Plants sprayed with harpin, a bacterial protein that induces hypersensitive cell death (HCD), develop systemic acquired resistance (SAR) without macroscopic necrosis. HCD sometimes accompanies the development of resistance conferred by resistance (R) genes. In Arabidopsis, some R genes require one or both of the signalling components NDR1 and EDS1 for function. This study addresses whether HCD, NDR1 and EDS1 are required for induction of SAR by harpin. When Arabidopsis and tobacco leaves were sprayed with harpin, microscopic hypersensitive response (micro-HR) lesions developed. Systemic expression of PR genes and the development of resistance were accompanied by micro-HR, except in the ndr1-1 mutant, in which harpin induced micro-HR without the development of resistance or expression of the PR-1 gene. Cell death and resistance did not occur following treatment with harpin in plants that could not accumulate salicylic acid. Harpin also failed to induce resistance in Arabidopsis eds1-1 mutants. Therefore, harpin-induced resistance seems to develop concomitantly with cell death and resistance requires NDR1 and EDS1.

We report the complete genome sequence of the model bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato DC3000 (DC3000), which is pathogenic on tomato and Arabidopsis thaliana. The DC3000 genome (6.5 megabases) contains a circular chromosome and two plasmids, which collectively encode 5,763 ORFs. We identified 298 established and putative virulence genes, including several clusters of genes encoding 31 confirmed and 19 predicted type III secretion system effector proteins. Many of the virulence genes were members of paralogous families and also were proximal to mobile elements, which collectively comprise 7% of the DC3000 genome. The bacterium possesses a large repertoire of transporters for the acquisition of nutrients, particularly sugars, as well as genes implicated in attachment to plant surfaces. Over 12% of the genes are dedicated to regulation, which may reflect the need for rapid adaptation to the diverse environments encountered during epiphytic growth and pathogenesis. Comparative analyses confirmed a high degree of similarity with two sequenced pseudomonads, Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, yet revealed 1,159 genes unique to DC3000, of which 811 lack a known function.

Salicylic acid (SA) and the NIM1/NPR1 protein have both been demonstrated to be required for systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and implicated in expression of race-specific resistance. In this work, we analyzed the role that each of these molecules play in the resistance response triggered by members of two subclasses of resistance (R) genes, members of which recognize unrelated pathogens. We tested the ability of TIR and coiled-coil-class (also known as leucine-zipper-class) R genes to confer resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato or Peronospora parasitica in SA-depleted (NahG) and nim1/npr1 plants. We found that all of the P. syringae pv. tomato-specific R genes tested were dependent upon SA accumulation, while none showed strong dependence upon NIM1/NPR1 activity. A similar SA dependence was observed for the P. parasitica TIR and CC-class R genes RPP5 and RPP8, respectively. However, the P. parasitica-specific R genes differed in their requirement for NIM1/NPR1, with just RPP5 depending upon NIM1/NPR1 activity for effectiveness. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that at least in Arabidopsis, SA accumulation is necessary for the majority of R-gene-triggered resistance, while the role of NIM1/NPR in race-specific resistance is limited to resistance to P. parasitica mediated by TIR-class R genes.

One of several induced defense responses in plants is systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which is regulated by salicylic acid and in Arabidopsis by the NIM1/NPR1 protein. To identify additional components of the SAR pathway or other genes that regulate SAR-independent resistance, we performed genetic suppressor screens of mutagenized nim1-1 seedlings, which are highly susceptible to infection by Peronospora parasitica. We isolated the son1 (suppressor of nim1-1) mutant, which shows full restoration of pathogen resistance without the induction of SAR-associated genes and expresses resistance when combined with a salicylate hydroxylase (nahG) transgene. These features indicate that son1-mediated resistance is distinct from SAR. Resistance is effective against both the virulent oomycete Peronospora and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato strain DC3000. We cloned SON1 and found it to encode a novel protein containing an F-box motif, an element found within the specificity determinant in the E3 ubiquitin-ligase complex. We propose the existence of a novel defense response that is independent of SAR and negatively regulated in Arabidopsis by SON1 through the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway.

