Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterised by the aggregation of TDP-43 and mutant FUS in the cytoplasm of affected motor neurons. Accumulation of DNA damage is emerging as a novel correlative trait of ALS. We recently showed that formation of TDP-43 and FUS cytoplasmic inclusions (CIs) lead to DNA damage accumulation through dysregulation of the DNA damage response (DDR). However, the multiple molecular mechanisms contributing to DNA damage accumulation in affected motor neurons in ALS have not been fully elucidated. In recent years, chemical inhibition of the serine/threonine kinase CHK1 was shown to lead to accumulation of DNA breaks as well as increased apoptosis, in differentiated cortical neurons. Notably, CHK1 has been involved in DNA double-strand break repair in non-dividing cells, by acting through the histone chaperone ASF1A. In this article, we show that cells bearing FUS and TDP-43 CIs show downregulation of the protein levels of CHK1 and ASF1A. We observe CHK1 protein downregulation in neuronal cell lines, as well as in patient-derived motor neurons progenitors and in the spinal cord of a FUS-ALS mouse model. Restoration of the nuclear levels of CHK1 and ASF1A via transient overexpression, is sufficient to reduce DNA damage signal accumulation and rescues DDR defects. Importantly, we show that the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is responsible for CHK1 degradation in cells bearing FUS CI, since its inhibition restores CHK1 and ASF1A protein levels. Our study demonstrates that proteasomal-dependent CHK1 and ASF1A downregulation contributes to accumulation of DNA damage in cells affected by ALS-linked protein aggregates.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most cytotoxic and most frequent lesions that arise in the mammalian genome; they occur as a result of both external insults and internal metabolic activities. Failures in damage signalling and repair of DSBs can result in permanent cell cycle arrest, cellular senescence, cell death or the accumulation of mutations and genomic instability - events that ultimately disrupt tissue homeostasis. To reduce these detrimental outcomes, cells have evolved a sophisticated and tightly coordinated network of mechanisms for detecting, signalling and repairing DNA lesions, collectively known as the DNA damage response (DDR). Repair occurs within the chromatin landscape, with DDR sensors, mediators, signalling kinases and ubiquitin ligases rapidly recruited to the site of damage. Simultaneously, local chromatin modifications and remodelling take place, which also modulate local transcriptional activity. More complex chromatin dynamics are subsequently orchestrated within the three-dimensional nuclear space - persistent DSBs are actively relocated to specialized nuclear domains and chromatin compartments undergo spatial reorganization to facilitate efficient repair. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we explore the interplay between local and global chromatin dynamics that coordinate DSB repair and preserve genome integrity within the context of a highly dynamic epigenome.

Formation of cytoplasmic inclusions (CIs) of TDP-43 and FUS, along with DNA damage accumulation, is a hallmark of affected motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). However, the impact of CIs on DNA damage response (DDR) and repair in this pathology remains unprobed. Here, we show that CIs of TDP-43 and FUSP525L, co-localizing with stress granules, lead to a dysfunctional DDR activation associated with physical DNA breakage. Inhibition of the activity of the DDR kinase ATM, but not of ATR, abolishes DDR signaling, indicating that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the primary source of DDR activation. In addition, cells with TDP-43 and FUSP525L CIs exhibit reduced DNA damage-induced RNA synthesis at DSBs. We previously showed that the two endoribonucleases DROSHA and DICER, also known to interact with TDP-43 and FUS during small RNA processing, contribute to DDR signaling at DSBs. Treatment with enoxacin, which stimulates DDR and repair by boosting the enzymatic activity of DICER, restores a proficient DDR and reduces DNA damage accumulation in cultured cells with CIs and in vivo in a murine model of ALS. In Drosophila melanogaster, Dicer-2 overexpression rescues TDP-43-mediated retinal degeneration. In summary, our results indicate that the harmful effects caused by TDP-43 and FUS CIs include genotoxic stress and that the pharmacological stimulation of the DNA damage signaling and repair counteracts it.

