-three patients (age 37-77 years) and 24 apheresis runs were evaluated. The median CD3-positive lymphocyte count in peripheral blood at the beginning of apheresis was 565 cells/μl (range: 70-1345 cells/μl). Circulating lymphoma cells were detected in one patient prior to apheresis. Target criteria were met in 21 of 23 patients. The median TNC count in the apheresate was 11.2 × 109 (range: 2.9 × 109 -47.4 × 109 ). The median CD3-positive lymphocyte count in the apheresate was 2.55 × 109 (range: 0.370 × 109 -6.915 × 109 ), which resulted in a median collection efficiency for CD3-positive lymphocytes of 63.7% (range: 9.56%-93.6%). No adverse events associated with the apheresis process were observed.CONCLUSIONS:Lymphapheresis with the Spectra Optia cMNC program provided a sufficient quantity of CD3-positive lymphocytes for CAR T-cell manufacturing for the majority of patients despite their heavy pretreatment and advanced age. Moreover, we are the first to advocate early pre-emptive lymphocyte collection in DLBCL-NOS patients intended to undergo treatment with Tisagenlecleucel.

Accelerated glycolysis leads to secretion and accumulation of lactate and protons in the tumor environment and determines the efficacy of adoptive T cell and checkpoint inhibition therapy. Here, we analyzed effects of lactic acid on different human CD4 T cell subsets and aimed to increase CD4 T cell resistance towards lactic acid. In all CD4 T cell subsets analyzed, lactic acid inhibited metabolic activity (glycolysis and respiration), cytokine secretion, and cell proliferation. Overexpression of the lactate-metabolizing isoenzyme LDHB increased cell respiration and mitigated lactic acid effects on intracellular cytokine production. Strikingly, LDHB-overexpressing cells preferentially migrated into HCT116 tumor spheroids and displayed higher expression of cytotoxic effector molecules. We conclude, that LDHB overexpression might be a promising strategy to increase the efficacy of adoptive T cell transfer therapy.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have evolved as a new standard-of-care (SOC) treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Here, we report the first German real-world data on SOC CAR T-cell therapies with the aim to explore risk factors associated with outcomes. Patients who received SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for LBCL and were registered with the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST) were eligible. The main outcomes analyzed were toxicities, response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We report 356 patients who received axi-cel (n = 173) or tisa-cel (n = 183) between November 2018 and April 2021 at 21 German centers. Whereas the axi-cel and tisa-cel cohorts were comparable for age, sex, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), international prognostic index (IPI), and pretreatment, the tisa-cel group comprised significantly more patients with poor performance status, ineligibility for ZUMA-1, and the need for bridging, respectively. With a median follow-up of 11 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, PFS, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) 12 months after dosing were 52%, 30%, and 6%, respectively. While NRM was largely driven by infections subsequent to prolonged neutropenia and/or severe neurotoxicity and significantly higher with axi-cel, significant risk factors for PFS on the multivariate analysis included bridging failure, elevated LDH, age, and tisa-cel use. In conclusion, this study suggests that important outcome determinants of CD19-directed CAR T-cell treatment of LBCL in the real-world setting are bridging success, CAR-T product selection, LDH, and the absence of prolonged neutropenia and/or severe neurotoxicity. These findings may have implications for designing risk-adapted CAR T-cell therapy strategies.

