Background To compare the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 survivors and non-survivors who were transferred from general wards to the critical care units in four tertiary hospitals of Nepal. Methods This study utilized electronic data from the National Intensive Care Unit (ICU) registry managed by the Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation (NICRF). A retrospective observational study was conducted among 78 eligible COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care units of four different hospitals between 2020 and 2022. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare each continuous variable between the survivors and non survivors, while Pearson's chi-squared test was used to examine the association between each categorical variable and outcome. Results Among 78 cases of COVID-19 studied, 29 (37.1%) had died, and 49 (62.8%) had recovered. The median age of the patient was 57.5 years, with a higher percentage of males (66.6%). Hypertension (41%) and diabetes (26.9%) were common comorbidities, whereas pneumonia (41%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (19.2%) were common complications. Most patients required oxygen therapy (96.2%). Corticosteroids (76.9%) and anticoagulants (83.3%) were commonly administered medications. Median of mean arterial pressure was 85 mm Hg [ IQR- 79.2 - 99.5] in non-survivors and 93.3 mm Hg [IQR- 86.6 - 102.6 ] in survivors which was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.04). Nine of the patients had cardiac dysfunction on ICU admission, of which none survived (p=0.001). Out of ten patients requiring inotropes or vasopressors, only two survived (p=0.001). Conclusions Non-survivor COVID patients had lower mean arterial pressure on admission to intensive care units. A higher proportion of patients with cardiac dysfunction and requiring inotropes or vasopressors could not survive.

Background This study aimed to assess the current status of critical care services in 13 districts of Bagmati Province in Nepal, with a focus on access, infrastructure, human resources, and intensive care unit (ICU) services. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare workers employed in 87 hospitals having medical/surgical ICUs across Bagmati Province. Data were collected through structured questionnaires administered via face-to-face and telephone interviews. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis, involving frequencies and percentages. Results From 87 hospitals, a total of 123 ICUs were identified in the province, providing 1167 beds and 615 functioning ventilators. The average ICU bed availability per 100,000 population was 19, ranging from 3.6 in Makwanpur to 33.9 in Kathmandu. Out of 13 districts, 95% of beds were concentrated in just four districts, while six had no ICU facilities. Of the available facilities, 69.9% were owned by private entities. One-to-one nurse-to-ventilated bed ratio was maintained by 63.4% of ICUs during daytime, and 62.6% at nighttime. Furthermore, 74.8% of ICUs had consultants trained in critical care medicine. While essential equipment availability was higher in Bagmati province, gaps existed in the availability of oxygen plants and isolation rooms. Similarly, many ICUs offered continuous medical education and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, but improvements were necessary in clinical audits, antibiotic stewardship programs, and research engagement. Conclusions Disparities in critical care resources were evident across districts in Bagmati Province, highlighting the need for a balanced and decentralized approach to ensure equitable access to care. Although there were disparities, numerous ICUs were effectively carrying out multiple critical care procedures. This study suggests conducting a nationwide mapping of ICU resources, prioritizing infrastructure development, optimizing resource allocation, and establishing national protocols.

Background This study aimed to assess the current status of critical care services in 13 districts of Bagmati Province in Nepal, with a focus on access, infrastructure, human resources, and intensive care unit (ICU) services. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare workers employed in 87 hospitals having medical/surgical ICUs across Bagmati Province. Data were collected through structured questionnaires administered via face-to-face and telephone survey. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis, involving frequencies and percentages. Results From 87 hospitals, a total of 123 ICUs were identified in the province, providing 1167 beds and 615 functioning ventilators. The average ICU bed availability per 100,000 population was 19, ranging from 3.6 in Makwanpur to 33.9 in Kathmandu. Out of 13 districts, 95% of beds were concentrated in just four districts, while six had no ICU facilities. Of the available facilities, 69.9% were owned by private entities. One-to-one nurse-to-ventilated bed ratio was maintained by 63.4% of ICUs during daytime, and 62.6% at nighttime. Furthermore, 74.8% of ICUs had consultants trained in critical care medicine. While essential equipment availability was higher in Bagmati province, gaps existed in the availability of oxygen plants and isolation rooms. Similarly, many ICUs offered continuous medical education and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, but improvements were necessary in clinical audits, antibiotic stewardship programs, and research engagement. Conclusions Disparities in critical care resources were evident across districts in Bagmati Province, highlighting the need for a balanced and decentralized approach to ensure equitable access to care. Although there were disparities, numerous ICUs were effectively carrying out multiple critical care procedures. This study suggests conducting a nationwide mapping of ICU resources, prioritizing infrastructure development, optimizing resource allocation, and establishing national protocols.

