PURPOSE:The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer can achieve tumor shrinkage, enabling less invasive surgical treatments, such as breast-conserving surgery instead of mastectomy, and sentinel node biopsy instead of axillary dissection. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have explored the use of primary systemic therapy for occult breast cancer with axillary presentation. These studies suggest that a more conservative approach, involving targeted axillary surgery could be cautiously proposed for occult breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients. In cases where a complete pathological response in the lymph nodes is achieved, there may also be the possibility to omit radiotherapy. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed surgical interventions for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome with axillary presentation at the European Institute of Oncology from April 2004 to October 2022. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected and follow-up information has been updated. RESULTS:A total of 114 patients who underwent axillary surgery for occult breast cancer were included. The 5-year disease-free survival was 74.5%, while overall survival was 88.5%. A total of 22.8% of patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Complete pathological response was achieved in 38.5%. Patients with complete nodal pathological response showed fewer events compared to patients with no complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION:Although the sample size is limited, recent advances in breast cancer multimodal treatment indicate that targeted axillary surgery may be considered for the rare clinical presentation of occult breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. TRIAL REGISTRY:Trial registration number UID 4184 24/07/2024 "retrospectively registered".

Abstract Exemestane is an effective drug to reduce breast cancer risk reaching an overall 65% reduction in breast cancer in the placebo–controlled phase III MAP.3 trial. To improve its acceptability in primary prevention programs, we are seeking the minimal effective dose. In a 3-arm presurgical trial of 4-6 weeks before breast surgery in 180 postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer, we investigated the activity of alternative exemestane schedules: 25 mg per day (QD), 25 mg three times/week (TIW) or 25 mg per week (QW) and showed that in adherent participants TIW was not inferior to QD in reducing circulating estradiol (Serrano et al JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0089). Moreover, Ki67 reduction was seen in all arms with no significant difference among arms. Here, we analyzed the concentration of sex steroids, exemestane, and its main metabolite in the cancer and adjacent non-cancerous breast tissue. Tissues samples were homogenized before liquid-liquid extraction. After reconstitution, samples were analyzed by coupling liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (Sciex QTRAP 6500, Nexera system, Shimadzu). We obtained breast cancer tissue from 93 and non-cancerous breast tissue from 117 participants to measure exemestane, 17-OH-exemestane, and sex steroids. Exemestane and 17-OH-exemestane concentrations were detectable only in the QD arm, while in TIW and QW arms levels were below the Lower Limit of Detection (< LLD). Median exemestane level was 3807 fmol/g and 17485 fmol/g and median 17-OH-exemestane level was 338 fmol/g and 1343 fmol/g in cancer and non-cancerous tissue, respectively. Interestingly, drug and its metabolite accumulated 4-5-fold in non-cancerous tissue compared to cancer tissue in the QD arm. Despite the between-arm drug concentration difference, estradiol was almost completely suppressed in all arms in the non-cancerous tissue, attaining level < LLD in QD and TIW arms, and barely detectable in QW arm. The median in the QW arm was < LLD (< LLD, interquartile range < LLD, 25.5 fmol/g) showing no differences in QD vs TIW and QD vs QW (p = 0.364 and p = 0.693 respectively). While a dose-response trend was observed in cancer tissue, estradiol level was < LLD (< LLD,52.2 fmol/g) on QD, 17.1 (< LLD, 125.3) on TIW, and 128 (< LLD, 224.8) on QW (p=0.046 QD vs TIW arms). Estrone showed a clear dose response trend among arms, whereas no differences were observed for testosterone and androstenedione for both cancer and non-cancerous tissue in all arms. The Ki-67 change was analyzed in the previous paper; here we report the data for those patients who had drug and hormones tissue concentration measured, where Ki-67 decreased in all arms: median Ki67 change from baseline was QD -8 (-10, -3), TIW -6 (-11, -2), QW -4 (-8, -1). Conclusions: Exemestane 25 mg three times a week maintains comparable activity to the standard dose on tissue estradiol suppression and Ki67 decrease. Considering the estradiol suppression in non-cancerous tissue of the lowest exemestane dose, QW might even be considered for breast cancer risk reduction in primary prevention. Further analyses are ongoing to investigate the correlation with other biomarkers including the role of polymorphic UGT2B17 genotype that could identify candidates to lower exemestane dosage. Citation Format: Davide Serrano, Harriet Johansson, Bjørn-Erik Bertelsen, Gunnar Mellgren, Parijatham Thomas, Katherine Crew, Nagi B Kumar, Debora Macis, Valentina Aristarco, Aliana Guerrieri Gonzaga, Sara Gandini, Mauro D’Amico, Tania Buttiron Webber, Irene Maria Briata, Stefano Spinaci, Viviana Galimberti, Giuseppe Viale, Lana A. Vornik, Eduardo Villar-Sanchez, Powel Brown, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Eva Szabo, Bernardo Bonanni, Andrea De Censi. Exemestane and breast cancer prevention: how low can we go? Drug and biomarker tissue levels in a randomized presurgical trial on exemestane alternative dosing regimen [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS07-01.