The NlM7 (for noninducible hmunity) gene product is involved in the signal transduction cascade leading to both systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and gene-for-gene disease resistance in Arabidopsis. We have isolated and characterized five new alleles of nim7 that show a range of phenotypes from weakly impaired in chemically induced pathogenesis-related protein-1 gene expression and funga1 resistance to very strongly blocked. We have isolated the NlM7 gene by using a map-based cloning procedure. Interestingly, the NlMl protein shows sequence homology to the mammalian signal transduction factor IKB subclass (Y. NF-KB/IKB signaling pathways are implicated in disease resistance responses in a range of organisms from Drosophila to mammals, suggesting that the SAR signaling pathway in plants is representative of an ancient and ubiquitous defense mechanism in higher organisms.

The Arabidopsis thaliana NIM1/NPR1 gene product is required for induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) by pathogens, salicylic acid (SA) or synthetic SA analogs. We identified, in a yeast two-hybrid screen, two NIM1/NPR1 interacting proteins, TGA2 and TGA5, which belong to the basic region, leucine zipper (bZIP) family of transcription factors. Both TGA2 and TGA5 strongly interact with NIM1/NPR1 in yeast and in vitro, and recognize the as-1 cis element found within the promoter of several pathogenesis-related genes, such as PR-1. To determine the role TGA2 and TGA5 may play in NIM1/NPR1-mediated disease resistance, we introduced sense and antisense versions of both genes into transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Characterization of TGA2 transgenic plants revealed that inhibition or overexpression of TGA2 does not significantly affect PR-1 expression or induction of SAR after pathogen infection or INA treatment. Surprisingly, all TGA5-antisense transgenic plants produced showed increased accumulation of TGA5 transcripts compared with untransformed control plants, while the TGA5-sense lines showed no significant increase in TGA5 mRNA levels. Interestingly, the high level of TGA5 mRNA in the antisense lines was accompanied by significant resistance to a highly virulent isolate of the oomycete pathogen Peronospora parasitica. Further, resistance was not coupled to accumulation of products from the SAR-linked PR-1 gene following inoculation with P. parasitica or treatment with INA, indicating that these plants express a robust, PR-1-independent resistance mechanism. Resistance was retained when a TGA5-accumulating line was combined genetically with a nim1-1 mutation or nahG (salicylate hydroxylase) transgene, indicating that resistance in these plants is due to an SA and SAR-independent mechanism.

To identify pathogen-induced genes distinct from those involved in systemic acquired resistance, we used cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism to examine RNA levels in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type, nim1-1, and salicylate hydroxylase-expressing plants after inoculation with an incompatible isolate of the downy mildew pathogen Peronospora parasitica. Fifteen genes are described, which define three response profiles on the basis of whether their induction requires salicylic acid (SA) accumulation and NIM1/NPR1 activity, SA alone, or neither. Sequence analysis shows that the genes include a calcium binding protein related to TCH3, a protein containing ankyrin repeats and potential transmembrane domains, three glutathione S-transferase gene family members, and a number of small, putatively secreted proteins. We further characterized this set of genes by assessing their expression patterns in each of the three plant lines after inoculation with a compatible P. parasitica isolate and after treatment with the SA analog 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid. Some of the genes within subclasses showed different requirements for SA accumulation and NIM1/NPR1 activity, depending upon which elicitor was used, indicating that those genes were not coordinately regulated and that the regulatory pathways are more complex than simple linear models would indicate.

To investigate the impact of induced host defenses on the virulence of a compatible Peronospora parasitica strain on Arabidopsis thaliana, we examined growth and development of this pathogen in nim1-1 mutants and transgenic salicylate hydroxylase plants. These plants are unable to respond to or accumulate salicylic acid (SA), respectively, are defective in expression of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), and permit partial growth of some normally avirulent pathogens. We dissected the P. parasitica life cycle into nine stages and compared its progression through these stages in the defense-compromised hosts and in wild-type plants. NahG plants supported the greatest accumulation of pathogen biomass and conidiophore production, followed by nim1-1 and then wild-type plants. Unlike the wild type, NahG and nim1-1 plants showed little induction of the SAR gene PR-1 after colonization with P parasitica, which is similar to our previous observations. We examined the frequency and morphology of callose deposits around parasite haustoria and found significant differences between the three hosts. NahG plants showed a lower fraction of haustoria surrounded by thick callose encasements and a much higher fraction of haustoria with callose limited to thin collars around haustorial necks compared to wild type, whereas nim1-1 plants were intermediate between NahG and wild type. Chemical induction of SAR in plants colonized by P. parasitica converted the extrahaustorial callose phenotype in NahG to resemble closely the wild-type pattern, but had no effect on nim1-1 plants. These results suggest that extrahaustorial callose deposition is influenced by the presence or lack of SA and that this response may be sensitive to the NIM1/NPR1 pathway. Additionally, the enhanced susceptibility displayed by nim1-1 and NahG plants shows that even wild-type susceptible hosts exert defense functions that reduce disease severity and pathogen fitness.

