We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult kidney transplant recipients (KTxR) with type 2 diabetes treated with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). A total of 211, 207, 161, and 92 KTxR were followed for 6, 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Over 5 years, we observed statistically significant reductions in the primary endpoints of weight, HbA1c, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The mean weight reduction was as follows: 1.17 kg at 6 months (p < 0.006), 1.2 kg at 12 months (p < 0.03), 3.7 kg at 36 months (p < 0.0001), and 4.1 kg at 60 months (p = 0.001) compared to baseline. The HbA1c levels showed reductions of 0.6 mmol/mol at 6 months (p < 0.0001), 0.5 mmol/mol at 12 months (p = 0.0004), 0.3 mmol/mol at 36 months (p = 0.04), and 0.35 mmol/mol at 60 months (p = 0.35). MACE rates fell from 45.5% at GLP-1RA initiation to 18.9% during follow-up (OR 3.6 (2.3-5.6), p < 0.0001). Insulin requirements decreased from 50 to 27 units over 5 years. Kidney function reduces over time in KTx, likely secondary to hemodynamic or vascular-mediated risk factors, chronic immunosuppressive agents, treatment for rejections, and solitary transplanted kidney. In our study, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) not only stayed stable but also showed a trend towards improvement (eGFR improved from 50 to 53 mL/ min/1.73m(2)). Further prospective randomized trials are needed to assess GLP-1RA efficacy and safety in KTxR.

INTRODUCTION:We assessed differences in the post-transplant outcomes between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated Kidney transplant (KTx) recipients.METHODS:We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 400 KTx from 2/1/2021 to 4/30/2022 with 6-21 months follow-up. Primary outcomes included differences in the incidence of post-transplant COVID-19, ICU admission for COVID-19, death, and graft failure between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were inpatient floor admission, outpatient-management, length of hospital stay during COVID-19 admission. We also reported rejection, DGF, CMV needing treatment, and BK PCR >10 000 in baseline characteristics.RESULT:70.5% (282/400) were fully vaccinated, and 29.5% (118/400) were unvaccinated. 33% (92/282) of vaccinated and 39% (46/118) of unvaccinated patients developed COVID-19 (p-value .03). In both groups, 16% received outpatient treatments for COVID-19. 3% (12/282) of the vaccinated and 8% (11/118) unvaccinated were admitted to the general floors (p-value .06), and 1% (3/282) of the vaccinated and 3.3% (4/118) of the unvaccinated patients needed admission to the ICU (p-value .2). The length of stay was 12 days in both groups. 13/282 (4.6%) vaccinated patients and 7/118 (5.93%) unvaccinated patients died during the follow-up period (p-value = .3). COVID-19 was deemed the etiology of death in 5/13 cases in the vaccinated and 3/7 in the unvaccinated. DGF, rejection, CMV requiring treatment, and BK PCR >10 000 were comparable between groups.CONCLUSION:The incidence of COVID-19 was higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated KTx. The two groups were not statistically different for other primary outcomes, including the need for hospital admissions (outpatient, general floor, ICU), length of hospital stay, death, and graft failure.

BACKGROUND:There is limited literature describing the real-world practice of delayed initiation and shortened duration direct-acting antiviral (DAA) in kidney transplant recipients. We compared Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure rates among kidney transplant recipients who received an HCV nucleic acid test positive (NAT +) kidney and were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for 12 weeks or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for 8 weeks, a duration that is 4 weeks shorter than the guideline recommendation for treatment delay beyond 1-week post-transplant. METHODS:Retrospective study of HCV-negative adult patients who received a kidney transplant from an HCV NAT+ donor between April 2019 and April 2022 treated with either SOF/VEL for 12 weeks or G/P for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completion of therapy (SVR12). Secondary outcomes included time to DAA initiation, renal function, graft loss, patient death, liver function tests, and opportunistic infections. RESULTS:102 kidney transplant recipients were included with 36 treated with G/P and 66 treated with SOF/VEL. All 36 (100%) treated with G/P achieved SVR12. One patient in the SOF/VEL group failed to achieve SVR12 but received additional therapy and was cured. Time to DAA initiation was similar with a mean of 4 weeks. There was no difference in AST/ALT > 3x ULN or renal function. One rejection occurred in each group. No patient death or graft loss was observed. There was no difference in cytomegalovirus and BK viremia between groups.  CONCLUSION: Delayed initiation of DAA therapy with 12 weeks of SOF/VEL or 8 weeks of G/P achieves SVR12 in kidney transplant recipients without significant adverse effects.