To offer an extensive retrospective experience on the management of male breast cancer. A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, including male patients diagnosed with breast cancer (invasive or in situ) in 12 Italian breast units from January 1975 to December 2019. Patients aged 18 years or older were assessed for eligibility. Exclusion criteria were metastatic cancer at diagnosis, previous cancer(s), received neoadjuvant treatment, incomplete data on (neo) adjuvant treatment(s), and/or follow-up data. Data on radiological examinations, demographic characteristics, risk factors, histological features, receptor status, treatments, and follow-up were collected. In a series of 671 male patients with breast cancer assessed for eligibility, 403 (28 in situ and 375 invasive neoplasms) were included in the study. All included patients underwent surgery. The median age at surgery was 63.8 years (IQR 56.1–72.1). In 68

Abstract Introduction: PrBC is an uncommon malignancy with aggressive behavior. Its pathogenesis involves distinct immune mechanisms associated with maternal-fetal tolerance and tumor-host immunoediting. PrBC displays specific patterns of TILs with increased CD8+ cells. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the molecular processes underlying this immune synergy is crucial for enhancing PrBC patients’ clinical management. Here, we sought to identify dysregulated immune-related genes in PrBC and explore their association with HR status and TILs. Methods: A total of n=75 PrBC (age range 26-43 years) and n=67 age-matched early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) in non-pregnant women (controls; age range 28-43 years) were selected from our Institutional registry. For all cases TILs were quantified according to the International TILs Working Group recommendations and profiled by IHC for CD4 and CD8. RNA was extracted from representative FFPE tissue blocks to perform the expression analysis of 395 genes involved in tumor-immune interactions using a targeted NGS panel (Oncomine™ Immune Response Research Assay, Thermofisher). Samples with >1,000,000 mapped reads and >800,000 valid reads were considered adequate. R package DESeq2 software 1.38.3 was used for sequencing depth differences normalization and differential gene expression analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on a significant p-value (p< 0.05). Results: The comparison between PrBC and EOBC revealed a total of n=7 DEGs. All of these genes were upregulated and belonged to distinct superfamilies, including Cancer/Testis (CT) Antigen (MAGEA1/3, XAGE1B), Interferons/Cytokines (IFNA17, IFNB1), Chemokines (CXCL13), and Immunoglobulin (PECAM1/CD31). Notably, the upregulation of Chemokines in respect to EOBC was observed exclusively in HR+ PrBC, whereas triple-negative (TN) PrBC did not exhibit this pattern compared to the control group. Hence, the upregulation of ALOX15B, an enzyme involved in fatty acid peroxidation, was specific to TN PrBC. The immune signatures showed significant variations between PrBC and EOBC also based on TILs density and subpopulations. Indeed, the upregulation of CT genes (MAGEA1, XAGE1B) was exclusively observed in PrBC cases characterized by low TILs levels and prevalence of CD8+ or CD4+ cells. Finally, CD4+ TILs were absent or low in PrBC with upregulated Interferons, Cytokines, Chemokines, and Immunoglobulin genes, but present in cases with increased expression of CT and KLRF1 (NK cells). Conclusion: These findings highlight the heterogeneity and distinct molecular characteristics of PrBC and EOBC. The upregulation of specific immune-related gene families, such as CT and Chemokines, in different PrBC subtypes may suggest their potential role as actionable biomarkers (e.g. MAGEA, a well-known oncogene and potential immunotherapy target). The differences in immune signatures and TILs subpopulations further emphasize the importance of the immune microenvironment in PrBC biology and behavior. Future studies could delve deeper into the clinical implications of these gene expression patterns and explore their relevance in personalized treatment strategies for PrBC. Citation Format: Konstantinos Venetis, Elham Sajjadi, Chiara Frascarelli, Mariia Ivanova, Marianna D'Ercole, Concetta Blundo, Massimo Giroda, Eugenia Di Loreto, Giovanna Scarfone, Stefano Ferrero, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana Galimberti, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori, Nicola Fusco, Elena Guerini-Rocco. Decoding the immune landscape of breast cancer (BC) during pregnancy (PrBC): Impact of hormone receptors (HR) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) phenotype on gene expression signatures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-16-04.

Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.

PURPOSE:To evaluate the outcome of partial breast reirradiation (re-PBI) with intensity modulated radiation therapy using a hypofractionated scheme for breast cancer (BC) local relapse (LR) operated on with repeat breast-conservative surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Intensity modulated radiation therapy-based re-PBI was performed using either helical or step-and-shoot modality to deliver 37.05 Gy in 13 fractions in 2.5 weeks. Cumulative incidence of second LR, toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS), BC-specific survival, and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS:Between May 2012 and May 2021, 70 patients had re-PBI. The median follow-up (FU) was 6.3 years (quartiles 1-3, 4.0-8.1.). The median age at first LR was 62 years. The median primary BC first LR interval was 12.4 years (range, 1.6-26.7 years). Luminal A-like first LR accounted for 41% of the cases, and the median size was 0.8 cm. During FU, 18 (26%) patients showed a subsequent event: 3 second LRs (corresponding to an 8-year cumulative rate of 4%), 3 regional nodal recurrences, 7 distant metastases, and 5 other primary tumors. At 8 years, DFS, BC-specific survival, and overall survival were 76%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, grade 3 and extensive intraductal components were independent predictors for DFS. For 51 and 46 patients, chronic toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated, respectively: 4% had grade 3 fibrosis, and cosmesis was deemed good/excellent in just >60% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS:Re-PBI after repeat breast-conservative surgery represents a feasible alternative to mastectomy with regard to local control, showing an acceptable toxicity profile. A long-term FU is crucial to better understand the pattern of relapse and consolidate the position of re-PBI in clinical practice.

In a 3-arm presurgical trial, four-six weeks exemestane 25 mg three times/week (TIW) was non-inferior to 25 mg/day (QD) in suppressing circulating estradiol in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer. Since obesity may decrease exemestane efficacy, we analyzed changes in sex steroids, adipokines, Ki-67, and drug levels in relation to obesity. Postmenopausal women with early-stage ER-positive breast cancer were randomized to either exemestane 25 mg QD (n = 57), 25 mg TIW (n = 57), or 25 mg/week (QW, n = 62) for 4–6 weeks before breast surgery. Serum and tissue pre- and post-treatment biomarkers were stratified by body mass index (BMI)< or ≥30 kg/m2. Post-treatment median exemestane and 17-OH exemestane levels were 5–6 times higher in the QD arm compared to the TIW arm. For obese women, TIW maintained comparable reductions to QD in systemic estradiol levels, although the reduction in estrone was less with the TIW regimen. There was less suppression of SHBG with the TIW versus the QD dose schedule in obese women which should result in less systemic bioavailable estrogens. Metabolically, the effect of the TIW regimen was similar to the QD regimen for obese women in terms of leptin suppression and increase in the adiponectin-leptin ratio. Reduction in tissue Ki-67 was less for obese women on the TIW regimen than QD, although changes were similar for non-obese women. Our findings suggest that TIW exemestane should be explored further for primary cancer prevention in both normal weight and obese cohorts.

Background Abemaciclib is currently approved for the adjuvant treatment of high -risk, lymph node (LN)-positive, hormone receptor (HR) -positive breast cancer (BC). In a real -world setting the clinicopathologic features of patients potentially eligible for adjuvant abemaciclib remain to be de fi ned. There are con fl icting data regarding the biological behavior and long-term outcomes across invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In our study we retrospectively assessed the real -world data and long-term outcome of selected high -risk features ILC compared to IDC, according to the MonarchE trial inclusion criteria. Methods We identified 15,071 patients who got surgery at the European Institute of Oncology for a fi rst primary, nonmetastatic, HR -positive, HER2-negative BC from 2000 to 2008.11,981 (79.5%) patients had an IDC and 1524 (10.1%) an ILC. The remaining 1566 patients (10.4%) had either combined ductal and lobular breast cancer or another histological breast cancer subtype. According to the eligibility criteria of the MonarchE study, we identified two high -risk groups, based on high number of positive lymph nodes, large tumor size, or a high cellular proliferation as measured by tumor grade or biomarkers. Patients were matched by propensity score. Findings A total of 2872 (21.3%) patients were selected as clinically high -risk, including 361/1524 ILC (23.7%) and 2511/11,981 IDC (21%). 322 high -risk ILC were matched with similar high -risk IDC. The median follow-up was 13.2 years for survival. In the matched set, invasive disease -free survival (IDFS) (log -rank P = 0.09) and overall survival (OS) (log -rank P = 0.48) were not statistically signi fi cantly different between the two histological groups. For IDC patients, the 5 -year and 10 -year IDFS rates (95% CI) were 77.7% (72.9 - 82.2) and 57.3% (51.7 - 63.1) respectively, compared to the 5 -year and 10 -year IDFS rates of ILC patients that were 75.5% (70.6 - 80.2) and 50.7% (45.0 - 56.6). The 5 -year and 10 -year distant relapse free survival (DRFS) rates were 80% (75.3 - 84.2) and 65.3% (59.8 - 70.7) in IDC cohort, compared to the 5 -year and the 10 -year DRFS rates of 78.7% (74.0 - 83.1) and 61.5% (55.9 - 67.1) in the ILC cohort. Such data match the recent outcomes eff i cacy results of the MonarchE control arm. More patients in the ILC (n = 17) than in the IDC group (n = 10) developed axillary recurrence. At multivariable analysis, strati fi ed for speci fi c clinical features, age <35 years, pT2-3, axillary involvement with more than 10 positive axillary nodes were found to be predictors of unfavorable IDFS and OS in the overall matched high -risk population. Interpretation Findings from this matched cohort study reported similar IDFS and DRFS rates for high risk HR positive early BC when compared to the control arm overall IDFS and DRFS rates reported from the MonarchE trial. Our study demonstrated rates of concordant long-term outcome status beyond histologic subtype. These data support an escalation strategy for these two different histological entities when diagnosed with high -risk features. In our dataset approximately 21% rate of high -risk HR positive early BC patients are potentially eligible for adjuvant abemaciclib treatment.