Background This study aims to investigate the associations between patient characteristics and the receipt of empiric broad-spectrum gram-negative antimicrobials among adult patients admitted to ICUs in Nepal. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 13 ICUs in Nepal between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2022. Empiric antibiotic use was defined as receiving gram-negative antibiotics within the first two days of ICU admission without evidence of infection from culture. Patient characteristics between patients receiving narrow-spectrum antibiotics and broad-spectrum gram-negative antibiotics were compared. Continuous variables were compared using mean and standard deviation, with mean differences and 95% confidence intervals calculated. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. A multi-level multivariable regression model assessed the relationship between selected variables and broad-spectrum antibiotic usage, treating admitting ICU as a random factor. Results Among 12,349 eligible patients, 8720 (70.6%) received Empiric gram-negative antibiotics. Of those, 3240 (37.15%) received empiric narrow-spectrum gram-negative antibiotics, and 5480 (62.8%) received Empiric broad-spectrum gram-negative antibiotics. Patients receiving broad-spectrum gram-negative antibiotics were older (57.4 vs 53.8 yrs); had higher mean heart rates (97.3 vs 89.5 bpm), respiratory rates (24 vs 21.9), a fraction of inspired oxygen ( 50% vs 40%), blood sugar levels (163.4 vs 153.9 mg/dl), total leucocyte counts (12,685 vs 10,647 cells/cu mm) and serum creatinine (2.06 vs 1.03 umol/l) compared to narrow spectrum antibiotics. Similarly, patients receiving broad-spectrum gram-negative antibiotics had lower systolic blood pressure (122.6 vs 126.5 mm Hg), partial pressure of oxygen (96.7 vs 105.3), and pH ( 7.33 vs 7.36) compared to narrow-spectrum antibiotics. On multivariable regression; patients with readmission, cardiac support, and mechanical ventilation were more likely to receive broad-spectrum antibiotics. Conclusion The rate of empiric broad-spectrum gram-negative antibiotics usage in intensive care units is significantly high and associated with features of increased severity of illness.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant physical and psychological impacts for survivors, and for the healthcare professionals caring for patients. Nurses and doctors in critical care faced longer working hours, increased burden of patients, and limited resources, all in the context of personal social isolation and uncertainties regarding cross-infection. We evaluated the burden of anxiety, depression, stress, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and alcohol dependence among doctors and nurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) in Nepal and explored the individual and social drivers for these impacts.Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study in Nepal, using an online survey to assess psychological well-being and semi-structured interviews to explore perceptions as to the drivers of anxiety, stress, and depression. Participants were recruited from existing national critical care professional organisations in Nepal and using a snowball technique. The online survey comprised of validated assessment tools for anxiety, depression, stress, PTSD, and alcohol dependence; all tools were analysed using published guidelines. Interviews were analysed using rapid appraisal techniques, and themes regarding the drivers for psychological distress were explored.Results 134 respondents (113 nurses, 21 doctors) completed the online survey. Twenty-eight (21%) participants experienced moderate to severe symptoms of depression; 67 (50%) experienced moderate or severe symptoms of anxiety; 114 (85%) had scores indicative of moderate to high levels of stress; 46 out of 100 reported symptoms of PTSD. Compared to doctors, nurses experienced more severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD, whereas doctors experienced higher levels of stress than nurses. Most (95%) participants had scores indicative of low risk of alcohol dependence. Twenty participants were followed up in interviews. Social stigmatism, physical and emotional safety, enforced role change and the absence of organisational support were perceived drivers for poor psychological well-being.Conclusion Nurses and doctors working in ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic sustained psychological impacts, manifesting as stress, anxiety, and for some, symptoms of PTSD. Nurses were more vulnerable. Individual characteristics and professional inequalities in healthcare may be potential modifiable factors for policy makers seeking to mitigate risks for healthcare providers.

