Introduction: The role of telemedicine should be reassessed in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. This study aimed to evaluate the perception and satisfaction of medical staff with telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic and compare these findings with those during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Between January and February 2023, a questionnaire regarding the utilization, safety, and satisfaction with telemedicine was administered to 200 medical staff members (100 doctors and 100 nurses). Additionally, open-ended questions were included to gather insights on the strengths, weaknesses, and prerequisites of telemedicine. The satisfaction levels of the medical staff were compared with those from a previous study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The response rate among medical staff was 60.0% (50 doctors and 70 nurses). Concerning patient safety, 83.3% of respondents indicated a risk of worsening symptoms in chronic patients, and 68.3% expressed concerns about emergencies related to patient safety. Eighty-two percent of doctors preferred in-person visits over telemedicine, while 48.6% of nurses reported equal or greater satisfaction with telemedicine (p = 0.003). The reported strengths of telemedicine included the convenience of outpatient clinics (67%), while its primary weakness was the incomplete assessment of patient conditions (73%). The likelihood of partial substitution of telemedicine for in-person visits was significantly higher in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period compared to during the pandemic (71.7% vs. 49.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, telemedicine continues to offer significant benefits in enhancing patient access to medical care. However, medical staff remain concerned about its safety and show lower satisfaction compared to in-person visits. In response to these concerns, an effective telemedicine platform and legal standards, including practical guidelines, should be developed.

INTRODUCTION:Frailty is a reduced physiological reserve condition associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. The chart-derived frailty index (CFI) can measure frailty using demographic and laboratory values. We evaluated the association of preoperative CFI with 90-d mortality after burn surgery. METHODS:This large retrospective study included burn intensive care unit (ICU) patients between 2012 and 2021 and calculated CFI using the sum of the following five variables: age >70 y, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, hematocrit <35%, albumin <3.4 g/dL, and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL; high CFI was a score of 3-5. Postoperative 90-d mortality rate, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), pneumonia, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) requirement, and prolonged ICU stay (>60 d) were evaluated. RESULTS:Of 1118 patients, 147 (13.1%) had high CFI. High CFI patients had a higher 90-d mortality rate than did low CFI patients (38.8% versus 22.6%, P < 0.001). A high CFI was significantly associated with postoperative 90-d mortality (hazard ratio = 4.124, 95% confidence interval = 2.980-5.707, P < 0.001) in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly different postoperative 90-d mortality rates between patients with high and low CFIs (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Incidences of postoperative MACE, pneumonia, the need for CRRT, and prolonged ICU stay were significantly higher in patients with high CFIs than in those with low CFIs. CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative high CFI was associated with increased 90-d mortality, MACE, pneumonia, CRRT requirement, and ICU stay following burn surgery.

BACKGROUND & AIMS:Fentanyl buccal tablets (FBTs) are a rapid-onset opioid indicated for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) and FBT titration is needed to optimize BTcP management. We aimed to predict which patients could tolerate a high dose of FBT (400 μg or more at a time).METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the final FBT dose. The final FBT doses were compared according to the clinical features. The prediction accuracy of patients tolerant of 400 μg or higher FBT was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A risk scoring model based on the odds ratio (OR) was developed from the final multivariable model, and patients were assigned into two groups: low tolerance (0-1 point) and high tolerance (2-3 points).RESULTS:Among 131 patients, the most frequently effective dose of FBT was 200 μg (54%), followed by 100 μg (30%). The median value of morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) was 60 mg/day, and the most common daily use was 3-4 times/day. In multivariable analysis, male sex, younger age, and use of FBTs three or more times per day were independently associated with high-dose FBT. According to the risk scoring model, the patients with a final FBT of 400 μg or higher were significantly more in the high tolerance group (17%) compared to the low tolerance group (3%; p = 0.023).CONCLUSIONS:According to the dose relationship between the final FBT dose and the clinical features, three factors (sex, age, daily use of FBT) were independently associated with the final dose of FBT. Our risk score model could help predict tolerance to high-dose FBT and guide the titration plan for BTcP.

