BACKGROUND:The COVID-19 pandemic added challenges to patient assessment and triage in the emergency department (ED).OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to describe the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ED triage nurse decisions for patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS).METHODS:This was a secondary analysis of data from a descriptive, electronic, survey-based study. Participants were asked 2 questions: whether the COVID-19 pandemic had affected their triage and/or assessment practices for patients with potential ACS and, if so, how. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the characteristics of participants. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze responses to the open-ended questions about the pandemic's effect on the triage process.RESULTS:Participants from across the United States had a mean age of 41.7 (12.3) years; 358 (80.6%) were women. The participants had a median of 10.0 (interquartile range, 16.0) years of experience as a registered nurse, with a median of 7.0 (interquartile range, 11.0) years of ED experience. A total of 180 of 444 participants (40.5%) indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic affected their triage processes and assessment of potential ACS patients; 156 (86.7%) provided a response to the open-ended question. Responses revealed 4 themes: (1) delays in triage and treatment, (2) ambiguous patient presentation, (3) heightened awareness of COVID-19 complications and sequelae, and (4) process changes.CONCLUSIONS:Forty percent of ED triage nurses participating reported that triage processes for patients with potential ACS were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most expressed barriers that resulted in delayed assessment and treatment of patients and often resulted from overlapping cardiac symptoms and COVID-19.

Introduction This study aimed to identify the symptoms used to assess angina, determine how emergency nurses make triage decisions for potential acute coronary syndrome, and determine emergency nurses’ initial actions. Methods This was a cross-sectional, survey-based design. Emergency nurses were recruited through a posting on the Emergency Nurses Association website and through postcards. Measures included demographic data, assessment of angina, and the Nurses’ Cardiac Triage Instrument. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression. Results A total of 414 registered nurses with a mean age of 41.7 (SD = 12.0) years participated. They were predominantly female (80.7%), had a baccalaureate degree (60.1%), and worked as a registered nurse for a median 10.0 years. Common terms used to assess angina were chest pain (79.5%), chest pressure (77.3%), chest tightness (72.9%), and chest discomfort (72.5%). The severity of chest pressure (median 5.0, interquartile range 1.0) and nature of chest pain (median 5.0, interquartile range 1.0) had the highest overall median scores to support initial cardiac triage decisions. Associated symptoms of diaphoresis, fatigue, and shortness of breath along with health history contributed to decision making. Discussion Emergency nurses primarily used chest symptoms and health history when deciding to evaluate for acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Associated symptoms of diaphoresis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, along with health history, also contributed to decision making. Initial registered nurse actions were to obtain an electrocardiogram, prepare the patient for the cardiac catheterization laboratory, and notify the emergency physician of the patient’s admission.

Background Adherence to prescribed analgesics for patients seriously ill with cancer pain is essential for comfort. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the analgesic adherence in seriously ill patients with cancer and its association with clinical and demographic characteristics. Methods This is a cross-sectional study. At home, 202 patients with cancer (mean age, 59.9 ± 14.2 years; 58% female, 48% Black, and 42% White) admitted to hospice/palliative care completed measures on a pen tablet: PAIN Report It, Symptom Distress Scale, mood state item, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index item, and Pain Management Index. Results The mean current pain intensity was 4.4 ± 2.9, and the mean worst pain in the past 24 hours was 7.2 ± 2.7. More than one-half of participants were not satisfied with their pain level (54%) and reported their pain was more intense than they wanted to tolerate for 18 hours or longer in the last 24 hours (51%). Only 12% were not prescribed analgesics appropriate for the intensity of their pain. Adherence rates were variable: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (0.63 ± 0.50), adjuvants (0.93 ± 0.50), World Health Organization step 2 opioids (0.63 ± 0.49), and step 3 opioids (0.80 ± 0.40). With setting/clinical/demographic variables in the model, dose intervals of less than 8 hours were associated with less adherence ( P < .001). Conclusion Little progress has been made toward improving analgesic adherence even in settings providing analgesics without cost. Research focused on targeting analgesic dose intervals and barriers not related to cost is needed. Implication for Practice Dose intervals of 8 hours or longer were significantly associated with higher adherence rates; therefore, use of longer-acting analgesics is one strategy to improve pain control at the end of life.

