Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United States with primary treatment consisting of a combination of surgery, systemic therapy, and radiation. Breast reconstruction has been shown to improve quality of life in women and utilization is increasing with time. There is a large amount of evidence demonstrating the complications of radiation therapy on implant-based breast reconstruction including but not limited to, capsular contracture, infection, and reoperation. However, the majority of these studies have examined populations consisting primarily of non-Hispanic white patients with breast cancer. In general, hispanic populations are not well represented in research studies or Phase II/III clinical trials. Therefore, the goal of this study was to analyze the impact of radiation therapy on post mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction complications in self-identified Hispanic patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mastectomy with implant reconstruction between January 1, 2017 and December 1, 2019. The inclusion criteria included female patients 18 years or older who self-reported as Hispanic or Latino. Exclusion criterias included patients who did not undergo mastectomy, did not undergo tissue-expander or implant reconstruction, or did not self identify as Hispanic descent. Outcomes infection needing antibiotics, capsular contracture Baker grade II-IV, and implant loss. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared analysis. Results: A total of 258 patients of Hispanic or Latino women were included in the study. This included 343 total number of breasts, with 228 breasts that underwent mastectomy with reconstruction due to breast cancer and 115 breasts that underwent prophylactic mastectomy with reconstruction. The median age at time of initial mastectomy was 49 years (range 19-86). 46 total breasts received adjuvant postoperative radiation and 296 breasts did not receive radiation. Median radiation dose to the chest wall was 50 Gy (range 42.56 - 60) in 2Gy (range 1.8 - 2.66) fractions. All patients who received postoperative radiation had at least 1 complication. The rate of complications and comparison between radiated breast compared to non-radiated breasts is demonstrated in table 1. Conclusion: The goal of this study was to analyze the impact of radiation therapy complications on post-mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction surgeries in patients of Hispanic descent. We demonstrate that the rate of capsular contracture is significantly higher after radiation therapy and the rate of overall complication after radiation therapy is higher (even though non statistically significant) compared with patients who do not undergo radiation. While these results are comparable to similar studies done in non-Hispanic groups, this is the first study to our knowledge that has looked at post-mastectomy complications focusing specifically on a Hispanic population. Mastectomy and subsequent implant reconstruction, radiation, and complications can have negative psychological effects on patients and can manifest differently with varying cultural backgrounds. It is imperative to understand the complications associated with race to better allow practitioners to cater treatment and support for a diverse patient population with breast cancer. Table 1. Complications. Citation Format: Brianna Conte, Caroline Shermoen, Danielle Cerbon, Susan Kesmodel, Caroline Fiser, sophia liu, Cristiane Takita, Jessica Meshman, John Oeltjen, Lora Wang. Post-Mastectomy Implant Complications in a Hispanic Breast Cancer Patient Population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-03.

Purpose/Objective(s): Several randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies have consistently shown that achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast with negative axillary nodes is associated with excellent long-term outcomes. NSABP B-511 is a phase III trial aimed to determine if chest wall and regional nodal irradiation (CWRNI) post-op reduces invasive breast cancer recurrence-free interval in patients (pts) with positive axillary lymph nodes (LN) who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, physicians might be biased towards avoiding enrollment of young patients (≤ 45 years) in this trial. Which in turn, could give way to this population becoming under-represented at the time of determining the standard of care. Our primary objective is to determine if the omission of CWRNI is associated with an increased risk of recurrence in a young patient population. Materials/Methods: Data were obtained from