Background: Chronic attritional midsubstance capsular tears arising from repetitive throwing stress are a rare but important source of pain and dysfunction in elite baseball players; however, little is known regarding outcomes after arthroscopic capsular repair.Purpose: To evaluate the patient-reported outcomes and return-to-sport (RTS) rates after arthroscopic capsular repair in elite baseball players.Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods: We identified 11 elite-level baseball players who were treated with arthroscopic repair for a midsubstance glenohumeral capsular tear by a single surgeon with a uniform approach and a standardized postoperative protocol between 2012 and 2019. All players had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Demographic data and concomitant surgical procedures were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) scores and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected in a subset of the cohort, and statistical comparisons were made. A telephone survey was conducted to determine the patients' RTS level and outcome scores. Statistical comparisons between preoperative and postoperative outcomes scores were made using t tests.Results: Eight major league players, 1 minor league player, and 2 collegiate players were included. There were 9 pitchers, 1 catcher, and 1 outfielder. All patients had debridement of the posterosuperior labrum and rotator cuff. Two pitchers underwent a rotator cuff repair, and 1 outfielder underwent a posterior labral repair. The mean age at the time of surgery was 26.9 years (range, 20-34 years), with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 2.6-5.9 years). There were significant preoperative versus postoperative improvements in the mean KJOC (20.6 vs 89.8; P = .0002) and SANE (28.3 vs 86.7; P = .001) scores. All patients reported a high degree of satisfaction. At a mean of 16.3 months (range, 6.5-25.4 months), 10 of 11 (90.1%) players met the Conway-Jobe good or excellent criteria for RTS.Conclusion: Arthroscopic capsular repair provided significant improvements in functional outcomes in elite baseball players, high levels of patient satisfaction, and high levels of RTS.

Purpose:To determine the postsurgical strength and stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with (ACLR-SA) and without suture tape augmentation (ACLR) in a human cadaveric model.Methods:Eight matched pairs of cadaveric knees were tested intact and after bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction. Specimens were potted and loaded onto a mechanical testing system, and an anterior drawer force of 88N was applied at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Specimens were then loaded to failure, with clinical failure defined as anterior translation greater than 10 mm.Results:ACL-intact knees translated an average of 4.99 ± 0.28 mm across all flexion angles when an 88N anterior load was applied. ACLR knees had significantly greater translation compared to intact specimens. ACLRs with suture augmentation had less of an increase (0.67 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20, 1.14, P < .01) than those without suture augmentation (1.42 mm, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.89, P < .001). ACLR-SA required greater anterior load (170.4 ± 38.1 N) to reach clinical failure compared to ACLR alone (141.8 ± 51.2 N), P = .042. In addition, stiffness of ACLR-SA constructs (23.5 ± 3.3) were significantly greater than ACLR alone (20.3 ± 3.9), P = .003.Conclusion:Augmentation of ACLR with suture tape allowed full range of motion with improved graft stiffness and increased failure load compared to unaugmented ACLR in this time-zero study.Clinical Relevance:Internal bracing may help reinforce ACLR grafts and allow for acceleration of rehabilitation protocols and earlier return to activity.

Concurrent lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tears are frequently encountered with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Previous studies have demonstrated that the menisci are secondary stabilizers and that LM root tears contribute to knee instability and increase femoral contact pressure. Thus, the effect of lateral meniscus posterior root tear on a reconstructed ACL remains a highly-debated clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to measure the strain across ACL reconstruction (ACLR) grafts before and after creating a LM posterior root tear.