Data on the prognostic impact of the micropapillary component in breast cancer are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes of pure and mixed invasive micropapillary breast cancer (IMPC) patients compared to invasive ductal cancer (IDC) patients. This retrospective study analysed all IMPC and IDC patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) between 1997 and 2019. The overall cohort of IMPC patients was divided in two groups, pure and mixed IMPC. Each patient with mixed or pure IMPC was matched with one patient with IDC, based on year of surgery, age, pT, pN, and molecular subtype. A total of 30,115 IDC, 120 pure IMPC and 150 mixed IMPC patients were considered eligible. Compared to IDC, pure and mixed IMPC patients presented a higher rate of locally advanced disease (pT2-T3, pN2-N3), vascular invasion, and Luminal B subtype. After matching, pure and mixed IMPC showed a significant higher rate of vascular invasion compared to IDC patients (p < 0.001). Invasive disease-free survival was better in IDC compared to pure IMPC patients (p = 0.11). Long-term overall survival was significantly worse in pure IMPC group compared to IDC group (p = 0.004), being instead similar between mixed IMPC vs matched IDC (p = 0.07). These real-world data reported the worse prognosis of pure IMPC compared to IDC, highlighting the peculiar prognostic value of the micropapillary subtype itself in the decision-making process of IMPC management. An accurate pre-surgical diagnostic evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach are pivotal to best personalize its treatment.

Physical activity (PA) has an established role in the promotion of health and fitness and the prevention of disease. Expected overall benefits include reduction of all-cause morbidity and death, weight control, improved quality of life, improved bone health and decreased falls of elderly subjects, , deeper cognition, and reduced risk of depression, anxiety, and sleeplessness. Currently, PA is a mainstay in the management of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and bone health. Recently, the perception of its role in primary and secondary prevention, interception, and treatment of cancer, however, is also gaining importance. Regular walking, the simplest type of PA, is associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, and a role in cancer prevention is of increasing interest. Furthermore, PA improves the quality of life of cancer patients, attenuating side effects of chemotherapy, decreasing sarcopenia, increasing fitness, and inhibiting the recurrence and progression of some cancer types. It promotes emotional and psychological benefits in patients, inducing positive changes. While mechanisms, effective levels and useful amount of PA practice are well established in cardiology, they are yet to be fully determined in oncology. Nevertheless, PA is recommended to reduce cancer risk in the general population, and it has been introduced in programs for the prevention of second cancers. In perspective, it will help as integrative therapy in cancer patients and for cancer survivors. The number of beneficial effects in the cancer continuum is highlighted in this review.