two institutions in South Florida. Patients aged ≤ 45 years, with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer, and positive clinical (LN) involvement, diagnosed between 2010 to 2017 and treated with NAC were identified through retrospective chart review. Disease recurrence including local and distant recurrence data were collected. The Kaplan-Meier survival function was used for plotting patients treated with CWRNI vs no CWRNI and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the recurrence-free survival according to groups. We reported recurrence probabilities at 5 years. Additionally, we also estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of patients treated with CWRNI vs no CWRNI using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: A total of 154 patients were identified. Median age was 39 years (24-45). Patients were 57% ER+, 33% HER2+, 29% triple negative and 59.1% were stage 3, with only 1 male patient in the cohort. PCR was achieved in 22.1% (34/154) of pts, and CWRNI frequency in these patients was 81.3%. Overall, 79.9% of pts received post-op CWRNI. Recurrence frequency in patients with a pCR who received CWRNI was 4/26 vs 2/6 in pts that did not receive CWRNI. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated an overall probability of recurrence at 5 years of 31.9% (95%CI 3.8% – 51.8%) in patients that did not receive CWRNI vs 27.49% (95%CI 18.42% – 35.56%) in patients that received CWRNI (log rank p=0.55) however, statistical significance was not met. Cox regression indicated that omission of CWRNI was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR 1.3, 95%CI 0.54 – 3.11, p=0.55). In patients that had a pCR after NAC, omission of CWRNI was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR 2.004, 95%CI 0.36 – 10.9, p=0.42). However, the sample size for these analyses was too small to achieve significance. Conclusion: This data highlights the tendency of giving CWRNI to younger patients with clinically node-positive disease at diagnosis regardless of response to NAC. Overall, absolute recurrence in this cohort was very low. Although an absolute number of recurrences favored CWRNI in the setting of pCR, this was not statically significant given the small sample size. Citation Format: Danielle Cerbon, Alex Sanchez-Covarrubias, Brianna Conte, Cristiane Takita, Lora Freedman, Jessica Meshman, Stuart Samuels, Caroline Shermoen, Neha Goel, Ruben Carmona, Lora Wang. Chest-Wall and Nodal Irradiation in Non-Metastatic, Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery, in A Retrospective Cohort of Women Aged 45 Years and Younger. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-36.

Purpose. Although breast cancer (BC) risk increases with age, BC in younger women is more aggressive with higher mortality compared with older women. We characterize the genomic landscape of BCs in younger women. Methods. Clinicopathologic, molecular, and genomic differences across age groups (< 40 years, 40-60 years, > 60 years) in female BC patients were investigated in two large cohorts [AACR-GENIE8.1 (n = 11,594) and METABRIC (n = 2509)]. Cox-proportional regression analyzed the prognostic impact of age groups for disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in METABRIC and progression- free survival (PFS) in GENIE cohorts. Chi-squared test was used to assess statistical associations between genomic alterations and age groups. Results. Survival analysis showed that women < 40 years had shorter DSS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.52, p = 0.005], RFS (HR: 1.4, p = 0.006), and PFS (HR: 1.82, p = 0.0003) compared with women 40-60 years, and shorter RFS (HR: 1.5, p = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.95, p < 0.0001) compared with women > 60 years. Molecular subtypes in the METABRIC cohort showed women < 40 years were enriched with basal, and HER2+ subtypes, and less enriched with luminal A and B subtype (p < 0.0001). Characterization of genomic alterations in both cohorts demonstrated that BCs in women < 40 years were more enriched with TP53 mutations (FDR < 0.0001), BRCA1 mutations (FDR = 0.01), ERBB2 amplifications (FDR < 0.001), CDK12 amplifications (FDR < 0.001), and PPM1D amplifications ( FDR < 0.001). In contrast, BCs in older women (> 60 years) were more enriched with PIK3CA, KMT2C, and CDH1 mutations (FDR < 0.0001). Conclusions. BCs in young women are associated with shorter survival and more aggressive genomic features, including mutations in TP53 and BRCA1, and amplifications in ERBB2 and CDK12. These findings have the potential to impact clinical trial design and treatment.