When plants encounter pathogens, resistance mechanisms are activated that can prevent infection, aid recovery from disease and prevent future infection. An important component in a plant’s defense arsenal is the pathogen-induced response called systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which when activated can prevent infection by a wide range of pathogens. SAR was described in 1961 by Frank Ross (Cornell University, USA) and later found by others to be associated with the induction of a suite of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and their corresponding proteins. Salicylic acid is an endogenous signaling molecule, which is required for the induction of SAR. Application of salicylic acid or its synthetic analogs [2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) or benzo (1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester (BTH)] to plants induces PR gene expression and resistance as would a biological agent. In addition, transgenic plants that express salicylate hydroxylase, which is encoded by the bacterial nahG gene, can neither accumulate salicylic acid after pathogen attack, nor activate SAR (reviewed in 1 Ryals J. et al. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell. 1996; 8: 1809-1819 Crossref PubMed Scopus (1743) Google Scholar , 2 Delaney T.P. Genetic dissection of acquired resistance to disease. Plant Physiol. 1997; 106: 5-12 Crossref Scopus (111) Google Scholar ). In the past several years, genetic analysis has revealed components in the pathway that regulates SAR by identifying mutants perturbed in this response. The recent description of a suppressor mutation that restores function to SAR mutants, and the cloning of its gene, has generated new insights into how this important plant defense response is regulated 3 Li X. et al. Identification and cloning of a negative regulator of systemic acquired resistance, SNI1, through a screen for suppressors of npr1-1.. Cell. 1999; 98: 329-339 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar .

Harpin, the product of the hrpN gene of Erwinia amylovora, elicits the hypersensitive response and disease resistance in many plants. Harpin and known inducers of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) were tested on five genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana to assess the role of SAR in harpin-induced resistance. In wild-type plants, harpin elicited systemic resistance to Peronospora parasitica and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, accompanied by induction of the SAR genes PR-1 and PR-2. However, in experiments with transgenic Arabidopsis plants containing the nahG gene which prevents accumulation of salicylic acid (SA), harpin neither elicited resistance nor activated SAR gene expression. Harpin also failed to activate SAR when applied to nim1 (non-inducible immunity) mutants, which are defective in responding to SA and regulation of SAR. In contrast, mutants compromised in responsiveness to methyl jasmonate and ethylene developed the same resistance as did wild-type plants. Thus, harpin elicits disease resistance through the NIM1-mediated SAR signal transduction pathway in an SA-dependent fashion. The site of action of harpin in the SAR regulatory pathway is upstream of SA.

The NIM1 (for noninducible immunity) gene product is involved in the signal transduction cascade leading to both systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and gene-for-gene disease resistance in Arabidopsis. We have isolated and characterized five new alleles of nim1 that show a range of phenotypes from weakly impaired in chemically induced pathogenesis-related protein-1 gene expression and fungal resistance to very strongly blocked. We have isolated the NIM1 gene by using a map-based cloning procedure. Interestingly, the NIM1 protein shows sequence homology to the mammalian signal transduction factor I kappa B subclass alpha. NF-kappa B/I kappa B signaling pathways are implicated in disease resistance responses in a range of organisms from Drosophila to mammals, suggesting that the SAR signaling pathway in plants is representative of an ancient and ubiquitous defense mechanism in higher organisms.

