Ideas of activity are widely used in the contemporary literature on psychology and methodology. It seems that everyone understands well what is being said. Nevertheless, one can claim that there is a methodological problem in connection with the idea of activity. Various researchers not only interpret activity differently but, what is more important, assess of the place of this category in knowledge differently. From the perspective of some researchers, activity is one way of describing and explaining reality. Others believe that the category of activity presents reality itself, that there is nothing but activity. If we adhere to the former point of view, we can raise the question, for example, of studying certain types of activity, as V.V. Davydov does (he points out that so far there has been little research on the origin and historical development of such types of activity as artistic and educational activity and that the cultural-historical aspects of activity have not been adequately studied [5, pp. 28-29]).
AP OGURTSOV合作论文数3BI Pruzhinin合作论文数2VS Stepin合作论文数2AF Zotov合作论文数2IB NOVIK合作论文数1TM Dridze合作论文数1IN SMIRNOV合作论文数1V. A. Kutyrev合作论文数1VI KUPTSOV合作论文数1MA Rozov合作论文数1VN PORUS合作论文数1LB BAZHENOV合作论文数1E. A. Mamchur合作论文数1NS AVTONOMOVA合作论文数1LA Mikeshina合作论文数1GN FILONOV合作论文数1VG GOROKHOV合作论文数1AV Yurevich合作论文数1IV BESTUZHEVLADA合作论文数1Ng Alekseev合作论文数1DI DUBROVSKII合作论文数1FT MIKHAILOV合作论文数1VV Kraevskii合作论文数1VS SHVYREV合作论文数1В. А. Лекторский合作论文数1AV BRUSHLINSKII合作论文数1SI YAKOVLENKO合作论文数1El Feinberg合作论文数1NV Gromyko合作论文数1BY GORODETSKII合作论文数1OI GENISARETSKII合作论文数1IT Kasavin合作论文数1
а г асмолов合作论文数Lomonosov Moscow State Univ1E. V. Shikin合作论文数1