Background: To minimize nosocomial infection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most hospitals conduct a prescreening process to evaluate the patient or guardian of any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 or exposure to a COVID-19 patient at entrances of hospital buildings. In our hospital, we have implemented a two-level prescreening process in the outpatient clinic: an initial prescreening process at the entrance of the outpatient clinic (PPEO) and a second prescreening process is repeated in each department. If any symptoms or epidemiological history are identified at the second level, an emergency code is announced through the hospital's address system. The patient is then guided outside through a designated aisle. In this study, we analyze the cases missed in the PPEO that caused the emergency code to be applied. Methods: All cases reported from March 2020 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. We calculated the incidence of cases missed by the PPEO per 1,000 outpatients and compared the incidence between first-time hospital visitors and those visiting for the second time or more; morning and afternoon office hours; and days of the week. Results: During the study period, the emergency code was applied to 449 cases missed by the PPEO. Among those cases, 20.7% were reported in otorhinolaryngology, followed by 11.6% in gastroenterology, 5.8% in urology, and 5.8% in dermatology. Fever was the most common symptom (59.9%), followed by cough (19.8%). The incidence of cases per 1,000 outpatients was significantly higher among first-time visitors than among those visiting for the second time or more (1.77 [confidence interval (CI), 1.44-2.10] vs. 0.59 [CI, 0.52-0.65], respectively) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Fever was the most common symptom missed by the PPEO, and otorhinolaryngology and gastroenterology most frequently reported missed cases. Cases missed by the PPEO were more likely to occur among first-time visitors than returning visitors. The results obtained from this study can provide insights or recommendations to other healthcare facilities in operating prescreening processes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: During the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, hospitals have strengthened their guidelines on infection prevention and control (IPC), and a rigorous adherence to these guidelines is crucial. An infection control surveillance-working group (ICS-WG) and infection control coordinators (ICCs) team were created to monitor the IPC practices of the healthcare workers (HCWs) in a regional hospital in Korea. This study analyzed the surveillance results and aimed to identify what IPC practices needed improvement. Methods: During phase 1 (March to April 2020), the ICS-WG performed random audits, recorded incidences of improper IPC practices, and provided advice to the violators. During phase 2 (April to July), the ICCs inspected the hospital units and proposed practical ideas about IPC. The surveillance and proposals targeted the following practices: patient screening, usage of personal protective equipment (PPE), hand and respiratory hygiene, equipment reprocessing, environmental cleaning, management of medical waste, and social distancing. Results: In phase 1, of the 127 violations observed, most (32.3%) corresponded to hand and respiratory hygiene. In phase 2, the highest proportion of violation per category was observed in the management of medical waste (37.8%); among these, a higher proportion of violation (71.4%) was observed in the collection of medical waste. Of the 106 proposals made by the ICCs, the most addressed practice was patient screening (28.3%). No case of nosocomial infection was reported during the study period. Conclusion: Adherence to proper hand and respiratory hygiene was inadequate at the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicate that more attention and further training are needed for the management of medical waste, particularly medical waste collection, and that continuous upgrading of the strategies for patient screening is essential. These results will be useful in helping other healthcare facilities to establish their IPC strategies.