Kidney transplantation from HCV‐viremic donors into uninfected recipients is associated with excellent short‐term outcomes. However, concerns regarding an increased risk for the development of de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) and acute rejection have been raised in single center reports.

Background. There is limited documentation of hematogenous transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in non–lung transplants from infected donors to uninfected recipients. Methods. We analyzed 16 recipients (7 liver, 9 kidney) transplanted from SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test+ deceased donors from December 25, 2021, to February 28, 2022, who were followed-up for at least 90 d. Primary outcomes included coronavirus disease 2019–positivity, allograft loss, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included biopsy-proven rejection (BPAR), donor-specific antibodies, delayed graft function, and opportunistic infections. Unlike previous studies, we followed the recipients clinically with the intent to treat if they developed SARS-CoV-2 symptoms. Results. All donors were SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction–positive 72 h before donation. No recipients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The nadir serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 1.33 mg/dL and 64 mL/min/1.732 m2 for kidney transplantation (KTx) respectively. The median alanine transaminase was 14.5 IU/L, aspartate aminotransferase 13 IU/L, and alkaline phosphatase 74 IU/L. Two KTx patients lost allograft, and 1 liver transplantation patient died with a failed allograft. However, this was unrelated to their SARS-CoV-2–positive donor status. One BPAR in the liver transplantation was treated with steroids. No donor-specific antibodies or BPAR were reported in the KTx. Six KTx patients experienced delayed graft function, and 4 are off dialysis. Two KTx patients developed cytomegalovirus infection because of an error in reporting the cytomegalovirus serostatus by the donor center. We did not do serial testing for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction, imaging, or cycle threshold score pre- or posttransplant for donor/recipient and had comparable outcomes with previous studies. Conclusions. Because of the low risk of transmission, serial testing might not be necessary and, thus, could be reciprocated at small-volume transplant centers.

BackgroundWith the availability of vaccines against SARS-COV-2, recommendations for vaccination of transplant candidates are widespread. At our institution, patients may receive liver transplant (LTx) regardless of vaccine status. The purpose of this study is to compare post-LTx outcomes between vaccinated (VAX) and unvaccinated (UNVAX) LTx recipients.MethodsThis is a retrospective, single-center study of LTx from January 1, 2021-March 30, 2022. The primary outcome is incidence of post-LTx COVID-19. Secondary outcomes include graft function, mortality, graft loss, and COVID-19 treatment.ResultsOne hundred and seventy-seven LTx recipients were included, 57% [101/177] VAX and 43% [76/177] UNVAX. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 28 (36.8%) UNVAX and 34 (33.7%) VAX tested COVID-19 positive during the study period (p = .193) at a mean of 312.6 [255.4-369.8] days for UNVAX versus 254.6 [215.2-293.9] days for VAX (p = .084). COVID-19 treatment was administered in 15 (53.6%) of the UNVAX compared to 22 (64.7%) in the VAX (p = .374), although eight (28.6%) of UNVAX required hospital admission for treatment compared with two (5.9%) of VAX (p = .016). There were no statistically significant differences in death, and no COVID-19 related death or graft loss. There were no statistically significant differences in liver function tests at 3- and 12-months post LTx.ConclusionIn a series with a large percentage of UNVAX patients, LTx appears to be safe, with no difference in the rate of COVID-19 or transplant-related outcomes compared to VAX. While we encourage vaccination to prevent severe COVID, based on our results, vaccine status should not be reason to deny lifesaving transplant.