The activation of the DNA-damage response (DDR) enforces the transcriptional silencing of genes near DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a process called DSB-induced silencing in cis (DISC). DISC involves the kinase ATM and the polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) component BMI1. Conversely, DSBs also trigger transcription of damage-induced long non-coding RNAs (dilncRNAs) in an MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN)-complex-dependent manner. MRN recruits the ribonuclease DROSHA, which, along with DICER, enhances DDR signaling and repair. We show that dilncRNAs, DROSHA, and DICER regulate DISC. MRN or ATM inhibition disrupts DISC, while enoxacin, a DICER activator, restores it even without ATM activity. Mechanistically, DROSHA and DICER enable BMI1 recruitment and H2A-K119 ubiquitination at DSBs. BMI1 interacts with DROSHA and dilncRNAs in a DICER-dependent manner. Blocking dilncRNAs by antisense oligonucleotide and Cas13 reduces BMI1 recruitment and DISC. We propose that DROSHA, DICER, and dilncRNAs mediate DISC by promoting PRC1 recruitment and chromatin modification at DSBs.

Formation of cytoplasmic inclusions (CIs) of TDP-43 and FUS, along with DNA damage accumulation, is a hallmark of affected motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). However, the impact of CIs on DNA damage response (DDR) and repair in this pathology remains unprobed. Here, we show that CIs of TDP-43 and FUSP525L, co-localizing with stress granules, lead to a dysfunctional DDR activation associated with physical DNA breakage. Inhibition of the activity of the DDR kinase ATM, but not of ATR, abolishes DDR signaling, indicating that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the primary source of DDR activation. In addition, cells with TDP-43 and FUSP525L CIs exhibit reduced DNA damage-induced RNA synthesis at DSBs. We previously showed that the two endoribonucleases DROSHA and DICER, also known to interact with TDP-43 and FUS during small RNA processing, contribute to DDR signaling at DSBs. Treatment with enoxacin, which stimulates DDR and repair by boosting the enzymatic activity of DICER, restores a proficient DDR and reduces DNA damage accumulation in cultured cells with CIs and in vivo in a murine model of ALS. In Drosophila melanogaster, Dicer-2 overexpression rescues TDP-43-mediated retinal degeneration. In summary, our results indicate that the harmful effects caused by TDP-43 and FUS proteinopathies include genotoxic stress and that the pharmacological stimulation of the DNA damage signaling and repair counteracts it. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Transcription of actively expressed genes is dampened for kilobases around DNA lesions via chromatin modifications. This is believed to favour repair and prevent genome instability. Nonetheless, mounting evidence suggests that transcription may be induced by DNA breakage, resulting in the local de novo synthesis of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Such transcripts have been proposed to play important functions in both DNA damage signalling and repair. Here, we review the recently identified mechanistic details of transcriptional silencing at damaged chromatin, highlighting how post-translational histone modifications can also be modulated by the local synthesis of DNA damage-induced ncRNAs. Finally, we envision that these entangled transcriptional events at DNA breakages can be targeted to modulate DNA repair, with potential implications for locus-specific therapeutic strategies.

Genome integrity is safeguarded by the DNA damage response (DDR). Transcriptional modulation of genes around DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is important for DNA repair. It has been shown that DSBs repress transcription of DSB-bearing genes in an ATM- and PRC1-dependent manner. However, DSB also induce local de novo transcription of non-coding RNA, which are processed by DROSHA and DICER into small DNA-damage-response RNA (DDRNA). Here we reconcile these apparently contrasting observations by showing that DROSHA and DICER inactivation prevents transcriptional repression of DSB-bearing genes by reducing PRC1 recruitment to DSB and consequent H2A-K119 chromatin ubiquitination. Indeed, DDRNAs generated at DSB associate with the PRC1 component BMI1 and inhibition of DDRNA function with antisense oligonucleotides is sufficient to reduce damage-induce transcriptional silencing in cis genes (DISC). We propose that DROSHA, DICER and DDRNAs control DISC at genomic lesion sites by favoring PRC1-driven chromatin ubiquitination.