Background This study aimed to assess the current status of critical care services in 13 districts of Bagmati Province in Nepal, with a focus on access, infrastructure, human resources, and intensive care unit (ICU) services. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare workers employed in 87 hospitals having medical/surgical ICUs across Bagmati Province. Data were collected through structured questionnaires administered via face-to-face and telephone interviews. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis, involving frequencies and percentages. Results From 87 hospitals, a total of 123 ICUs were identified in the province, providing 1167 beds and 615 functioning ventilators. The average ICU bed availability per 100,000 population was 19, ranging from 3.6 in Makwanpur to 33.9 in Kathmandu. Out of 13 districts, 95% of beds were concentrated in just four districts, while six had no ICU facilities. Of the available facilities, 69.9% were owned by private entities. One-to-one nurse-to-ventilated bed ratio was maintained by 63.4% of ICUs during daytime, and 62.6% at nighttime. Furthermore, 74.8% of ICUs had consultants trained in critical care medicine. While essential equipment availability was higher in Bagmati province, gaps existed in the availability of oxygen plants and isolation rooms. Similarly, many ICUs offered continuous medical education and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, but improvements were necessary in clinical audits, antibiotic stewardship programs, and research engagement. Conclusions Disparities in critical care resources were evident across districts in Bagmati Province, highlighting the need for a balanced and decentralized approach to ensure equitable access to care. Although there were disparities, numerous ICUs were effectively carrying out multiple critical care procedures. This study suggests conducting a nationwide mapping of ICU resources, prioritizing infrastructure development, optimizing resource allocation, and establishing national protocols.

Objective:This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and practices of antibiotic use in intensive care units (ICUs) in Nepal and to identify potential areas for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs.Design:A point prevalence survey was conducted to characterize and quantify the antimicrobial utilization in level III ICUs of Nepal.Methods:Data on antibiotic prescription rates, reasons for prescribing antibiotics, and prescribing practices were collected and analyzed. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was also assessed.Results:The antibiotic prescribing rate was found to be very high, with 92.85% of patients in ICU on antibiotics. Prolonged surgical prophylaxis was the most common reason for prescribing antibiotics. Empirical therapy accounted for 67.5% of all antibiotic prescriptions. Prescribing practices were poor, with low adherence to guidelines and best practices. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were commonly used even for surgical prophylaxis or community-acquired infections. High resistance was observed against commonly used antibiotics.Conclusions:The study underscores the urgent need for effective antimicrobial stewardship programs in ICUs of Nepal. Implementing robust stewardship programs could help optimize antibiotic utilization, improve patient outcomes, and combat the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. The findings serve as a stepping stone toward understanding and improving antibiotic prescribing practices in ICUs of Nepal.