Background/Aim: The purpose was to analyze the impact of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) on implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) in self-identified Hispanic patients compared to non-Hispanic counterparts. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent IBR between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 at a single hospital system. Patients were cisgender women, assigned female at birth, 18 years or older, and underwent mastectomy with immediate IBR +/- PMRT. We compared characteristics between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients, assessing capsular contracture and implant loss rates. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with complications. Results: A total of 317 patients underwent mastectomy and reconstruction. Of these patients, 302 underwent a total of 467 mastectomies with IBR, and these 467 procedures were included in the analysis of complications. Complications occurred in 175 breasts (37.5%), regardless of PMRT. Seventy-two of the 302 patients (24%) received PMRT to one breast. The overall rates of capsular contracture, implant loss, and overall complications did not vary significantly between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients (p=0.866, 0.974, and 0.761, respectively). When comparing only irradiated patients, there was a trend towards increased implant loss and overall complication rates in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic patients (p=0.107 and 0.113, respectively). Following PMRT the rate of any complication was 71% in Hispanic women and 53% in non-Hispanic women. Conclusion: Our study illuminates a trend towards higher complication rates after PMRT in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic patients. Further studies are needed to understand why Hispanic patients may have more side effects from radiation therapy.

Many studies show significantly improved survival after R0 resection compared with R1 resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC); however, the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) on this association is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive surgical margins (SMs) after NACRT compared with upfront surgery + adjuvant therapy in PAC. All cases of surgically resected PAC at a single institution were reviewed from 1996 to 2014; patients treated with palliative intent, metastatic disease, and biliary/ampullary tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Overall, 300 patients were included; 134 patients received NACRT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine followed by surgery, and 166 patients received upfront surgery (+ adjuvant chemotherapy in 72% of patients and RT in 65%); 31% of both groups had a positive SM (+SM). The median OS for patients with a +SM or negative SM (−SM) was 26.6 and 31.6 months, respectively for NACRT, and 12.0 and 24.5 months, respectively, for upfront surgery. OS was significantly improved with −SM compared with +SM in both groups (p = 0.006). When resection yielded +SM, NACRT patients had improved OS compared with upfront surgery patients (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, +SM in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04–4.24; p < 0.001) and older age (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.03, per year; p = 0.007) predicted worse OS. +SM in the NACRT group was not associated with worse OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.72–1.65; p = 0.70). Patients with a positive margin after NACRT and surgery had longer survival compared with patients with a positive margin after upfront surgery. NACRT should be strongly considered for patients at high risk of R1 resections.

Although the United States (US) Hispanic population consists of diverse communities, prior breast cancer studies often analyze this group in aggregate. Our aim was to identify differences in breast cancer stage at presentation in the US population, with a particular focus on Hispanic subgroups. Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017 were used to select women with primary breast cancer; individuals were disaggregated by racial and ethnic subgroup and Hispanic country of origin. Ordinal logistic regression was used to create adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95

OBJECTIVES:To examine the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) about the elbow.DESIGN:Retrospective chart review.SETTING:Level 1 trauma center.PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who received prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) over a 15-year period were identified. Patients were included if they received XRT to the elbow joint and had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after XRT. Fifty-four patients were ultimately included.INTERVENTION:All patients were treated with a single dose of 7 Gy. Ninety-eight percentage of patients received XRT within 24 hours after surgery, and all patients received XRT within 72 hours after surgery.MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS:The primary study measures evaluated were the presence or absence of clinically symptomatic HO and the presence of radiographic HO after XRT to the elbow joint.RESULTS:Eighteen patients were treated with XRT after a traumatic injury requiring surgery (primary prophylaxis), and 36 were treated with XRT after excision surgery to remove HO which had already formed (secondary prophylaxis). In the primary cohort, 16.7% developed symptomatic HO after XRT and 11.1% required surgery to resect the heterotopic bone. In the secondary cohort, 11.1% developed symptomatic HO after surgery and XRT and 5.5% required resection surgery. No secondary malignancies were identified.CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that XRT for elbow HO may be safe and effective for both primary and secondary HO. XRT for HO was not shown to be associated with radiation-induced sarcoma in this series, at least in the short term. Further study in a large patient population with extended follow-up is required to better characterize populations at high risk for development of HO and secondary malignancy.