AbstractManufacturing immune effector cells (T or NK cells) with CAR-encoding DNA sequences requires efficient and safe genetic engineering procedures. For this purpose, an appropriate genetic vector is chosen according to numerous factors, including the vector genome packaging capacity, cellular tropism, genomic integration, immune toxicity, and other factors. In clinical trials, genomes integrating viral vectors, in particular vectors based on members of the Retroviridae family, such as retroviruses and lentiviruses, have been successfully used for more than 20 years. These vectors contain an RNA genome that when transcribed into double-stranded DNA by reverse transcriptase integrates into the genome of the transduced cell.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is associated with severe disease conditions either following congenital transmission of the virus or viral reactivation in immunosuppressed individuals. Consequently, the establishment of a protective vaccine is of high medical need. Several candidates have been tested in preclinical and clinical studies, yet no vaccine has been licensed. Subviral dense bodies (DB) are a promising vaccine candidate. We have recently provided a GMP-compliant protocol for the production of DB, based on a genetically modified version of the HCMV laboratory strain Towne, expressing the pentameric complex of envelope protein gH-gL-pUL128-131 (Towne-UL130rep). In this work, we genetically attenuated Towne-UL130rep by abrogating the expression of the tegument protein pUL25 and by fusing the destabilizing domain ddFKBP to the N-terminus of the IE1- and IE2-proteins of HCMV. The resulting strain, termed TR-VAC, produced high amounts of DB under IE1/IE2 repressive conditions and concomitant supplementation of the viral terminase inhibitor letermovir to the producer cell culture. TR-VAC DB retained the capacity to induce neutralizing antibodies. A complex pattern of host protein induction was observed by mass spectrometry following exposure of primary human monocytes with TR-VAC DB. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) moderately increased the expression of activation markers and MHC molecules upon stimulation with TR-VAC DB. In a co-culture with autologous T cells, the TR-VAC DB-stimulated DC induced a robust HCMV-specific T cell-activation and –proliferation. Exposure of donor-derived monocytic cells to DB led to the activation of a rapid innate immune response. This comprehensive data set thus shows that TR-VAC is an optimal attenuated seed virus strain for the production of a DB vaccine to be tested in clinical studies.

In recent years, onco-metabolites like D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which is produced in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutated tumors, have gained increasing interest. Here, we report a metabolite in human specimens that is closely related to 2-hydroxyglutarate: the intramolecular ester of 2-hydroxyglutarate, 2-hydroxyglutarate-γ-lactone. Using 13C5-L-glutamine tracer analysis, we showed that 2-hydroxyglutarate is the endogenous precursor of 2-hydroxyglutarate-lactone and that there is a high exchange between these two metabolites. Lactone formation does not depend on mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase, but its formation is most probably linked to transport processes across the cell membrane and favored at low environmental pH. Furthermore, human macrophages showed not only striking differences in uptake of 2-hydroxyglutarate and its lactone but also in the enantiospecific hydrolysis of the latter. Consequently, 2-hydroxyglutarate-lactone may play a critical role in the modulation of the tumor microenvironment.

Abstract Introduction The CD19 targeting CAR-T cell constructs axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) have become an accepted standard salvage treatment of LBCL beyond the second line. Patients scheduled for approved CAR-T cell therapies usually have 4-8 weeks wait time for CAR-T cell infusion, thus often requiring bridging strategies in rapidly progressing patients to achieve disease control until start of lymphodepletion. It is still unclear, however, if the adverse impact of active progressive lymphoma can be overcome by successful bridging. We have addressed this question using registry data provided by the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST), the national partner of the EBMT. Methods We analyzed 356 consecutive patients who received standard of care axi-cel (n=173) or tisa-cel (n=183) treatment of LBCL between November 2018 and April 2021 at 21 German centers and were registered with the DRST/EBMT. Baseline patient, disease, and transplant data were collected from MED-A cellular therapy forms. Centers were contacted to provide additional treatment and follow-up information. Predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed by uni- and multivariate comparisons. Results Compared to the approval trials, patients were of poor risk with 58% presenting with elevated LDH at lymphodepletion and 71% having received ≥3 pretreatment lines, resulting in ineligibility for the ZUMA-1 study in 87% of cases. Kaplan-Maier estimates of overall survival, PFS and non-relapse mortality (NRM) 12 months after dosing were 52%, 30% and 7%, respectively. Information on bridging was available for 355 patients (99%). Of these, 279 patients (78%) underwent at least one line of bridging attempt, whereas bridging was deemed unnecessary in 76 patients (22%). A wide variety of modalities were employed for bridging, with the most frequent being chemoimmunotherapy (n=188), chemotherapy (n=41), radiation (n=30), immunotherapy (n=12) and steroids (n=6). Bridging resulted in disease control (CR/PR) in 58 of 