Purpose: Positional errors resulting from motion are a principal challenge across all disease sites in radiation therapy. This is particularly pertinent when treating lesions in the liver with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To achieve dose escalation and margin reduction for liver SBRT, kV real-time imaging interventions may serve as a potential solution. In this study, we report results of a retrospective cohort of liver patients treated using real-time 2D kV-image guidance SBRT with emphasis on the impact of (1) clinical workflow, (2) treatment accuracy, and (3) tumor dose. Methods and Materials: Data from 33 patients treated with 41 courses of liver SBRT were analyzed. During treatment, planar kV images orthogonal to the treatment beam were acquired to determine treatment interventions, namely treatment pauses (ie, adequacy of gating thresholds) or treatment shifts. Patients were shifted if internal markers were >3 mm, corresponding to the PTV margin used, from the expected reference condition. The frequency, duration, and nature of treatment interventions (ie, pause vs shift) were recorded, and the dosimetric impact associated with treatment shifts was estimated using a machine learning dosimetric model. Results: Of all fractions delivered, 39% required intervention, which took on average 1.9 ± 1.6 minutes and occurred more frequently in treatments lasting longer than 7 minutes. The median realignment shift was 5.7 mm in size, and the effect of these shifts on minimum tumor dose in simulated clinical scenarios ranged from 0% to 50% of prescription dose per fraction. Conclusion: Real-time kV-based imaging interventions for liver SBRT minimally affect clinical workflow and dosimetrically benefit patients. This potential solution for addressing positional errors from motion addresses concerns about target accuracy and may enable safe dose escalation and margin reduction in the context of liver SBRT.

AbstractPurposeHeart doses have been shown to be predictive of cardiac toxicity and overall survival (OS) for esophageal cancer patients. There is potential for functional imaging to provide valuable cardiac information. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cardiac metabolic dose–response using 18F‐deoxyglucose (FDG)–PET and to assess whether standard uptake value (SUV) changes in the heart were predictive of OS.MethodsFifty‐one patients with esophageal cancer treated with radiation who underwent pre‐ and post‐treatment FDG–PET scans were retrospectively evaluated. Pre‐ and post‐treatment PET‐scans were rigidly registered to the planning CT for each patient. Pre‐treatment to post‐treatment absolute mean SUV (SUVmean) changes in the heart were calculated to assess dose–response. A dose–response curve was generated by binning each voxel in the heart into 10 Gy dose‐bins and analyzing the SUVmean changes in each dose‐bin. Multivariate cox proportional hazard models were used to assess whether pre‐to‐post treatment cardiac SUVmean changes predicted for OS.ResultsThe cardiac dose–response curve demonstrated a trend of increasing cardiac SUV changes as a function of dose with an average increase of 0.044 SUV for every 10 Gy dose bin. In multivariate analysis, disease stage and SUVmean change in the heart were predictive (p < 0.05) for OS.ConclusionsChanges in pre‐ to post‐treatment cardiac SUV were predictive of OS with patients having a higher pre‐ to post‐treatment cardiac SUV change surviving longer.