Trimethylguanosine synthase 1 (TGS1) is a highly conserved enzyme that converts the 5'-monomethylguanosine cap of small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) to a trimethylguanosine cap. Here, we show that loss of TGS1 in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and Danio rerio results in neurological phenotypes similar to those caused by survival motor neuron (SMN) deficiency. Importantly, expression of human TGS1 ameliorates the SMN-dependent neurological phenotypes in both flies and worms, revealing that TGS1 can partly counteract the effects of SMN deficiency. TGS1 loss in HeLa cells leads to the accumulation of immature U2 and U4atac snRNAs with long 3' tails that are often uridylated. snRNAs with defective 3' terminations also accumulate in Drosophila Tgs1 mutants. Consistent with defective snRNA maturation, TGS1 and SMN mutant cells also exhibit partially overlapping transcriptome alterations that include aberrantly spliced and readthrough transcripts. Together, these results identify a neuroprotective function for TGS1 and reinforce the view that defective snRNA maturation affects neuronal viability and function.

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade that recognizes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and promotes their resolution via the DNA repair pathways of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). We and others have shown that DDR activation requires DROSHA; however, whether DROSHA exerts its functions by associating with damage sites, what controls its recruitment, and how DROSHA influences DNA repair remains poorly understood. Here, we show that DROSHA associates with DSBs independently of transcription. Neither H2AX, nor ATM or DNA-PK kinase activities are required for recruitment of DROSHA to break sites. Rather, DROSHA interacts with RAD50, and inhibition of the MRN complex by mirin treatment abolishes this interaction. MRN complex inactivation by RAD50 knockdown or mirin treatment prevents DROSHA recruitment to DSBs and, as a consequence, also prevents 53BP1 (also known as TP53BP1) recruitment. During DNA repair, DROSHA inactivation reduces NHEJ and boosts HR frequency. Indeed, DROSHA knockdown also increases the association of downstream HR factors such as RAD51 to DNA ends. Overall, our results demonstrate that DROSHA is recruited at DSBs by the MRN complex and directs DNA repair towards NHEJ.

Telomerase negative cancer cell types use the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) pathway to elongate telomeres ends. Here, we show that silencing human DNA polymerase (Pol λ) in ALT cells represses ALT activity and induces telomeric stress. In addition, replication stress in the absence of Pol λ, strongly affects the survival of ALT cells. In vitro, Pol λ can promote annealing of even a single G-rich telomeric repeat to its complementary strand and use it to prime DNA synthesis. The noncoding telomeric repeat containing RNA TERRA and replication protein A negatively regulate this activity, while the Protection of Telomeres protein 1 (POT1)/TPP1 heterodimer stimulates Pol λ. Pol λ associates with telomeres and colocalizes with TPP1 in cells. In summary, our data suggest a role of Pol λ in the maintenance of telomeres by the ALT mechanism.

It has been shown that protein low-sequence complexity domains (LCDs) induce liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), which is responsible for the formation of membrane-less organelles including P-granules, stress granules and Cajal bodies. Proteins harbouring LCDs are widely represented among RNA binding proteins often mutated in ALS. Indeed, LCDs predispose proteins to a prion-like behaviour due to their tendency to form amyloid-like structures typical of proteinopathies. Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) can influence phase transition through two main events: i) destabilizing or augmenting multivalent interactions between phase-separating macromolecules; ii) recruiting or excluding other proteins and/or nucleic acids into/from the condensate. In this manuscript we summarize the existing evidence describing how PTM can modulate LLPS thus favouring or counteracting proteinopathies at the base of neurodegeneration in ALS.