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after lung transplantation (LT) and is associated with higher cost and mortality. We sought to evaluate the incidence of postoperative AKI, defined as AKI within 14 days of transplant, and identify associated perioperative factors. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of 153 lung transplant recipients. Postoperative AKI was determined using the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage) criteria. Perioperative covariates and their association with postoperative AKI were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to evaluate patient survival at 1 year and data finalization. A sub-analysis was performed evaluating factors associated with early AKI (within 48 h of transplant) and late AKI. Results Postoperative AKI occurred in 36.6% of patients with 51.8% of cases occurring within 48 h of LT. Recipient race, transplant type, cardiopulmonary support, and red blood cell administration were associated with postoperative AKI. Survival was significantly lower in patients with postoperative AKI following LT. Conclusions Postoperative AKI within 2 weeks of lung transplant is associated with lower short- and long-term survival. Perioperative factors associated with postoperative AKI may be potential points of intervention to minimize AKI development in the future.

BACKGROUND:kidney transplantation from Hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors to uninfected recipients is associated with excellent short-term outcomes. However, HCV viremia might be associated with an increased risk for post-transplant viral complications.METHODS:We designed a retrospective study of HCV-negative kidney-only transplant recipients between 2018 and 2020. Recipients were grouped into group 1; HCV-negative donors, and group 2; HCV-viremic donors. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score. The primary objectives were to compare the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia ≥ 200 ml/IU, and BK viremia ≥1000 copies/ml between the groups. Secondary outcomes included group comparison of CMV disease, BK viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml, and 1-year patient and allograft survival.RESULTS:The study included 634 patients in group 1, and 71 patients in group 2. Sixty-five pairs of patients were matched. Incidence of CMV viremia (33.3% vs. 40.0%, p = .4675), and BK viremia (15.9% vs. 27.7%, p = .1353) did not differ significantly between groups in the matched cohort. Incidence of CMV disease (81.0% vs. 76.9%, p = 1.000), and BK viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml (9.5% vs. 16.9%, p = .2987) were comparable between groups. There was no difference in the 1-year patient or allograft survival between groups.CONCLUSION:kidney transplant from HCV-viremic donors is not associated with increased risk for BK or CMV viremia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:There are no standardized benchmarks to measure productivity and compensation of transplant nephrologists in the United States, and consequently, criteria set for general nephrologists are often used. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:A web-based survey was sent to 809 nephrologists who were members of the American Society of Transplantation to gather data on measures of productivity, compensation, and job satisfaction. Factors associated with higher total compensation and job satisfaction were examined. RESULTS:Of 365 respondents, 260 were actively practicing in the United States and provided data on compensation. Clinical productivity was assessed variably, and although 194 (76%) had their work relative value units (wRVUs) reported to them, only 107 (44%) had an established RVU target. Two hundred thirty-four respondents (90%) had fixed base compensation, and 172 (66%) received a bonus on the basis of clinical workload (68%), academic productivity (31%), service (32%), and/or teaching responsibility (31%). Only 127 respondents (49%) filled out time studies, and 92 (35%) received some compensation for nonbillable transplant activity. Mean total compensation (base salary and bonus) was $274,460±$91,509. The unadjusted mean total compensation was higher with older age and was higher for men; Hispanic and White respondents; adult care transplant nephrologists; residents of the western United States; US medical school graduates; nonuniversity hospital employees; and those with an administrative title, higher academic rank, and a higher number of years in practice. Two hundred and nine respondents (80%) thought their compensation was unfair, and 180 (70%) lacked a clear understanding of how they were compensated. One hundred forty-five respondents (55%) reported being satisfied or highly satisfied with their job. Job satisfaction was greater among those with higher amounts of compensation and US medical school graduates. CONCLUSIONS:We report significant heterogeneity in the assessment of productivity and compensation for transplant nephrologists and the association of compensation with job satisfaction.