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PurposeRespiratory motion of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) adds to the challenge of targeting the disease with radiotherapy (RT). One technique used frequently to alleviate this challenge is an internal gross tumor volume (IGTV) generated from manual contours on a single respiratory phase of the 4DCT via the aid of deformable image registration (DIR)-based auto-propagation. Through assessing the accuracy of DIR-based auto-propagation for generating IGTVs, this study aimed to identify erring characteristics associated with the process to enhance RT targeting in LA-NSCLC.Methods4DCTs of 19 patients with LA-NSCLC were acquired using retrospective gating with 10 respiratory phases (RPs). Ground-truth IGTVs (GT-IGTVs) were obtained through manual segmentation and union of gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in all 10 phases. IGTV auto-propagation was carried out using two distinct DIR algorithms for the manually contoured GTV from each of the 10 phases, resulting in 10 separate IGTVs for each patient per each algorithm. Differences between the auto-propagated IGTVs (AP-IGTVs) and their corresponding GT-IGTVs were assessed using Dice coefficient (DICE), maximum symmetric surface distance (MSSD), average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), and percent volume difference (PVD) and further examined in relation to anatomical tumor location, RP, and deformation index (DI) that measures the degree of deformation during auto-propagation. Furthermore, dosimetric implications due to the analyzed differences between the AP-IGTVs and GT-IGTVs were assessed.ResultsFindings were largely consistent between the two algorithms: DICE, MSSD, ASSD, and PVD showed no significant differences between the 10 RPs used for propagation (Kruskal–Wallis test, ps > 0.90); MSSD and ASSD differed significantly by tumor location in the central–peripheral and superior–inferior dimensions (ps < 0.0001) while only in the central–peripheral dimension for PVD (p < 0.001); DICE, MSSD, and ASSD significantly correlated with the DI (Spearman’s rank correlation test, ps < 0.0001). Dosimetric assessment demonstrated that 79% of the radiotherapy plans created by targeting planning target volumes (PTVs) derived from the AP-IGTVs failed prescription constraints for their corresponding ground-truth PTVs.ConclusionIn LA-NSCLC, errors in DIR-based IGTV propagation present to varying degrees and manifest dependences on DI and anatomical tumor location, indicating the need for personalized consideration in designing RT internal target volume.

Genomic profiling in early-stage breast cancer provides prognostic and predictive information. Genomic profiling assays have not been validated in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We examined a large cancer registry to evaluate genomic profiling in LABC and its effect on treatment decisions and survival. Females with ER+/HER2− LABC who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy were selected from the National Cancer Database 2004–2017. We compared characteristics between patients with and without genomic profiling and with low genomic risk, 21-gene recurrence score ≤ 25 or low-risk 70-gene signature, treated with endocrine therapy ± chemotherapy. Propensity score methods were utilized to account for covariates that may have predicted treatment. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed. Of 18,437 patients with LABC, 1258 (7%) had genomic profiling and 1022 (81%) had low genomic risk results. 562 patients (55%) with low genomic risk received chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (chemoendocrine). Patients who received chemoendocrine therapy were younger, had fewer comorbidities, presented with higher stage disease, had higher grade tumors, more frequently had partial mastectomy, and more often received radiation than those who received endocrine therapy alone. On multivariable analysis, endocrine therapy alone was associated with worse OS compared to chemoendocrine therapy (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.13–2.78, p = 0.013). In women with LABC and low genomic risk, endocrine therapy alone was associated with worse OS compared to chemoendocrine therapy. This suggests that genomic profiling is not predictive in LABC. Accordingly, genomic profiling should not be routinely utilized to make adjuvant treatment decisions in LABC in the absence of further data which shows a benefit.

Prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) is a commonly used treatment to decrease heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with traumatic hip injuries. We conducted a retrospective review of patients at risk for HO who underwent XRT. Of the patients reviewed, 27.3% developed radiographic HO, 11.2% developed symptoms, and 2.0% required resection surgery. Patients were divided into primary (n = 71) and secondary prophylaxis (n = 27) cohorts. In the primary group, 25.0% developed radiographic HO, 5.6% developed symptoms, and 0 required surgery. In the secondary cohort, 33.3% of patients developed new radiographic HO, and 25.9% were symptomatic: four had a Brooker score of 3, and three had a score of 4 (p = 0.03), and 7.4% required surgical resection. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):113-118, 2022).