IMPORTANCE For many types of epithelial malignant neoplasms that are treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), treatment prolongation and interruptions have an adverse effect on outcomes. OBJECTIVE To analyze the association between RT duration and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study was an unplanned, post hoc secondary analysis of 3 prospective, multi-institutional phase 3 randomized clinical trials (Radiation Therapy O ncology Group [RTOG] 8501, RTOG 9405, and RTOG 0436) of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (formerly the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, RTOG, and Gynecologic Oncology Group). Enrolled patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer underwent definitive CRT in the trials between 1986 and 2013, with follow-up occurring through 2014. Data analyses were conducted between March 2022 to February 2023. EXPOSURES Treatment groups in the trials used standard-dose RT (50 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The outcomes were local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable models were used to examine the associations between these outcomes and both RT duration and interruptions. Radiotherapy duration was analyzed as a dichotomized variable using an X-Tile software to choose a cut point and its median value as a cut point, as well as a continuous variable. RESULTS The analysis included 509 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [57-70] years; 418 males [82%]; and 376 White individuals [74%]). The median (IQR) follow-up was 4.01 (2.93-4.92) years for surviving patients. The median cut point of RT duration was 39 days or less in 271 patients (53%) vs more than 39 days in 238 patients (47%), and the X-Tile software cut point was 45 days or less in 446 patients (88%) vs more than 45 days in 63 patients (12%). Radiotherapy interruptions occurred in 207 patients (41%). Female (vs male) sex and other (vs White) race and ethnicity were associated with longer RT duration and RT interruptions. In the multivariable models, RT duration longer than 45 days was associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04). The HR for OS was 1.33, but the results were not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.77; P = .05). Radiotherapy duration longer than 39 days (vs <= 39 days) was associated with a higher risk of LRF (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.65; P = .01). As a continuous variable, RT duration (per 1 week increase) was associated with DFS failure (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; P = .03). The HR for LRF 1.13, but the result was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study indicated that in patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive CRT, prolonged RT duration was associated with inferior outcomes; female patients and those with other (vs White) race and ethnicity were more likely to have longer RT duration and experience RT interruptions. Radiotherapy interruptions should be minimized to optimize outcomes.

Novel toxicity metrics that account for all adverse event (AE) grades and the frequency of may enhance toxicity reporting in clinical trials. The Toxicity Index (TI) accounts for all AE grades and frequencies for categories of interest. We evaluate the feasibility of using the TI methodology in 2 prospective anal cancer trials and to evaluate whether more conformal radiation (using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) results in improved toxicity as measured by the TI. Patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 0529 or nonconformal RT enrolled on the 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin arm of NRG/RTOG 9811 were compared using the TI. Patients treated on NRG/RTOG 0529 had lower median TI compared with patients treated with nonconformal RT on NRG/RTOG 9811 for combined GI/GU/Heme/Derm events (3.935 vs 3.996, P=0.014). The TI methodology is a feasible method to assess all AEs of interest and may be useful as a composite metric for future efforts aimed at treatment de-escalation or escalation.

613 Background: The optimal dose and fractionation scheme for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is unknown. The biologic effects of ultra-high doses per fraction (>8Gy) are theoretical, but may include eliciting an effect on the endothelial cells of the tumor vasculature which could improve treatment response. This study aimed to determine the safety and maximally tolerated dose of 3-fraction SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: A multi-site phase 1 dose escalation trial was conducted from March 2016 to April 2019 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (NCT02643498) and University of Colorado (NCT02873598). Patients with localized histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed unresectable on multidisciplinary review without distant progression following induction chemotherapy for ≥ 2 months were eligible. Patients received 3-fraction LINAC-based SBRT at 3 dose levels, 27Gy, 30Gy and 33Gy following a modified 3+3 design, allowing for enrollment of additional patients at the last dose level during the 90-day observation period, provided no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. DLTs were defined as ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related GI toxicity within 90 days of RT by CTCAE v.4. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local progression-free and distant metastasis-free survival (LPFS and DMFS, respectively). Univariate analysis using log-rank test was performed to identify factors associated with OS. Results: Twenty-three evaluable patients were enrolled, including 8 patients at 27Gy, 8 patients at 30Gy and 7 patients at 33Gy. The median age was 67 years (range 52 - 79), 9 patients (39%) were male, all were stage IIIwith a median tumor size of 3.5cm (range, 1.0 - 6.4) and CA19-9 of 60U/mL (range, <1 - 4880). All received chemotherapy for a median of 4.0 months (range 2.5 -11.4). There were no grade ≥ 3 abdominal pain, dyspepsia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Four patients underwent resections (pancreaticoduodenectomy=3, Appleby=1). Twelve-month rates of OS, DMFS and LPFS were 45.8 %, 37.7% and 53.0%, respectively. On univariate analysis, CA19-9 (HR=0.2365, 95%CI 0.07999 to 0.6990), but not dose level, size, N stage, tumor location, duration of chemotherapy were associated with OS. Twelve-month OS for patients with CA19-9 ≤ 60U/mL vs > 60U/mL were 80% vs 27% (p=0.0023). Conclusions: For select LAPC patients, dose escalation to the target dose of 33Gy in 3 fractions resulted in no DLTs and disease outcomes comparable to conventional RT. Lower pre-SBRT CA19-9 values were associated with improved OS and could help identify patients most likely to benefit from local therapies. Continued exploration of (ultra)hypofractionated schemes to maximize tumor control while enabling efficient integration of RT with systemic therapy is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02643498/NCT02873598.