Plants come in frequent contact with potentially pathogenic fungi, bacteria, and viruses, yet disease results from relatively few of these exposures.In many cases an encounter leaves no obvious trace of its occurrence and the microbe fails to establish itself due to a lack in activation of pathogenicity functions or to highly effective plant defense mechanisms.Other encounters leave evidence of an intense plant-microbe interaction that results in the arrest of pathogen development after attempted colonization.In these cases plant tissues often display activated defense functions that produce antimicrobial compounds, enzymes, and structural reinforcements that may limit pathogen growth (Dixon and Lamb, 1990).These reactions may also be associated with the HR, a localized region of plant cell death around infection sites.An HR may involve just a single cell or it can produce death of extensive regions of tissue.The combination of defense activities can limit infection and prevent it from spreading to other tissues.The effectiveness of these defense strategies is determined both by the rate of host activation of defenses and by the rate of expansion of the pathogen colony.Therefore, in the evolution of plants and their pathogens, traits that permit rapid and effective defense responses should be favored in the evolution of the host, whereas desirable pathogen traits are those that enable rapid growth or facilitate evasion, suppression, or tolerance of host reactions.Host defense reactions are activated by sensing of the pathogen, and are sometimes mediated by plant R genes

In many interactions of plants with pathogens, the primary host defense reaction is accompanied by plant cell death at the site of infection. The resulting lesions are correlated with the establishment of an inducible resistance in plants called systemic acquired resistance (SAR), for which salicylic acid (SA) accumulation is a critical signaling event in Arabidopsis and tobacco. In Arabidopsis, the lesions simulating disease (lsd) mutants spontaneously develop lesions in the absence of pathogen infection. Furthermore, lsd mutants express SAR marker genes when lesions are present and are resistant to the same spectrum of pathogens as plants activated for SAR by necrogenic pathogen infection. To assess the epistatic relationship between SA accumulation and cell death, transgenic Arabidopsis unable to accumulate SA due to the expression of the salicylate hydroxylase (nahG) gene were used in crosses with the dominant mutants lsd2 or lsd4. Progeny from the crosses were inhibited for SAR gene expression and disease resistance. However, these progeny retained the spontaneous cell death phenotype similar to siblings not expressing nahG. Because lesions form in the absence of SA accumulation for lsd2 and lsd4, a model is suggested in which lesion formation in these two mutants is determined prior to SA accumulation in SAR signal transduction. By contrast, the loss of SAR gene expression and disease resistance in nahG-expressing lsd mutants indicates that these traits are dependent upon SA accumulation in the SAR signal transduction pathway.

A 25-kb DNA region, previously cloned from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 in cosmid pHIR11, enables nonpathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens and Escherichia coli to elicit the hypersensitive response (HR) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). hrmA is located within this region, adjacent to a conserved cluster of hrp genes, and is essential for nonpathogens to elicit the HR. DNA sequence analysis suggested that hrmA was the second of two genes in an operon and was preceded by an open reading frame (ORF), ORF1, which is predicted to encode a 10.9-kDa protein. DNA gel blot analysis revealed that sequences hybridizing with a DNA fragment internal To hrmA were absent from P. syringae pv. syringae B728a, P. syringae pv. tabaci 11528, and P. syringae pv. glycinea race 4 U1, but present in P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000. A 2.4-kb BamHI-AvrII fragment carrying hrmA, ORF1, and native regulatory sequences was subcloned into broad-host-range vector pDSK519 and electroporated into P. syringae pv. syringae B728a and P. syringae pv. tabaci 11528. The presence of the hrmA locus had no apparent effect on the ability of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a to cause brown spot of bean, but it caused P. syringae pv. tabaci 11528 to elicit the defense-associated HR rather than disease in N. tabacum cvs. Xanthi N and Xanthi NC and N. clevelandii. Furthermore, N. debeyii, N. glutinosa, N. rustica, and N. tabacum cvs. Petit Havana and Samsun responded with the HR to P. fluorescens (pHIR11). In contrast, N. benthamiana-P. syringae pv. tabaci interactions were unaffected by the presence of HrmA, and P. fluorescens (pHIR11) did not elicit the HR in N. benthamiana. The hrmA ORF was subcloned into pFLAG-CTC, which expressed HrmA with a C-terminal FLAG synthetic epitope fusion. Escherichia coli MC4100 cells carrying the functional hrp cluster and the hrmA-FLAG derivative secreted the HrpZ harpin, but not HrmA-FLAG, to the medium, as indicated by immunoblot analysis with M2 anti-FLAG and polyclonal anti-HrpZ antibodies. The hrmA ORF was also subcloned into plant expression vector pFF19 and then biolistically delivered, along with pFF19G (expressing beta-glucuronidase), into suspension-cultured tobacco cells, Histochemical staining 24 h later revealed substantial beta-glucuronidase activity in cells receiving pFF19G and pFF19 but not in those receiving pFF19G and pFF19-HrmA, Thus, internal production of HrmA was deleterious to tobacco cells.