La conservación de la vegetación en ambientes urbanos, especialmente de los pastizales, es una problemática poco abordada, pero de gran relevancia ecológica y social. En este artículo proponemos un debate abierto sobre la importancia de los pastizales urbanos y periurbanos, los desafíos para conservar su biodiversidad y las implicancias socioecológicas asociadas. Para ello, nos basamos en relevamientos de diversidad vegetal en cinco pastizales urbanos de la Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires (RMBA), donde organizaciones socioambientales comprometidas participan en su conservación. Primero, exploramos las problemáticas de los pastizales, la definición de pastizal urbano y sus distintas acepciones en la literatura, así como la percepción y la valoración de la sociedad de estos espacios. Sintetizamos los beneficios que los pastizales urbanos aportan a la sociedad, incluyendo la conservación de la biodiversidad, la recreación y la educación ambiental. Luego, describimos las características específicas de cinco áreas de pastizales en la RMBA destinadas a conservación. En estas áreas, a pesar de la fragmentación de la matriz urbana y la presencia de especies exóticas invasoras, persiste una proporción significativa de especies nativas representativas del pastizal pampeano, valiosas para la conservación de la biodiversidad urbana. Esto evidencia la importancia ecológica de los pastizales urbanos y la necesidad de generar estrategias efectivas para conservar y restaurar sus fragmentos. Finalmente, analizamos las ventajas y oportunidades que estos fragmentos representan para la región. Proponemos soluciones a las problemáticas identificadas, como implementar prácticas de manejo adecuadas para reducir la invasión de especies exóticas y promover la restauración de los pastizales.

Human activities alter biomass, nutrient availability, and species dominance in grasslands, impacting their richness, composition, and biomass production. Stability (invariability in time or space) can inform the predictability of plant communities in response to human activities. However, this measure has been simplistically analyzed for temporal (interannual) changes in live biomass, disregarding their spatial stability and the temporal stability of other plant community attributes. Moreover, the simultaneous analysis of temporal and spatial stabilities of plant communities has been scarcely assessed. Here, we test how biomass removal and nutrient addition simultaneously modify the temporal and spatial stabilities of plant richness (α diversity), composition dissimilarity (β diversity), aboveground live biomass, and the role of plant species dominance in the stability responses. We conducted a factorial experiment of biomass removal (grazing, mowing, or intact -no removal-) and nutrient addition (unfertilized or fertilized with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) in a temperate grassland of Argentina, South America. We replicated the experiment in 6 blocks over 10 years to estimate the temporal and spatial stabilities of the plant community. The spatiotemporal stability of plant richness and composition dissimilarity decreased in the intact grassland, while the temporal stability of live biomass increased, compared to the grazed and mowed grasslands. Nutrient addition reduced the spatiotemporal stability of live biomass and the spatial stability of plant richness. The stabilities of species richness as well as that of composition dissimilarity were negatively associated with plant dominance, while the live biomass stability was not. Our results suggest that simplifying the effect of biomass removal and nutrient addition on grassland stability is not feasible, as plant diversity stability responses are not surrogates for biomass stability. The contrasting spatiotemporal stability responses of plant diversity and biomass represent a step forward in predicting human activities' impact over time and across space in temperate grasslands.

Question: Legumes are a key component of rangelands because they play an important role in animal nutrition and the entrance of nitrogen (N) into ecosystems through symbiotic fixation. Legume abundance is commonly low in N-enriched environments because of competition with grasses and non-legume forbs. Both haying and livestock grazing remove plant biomass and reduce light limitation to plant growth, with the difference that livestock may selectively consume legumes. This study examines how legumes respond to grazing, haying and fertilization, and what mechanisms explain legume abundance in rangelands.Location: Flooding Pampa, Argentina.Methods: We performed two manipulation field experiments over 3 years. First, a factorial of rangeland management (intact, haying, or grazing) under two nutrient levels (ambient and increased N, phosphorus [P] and potassium [K]); and second, a factorial of rangeland management (intact or haying) and N x P addition. We evaluated legume, grass and non-legume forb abundance and ground-level light in three to five replicates of our experiments over 3 years.ResultsNPK fertilization increased legume abundance consistently under grazing, and temporarily under haying, but had no effect in the intact grassland. Also, P addition increased legume abundance only under haying when N was not added. Temporal changes in legume abundance were positively associated with changes in ground-level light, which increased with haying and grazing, but decreased with fertilization in the intact grassland, and negatively with grass abundance.Conclusions: The negative effects of nutrients on legume abundance were offset by the positive effects of livestock. The reduction in grass competition and increase in ground-level light due to grazing and haying explained the positive responses of legume abundance to nutrients in this temperate grassland. Our results highlight the importance of considering the interactive response of legume abundance to grazing and fertilization, which are becoming common practices in rangelands.

Changes in livestock loads and eutrophication associated with human activities can modify the stability of grassland's aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), by modifying the mean (mu) and/or standard deviation (sigma) of ANPP. The changes in attributes of the plant community (i.e., species richness, species asynchrony, dominance) might in turn explain the ecosystem temporal (inter-annual) stability of grassland production. Here, we evaluated the interactive effects of changes in livestock loads and chronic nutrient addition on the temporal stability of ANPP (estimated as mu/sigma) in temperate grasslands. We also assessed the role of different attributes of the plant community on ecosystem stability. We carried out a factorial experiment of domestic livestock exclusion and nutrient addition (10 g.m(-2).year(-1) of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium; n = 6 blocks) during five consecutive years in a natural grassland devoted to cattle production (Flooding Pampa, Argentina). Domestic livestock exclusion reduced ANPP stability by 65%, regardless of nutrient load, mainly by the increase of ANPP standard deviation. This reduction in ANPP stability after livestock exclusion was associated mostly with higher plant species dominance and also with reductions in plant effective richness and in the asynchrony of grassland's species. Despite not finding direct negative effects of eutrophication on ANPP stability, chronic nutrient addition decreased effective species richness and asynchrony, which may translate into reductions in ANPP stability in the future. Our findings highlight that the presence of livestock maintains the temporal stability of ANPP mainly by lowering the dominance of the plant community. However, increases in nutrient loads in grasslands devoted to livestock production may threaten grassland's stability.

