Abstract To evaluate the prognostic value of biomarkers from peripheral blood obtained as routine laboratory assessment for overall survival in a cohort of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive radiochemotherapy at a high-volume cancer center. Seven blood biomarkers from 160 patients treated with definitive radiochemotherapy for stage III NSCLC were analyzed throughout the course treatment. Parameters were preselected using univariable and multivariable proportional hazards analysis and were assessed for internal validity using leave-one-out cross validation. Cross validated classifiers including biomarkers in addition to important clinical parameters were compared with classifiers containing the clinical parameters alone. An increased C-reactive protein (CRP) value in the final week of radiotherapy was found as a prognostic factor for overall survival, both as a continuous (HR 1.099 (1.038–1.164), p < 0.0012) as well as categorical variable splitting data at the median value of 1.2 mg/dl (HR 2.214 (1.388–3.531), p < 0.0008). In the multivariable analysis, the CRP value-maintained significance with an HR of 1.105 (1.040–1.173) and p-value of 0.0012. The cross validated classifier using CRP at the end of radiotherapy in addition to clinical parameters separated equally sized high and low risk groups more distinctly than a classifier containing the clinical parameters alone (HR = 2.786 (95% CI 1.686–4.605) vs. HR = 2.287 (95% CI 1.407–3.718)). Thus, the CRP value at the end of radiation therapy has successfully passed the crucial cross-validation test. The presented data on CRP levels suggests that inflammatory markers may become increasingly important during definitive radiochemotherapy, particularly with the growing utilization of immunotherapy as a consolidation therapy for stage III NSCLC.

Background: In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, a cT3–cT4 primary tumor or an cN2/cN3 lymph node status was reported to be associated with unfavorable outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of definitive or neoadjuvant thoracic radiochemotherapy for long-term outcome of these patients in order to find more appropriate treatment schedules. Methods: Analysis of the West Cancer Centre (WTZ) institutional database from 08/2016 to 08/2020 was performed. Patients with primary synchronous OMD, all without actionable driver mutations, who received definitive thoracic radiochemotherapy (RCT) or neoadjuvant RCT followed by surgery (trimodality treatment) were included. Survival outcome is compared with stage III NSCLC. Results: Altogether, 272 patients received concurrent radiochemotherapy. Of those, 220 presented with stage III (158 with definitive RCT, 62 with trimodality approach). A total of 52 patients had OMD patients with cT3/cT4 or cN2/cN3 tumors. Overall survival (OS) at five years for OMD patients was 28.3% (95%-CI: 16.4–41.5%), which was not significantly different from OS of patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive or neoadjuvant RCT (34.9% (95%-CI: 27.4–42.8%)). However, the PFS of OMD patients at five years or last follow-up was significantly worse than that of stage III patients (13.0% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.0048). The latter was due to a higher cumulative incidence of distant metastases in OMD patients (50.2% vs. 20.4% at 48 months, p < 0.0001) in comparison to stage III patients. A cross-validated classifier that included severe comorbidity, ECOG performance status, gender and pre-treatment serum CRP level as the most important factors in the univariable analysis, was able to divide the OMD patient group into two equally sized groups with a four-year survival rate of 49.4% in the good prognosis group and 9.9% in the poor prognosis group (p = 0.0021). Laboratory chemistry and clinical parameters, in addition to imaging and high-precision therapies, can help to predict and improve prognosis. Conclusions: A multimodality treatment approach and local metastases-directed therapy in addition to chemoimmunotherapy can lead to good long-term survival in patients with cT3/cT4 or cN2/cN3 OMD NSCLC without severe comorbidities and in good performance status and is therefore recommended.

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a very aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Most patients receive systemic treatment only; however, some patients may benefit from multimodality treatment. A precise staging of patients undergoing multimodal treatment is mandatory. We investigated the pattern of metastasis in a cohort of patients screened for multimodal treatment to define the extent of staging examinations. Additionally, we investigated the occurrence of metastasis during follow-up. We investigated a single-center experience of 545 patients newly diagnosed and/or treated with PM between the years 2010 and 2022. Patients who were treated naïvely and had a whole set of imaging of the brain were included and further analyzed. A total of 54% of all patients with cerebral imaging had an available 18FDG-PET CT scan. We also recorded metastasis during treatment follow-up. There were 110 patients who had a whole set of imaging (CT = 89% and MRI = 11%) of the brain, and 54% of all patients with cerebral imaging had an available 18FDG-PET CT scan. We identified four patients with cerebral metastasis at the time of first diagnosis, which means that 5.4% of the cohort had cerebral metastasis and 13.3% of all patients in the subgroup with complete data of 18FDG-PET CT had distant non-cerebral metastasis. During the longitudinal follow-up, we found 11 patients with newly diagnosed metastases after a median time of 1.6 years (range: 2 months to 3.3 years) after first diagnosis without metastases. Distant metastases are more frequent in mesothelioma patients than previously thought. This implies that extensive staging is needed for patients selected for multimodal treatment, including brain imaging and 18FDG-PET CT.

Over 40% stage-III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) experience 5-year survival following multimodality treatment. Nevertheless, little is known about relevant late toxicities and quality-of-life (QoL) in the further long-term follow-up. Therefore, we invited pts from our randomized phase-III trial (Eberhardt et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015) after 10 years from diagnosis to participate within a structured survivorship program (SSP) including follow-up imaging, laboratory parameters, cardio-pulmonary investigations, long-term toxicity evaluations and QoL questionnaires. Of 246 pts initially accrued, 161 were considered potentially resectable following the induction therapy and were randomized (80 to arm A: definitive chemoradiation; 81 to arm B: definitive surgery; 85 not randomized for different reasons; group C). 31 from 37 pts still alive after 10 years agreed to the SSP (13 in A; 12 in B; 6 in C). Clinically relevant long-term toxicities (grade 3 and 4) were rarely observed with no signal favoring any of the randomization arms. Furthermore, available data from the global QoL analysis did not show a signal favoring any definitive locoregional approach (Mean QoL in SSP A pts: 56.41/100, B pts: 64.39/100) and no late decline in comparison to baseline and early 1-year follow-up. This is the first comprehensive SSP of very late survival follow-up reported in stage-III NSCLC treated within a randomized multimodality trial and it may serve as important baseline information for physicians and pts deciding for a locoregional treatment option.