The purpose of this report is to present the implementation of a process for after-hours radiation treatment (RT) utilizing remote treatment planning based on optimized diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans for the urgent palliative treatment of inpatients. A standardized operating procedure was developed by an interprofessional panel to improve the quality of after-hours RT and minimize the risk of treatment errors. A new diagnostic CT protocol was created that could be performed after-hours on hospital scanners and would ensure a reproducible patient position and adequate field of view. An on-call structure for dosimetry staff was created utilizing remote treatment planning. The optimized CT protocol was developed in collaboration with the radiology department, and a novel order set was created in the electronic health system. The clinical workflow begins with the radiation oncologist notifying the on-call team (therapist, dosimetrist, and physicist) and obtaining an optimized diagnostic CT scan on a hospital-based scanner. The dosimetrist remotely creates a plan; the physicist checks the plan; and the patient is treated. Plans are intentionally simple (parallel opposed fields, symmetric jaws) to expedite care and reduce the risk of error. Education on the new process was provided for all relevant staff. Our process was successfully implemented with the use of an optimized CT protocol and remote treatment planning. This approach has the potential to improve the quality and safety of emergent after-hours RT by better approximating the normal process of care.

Novel toxicity metrics that account for all adverse event (AE) grades and the frequency of may enhance toxicity reporting in clinical trials. The Toxicity Index (TI) accounts for all AE grades and frequencies for categories of interest. We evaluate the feasibility of using the TI methodology in 2 prospective anal cancer trials and to evaluate whether more conformal radiation (using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) results in improved toxicity as measured by the TI. Patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 0529 or nonconformal RT enrolled on the 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin arm of NRG/RTOG 9811 were compared using the TI. Patients treated on NRG/RTOG 0529 had lower median TI compared with patients treated with nonconformal RT on NRG/RTOG 9811 for combined GI/GU/Heme/Derm events (3.935 vs 3.996, P =0.014). The TI methodology is a feasible method to assess all AEs of interest and may be useful as a composite metric for future efforts aimed at treatment de-escalation or escalation