Subcellular compartmentalization contributes to the organization of a plethora of molecular events occurring within cells. This can be achieved in membraneless organelles generated through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a demixing process that separates and concentrates cellular reactions. RNA is often a critical factor in mediating LLPS. Recent evidence indicates that DNA damage response foci are membraneless structures formed via LLPS and modulated by noncoding transcripts synthesized at DNA damage sites. Neurodegeneration is often associated with DNA damage, and dysfunctional LLPS events can lead to the formation of toxic aggregates. In this review, we discuss those gene products involved in neurodegeneration that undergo LLPS and their involvement in the DNA damage response.

The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex supports the synthesis of damage-induced long non-coding RNA (dilncRNA) by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by an unknown mechanism. Here, we show that recombinant human MRN and native RNAPII are sufficient to reconstitute a minimal functional transcriptional apparatus at DSBs. MRN recruits and stabilizes RNAPII at DSBs. Unexpectedly, transcription is promoted independently from MRN nuclease activities. Rather, transcription depends on the ability of MRN to melt DNA ends, as shown by the use of MRN mutants and specific allosteric inhibitors. Single-molecule FRET assays with wild-type and mutant MRN show a tight correlation between the ability to melt DNA ends and to promote transcription. The addition of RPA enhances MRN-mediated transcription, and unpaired DNA ends allow MRN-independent transcription by RNAPII. These results support a model in which MRN generates single-strand DNA ends that favor the initiation of transcription by RNAPII.

Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) molecules have been shown to play a variety of cellular roles; however, the contributions of different types of RNA to specific phenomena are often hard to dissect. To study the role of RNA in the assembly of DNA damage response (DDR) foci, we developed the RNase A treatment and reconstitution (RATaR) method, in which cells are mildly permeabilized, incubated with recombinant RNase A and subsequently reconstituted with different RNA species, under conditions of RNase A inactivation and inhibition of endogenous transcription. The block of transcription right after RNase A removal represents a key innovation of RATaR, preventing potential contributions of endogenously neo-synthesized transcripts to the phenotypes studied. A critical aspect of this technique is the balance between sufficient permeabilization of membranes to allow enzyme/RNA access into the cell nucleus and cell viability. Here, we present our protocol for RNA-dependent DDR foci disassembly and reassembly using fluorescent DDR RNAs (DDRNAs) in NIH2/4 cells, an engineered NIH3T3-derived cell line. The use of sequence-specific, fluorescent RNA molecules permits the concomitant determination of their subcellular localization and biological functions. We also outline adaptations of RATaR when implemented in different cell lines exposed to various genotoxic treatments, such as γ-radiation, restriction enzymes and telomere deprotection. In all these cases, the entire procedure can be completed within 2 h without the need for special equipment or uncommon skills. We believe this technique will prove useful for investigating the contribution of RNA to a variety of relevant cellular processes.

A novel class of small non-coding RNAs called DNA damage response RNAs (DDRNAs) generated at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in a DROSHA- and DICER-dependent manner has been shown to regulate the DNA damage response (DDR). Similar molecules were also reported to guide DNA repair. Here, we show that DDR activation and DNA repair can be pharmacologically boosted by acting on such non-coding RNAs. Cells treated with enoxacin, a compound previously demonstrated to augment DICER activity, show stronger DDR signalling and faster DNA repair upon exposure to ionizing radiations compared to vehicle-only treated cells. Enoxacin stimulates DDRNA production at chromosomal DSBs and at dysfunctional telomeres, which in turn promotes 53BP1 accumulation at damaged sites, therefore in a miRNA-independent manner. Increased 53BP1 occupancy at DNA lesions induced by enoxacin ultimately suppresses homologous recombination, channelling DNA repair towards faster and more accurate non-homologous end-joining, including in post-mitotic primary neurons. Notably, augmented DNA repair stimulated by enoxacin increases the survival also of cancer cells treated with chemotherapeutic agents.