270 patients evaluable for response (21%). With a median follow-up of 11 months, 12-month PFS rates for patients without bridging, successful bridging, and bridging failure were 41%, 52%, and 20%, respectively, p=<0.001 (Figure). Of note, an increased LDH at lymphodepletion did not impair PFS within the bridging responders, but affected the outcome of those patients who did not respond or not undergo bridging (p<0.0001). The adverse impact of bridging failure on PFS was confirmed after multivariable adjustment for confounders (p=0.001, HR 2.083; 95% CI 1.358-3.195). Other significant risk factors for PFS on multivariate analysis were elevated LDH (p=0.012, HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.08-1.96), tisa-cel (p=0.0109, HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.06-1.88) and ECOG (p=0.021, HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.03-1.45). Conclusion The results of this large German GLA/DRST analysis suggest that effective bridging can overcome the adverse impact of active disease on the outcome of standard-of-case CD19 CAR-T therapy. With current treatment strategies, however, bridging is often unsuccessful, highlighting the need for exploring innovative tools for inducing temporary LBCL control for CAR-T therapy preparation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bethge: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schmitt: TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Apogenix: Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding. Holtick: Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Borchmann: Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Subklewe: Klinikum der Universität München: Current Employment; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. von Tresckow: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pentixafarm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: congress and travel support; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Ayuk: Gilead: Honoraria; Mallinckrodt/Therakos: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biomedicine: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Kroeger: Novartis: Honoraria; AOP Pharma: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wulf: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Clinigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Marks: Merck: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: Meeting attendance; Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Penack: Astellas: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Koenecke: Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Von Bonin: Kite/Gilead: Other: traveling support and advisory fees; Novartis: Other: traveling support and advisory fees; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: traveling support and advisory fees. Stelljes: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Glass: BMS: Consultancy; Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch: Current Employment; Kite: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Baldus: Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Vucinic: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; MSD: Honoraria. Topp: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Macrogeniecs: Research Funding; Universitatklinikum Wurzburg: Current Employment. Schroers: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Thomas: Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Art tempi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Kite-Gilead: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau. Dreger: Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is attractive for the development of CAR T-cell immunotherapy because AML blasts are susceptible to T-cell-mediated elimination. Here, we introduce sialic-acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglec)-6 as a novel target for CAR T-cells in AML. We designed a Siglec-6-specific CAR with a targeting-domain derived from a human monoclonal antibody JML‑1. We found that Siglec-6 is prevalently expressed on AML cell lines and primary AML blasts, including the subpopulation of AML stem cells. Treatment with Siglec-6-CAR T-cells confers specific anti-leukemia reactivity that correlates with Siglec-6-expression in pre-clinical models, including induction of complete remission in a xenograft AML model in immunodeficient mice (NSG/U937). In addition, we confirmed Siglec-6-expression on transformed B-cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and show specific anti-CLL-reactivity of Siglec-6-CAR T-cells in vitro. Of particular interest, we found that Siglec-6 is not detectable on normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSC/P) and that treatment with Siglec-6-CAR T-cells does not affect their viability and lineage differentiation in colony-formation assays. These data suggest that Siglec-6-CAR T-cell therapy may be used to effectively treat AML without a need for subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In mature normal hematopoietic cells, we detected Siglec-6 in a proportion of memory (and naïve) B-cells and basophilic granulocytes, suggesting the potential for limited on-target/off-tumor reactivity. The lacking expression of Siglec-6 on normal HSC/P is a key differentiator from other Siglec-family members (e.g. Siglec-3=CD33) and other CAR target antigens, e.g. CD123, that are under investigation in AML and warrants the clinical investigation of Siglec-6-CAR T-cell therapy.