PurposeA multi-institutional phase 2 trial assessed long-term outcomes of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) for anal canal cancer.Methods and MaterialsT2-4N0-3M0 anal cancers received 5FU (1000 mg/m2/d, 96-hour infusion) and MMC (10 mg/m2 bolus) on days 1 and 29 of dose-painted IMRT prescribed as follows: T2N0 = 42 Gy elective nodal and 50.4 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 28 fractions; T3-4N0-3 = 45Gy elective nodal, 50.4 Gy ≤3 cm and 54 Gy >3cm metastatic nodal and 54 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 30 fractions. Local-regional failures, distant metastases, and colostomy failures were assessed using the cumulative incidence method, and disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Late effects were scored using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.ResultsOf 52 patients, 54% were stage II, 25% were stage IIIA, and 21% were stage IIIB. Median follow-up was 7.9 years (min-max, 0.02-9.2 years). Local-regional failure, colostomy failures, distant metastases, overall survival, disease-free survival, and colostomy-free survival at 5 years are 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-27%), 10% (95% CI, 4%-20%), 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 76% (95% CI, 61%-86%), 70% (95% CI, 56%-81%), and 74% (95% CI, 59%-84%); and at 8 years they are 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 12% (95% CI, 5%-23%), 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%), 68% (95% CI, 53%-79%), 62% (95% CI, 47%-74%) and 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%), respectively. Eight patients experienced local-regional failure, with 5 patients having persistent disease at 12 weeks. No isolated nodal failures occurred in the microscopic elective nodal volumes. Six patients required colostomy—5 for local-regional salvage and 1 for a temporary ostomy for anorectal dysfunction. Rates of late adverse events included: 28 patients (55%) with grade 2, 8 patients (16%) with grade 3, 0 patients with grade 4, and 2 patients (4%) with grade 5 events (sinus bradycardia and myelodysplasia, possibly owing to chemotherapy). Only 11 patients reported grade 1 to 3 sexual dysfunction.ConclusionsDose-painted IMRT with 5FU/MMC for the treatment of anal canal cancer yields comparable long-term efficacy as conventional radiation cohorts. Enhanced normal tissue protection lowered rates of grade 3 and higher late effects without compromising pelvic tumor control.

Abstract Objectives Distress screening has now become part of the culture of cancer care, with clinical practice guidelines set forth by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and requirements by the Commission on Cancer (CoC). Because interdisciplinary teams are specialists in treating certain disease sites, it is important to develop distress screening guidelines that best serve that patient population and their treatment. Methods A retrospective review of patients with surgically resectable esophageal cancer who were treated at a single institution was performed. Patients voluntarily undergoing the prehabilitation program (n = 11) received a structured protocol intervention in several clinical domains, including psychosocial distress screening. Results Despite having a protocol, variations in the number of times patients were screened for distress (range, 1-9 times; mean = 4.73) suggests that the protocol was not accomplished. Elapsed time between first and final distress screens ranged from 0 to 68 days (mean = 40.27), and time from final distress screen to surgery ranged from 50 to 122 days, with a mean of 76.45 days. Significance of Results The pilot prehabilitation program demonstrated difficulties with the distress screening protocol. Subsequently, a more comprehensive distress screening program is recommended in this highly vulnerable patient population by aligning the NCCN distress management screening guidelines with the clinical pathway for treating surgically resectable esophageal cancer. With the difficult prognosis and treatment known for patients with esophageal cancer, tailored distress screening protocols should be implemented throughout the duration of treatment.

64 Background: The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has historically included preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently there has been an increasing utilization of preoperative chemotherapy in addition to standard chemoradiation, a strategy known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TNT has been offered to patients at the University of Colorado Cancer Center since 2015. Methods: Records of all patients presenting to the University of Colorado colorectal multidisciplinary clinic since 2015 were screened for treatment with TNT. Data collected on these patients included demographic information, diagnosis and initial staging, preoperative treatment received, and surgical outcomes including treatment response and pathological stage. TNT included preoperative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin combined with either 5-FU (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (CAPOX) as well as chemoradiation, generally given with concurrent capecitabine. Patients then underwent surgical resection; if a complete clinical response was achieved with TNT, non-operative management (NOM) was offered. Results: A total of 81 patients thus far have undergone TNT followed by resection or, if complete clinical response and preferred by the patient, NOM. The mean age of patients was 56 years, ranging from 23 to 87, and 60% of patients were male. The majority of patients (67) had stage III disease at presentation while 1 had stage 1 (T2N0) disease, 11 had stage II disease and 2 patients had oligometastatic disease. Ultimately 13 patients (16%) opted for non-operative management after being found to have a complete clinical response following TNT. Of the 68 patients who underwent surgical resection, 21 (31%) had a pathological complete response, with another 14 (21%) with near-complete response. 28 patients (41%) had a partial treatment response and 5 (7%) had no treatment response. In total, the rate of complete clinical or pathologic response was 42%. Treatment was overall well-tolerated with 90% of patients receiving the full planned dose of radiation and 98% of patients completing all planned cycles of chemotherapy, though most of them with typical dose reductions needed. Of the patients who underwent surgery, 49 (72%) had low anterior resection and 19 (28%) had an abdominoperineal resection. Of patients with temporary ileostomies, 85% of them had their ileostomy reversed within 10 weeks of surgery. Conclusions: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer by a total neoadjuvant approach is well-tolerated and results in a high rate of clinical and pathological complete response.