Coding for proteins has been considered the main function of RNA since the "central dogma" of biology was proposed. The discovery of noncoding transcripts shed light on additional roles of RNA, ranging from the support of polypeptide synthesis, to the assembly of subnuclear structures, to gene expression modulation. Cellular RNA has therefore been recognized as a central player in often unanticipated biological processes, including genomic stability. This ever-expanding list of functions inspired us to think of RNA as a "smart" phone, which has replaced the older obsolete "cellular" phone. In this review, we summarize the last two decades of advances in research on the interface between RNA biology and genome stability. We start with an account of the emergence of noncoding RNA, and then we discuss the involvement of RNA in DNA damage signaling and repair, telomere maintenance, and genomic rearrangements. We continue with the depiction of single-molecule RNA detection techniques, and we conclude by illustrating the possibilities of RNA modulation in hopes of creating or improving new therapies. The widespread biological functions of RNA have made this molecule a reoccurring theme in basic and translational research, warranting it the transcendence from classically studied "cellular" RNA to "smart" RNA.

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade through which a cell recognizes DNA lesions, and promotes their resolution via the repair pathways of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ), or Homologous Recombination (HR). We recently demonstrated that DROSHA boosts DDR signaling by processing damage-induced long non-coding RNAs into smaller DNA damage response RNAs (DDRNAs). However, the location at which DROSHA exerts its DDR functions, relative to sites of DNA damage, remains unknown.To investigate DROSHA’s localization during DDR activation, we used the DiVA cellular system, which allows the controlled induction of several DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in the human genome. Indeed, by genome wide chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing, we demonstrate that DROSHA associates with DSBs. In support of this, DSB-recruitment of DROSHA is detectable at the single-cell level by Proximity Ligation Assay between DROSHA and known DDR markers, and by DNA damage in situ ligation followed by Proximity Ligation Assay (DI-PLA), which demonstrates proximity of DROSHA to DNA ends. DROSHA recruitment occurs at both genic and inter-genic DSBs, suggesting that its recruitment is independent from ongoing transcription preceding damage generation. DROSHA’s recruitment to DNA lesions occurs throughout the cell cycle, and with a preference for NHEJ-prone DSBs. Consistently, inhibition of the HR pathway increases DROSHA recruitment, and DROSHA knock down strongly impairs NHEJ efficiency in a GFP-reporter cellular system for monitoring NHEJ DNA repair. Overall, these results demonstrate that DROSHA acts locally at sites of DNA damage to promote NHEJ DNA repair.

The fine modulation of transcriptional activity around DNA lesions is essential to carefully regulate the crosstalk between the activation of the DNA damage response, DNA repair and transcription, particularly when the lesion occurs next to actively transcribed genes. Recently, several studies have been carried out to investigate how DNA lesions impact on local transcription, but the emerging model remains incomplete. Transcription of genes around damaged DNA is actively downregulated by the DNA damage response through different mechanisms, which appear specific to the chromatin context, the type of DNA damage or its complexity. Intriguingly, emerging evidence also indicates that transcription of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) is induced at sites of DNA damage, producing small ncRNAs that are, in turn, required for a full DNA damage response activation. We discuss here these recent findings, highlighting the major unresolved questions in the field, and propose ways to reconcile these apparently contradictory observations.

In response to ionizing radiation (IR), cells activate a DNA damage response (DDR) pathway to re-program gene expression. Previous studies using total cellular RNA analyses have shown that the stress kinase ATM and the transcription factor p53 are integral components required for induction of IR-induced gene expression. These studies did not distinguish between changes in RNA synthesis and RNA turnover and did not address the role of enhancer elements in DDR-mediated transcriptional regulation. To determine the contribution of synthesis and degradation of RNA and monitor the activity of enhancer elements following exposure to IR, we used the recently developed Bru-seq, BruChase-seq and BruUV-seq techniques. Our results show that ATM and p53 regulate both RNA synthesis and stability as well as enhancer element activity following exposure to IR. Importantly, many genes in the p53-signaling pathway were coordinately up-regulated by both increased synthesis and RNA stability while down-regulated genes were suppressed either by reduced synthesis or stability. Our study is the first of its kind that independently assessed the effects of ionizing radiation on transcription and post-transcriptional regulation in normal human cells.