(1) Background and purpose: clinical trials have unsuccessfully tried to de-escalate treatment in locally advanced human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with the goal of reducing treatment toxicity. The aim of this study was to explore the role of radiomics for risk stratification in this patient population to guide treatment. (2) Methods: the study population consisted of 225 patients with locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC treated with curative-intent radiation or chemoradiation therapy. Appearance of distant metastasis was used as the endpoint event. Radiomics data were extracted from the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) identified on the planning CT, with gray level being discretized using three different bin widths (8, 16, and 32). The data extracted for the groups with and without distant metastasis were subsequently balanced using three different algorithms including synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN), and borderline SMOTE. From these different combinations, a total of nine radiomics datasets were derived. Top features that minimized redundancy while maximizing relevance to the endpoint were selected individually and collectively for the nine radiomics datasets to build support vector machine (SVM) based predictive classifiers. Performance of the developed classifiers was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. (3) Results: of the 225 locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC patients being studied, 9.3% had developed distant metastases at last follow-up. SVM classifiers built for the nine radiomics dataset using either their own respective top features or the top consensus ones were all able to differentiate the two cohorts at a level of excellence or beyond, with ROC area under curve (AUC) ranging from 0.84 to 0.95 (median = 0.90). ROC comparisons further revealed that the majority of the built classifiers did not distinguish the two cohorts significantly better than each other. (4) Conclusions: radiomics demonstrated discriminative ability in distinguishing patients with locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC who went on to develop distant metastasis after completion of definitive chemoradiation or radiation alone and may serve to risk stratify this patient population with the purpose of guiding the appropriate therapy.

Locoregionally advanced nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has an aggressive clinical course characterized by high rates of treatment failure and poor survival compared with localized skin cancers. Our goal was to investigate multimodal therapy for lymph-node-positive NMSC. Data from patients with lymph-node-positive NMSC who underwent surgery and adjuvant therapy at a single tertiary center from 2002 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Median follow-up was 1.8 years (range: 0.5 to 8.5). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The chi-square test and logistic regression were used to determine the association between locoregional control (LRC) and the following variables: evidence of extracapsular extension, number of lymph nodes positive, largest involved lymph node, presence of a positive margin, and use of concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Forty-six patients were evaluated, 13 (28%) of whom received adjuvant CRT. CRT patients were younger (p < 0.001) and had a significantly greater number of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.016) than patients who received adjuvant radiation alone. At 5 years, LRC was 76%, PFS was 65%, and OS was 49%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that CRT (p = 0.006), largest lymph node measurement (p = 0.039), and ≥3 involved lymph nodes (p = 0.001) predicted local recurrence. CRT (p = 0.035, odds ratio [OR] 0.20 [95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.90]) and ≥3 involved lymph nodes (p = 0.017, OR 0.07 [95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.62]) remained significant on multivariate analysis. CRT was well tolerated. No grade ≥3 toxicities were observed except for 1 asymptomatic grade-4 thrombocytopenia. Patients with lymph-node-positive NMSC do poorly. Patient selection for intensification of adjuvant therapy needs clarification.