Background: The role of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with borderline resectable pancreas cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) remains controversial. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BRPC and LAPC patients treated at our institution who underwent 2-3 months of chemotherapy followed by SBRT to a dose of 30-33 Gy. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Results: We identified 103 (85 BRPC and 18 LAPC) patients treated per our neoadjuvant paradigm between 2011 and 2018, with resectability based on NCCN definitions. Median follow up was 25 months. Of patients completing neoadjuvant therapy, 73 (71%) underwent definitive resection. Seventy-one (97%) patients with definitively resected tumors had R0 resection and 5 (7%) had a complete pathologic response CR to neoadjuvant therapy. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 24 months. Those with a complete or marked pathologic response had significantly better OS than those with a moderate response (41 vs 24 months, p < 0.02) and patients unable to undergo definitive surgery (17 months, p < 0.0003). Six resected patients experienced grade >3 surgical complications. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT are associated with promising pathologic response rates and R0 resection rates, with acceptable perioperative morbidity.

BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (nCRT) is an accepted treatment regimen for patients with potentially curable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) before nCRT is associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) when compared with patients who received nCRT alone for esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma.METHODS:Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients who received nCRT and curative-intent esophagectomy for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2015 were included. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy start dates were used to define cohorts who received IC before nCRT (IC + nCRT) versus those who only received concurrent nCRT before surgery. Propensity weighting was conducted to balance patient, disease, and facility covariates between groups.RESULTS:12,460 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 11,880 (95%) received nCRT and 580 (5%) received IC + nCRT. Following propensity weighting, OS was significantly improved among patients who received IC + nCRT versus nCRT (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.92; p < 0.001) with median OS for the IC + nCRT cohort of 3.38 years versus 2.45 years for nCRT. For patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2015, IC + nCRT was also associated with higher odds of pCR compared with nCRT (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.14-2.21; p = 0.007).CONCLUSION:IC + nCRT was associated with a significant OS benefit as well as higher pCR rate in the more modern patient cohort. These results merit consideration of a sufficiently powered prospective multiinstitutional trial to further evaluate these observed differences.

Introduction: The impact of radiation prescription dose on postoperative complications during standard of care trimodality therapy for operable stage II-III esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers has not been established.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers treated between 2004 and 2016 with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection at a single institution. Post-operative complications within 30 days were reviewed and scored using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Results were compared between patients treated with <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy, as well as to published CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation group data (41.4 Gy).Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated with <50 Gy (range 39.6–46.8 Gy) and 53 patients were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0–52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Complication rates and CCI scores between our <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS data, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation, <50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS group (50%) than our <50 Gy (38%) or ≥ 50 Gy (30%) groups.Conclusions: In selected esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients, radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy do not appear to increase 30 day post-operative complication rates. These findings suggest that the use of definitive doses of radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant setting may not increase post-operative complications.