Questions Arid communities are strongly limited by soil resources including water and nitrogen (N). Plants compete for N with other plants and microorganisms, which are also limited by carbon (C). We propose that above- and below-ground plant responses to soil resources are modulated by community structure (species relative abundances, "mass ratio hypothesis") and species traits (relative growth rates - RGRs). We evaluated the single and combined effects of soil N and C addition on the above- and below-ground biomass accumulation of perennial grass patches in an arid community, and the mechanisms involved in their responses. Location Patagonian steppe, Argentina. Methods We added N (2 g N m(-2); NH4NO3) and C (330 g C m(-2); sucrose) to 1-m(2) field plots in a factorial design. After two years, we harvested above-ground (n = 5 plots) and below-ground biomass (n = 10 soil cores) and sorted it by species. We measured potential soil respiration as a proxy of microbial activity. Results Total above-ground biomass increased by 55% as a result of N and decreased by 45% as a result of C addition, in relation to controls. C addition reduced total below-ground biomass by 42%. The above-ground differences were associated with changes in the biomass of dominant species according to their RGRs. Poa ligularis (dominant, high RGR) increased by 92% as a result of N addition while Pappostipa speciosa (dominant, low RGR) decreased by 55% as a result of C addition. Intermediate and subordinate grasses did not modify their biomass, independently of their RGR. Potential soil respiration was three times higher in plots with C addition than in control plots. Conclusions Community biomass was explained by a combination of mass ratio hypothesis and specific RGR, as dominant grasses controlled above-ground community responses to N (high-RGR species) and C addition (low-RGR species). Our findings highlight the independence between the above- and below-ground processes and the importance of considering community equitability and species characteristics to predict plant community responses to changes in soil resources.

Questions: Human activities are increasing the density of domestic grazers and global nutrient loads, modifying the main determinants of vegetation community dynamics. Grazing (top-down control) and nutrient availability (bottom-up control) may interactively modify plant biomass, which is particularly important in grasslands devoted to livestock production. Here, we aim to understand the interactive effects of grazing and fertilization on grassland plant biomass. We hypothesized that the joint effects of nutrient addition and domestic grazing on above-ground plant biomass are not additive, but they modify each other through changes in ground-level light, leaf nutritional quality, above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP), and below-ground plant allocation. Location: Flooding Pampa (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Methods: We carried out a factorial experiment of grazing exclusion and fertilization with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium + micronutrients during several years in a mesic grassland devoted to livestock production. Results: After four years, grazing reduced live above-ground plant biomass by 52%, and when combined with fertilization this reduction was 70%. Nutrient addition in the grazed grassland increased ANPP and leaf nutrient concentration. These changes in turn intensified grazing pressure and cattle's plant consumption. By contrast, fertilization did not produce any significant effect on plant biomass or ANPP inside the exclosures, where ground-level light was low. A structural equation model revealed that the increase in ANPP fostered above-ground and reduced below-ground plant biomass. Conclusions: This is the first study conducted in the Pampas grasslands that evaluated the effect of cattle grazing and fertilization on plant communities under field conditions over several years. Grazing and nutrient addition synergistically controlled grassland plant biomass, as the reduction in above-ground biomass by cattle consumption was greater in fertilized plots. Our results provided empirical evidence that leaf nitrogen and ANPP modulated plant biomass dynamics in grasslands devoted to livestock production in the context of increased nutrient loads in terrestrial ecosystems.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20985-z.

Nutrient enrichment can simultaneously increase and destabilise plant biomass production, with co-limitation by multiple nutrients potentially intensifying these effects. Here, we test how factorial additions of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium with essential nutrients (K+) affect the stability (mean/standard deviation) of aboveground biomass in 34 grasslands over 7 years. Destabilisation with fertilisation was prevalent but was driven by single nutrients, not synergistic nutrient interactions. On average, N-based treatments increased mean biomass production by 21-51% but increased its standard deviation by 40-68% and so consistently reduced stability. Adding P increased interannual variability and reduced stability without altering mean biomass, while K+ had no general effects. Declines in stability were largest in the most nutrient-limited grasslands, or where nutrients reduced species richness or intensified species synchrony. We show that nutrients can differentially impact the stability of biomass production, with N and P in particular disproportionately increasing its interannual variability.

Human activities are transforming grassland biomass via changing climate, elemental nutrients, and herbivory. Theory predicts that food-limited herbivores will consume any additional biomass stimulated by nutrient inputs ('consumer-controlled'). Alternatively, nutrient supply is predicted to increase biomass where herbivores alter community composition or are limited by factors other than food ('resource-controlled'). Using an experiment replicated in 58 grasslands spanning six continents, we show that nutrient addition and vertebrate herbivore exclusion each caused sustained increases in aboveground live biomass over a decade, but consumer control was weak. However, at sites with high vertebrate grazing intensity or domestic livestock, herbivores consumed the additional fertilization-induced biomass, supporting the consumer-controlled prediction. Herbivores most effectively reduced the additional live biomass at sites with low precipitation or high ambient soil nitrogen. Overall, these experimental results suggest that grassland biomass will outstrip wild herbivore control as human activities increase elemental nutrient supply, with widespread consequences for grazing and fire risk.