Purpose: To quantify the amount of strain across an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) before and after a lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root complex tear and determine whether a meniscal root repair effectively protects the ACLR against excessive strain. Methods: Fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with an 88-N anterior drawer force and an internal and external torque of 5-Nm applied at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. A simulated pivot shift was also applied at 0, 15, and 30° of flexion. Rotation and translation of the tibia, and strain across the ACL graft were recorded. Testing was repeated for the following four conditions: ACL-intact, ACLR with intact LM, ACLR with LM posterior root complex tear, and ACLR with root repair. Results: The kinematic data from 12 fresh frozen cadaveric knees underwent analysis. Only 11 specimens had usable strain data. Sectioning the meniscofemoral ligaments and the LM posterior root increased rotational and translational laxity at 30° of knee flexion. ACLR graft strain significantly increased when an anterior load and internal torque were applied. Repair of the LM posterior root reduced strain when the knee was internally rotated but was unable to normalize strain when an anterior force was applied. Conclusions: This cadaveric biomechanical study suggests injury to the LM posterior root complex increases rotational and anterior laxity of the knee and places increased strain across reconstructed ACL grafts. Subsequent root repair did not result in a statistically significant reduction in strain. Clinical Relevance: This study provides quantitative data on the implications of a LM posterior root injury in the setting of an ACL reconstruction to help guide clinical decision-making.

Background: The optimal surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability remains controversial. Hypothesis: (1) Implants and facility-related costs are the primary drivers of variation in direct costs between arthroscopic Bankart and Latarjet procedures, and (2) distal tibial allograft (DTA) is more costly than Latarjet as a function of the graft expense. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Intraoperative cost data were derived for all arthroscopic anterior stabilizations and Latarjet and DTA procedures performed at a single academic institution from January 2012 to September 2017. Cost comparisons were made between those undergoing arthroscopic stabilization and Latarjet and between Latarjet and DTA. Multivariate regressions were performed to determine the difference in direct costs accounting for various patient- and surgery-related factors. Results: A total of 87 arthroscopic stabilizations, 44 Latarjet procedures, and 5 DTA procedures were performed during the study period. Arthroscopic Bankart repair was found to be 17% more costly than Latarjet, with suture anchor implant cost being the primary driver of cost. DTA was 2.9-fold more costly than Latarjet, with greater costs across all domains. Multivariate analysis also found the number of prior arthroscopic procedures performed (P = .007) and whether the procedure was performed in an ambulatory or inpatient setting (P < .0001) to be significantly associated with higher direct costs. Conclusion: Latarjet is less costly than arthroscopic Bankart repair, largely because of implant cost. Value-driven strategies to narrow the cost differential could focus on performing these procedures in an outpatient setting in addition to reducing overall implant cost for arthroscopic procedures. Perceived potential benefits of DTA over Latarjet may be outweighed by higher costs.

BACKGROUND:Acromioplasty has been proposed as a means of altering elevated critical shoulder angles (CSAs). We aimed to localize the critical acromion point (CAP) responsible for the acromial contribution of the CSA and determine whether resection of the CAP can alter the CSA to a normal range. METHODS:The CAP and 3-dimensional (3D) CSAs were determined on 3D computed tomography reconstructions of 88 cadaveric shoulders and compared with corresponding CSAs on digitally reconstructed radiographs. The position of the CAP was fluoroscopically isolated in 20 of these specimens and the resulting fluoroscopic CSA compared with the corresponding 3D CAP and 3D CSA. We investigated the CSA before and after a virtual acromioplasty of 2.5 and 5 mm at the CAP in specimens with a CSA greater than 35°. RESULTS:The mean CAP was 21% ± 10% of the acromial anterior-posterior length from the anterolateral corner. There was no difference between the mean 3D CSA and the CSA on digitally reconstructed radiographs (32° vs 32°, P = .096). No difference between the mean fluoroscopic CSA and 3D CSA was found (31° vs 31°, P = .296). A 2.5-mm acromial resection failed to reduce the CSA to 35° or less in 7 of 13 shoulders, whereas a 5-mm resection reduced the CSA to 35° or less in 12 of 13. CONCLUSION:The CAP was localized to the anterolateral acromial edge and was easily identified fluoroscopically. A 5-mm acromial resection was effective in reducing the CSA to 35° or less. These data can guide surgeons in where and how to alter the CSA if future studies demonstrate a clinical benefit to surgically modifying this radiographic parameter.