Objectives: Skin adnexal carcinoma (SAC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy that arises from sebaceous and sweat glands. These carcinomas are believed to behave more aggressively than cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) with a propensity for local recurrence. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in SAC is undefined. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of head and neck SAC treated with surgery and adjuvant radiation from 2000 to 2012 at a single institution. Results: Nine cases were identified. Median age was 67 (range, 52 to 88) years. The histologies were: adnexal carcinoma (n=1), adnexal carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation (n=1), adnexal carcinoma with squamous differentiation (n=1), skin appendage carcinoma (n=1), sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma (n=1), mucinous carcinoma (n=1), ductal eccrine adenocarcinoma (n=1), porocarcinoma (n=1), and trichilemmal carcinoma (n=1). All tumors were reviewed by a dermatopathologist to confirm the SAC diagnosis. All patients had undergone surgery. Indications for adjuvant radiation included involved lymph nodes (n=4), perineural invasion (n=2), nodal extracapsular extension (n=2), positive margin (n=1), high-grade histology (n=6), multifocal disease (n=2), and/or recurrent disease (n=5). Radiation was delivered to the primary site alone (n=3), to the draining lymphatics alone (n=2), or to both (n=4). One patient received concurrent cisplatin. Median dose to the primary site was 60 Gy and to the neck was 50 Gy. Median follow-up was 4.0 years (range, 0.6 to 11.4 y). Locoregional control was 100%. Five-year progression-free survival was 89%. There was 1 acute grade 3 toxicity and no greater than or equal to grade 2 late toxicities were recorded. Conclusions: Surgery and adjuvant radiation for high-risk SAC offers excellent locoregional control with acceptable toxicity.

415 Background: Sarcopenia (Sp) or severe loss of muscle mass is a prognostic factor in cancer patients. We assessed the association between Sp and outcomes in borderline resectable or locally advanced/unresectable pancreatic cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation (CRT). Methods: We reviewed all patients who underwent CRT at an NCI-designated cancer center between 2007-2012. Patients with available pre-treatment imaging were included in the analysis. Sp was defined as a lumbar skeletal muscle area/height of < 55.4 cm2/m2 for males and < 38.9 cm2/m2for females. Sp was correlated to treatment toxicity, cause specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Analysis was performed using chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression was used for survival analysis. Results: A total of 86 patients met the inclusion criteria with 32 (37%) patients being sarcopenic. The median age was 70 (range 46-91) with a median follow-up of 14 months (3-68). The majority of patients were male (57%), had T3 disease (47%), or were borderline resectable (63%). Twenty nine (33.7%) patients underwent surgery. Sarcopenic patients were less likely to undergo surgery (p = 0.024) versus non-sarcopenic patients. Otherwise there was no difference in clinical or treatment factors. The 12-month actuarial OS for patients with and without Sp was 47.9% and 70.7%, respectively (p = 0.047). The 12-month actuarial CSS for patients with and without Sp was 48% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.007). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for T-stage, N-stage, resectability, gender, pre-treatment CA 19-9, and surgery, Sp was no longer associated with CSS (HR 0.284 95% CI 0.774-2.398) or OS (HR 1.077 95% CI 0.626-1.853). Surgery remained associated with CSS (HR 0.205 95% CI = 0.102-0.412) and OS (HR 0.187 95% CI 0.096-0.363). T-stage also remained associated with both CSS (HR 0.616 95% CI 0.410-0.925) and OS (HR 0.649 95% CI 0.440-0.957). Conclusions: The presence of Sp decreases the likelihood of undergoing curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. This may be another useful tool to identify poor prognosis patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of fellow, resident, or medical student (MS) involvement on outcomes in patients undergoing permanent I-125 prostate seed implant.METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population consisted of men with clinically localized low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Cases were stratified according to resident, fellow, MS, or attending involvement. Outcomes were compared using analysis of variance, logistic regression, and log rank tests.RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were evaluated. Fellows, residents, and MS were involved in 47 (16.2%), 231 (79.4%), and 34 (11.7%) cases, respectively. Thirteen (4.4%) cases were completed by an attending physician alone. There was no difference in freedom from biochemical failure when comparing the resident, fellow, or attending alone groups (p = 0.10). There was no difference in V-100 (volume of the prostate receiving 100% of the prescription dose) outcomes when