Importance Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is often used to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and decrease locoregional relapse; however, more than one-third of patients develop recurrent metastatic disease. As such, novel combinations are needed. Objective To assess whether the addition of pembrolizumab during and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can lead to an improvement in the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score compared with treatment with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and chemoradiotherapy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants In this open-label, phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NRG-GI002), patients in academic and private practice settings were enrolled. Patients with stage II/III LARC with distal location (cT3-4 ≤ 5 cm from anal verge, any N), with bulky disease (any cT4 or tumor within 3 mm of mesorectal fascia), at high risk for metastatic disease (cN2), and/or who were not candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) were stratified based on clinical tumor and nodal stages. Trial accrual opened on August 1, 2018, and ended on May 31, 2019. This intent-to-treat analysis is based on data as of August 2020. Interventions Patients were randomized (1:1) to neoadjuvant FOLFOX for 4 months and then underwent chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine with 50.4 Gy) with or without intravenous pembrolizumab administered at a dosage of 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 doses before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the NAR score. Secondary end points included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, SSS, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This report focuses on end points available after definitive surgery (NAR score, pCR, SSS, clinical complete response rate, margin involvement, and safety). Results A total of 185 patients (126 [68.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 55.7 [11.1] years) were randomized to the control arm (CA) (n = 95) or the pembrolizumab arm (PA) (n = 90). Of these patients, 137 were evaluable for NAR score (68 CA patients and 69 PA patients). The mean (SD) NAR score was 11.53 (12.43) for the PA patients (95% CI, 8.54-14.51) vs 14.08 (13.82) for the CA patients (95% CI, 10.74-17.43) (P = .26). The pCR rate was 31.9% in the PA vs 29.4% in the CA (P = .75). The clinical complete response rate was 13.9% in the PA vs 13.6% in the CA (P = .95). The percentage of patients who underwent SSS was 59.4% in the PA vs 71.0% in the CA (P = .15). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were slightly increased in the PA (48.2%) vs the CA (37.3%) during chemoradiotherapy. Two deaths occurred during FOLFOX: sepsis (CA) and pneumonia (PA). No differences in radiotherapy fractions, FOLFOX, or capecitabine doses were found. Conclusions and Relevance Pembrolizumab added to chemoradiotherapy as part of total neoadjuvant therapy was suggested to be safe; however, the NAR score difference does not support further study. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02921256

Importance Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is often used to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and decrease locoregional relapse; however, more than one-third of patients develop recurrent metastatic disease. As such, novel combinations are needed. Objective To assess whether the addition of pembrolizumab during and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can lead to an improvement in the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score compared with treatment with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and chemoradiotherapy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants In this open-label, phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NRG-GI002), patients in academic and private practice settings were enrolled. Patients with stage II/III LARC with distal location (cT3-4 ≤ 5 cm from anal verge, any N), with bulky disease (any cT4 or tumor within 3 mm of mesorectal fascia), at high risk for metastatic disease (cN2), and/or who were not candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) were stratified based on clinical tumor and nodal stages. Trial accrual opened on August 1, 2018, and ended on May 31, 2019. This intent-to-treat analysis is based on data as of August 2020. Interventions Patients were randomized (1:1) to neoadjuvant FOLFOX for 4 months and then underwent chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine with 50.4 Gy) with or without intravenous pembrolizumab administered at a dosage of 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 doses before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the NAR score. Secondary end points included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, SSS, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This report focuses on end points available after definitive surgery (NAR score, pCR, SSS, clinical complete response rate, margin involvement, and safety). Results A total of 185 patients (126 [68.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 55.7 [11.1] years) were randomized to the control arm (CA) (n = 95) or the pembrolizumab arm (PA) (n = 90). Of these patients, 137 were evaluable for NAR score (68 CA patients and 69 PA patients). The mean (SD) NAR score was 11.53 (12.43) for the PA patients (95% CI, 8.54-14.51) vs 14.08 (13.82) for the CA patients (95% CI, 10.74-17.43) (P = .26). The pCR rate was 31.9% in the PA vs 29.4% in the CA (P = .75). The clinical complete response rate was 13.9% in the PA vs 13.6% in the CA (P = .95). The percentage of patients who underwent SSS was 59.4% in the PA vs 71.0% in the CA (P = .15). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were slightly increased in the PA (48.2%) vs the CA (37.3%) during chemoradiotherapy. Two deaths occurred during FOLFOX: sepsis (CA) and pneumonia (PA). No differences in radiotherapy fractions, FOLFOX, or capecitabine doses were found. Conclusions and Relevance Pembrolizumab added to chemoradiotherapy as part of total neoadjuvant therapy was suggested to be safe; however, the NAR score difference does not support further study. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921256.