PURPOSE:Intraoperative radiation therapy with electrons (IOERT) may represent a viable choice for partial breast reirradiation after repeat quadrantectomy for local recurrence (LR) for primary breast cancer (BC) in lieu of mastectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS:A database collecting data on partial breast reirradiation with IOERT from 8 Italian centers was set up in 2016 to 2018, providing data on cumulative incidence (CumI) of second LR and survival with a long follow-up. RESULTS:From 2002 to 2015, 109 patients underwent the conservative retreatment. The median primary BC first LR interval was 11.1 years (range, 2.4-27.7). The median first LR size was 0.9 cm (range, 0.3-3.0), and 43.6% cases were luminal A. Median IOERT dose was 18 Gy (range, 12-21), and median collimator diameter was 4 cm (range, 3-6). Median follow-up duration was 11.7 years (IQR, 7.7-14.6). The second LR CumI was 12.2% (95% CI, 6.8%-19.2%) at 5 years and 32.3% at 10 years (95% CI, 22.8%-42.2%), occurring in the same site as the first LR in about half of the cases. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and collimator size were independent LR predictors. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 95.2% and 88.3%, respectively, whereas 5- and 10-year BC-specific survival rates were 98% and 94.5%, respectively. The development of a second LR significantly reduced BC-specific survival (hazard ratio, 9.40; P < .001). Grade ≥3 fibrosis rate was 18.9%. Patient-reported cosmesis was good/excellent in 59.7% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS:Second LR CumI was within the range of the literature but higher than expected, opening questions on radiation field extension and fractionation schedule. Because a second LR worsened the outcome, salvage modality must be carefully planned.

BACKGROUND:De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) management began when sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard of care in patients with node-negative BC. The second step consolidated ALND omission in selected subgroups of BC patients with up to two macrometastases and recognized BC molecular and genomic implication in predicting prognosis and planning adjuvant treatment. Outcomes from the recent RxPONDER and monarchE trials have come to challenge the previous cut-off of two SLN in order to inform decisions on systemic therapies for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2) negative BC, as the criteria included a cut-off of respectively three and four SLNs. In view of the controversy that this may lift in surgical practice, the Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (Associazione Nazionale Italiana Senologi Chirurghi, ANISC) reviewed data regarding the latest trials on this topic and proposes an implementation in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS:We reviewed the available literature offering data on the pathological nodal status of cN0 breast cancer patients. RESULTS:The rates of pN2 status in cN0 patients ranges from 3.5 % to 16 %; pre-surgical diagnostic definition of axillary lymph node status in cN0 patients by ultrasound could be useful to inform about a possible involvement of ≥4 lymph nodes in this specific sub-groups of women. CONCLUSIONS:The Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC) considers that for HR + HER2-/cN0-pN1(sn) BC patients undergoing breast conserving treatment the preoperative workup should be optimized for a more detailed assessment of the axilla and the technique of SLNB should be optimized, if considered appropriate by the surgeon, not considering routine ALND always indicated to determine treatment recommendations according to criteria of eligibility to RxPONDER and monarch-E trials.

ImportancePathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline CDH1 variants are associated with risk for diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer (LBC) in the so-called hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome. However, in some circumstances, LBC can be the first manifestation of this syndrome in the absence of diffuse gastric cancer manifestation.ObjectivesTo evaluate the frequency of germline CDH1 variants in women with the hereditary LBC (HLBC) phenotype, somatic CDH1 gene inactivation in germline CDH1 variant carriers’ tumor samples, and the association of genetic profiles with clinical-pathological data and survival.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis single-center, longitudinal, prospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2021, with follow-up until January 31, 2023. Women with LBC seen at the European Institute of Oncology were included. Testing for germline CDH1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 genes was performed. Somatic profiling was assessed for germline CDH1 carriers.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAccurate estimates of prevalence of germline CDH1 variants among patients with HLBC and the association of somatic sequence alteration with HLBC syndrome. The Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied for overall and disease-free survival analysis.ResultsOf 5429 cases of primary LBC, familial LBC phenotype accounted for 1867 (34.4%). A total of 394 women with LBC were tested, among whom 15 germline CDH1 variants in 15 unrelated families were identified. Among these variants, 6 (40.0%) were P/LP, with an overall frequency of 1.5% (6 of 394). Of the 6 probands with P/LP CDH1 LBC, 5 (83.3%) had a positive family history of BC and only 1 (16.7%) had sporadic juvenile early-onset LBC. No germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were identified in CDH1 carriers. An inactivating CDH1 mechanism (second hit) was identified in 4 of 6 explored matched tumor samples (66.7%) in P/LP germline carriers. The P/LP CDH1 LBC variant carriers had a significantly lower age at diagnosis compared with the group carrying CDH1 variants of unknown significance or likely benign (42.5 [IQR, 38.3-43.0] vs 51.0 [IQR, 45.0-53.0] years; P = .03).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, P/LP germline CDH1 variants were identified in individuals not fulfilling the classic clinical criteria for HDGC screening, suggesting that identification of these variants may provide a novel method to test women with LBC with early age at diagnosis and/or positive family history of BC.