comparing resident cases to fellow cases (p = 0.72) or attending alone cases (p = 0.78). There was no difference in D-90 (minimum dose covering 90% of the postimplant volume) outcomes when comparing resident cases to fellow cases (p = 0.74) or attending alone cases (p = 0.58). When examining treatment toxicity, fellow cases had higher rates of acute Grade 2 + GU toxicity (p = 0.028). With the exception of higher urethra D90 among PGY 2-3 cases (p = 0.02), dosimetric outcomes were similar to cases with PGY 4-5 resident participation. There was no difference in outcomes for cases with and without MS participation.CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial prostate seed implants can be safely performed by trainees with appropriate supervision. Hands-on brachytherapy training is effective and feasible for trainees. (C) 2016 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Purpose: This study was undertaken to identify parameters associated with hematologic toxicity or chemotherapy dose modification in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with gemcitabine for localized pancreatic cancer.Methods and materials: We reviewed patients with localized pancreatic cancer undergoing CRT between 2006 and 2012. Exclusion criteria included receipt of nongemcitabine therapy, chemotherapy before CRT, or abnormal baseline hematologic indices. The T11-L3 vertebrae were contoured as bone marrow region at risk. Linear and logistic regression models were used to test associations between dosimetric parameters and gemcitabine dose modification or hematologic toxicity during or within 3 months following CRT. Receiver operator curves were generated to identify threshold doses for hematologic toxicity.Results: Forty-nine patients were included. During CRT, the maximum thoracolumbar dose was associated with grade 2+ neutropenia during CRT (P = .017) and the volume receiving 5 Gy (V5) was associated with grade 2+ leukopenia (P = .041). Post-CRT, thoracolumbar mean dose (P = .015), V5 (P = .01), and V10 (P = .012) were associated with increased grade 2+ neutropenia. On multivariable analysis, the thoracolumbar maximum dose (P = .045) and V5 (P = .045) were associated with grade 2+ neutropenia and grade 2+ leukopenia during CRT, respectively. Post-CRT, the mean dose (P = .046), V5 (P = .019), and V10 (P = .037) were associated with increased grade 2+ neutropenia. A maximum dose of 48.02 Gy and V5 of 57.6% were identified as predictors of toxicity during CRT. A V5 of 56.6%, V10 of 47.05%, and mean dose of 11.67 Gy were identified as predictors of post-CRT hematologic toxicity. Post-CRT, there was a trend toward increased dose modifications with increased V5 (P = .065).Conclusions: In our dataset, the thoracolumbar mean dose, maximum dose, V5, and V10 correlated with hematologic toxicity during CRT and post-CRT in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Because of the high rates of distant failure and importance of systemic therapy in these patients, this may be an important consideration during treatment planning. (C) 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Purpose: To assess the long-term quality of life (QoL) outcomes from a phase 3 trial comparing 2 modes of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): conventional IMRT (CIMRT) versus hypofractionated IMRT (HIMRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: Between 2002 and 2006, 303 men with low-risk to high-risk prostate cancer were randomized to 76 Gy in 38 fractions (CIMRT) versus 70.2 Gy in 26 fractions (HIMRT). QoL was compared by use of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and EuroQoL (EQ5D) questionnaires. The primary outcome of the QoL analysis was a minimum clinically important difference defined as a 0.5 standard deviation change from baseline for each respective QoL parameter. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of logistic mixed effects regression models.Results: A total of 286, 299, and 218 patients had baseline EPIC, IPSS, or EQ5D data available and were included in the analysis. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatment arms in terms of EPIC, IPSS, or EQ5D scores over time, although there was a trend toward lower EPIC urinary incontinence scores in the HIMRT arm. More patients in the HIMRT arm had a lower EPIC urinary incontinence score relative to baseline versus patients in the CIMRT arm with long-term follow-up. On multivariable analysis, there was no association between radiation fractionation scheme and any QoL parameter. When other clinical factors were examined, lymph node radiation was associated with worse EPIC hormonal scores versus patients receiving no lymph node radiation. In general, QoL outcomes were generally stable over time, with the exception of EPIC hormonal and EQ5D scores.Conclusions: In this randomized prospective study, there were stable QoL changes in patients receiving HIMRT or CIMRT. Our results add to the growing body of literature suggesting that HIMRT may be an acceptable treatment modality in clinically localized prostate cancer. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.