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepa-tocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatol-ogists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer ex-pertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial thera-pies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezo-lizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superi -or survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.

685 Background: For borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), neoadjuvant (NAT) FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) are standard treatment options and these regimens have shown a survival advantage over single-agent gemcitabine. However, the role of these modern therapeutic regimens in elderly patients is debatable. In this analysis, we evaluated the outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with combination chemotherapy in elderly patients. Methods: 230 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for BRPC/LAPC discussed and planned for NAT at the University of Colorado Cancer Center from January 2011 to March 2019 were reviewed. 214 patients who received FOLFIRINOX (n = 143) or GnP (n = 71) were eligible for analysis. We divided all patients into three groups ( < 70, 70-74, ≥75 years) and compared the short-term and long-term outcomes. Results: Of 214 patients, patients < 70 (n = 147) received FOLFIRINOX more frequently than the other groups (p < 0.001): FOLFIRINOX: 115 cases, GnP: 32 cases, 70-74 years (n = 33): FOLFIRINOX: 15 cases, GnP: 18 cases, and ≥75 years (n = 34): FOLFIRINOX: 13 cases, GnP: 21 cases. Resection rates were not statistically different between three groups ( < 70: 62%, 70-74: 70%, ≥75 years: 56%, p = 0.504). There was a slight trend towards worse survival in the two older groups (Median Survival Time [MST]: < 70: 23.2 mo., 70-74: 19.5 mo., ≥75 years: 17.6 mo., p = 0.075) The FOLFIRINOX group was superior to GnP group in all three groups (MST: < 70: 25.6 vs 18.2 mo., p = 0.017; 70-74: 33.2 vs 16.1mo., p = 0.029; ≥75 years: not reached vs 16.1 mo., p = 0.135). There were no toxic deaths or 30 day mortality after pancreatectomy in the study population. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy regimens were safe and feasible for elderly patients. Neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage vs GnP and is an good option for fit and elderly patients ≥75 years.

PURPOSE:Studies have noted a link between radiation dose to the heart and overall survival (OS) for patients with lung cancer treated with chemoradiation. The purpose of this study was to characterize pre- to posttreatment cardiac metabolic changes using fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images and to evaluate whether changes in cardiac metabolism predict for OS.METHODS AND MATERIALS:Thirty-nine patients enrolled in a functional avoidance prospective study who had undergone pre- and postchemoradiation FDG-PET imaging were evaluated. For each patient, the pretreatment and posttreatment PET/CTs were rigidly registered to the planning CT, dose, and structure set. PET-based metabolic dose-response was assessed by comparing pretreatment to posttreatment mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) in the heart as a function of dose-bin. OS analysis was performed by comparing SUVmean changes for patients who were alive or had died at last follow-up and by using a multivariate model to assess whether pre- to posttreatment SUVmean changes were a predictor of OS.RESULTS:The dose-response curve revealed increasing changes in SUV as a function of cardiac dose with an average SUVmean increase of 1.7% per 10 Gy. Patients were followed for a median of 437 days (range, 201-1131 days). SUVmean change was significantly predictive of OS on multivariate analysis with a hazard ratio of 0.541 (95% confidence intervals, 0.312-0.937). Patients alive at follow-up had an average increase of 17.2% in cardiac SUVmean while patients that died had an average decrease in SUVmean decrease of 13.5% (P = .048).CONCLUSIONS:Our data demonstrated that posttreatment SUV changes in the heart were significant indicators of dose-response and predictors of OS. The present work is hypothesis generating and must be validated in an independent cohort. If validated, our data show the potential for cardiac metabolic changes to be an early predictor for clinical outcomes.