Introduction: Telephone-based telemedicine was temporarily permitted in Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess satisfaction with the telemedicine done during temporary hospital closing when in-person visits were not allowed due to in-hospital COVID-19 transmission. Methods: Survey questionnaires partially taken from a telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ) were sent to 6,840 patients who used telephone-based telemedicine from February 24 to March 7, 2020. Questionnaires sent to patients and additionally created questionnaires to evaluate telemedicine were sent to medical staff (182 doctors and 138 nurses). Results: Response rates of patients and medical staff were 13.2% and 17.2%, respectively. Patients' satisfaction with telemedicine was significantly greater than medical staff's satisfaction for all five components taken from TUQ (all p = 0.000). In addition, created questionnaires showed good reliability, obtaining similar results between doctors and nurses (all p > 0.05). More than 85% of medical staff replied that telemedicine was needed in COVID-19, whereas more than 80% of them worried about incomplete assessment and communication of medical condition. Overall satisfaction with telemedicine by medical staff was 49.7%. The strength of telephone-based telemedicine was patients' convenience (53.4%). However, incomplete assessment of patients' condition (55.0%) was its weakness. Conclusion: Satisfaction with telephone-based telemedicine by patients was significantly greater than that by medical staff (doctors and nurses). Negative views for safety and inconvenience resulted in a greater proportion of dissatisfaction among medical staff. For safe application of telemedicine, medical staff insisted that developing a platform and creating guidelines should be needed.

Background: Surgeries performed for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) place the medical staff at very high risk of infection. We suggest recommendations for appropriate operation preparation, anesthetic management, and infection control for COVID-19 patients in operating rooms.Current Concepts: Surgeries must be performed in an airborne infection isolation room, such as a negative-pressure operating room. It is recommended that scheduled surgeries for COVID-19 patients be postponed to an acceptable extent, with the exception of emergency cases. Moreover, the number of medical staff participating in the surgery should be minimized. Medical staffs should practice proper hand hygiene and wear an appropriate level of personal protective equipment depending on the infection risk. While performing surgery and inducing anesthesia in COVID-19 patients, endotracheal intubation should be performed by trained anesthesiologists with a video laryngoscope, preferably using high-efficiency viral filters, which can prevent contamination in the anesthesia machine. Use of disposable equipment or COVID-19 patient-specific devices is recommended to prevent the spread of infection, but instruments that require sharing among multiple patients must be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected before their use for the next patient.Discussion and Conclusion: Medical staff performing surgeries for COVID-19 patients are at very high risk of infection. Therefore, the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, high-efficiency viral filters in breathing circuits during anesthesia, and disinfection of contaminated equipment after the operation are mandatory.

Rationale: Endotracheal intubation is an essential step for airway management during general anesthesia. When surgeons carry out thoracic surgery such as pneumonectomy, they usually request lung isolation to secure a clear surgical view. A double lumen endotracheal tube is used for lung isolation in routine thoracic surgeries. Patient Concerns: A 56-year-old man was previously diagnosed with left Aspergilloma, a tuberculosis destroyed lung, and diabetes mellitus. According to his chest x-ray and chest computed tomography, his left lung was nearly collapsed, and the result of a pulmonary function test was severely restricted. The patient's diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was 63% and predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 23.5% Diagnoses: Due to his previous history, radiologic findings and laboratory test results, he was diagnosed with left Aspergilloma and tuberculosis destroyed lung. Interventions: Due to recurrence of Aspergilloma in his left lung, the patient was scheduled for a left pneumonectomy. Since the patient's partial oxygen concentration was adequate despite his left lung being nearly totally collapsed, we thought that we would be capable of performing the pneumonectomy using a single lumen tube (SLT). For a better surgical view, we planned lung isolation via insertion of a SLT deep into the bronchus. Outcomes: During pneumonectomy, after tracheal suction was performed, we tried a lung recruitment maneuver. Suddenly end-tidal carbon dioxide did not show on the monitor. The patient's blood pressure dropped and heart rate was decreasing. We thought that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was needed and an approximately 2 cm sized hematoma was removed from the endotracheal tube after vigorous suctioning. After getting rid of the hematoma, we changed the single tube to a double lumen tube (DLT). Lessons: This case led us to the conclusion that a DLT should be used for safety when carrying out thoracic surgery. We report a rare case of an airway obstruction using a SLT during pneumonectomy.

