In the context of the global digital competition, acceding to the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement（DEPA） is a means of improving digital governance and responding to external regulatory challenges. The research on constructing the connection between domestic data governance regulations and the DEPA and optimizing China’s data governance system will be receiving theoretical and practical attention.While a regulatory standard of “principled free flow plus exceptional restriction” is embodied in the DEPA for cross-border data to strike a balance between “free flow” and “security protection”, it establishes the tests of legitimate purposes and reasonable and proper means for the invocation of the exceptions in line with connotation of the principle of proportionality. There is a risk of the incompatibility between the domestic regulation concerning data localization and the DEPA standard in terms of appropriateness. Therefore, it can be made on the basis of the principle of proportionality and the standard of DEPA as a guide, orderly implements data regulatory systems and measures and optimizes the measures of data localization in order to establish a well-functioning cross-border data flow system.

在中国设立国际商事法庭(CICC)和中国法院日益参与全球治理的背景下,中国商事判决在境外特别是在"一带一路"沿线国家执行力的问题亟待解决.当下,双边司法协助条约尚未形成框架且难于达成相互承认与执行判决互惠安排,无力支撑商事判决的境外执行,国际司法协助公约亦无法助力中国商事判决的跨境执行.在此背景下,探索有效跨境执行司法合作体系是充分发挥CICC功能、提升中国商事判决境外司法影响力的关键.迪拜国际金融中心法院提出的借由国际商事法院常设论坛得以推广的备忘录司法合作新模式正逢其时.备忘录合作模式除了具有对参与各国商事案件金钱判决执行条件予以释明的功能以外,对中国来说还具备在短期内为商事判决的跨境执行司法合作提供新的路径、为商签双边民商事司法协助条约奠定基础、补足"推定互惠"判定因素的独特价值.备忘录模式的推广和使用,有助于优化跨境执行司法合作机制,最终构建以双边司法协助条约框架为骨干、广泛的推定互惠安排和现有国际公约为补充、备忘录为辅助的一体化的有效跨境执行司法合作体系.

以2013年"棱镜门"事件为开端,数据信任危机不断发酵,数据跨境流动规则碎片化、缺乏互操作性以及数据本地化等问题无法消解.而依赖于数据跨境流动的数据合作、开放与共享已成为当今时代的主旋律,国际社会亟需建立国家之间的信任关系以保障数据安全、有序、可信任地跨境流动.国家之间的信任关系应以国家外交行为和价值观之感性维度为基础,由利益权衡和制度约束之理性维度的交互作用来构建.数据跨境流动方面的信任关系,不同于一般意义上的国家信任关系,终将由国家在理性地权衡利弊之下作出选择,即解决数据跨境流动信任关系缺失问题的关键在于制度而非利益.中国应立足各国数据跨境流动需求,以利益为纽带,为合作对象国提供互利的制度框架提案来与他国建立信任关系.