Background: Most women experience prodromal myocardial infarction (MI) symptoms, but more information is needed about the perception, attribution, and care-seeking behaviors related to these prodromal symptoms. Objectives: We aimed to describe women's perceptions, attributions, and care-seeking behaviors related to prodromal MI symptoms. Method: We used a qualitative, multiple case study approach, recruiting participants during summer 2019 from a large hospital in the Midwestern United States. Data were collected from interviews with the women who experienced MI and some of their family members, journals, and electronic health records. An inductive, comparative analysis procedure was applied. Results: Ten women, ages 42 to 84, participated in the study. The women experienced a mixture of certainty and uncertainty related to their symptoms and engaged in several cognitive processes to conceptualize and act upon their symptoms. Although all the women retrospectively reported at least 4 prodromal symptoms, they lacked knowledge of prodromal MI symptoms and often responded to prodromal sensations that they experienced using emotion- and avoidance-based strategies. It was difficult for the women to establish a symptom pattern that was attributable to heart disease. Discussion: The findings of this study may be used as evidence to support interventions that would facilitate women's care seeking for and health care providers' recognition of prodromal MI symptoms. Additional research is necessary to more fully characterize the cognitive processes at play for women of many different sociocultural backgrounds who experience prodromal MI symptoms.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to explore adult women's unique and shared experiences of prodromal myocardial infarction fatigue. BACKGROUND:Fatigue is the most prevalent symptom experienced by women in the weeks and months before myocardial infarction. However, dimensions of this fatigue, such as timing, distress, intensity, quality, patterns and associated characteristics have not been established through studies of this symptom. A lack of understanding of the characteristics of myocardial infarction fatigue and the context in which it occurs makes clinical decision-making difficult. DESIGN:A qualitative, multiple case study guided by the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms. METHODS:Women were purposively enrolled from a large hospital in the Midwestern USA. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted during hospitalisation and at 2-3 months postdischarge; women were also provided with a journal. A supplementary interview with family members and electronic health record review also assisted in data triangulation. Analysis was inductive and conducted within and across cases, using coding and categorisation, counting, clustering, visual displays of data and thematic development. The SRQR checklist was used in reporting the study. RESULTS:Ten women, with a median age of 60, participated. Fatigue was described primarily using the terms tiredness and lack of energy, though some women described generalised weakness and cognitive fog. This fatigue was unusual and a notable change from baseline. Many women described significant difficulties performing activities of daily living due to fatigue. CONCLUSIONS:The findings of this study will advance symptom science and an understanding of prodromal myocardial infarction fatigue. Future instrument development or selection of instruments for quantitative work will be aided by this study. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE:This study provides a clearer picture of prodromal myocardial infarction fatigue experienced by women, aiding healthcare professionals in understanding and identifying this symptom.

An estimated 1.2 million older adults nationwide currently reside in assisted/supportive living facilities, and research is required to continue to identify best outcomes in for their care. However, challenges exist. The aim of this paper is to address barriers and provide insights related to participant recruitment in assisted and supportive living facilities. Identified barriers included unproductive communication with reception area staff, a perceived lack of interest in research activity, and the inability of Director of Nursing (DON) to provide authorization for research activities. Recruitment insights included productive encounters with gatekeepers, establishing trust with executive administration and healthcare personnel, and research team persistence.

In patients having gastric tubes inserted in the emergency department setting, which bedside technique is best for confirmation of accurate placement immediately after tube insertion compared to radiograph?

Which massive transfusion scoring systems are most useful and effective in predicting the need for massive transfusion in adult non-military emergency department trauma patients?