Abstract Introduction Although the labeled CD19 targeting CAR-T cell constructs axi-cel and tisa-cel are generally associated with an acceptable safety profile, non-relapse deaths can occur. Little is known about timing, causes and predictors of NRM following SOC CAR-T cell therapy for LBCL. Here, we analyzed frequency, causes, and risk factors of non-relapse deaths with focus on late NRM (beyond 4 weeks after dosing) using registry data provided by the DRST, the national partner of the EBMT. Methods Patients were selected from 356 consecutive patients who received SOC CAR-T treatment of LBCL between November 2018 and April 2021 at 21 German centers and were registered with the DRST/EBMT. Baseline patient, disease, and transplant data were collected from MED-A cellular therapy forms. Centers were contacted to provide additional treatment and follow-up information. Patients with late NRM (defined as NRM occurring beyond 4 weeks after dosing without prior LBCL relapse or progression) were compared with all patients surviving progression-free the 4-week landmark after dosing without subsequent NRM. Cumulative incidences of NRM were calculated considering relapse/progression as competing event. Results The analysis set consisted of 312 patients surviving progression-free at least 28 days after CAR-T treatment and remained alive until the end of follow-up or had a documented cause of death. Median age was 61 years (19-83), 66% were male, 52% had an IPI ≥3, 13 had an ECOG score >1, 70% had received ≥3 treatment lines, 33% had failed a prior HCT, and 78% were refractory at lymphodepletion. 50% had been treated at a center contributing ≥20 cases with axi-cel (52%) or tisa-cel (48%). Grade ≥3 CRS and grade ≥3 neurotoxicity (NT) had occurred in 11% each, and 7% had no neutrophil recovery at day 100 post dosing or at last follow-up, whatever was earlier. With a median follow-up of 11.2 months, 124 patients (40%) had died, 109 (35%) LBCL-related, and 15 (5%) because of NRM. The cumulative incidence of late NRM at 12 months post dosing was 4.3% (95%CI 2.0-6.6). Causes of NRM were infections in 10 patients (bacterial or fungal sepsis/pneumonia 6; viral/atypical pneumonia/encephalitis 4); late NT 2; hyperinflammatory syndrome 1; 2 nd malignancy 1; unknown 1). Of note, 5 of the 6 lethal fungal/bacterial infections occurred subsequent to high grade NT. There was no significant difference between patients experiencing and not experiencing NRM in terms of age, gender, IPI, ECOG, pretreatment lines, prior HCT, disease status at lymphodepletion, and grade ≥3 CRS frequency. However, a significantly larger proportion of patients with late NRM had failed neutrophil recovery (27% vs 5%, p 0.011), had experienced grade ≥3 NT (40% vs 10%, p 0.0031), and/or had received axi-cel (93% vs 51%, p 0.001). Patients having neutrophil non-recovery and/or grade ≥3 NT had a 12-month NRM incidence of 16% (95%CI 5.1-26.9) vs 2.5% (95%CI 0.3-4.7) in patients with none of these 2 factors. Conclusions Late NRM in patients receiving SOC CAR-T treatment for LBCL is largely driven by infections. Risk factors for late NRM appear to be protracted neutropenia and higher grade NT, suggesting that intensified anti-bacterial/anti-fungal prophylaxis may be considered in patients with persisting critical neutropenia or exposed to high-dose steroids for NT treatment. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dreger: BMS: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schubert: Gilead: Consultancy. Holtick: Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Subklewe: Miltenyi: Research Funding; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Klinikum der Universität München: Current Employment; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bastian: Abbvie: Other; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other; BMS and Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Pentixafarm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Ayuk: Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biomedicine: Honoraria; Mallinckrodt/Therakos: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Marks: Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy; AbbVie: Other: Meeting attendance. Penack: Priothera: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Shionogi: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy. Koenecke: EUSA Pharm: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Von Bonin: Daiichi Sankyo: Other: traveling support and advisory fees; Novartis: Other: traveling support and advisory fees; Kite/Gilead: Other: traveling support and advisory fees. Stelljes: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Glass: BMS: Consultancy; Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch: Current Employment; Kite: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Baldus: Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Vucinic: MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring. Topp: Universitatklinikum Wurzburg: Current Employment; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Macrogeniecs: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schroers: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Hanoun: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Other: travel expenses; Novartis: Research Funding. Thomas: AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Art tempi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Bethge: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

