BACKGROUND:Caffeine enhances the efficacy of non-opioid analgesics. Data on the cardiovascular health effects of caffeine intake are controversial, and studies on the cardiovascular effects of medical caffeine use are lacking.OBJECTIVE:The study aims to explore the cardiovascular effects of an ibuprofen/caffeine combination in comparison to ibuprofen alone.METHODS:Secondary analysis of a previously reported bioequivalence study of a single dose of a fixed dose ibuprofen/caffeine combination (400/100 mg) vs. ibuprofen alone in a randomized, cross-over design in 36 healthy volunteers. Plasma catecholamines were analyzed to enhance mechanistic interpretation of the data.RESULTS:After exclusion of 10 protocol violators (pre-dosing intake of caffeine), vital signs were comparable over a 24-h period in the absence and presence of caffeine. Plasma catecholamine levels were also comparable.CONCLUSION:These data do not support the hypothesis that occasional intake of a small dose of caffeine as part of pain medication imposes a health risk due to vital sign changes. Based on the proven increase in efficacy, the addition of caffeine to non-opioid analgesics such as IBU has a favorable risk/benefit profile for occasional use.

Ibuprofen is an effective analgesic treatment with a ceiling effect at doses above 400 mg. This study compared the combination of ibuprofen 400 mg and caffeine 100 mg with ibuprofen 400 mg monotherapy, caffeine and placebo in the analgesic treatment of moderate to severe acute dental pain following third molar extraction.

BACKGROUND:Neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and available options are frequently not sufficient. The expectorant ambroxol also works as a strong local anesthetic and blocks sodium channels about 40 times more potently than lidocaine. Ambroxol preferentially inhibits the channel subtype Nav 1.8, which is expressed particularly in nociceptive C fibers. Due to the low toxicity, topical ambroxol seemed to represent a reasonable therapeutic attempt for treatment of neuropathic pain resistant to other standard options. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Medical records of 7 patients with severe neuropathic pain, in whom many attempts at treatment with approved substances were not sufficient or possible, are reported retrospectively. Patients were then treated with topical ambroxol 20% cream applied in the area of neuropathic pain. RESULTS:Causes of neuropathic pain were postherpetic neuralgia (2-×), mononeuropathy multiplex, phantom pain, deafferentation pain, postoperative neuralgia and an unclear allodynia of the foot. Mean pain intensity was reported as 4-6/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and maximum pain intensity as 6-10/10. Pain reduction following ambroxol cream was 2-8 points (NRS) within 15-30 min and lasted 3-8 h. Pain attacks were reduced in all 5 patients presenting this problem. Topical ambroxol achieved pain reduction in 4 patients with no improvement after lidocaine 5% and 1 patient with no response to capsaicin 8%. No adverse events or skin changes have been observed, and the longest treatment duration is currently 4 years. CONCLUSION:Ambroxol acts as a strong local anesthetic and preferentially inhibits the nociceptive-relevant sodium channel subtype Nav 1.8. For the first time, we report relevant pain reduction following topical Ambroxol 20% cream in patients with neuropathic pain. Regarding the advantageous profile with rare side effects, the clinical benefit for pain patients should be further investigated.

Neuropathische Schmerzen sind schwer behandelbar, die vorhandenen Therapien oft nicht ausreichend. Das Sekretolytikum Ambroxol hat auch stark lokalanästhetische Eigenschaften und hemmt Natriumkanäle etwa 40-mal potenter als Lidocain. Es blockiert bevorzugt den Kanalsubtyp Nav 1.8, der besonders in nozizeptiven C-Fasern exprimiert wird. Bei geringer Toxizität erschien ein Behandlungsversuch mit topischen Ambroxol bei unzureichend behandelbaren, neuropathischen Schmerzen berechtigt.

Neuropathic pain is difficult to treat, and the available options are often inadequate. The expectorant ambroxol also acts as a strong local anaesthetic and blocks sodium channels about 40 times more potently than lidocaine. It preferentially inhibits the channel subtype Nav 1.8, which is expressed especially in nociceptive C-fibres. In view of the low toxicity of ambroxol, it seemed reasonable to try using it for the treatment of neuropathic pain that failed to respond to other standard options.