BACKGROUND:Many older people experience chronic pain, so increased comfort and pain relief are important for older residents in assisted and/or supported-living environments. While several studies have found that people using non-pharmacological interventions without taking pain medication experienced significant differences in pain, the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on comfort and chronic pain in older people has not been studied.AIM:To assess differences in comfort and pain among older people in assisted and supported-living facilities who had chronic, non-cancer pain and who used or did not use non-pharmacological interventions.METHOD:A descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional pilot study with a convenience sample of 82 participants from 11 assisted and supported-living facilities. Three questionnaires were used to obtain data on the independent variable of use/non-use of non-pharmacological interventions and the dependent variables of perceived comfort and pain. Multivariate analyses of variance were computed to measure differences between the use/non-use groups, and Roy-Bargmann stepdown analyses were computed to further subdivide and analyse the groups who were using and not using pain medication.RESULTS:No significant differences were found in chronic pain and perceived comfort between participants who did or did not use non-pharmacological interventions if they were not also taking pain medication. However, when participants were also taking pain medication, chronic pain and perceived comfort scores were significantly affected by the use of non-pharmacological interventions. The most common non-pharmacological interventions were exercise, heat therapy, spiritual activity/religion and listening to music.CONCLUSION:Older people using non-pharmacological interventions and taking pain medication had higher perceived comfort scores and lower pain scores than those using pain medication only. Relationships between non-pharmacological interventions and comfort should be explored further. With minor changes, this pilot study design could be used with a larger sample.

For adult (18 and older) emergency department patients, how effective is screening and/or intervention for intimate partner violence?

Is there evidence of pain and distress reduction in pediatric patients who receive analgesic or anxiolytic interventions during needle-related or minor invasive procedures in the emergency department?

Does family presence have a positive or negative influence on the patient, family, and staff during invasive procedures and resuscitation?

What risk assessment tools and predictors are effective in screening for self-harm or suicidal ideation during initial assessment of patients across the life span in the emergency department?

Elders residing in long-term care facilities experience ongoing moderate to severe pain, relief from and increased comfort remain relevant healthcare concerns. However, persistent, noncancer pain may not have been properly addressed due to insufficient attention to research that exists to support the utilization and efficacy of nonpharmacological intervention(s) for elders in long-term care facilities. Our aim of this integrated review was to evaluate the current state of the science on nonpharmacological intervention(s) for pain that are currently utilized in elders who reside in long-term care facilities. Exercise, massage, heat therapy, and relaxation/rest were identified as significant nonpharmacological interventions for persistent pain in elder residents living in long-term care facilities.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore the extant literature for key features of prodromal and acute myocardial infarction fatigue experienced by women, including estimates of severity, narrative descriptors, impacts on activities of daily living and frequency, and to describe what is known from the current evidence base. BACKGROUND Several studies, conducted across the globe, have investigated prodromal and acute myocardial infarction symptoms experienced by women and suggested that fatigue is prevalent, and they have also sporadically described specific characteristics of fatigue, such as narrative descriptors and severity. However, no review specific to this acute and prodromal fatigue could be located in the literature. DESIGN Integrative review, guided by Whittemore and Knafl's approach and the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms. METHODS We used a comprehensive, systematic approach to searching, screening, selecting, evaluating and analysing the records. Data were collected in February 2017. RESULTS Twenty-one articles were included in the review, including nine quantitative, six qualitative and six mixed-methods studies, with the majority (14) published in the USA. The average age of participants across the studies was the early 60s. Distress, quality, intensity and timing of prodromal myocardial infarction fatigue were more completely described in the literature than acute myocardial infarction fatigue. CONCLUSIONS Fatigue is the most common prodromal myocardial infarction symptom experienced by women and is also a common acute symptom. Additional research exploring prodromal and acute myocardial infarction fatigue is necessary. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE As healthcare professionals work with women across the healthcare spectrum, recognising fatigue as an important potential myocardial infarction symptom is essential. Not only can women be educated about this symptom and other possible myocardial infarction symptoms, but clinicians can consider fatigue as an important symptom in a constellation of factors when evaluating women's health and the potential for coronary disease and myocardial infarction.