Background: Epidemiological data on critically ill patients is crucial for understanding resource utilisation, gaps in quality of care and for supporting surveillance of endemic or emerging diseases. We report the epidemiology of critically ill patients from 17 intensive care units (ICUs) in Nepal using an established and standardised ICU registry. Methods: The ICU registry data is collected prospectively and includes data on case mix, severity, organ support and outcomes. We conducted a retrospective observational study with all adult (≥18 years) critically ill patients admitted to 17 ICUs in Nepal between September 2019 and September 2022. We report on case mix, treatment received, severity of illness, standardised mortality rates (SMR), discharge outcomes and ICU service activity. Descriptive statistics were used to report the findings. Results: Of the 18603 unique admissions, 14% were operative, with 35% emergency surgeries. Patients’ median age was 57 (IQR 40-71) and 59% were male. Hypertension and diabetes were common comorbidities and pneumonia accounted for 26% of all admissions. During the ICU stay, 39% of patients received mechanical ventilation, 29% received vasoactive medication and 10% received renal replacement therapy. The median predicted risk of death was 0.1 (IQR 0.1-0.3) using APACHE II and 0.2 (IQR 0.1-0.4) using eTropICS. The median SMR was 0.7 (IQR 0.5-0.8) and 0.8 (IQR 0.6-1.4) using eTropICS and APACHE II, respectively. Median length of stay was 4 days (IQR 2-7). Eighteen percent died in the ICU; of those alive at discharge, 12% went home, 84% went to another department and 3% went to another hospital. COVID-19 was the most common notifiable disease reported (12% of all admissions). Median ICU turnover was 9% (IQR 6-14) with bed capacity ranging from 43-278. Conclusions: These findings should guide forecasting and service planning to ensure ICUs can optimally care for critically ill patients in Nepal.

Background: Practice guidelines have the potential to improve processes and outcomes of care if strategies to facilitate implementation include attention to feasibility and acceptability in the local setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a guideline for using a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in intensive care units (ICUs) that was introduced in Nepal. Methods: We measured the proportion of eligible patients in seven ICUs who received HFNC between September 14, 2020, and December 9, 2021. We compared measures of oxygenation between patients who successfully survived HFNC and those who did not. We used an electronic survey of healthcare workers to measure the guideline's acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Results: Out of the total (7,121) patients admitted to ICUs during the study period, 4,099 (57%) were eligible and 584 (14%) of the eligible patients received HFNC during the first three days (12% before and 14% after the introduction of the guideline). The median ROX time index (integral of ROX index (PaO2/FiO2 x respiratory rate) over time) of patients who were successfully treated with HFNC (n=146) was greater than that of patients who failed HFNC (n= 42; 0.8 vs. 0.04; p=0.001). Respondents rated the HFNC guideline highly for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Conclusions: Introduction of the guideline was associated with a small increase in the use of HFNC, but the guideline was feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for use in clinical practice.

The Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform (REMAP-CAP) adapted for COVID-19) trial is a global adaptive platform trial of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We describe implementation in three countries under the umbrella of the Wellcome supported Low and Middle Income Country (LMIC) critical care network: Collaboration for Research, Implementation and Training in Asia (CCA). The collaboration sought to overcome known barriers to multi centre-clinical trials in resource-limited settings. Methods described focused on six aspects of implementation: i, Strengthening an existing community of practice; ii, Remote study site recruitment, training and support; iii, Harmonising the REMAP CAP- COVID trial with existing care processes; iv, Embedding REMAP CAP- COVID case report form into the existing CCA registry platform, v, Context specific adaptation and data management; vi, Alignment with existing pandemic and critical care research in the CCA. Methods described here may enable other LMIC sites to participate as equal partners in international critical care trials of urgent public health importance, both during this pandemic and beyond.

The Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform (REMAP-CAP) adapted for COVID-19) trial is a global adaptive platform trial of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We describe implementation in three countries under the umbrella of the Wellcome supported Low and Middle Income Country (LMIC) critical care network: Collaboration for Research, Implementation and Training in Asia (CCA). The collaboration sought to overcome known barriers to multi centre-clinical trials in resource-limited settings. Methods described focused on six aspects of implementation: i, Strengthening an existing community of practice; ii, Remote study site recruitment, training and support; iii, Harmonising the REMAP CAP- COVID trial with existing care processes; iv, Embedding REMAP CAP- COVID case report form into the existing CCA registry platform, v, Context specific adaptation and data management; vi, Alignment with existing pandemic and critical care research in the CCA. Methods described here may enable other LMIC sites to participate as equal partners in international critical care trials of urgent public health importance, both during this pandemic and beyond.