The cancer-testis antigen PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is expressed at high levels in several oncological indications, including leukemias and solid tumors, as confirmed by mRNA or protein expression studies. Its low to absent expression on normal tissues allows suitable discrimination of tumors for targeted immunotherapy. As an intracellular protein, PRAME-derived peptides can be presented by several HLA class I allotypes, including HLA-A*02:01, and specific T cell recognition has been reported for different PRAME peptide-HLA (pHLA) ligands. Thus, developing a small set of TCRs covering different HLAs could increase the number of PRAME-positive patients eligible for treatment with T cell receptor (TCR)-based immunotherapy approaches. We determined PRAME expression in a group of Caucasian patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In addition, we analyzed the HLA-A genotype distribution in a set of healthy blood donors to determine how many and which different TCRs would be needed to optimally cover a Caucasian population in Germany. For the analysis of PRAME expression, bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples from 165 patients (AML=133, MDS=32), obtained from multiple clinical sites across Germany, were studied. Ninety-six samples were from newly diagnosed patients (58%) while 68 samples were from relapsed/refractory patients (41%), irrespective of percentage of leukemic blasts. Disease status was not known for one patient. PRAME mRNA expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A threshold for PRAME-negativity was derived by measuring average PRAME mRNA expression in 22 healthy individuals. Detection of 99 or more copies of PRAME, as measured in 12.5 ng RNA, was considered positive. Of the 165 AML/MDS patients, 79 (48%; AML= 69, MDS=10) were positive for PRAME mRNA. Among relapsed/refractory patients, 52% (35/68) were classified as PRAME-positive, versus 45% (43/96) of first-diagnosis AML/MDS patients. NGS high-resolution HLA-A genotyping showed that 55% of all patients had an HLA-A*02:01 allotype, which is higher than the approximately 45% expected for a random Caucasian population and accounted for by the fact that some patients were included with known HLA-A2 status due to prior assessment for transplant eligibility. In combination, 43 (26%) AML/MDS patients were positive for PRAME above the threshold level as well as for HLA-A*02:01, thereby being potential candidates for treatment with PRAME-specific, HLA-A*02:01-restricted TCR immunotherapy. In a group of 141 healthy local blood donors, NGS high-resolution HLA-A genotyping showed an expected distribution of HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*01:01, HLA-A*03:01, HLA-A*24:02 and HLA-A*11:01 of 43%, 26%, 25%, 19% and 8% respectively, with some donors heterozygous for two of these particular allotypes. To determine the smallest number of TCRs needed to address the largest number of patients, we assessed how the non-overlapping distribution for each potential HLA-A allotype would contribute to patient coverage. Starting with the 43% of patients who would be covered by an HLA-A*02:01-restricted TCR immunotherapy product, additional coverage of 21%, 14%, 9%, and 1% of patients could be achieved with TCR products using HLA-A*01:01-, HLA-A*03:01-, HLA-A*24:02- and HLA-A*11:01-restricted TCRs, respectively. In conclusion, approximately half of AML/MDS patients are PRAME-positive and could be addressed with PRAME-specific TCR immunotherapy approaches. An HLA-A*02:01-restricted TCR addresses the most patients in a population in Germany at 43%, while coverage could be increased to 87% with addition of three TCRs restricted by the next most common HLA-A allotypes, contingent upon suitable TCR discovery. Disclosures Addo: Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment. Davari:Medigene Immunotherapies: Current Employment. Raffegerst:Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tippmer:Medigene Immunotherapies: Current Employment. Schendel:Medigene AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pinkernell:Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

HLA-DPB1 antigens are mismatched in about 80% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations from HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donors and were shown to be associated with a decreased risk of leukemia relapse. We recently developed a reliable in vitro method to generate HLA-DPB1 mismatch-reactive CD4 T-cell clones from allogeneic donors. Here, we isolated HLA-DPB1 specific T cell receptors (TCR DP) and used them either as wild-type or genetically optimized receptors to analyze in detail the reactivity of transduced CD4 and CD8 T cells toward primary AML blasts. While both CD4 and CD8 T cells showed strong AML reactivity in vitro, only CD4 T cells were able to effectively eliminate leukemia blasts in AML engrafted NOD/SCID/IL2Rγc−/− (NSG) mice. Further analysis showed that optimized TCR DP and under some conditions wild-type TCR DP also mediated reactivity to non-hematopoietic cells like fibroblasts or tumor cell lines after HLA-DP upregulation. In conclusion, T cells engineered with selected allo-HLA-DPB1 specific TCRs might be powerful off-the-shelf reagents in allogeneic T-cell therapy of leukemia. However, because of frequent (common) cross-reactivity to non-hematopoietic cells with optimized TCR DP T cells, safety mechanisms are mandatory.

Die moderne Immunonkologie hat die Krebstherapie in den letzten Jahren revolutioniert. Diese Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über die aktuellen Therapiemöglichkeiten. Ein Review der aktuellen Studiendaten wurde erstellt. In der Onkologie sind Immuncheckpointinhibitoren (ICPi) in der Monotherapie oder auch in Kombination mit anderen Medikamenten zum neuen Therapiestandard bei vielen Entitäten geworden. In der Therapie hämatologischer Neoplasien zeigen CAR-T-Zellen (CAR chimäre Antigenrezeptoren) und bispezifische Antikörper beeindruckende Ansprechraten. Die Tumorvakzination stellt eine weitere immunologische Therapieform mit hohem Potenzial dar, die jedoch noch keinen breiten Eingang in die Klinik gefunden hat. Die Immunonkologie gehört mit unterschiedlichen Ansätzen in vielen Entitäten aktuell zum Therapiestandard.