BACKGROUND:The analgesic effect of perineural opioid in clinical practice are still controversial. This randomized controlled trial compared analgesic effect of ropivacaine with fentanyl or ropivacaine alone for continuous femoral nerve block following unilateral total knee arthroplasty.METHODS:Fourty patients of ASA PS Ⅰ or Ⅱ receiving total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia were enlisted and randomly allocated into two groups. Group R; bolus injection of 0.375% ropivacaine, 30 ml and an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml/h (n = 20). Group RF; 0.375% ropivacaine, 29 ml added with 50 μg of fentanyl as a bolus and an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine mixed with 1 μg/ml of fentanyl at 8 ml/h (n = 20). Local anesthetic infusion via a femoral nerve catheter was started at the end of operation and continued for 48 h. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with hydromorphone (0.15 mg/ml, 0-1-10) were used for adjuvant analgesics. Position of catheter tip and contrast distribution, visual analogue scale of pain, hydromorphone consumption, side effects were recorded for 48 h after operation. Patient satisfaction for the pain control received were noted.RESULTS:The pain visual analogue scale, incidences of side effects and satisfaction were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the hydromorphone usage at 48 h after operation were lower in the Group RF than in the Group R (P = 0.047).CONCLUSIONS:The analgesic effect of ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous femoral nerve block after knee replacement arthroplasty was not superior to that of the ropivacaine alone.

Background Surgeries in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) put medical staff at a high risk of infection. We report the anesthetic management and infection control of a mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patient who underwent exploratory laparotomy for suspected duodenal ulcer perforation. Case A 73-year-old man, mechanically ventilated for confirmed COVID-19, showed clinical and radiographic signs of a perforated duodenal ulcer, and he was transferred under sedation and intubation to a negative-pressure operating room. The operating and assistant staff wore personal protective equipment. High-efficiency particulate absorbing filters were inserted into the expiratory circuits of the anesthesia machine and portable ventilator. No participating staff contracted COVID-19, although the patient later died due to pneumonia. Conclusions This report can contribute to establishing clinical guidelines for the surgical management and operation room setting of COVID-19 patients.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is unlikely to end soon, and hospitals face a high risk of exposure to COVID-19 and nosocomial infections Therefore, strengthened infection control and prevention (ICP) strategies are crucial Here, we share our experience of activities implemented by an infection control surveillance-working group (ICS-WG) and the introduction of a hospital emergency code for patients requiring screening for COVID-19, which were established at a university-affiliated hospital This hospital applies multi-step processes to identify patients who must visit the outdoor screening clinic for COVID-19 testing, instead of entering the hospital building However, some of these patients inevitably end up inside the hospital building To solve this issue, we implemented a process to announce the emergency code (“code apple”) and have the medical personnel escort such patients to the outdoor screening clinic This process was useful in protecting the hospital from unnecessary exposure to COVID-19 The ICS-WG was assigned to conduct the surveillance of ICP practices, patrol the hospital, and recommend improvements for any practices that did not adhere to the guidelines The ICS-WG also developed a checklist as a monitoring tool for ICP practices The checklists were distributed to the infection control coordinators who were assigned to monitor their team's ICP practices and report to the ICS-WG Overall, we believe that code apple and the ICS-WG are effective strategies in improving ICP practices of COVID-19 at hospitals

BACKGROUND:Hydroxyethyl starch (HES), a class of synthetic colloid solutions, has been widely used to treat perioperative hypovolemia. The use of HES, however, is associated with the risk of allergic reactions.CASE:An 83-year-old man was scheduled to undergo an open reduction and internal fixation of a pertrochanteric fracture under spinal anesthesia. He had no history of allergy. Five minutes after HES administration, hypotension, agitation, and skin rash were developed. HES infusion was terminated due to a suspected anaphylactic reaction. The vital signs recovered following administration of phenylephrine, dexamethasone, and hydrocortisone. Serum tryptase and total immunoglobulin E levels were elevated in plasma samples collected following the commencement of the allergic reaction during surgery.CONCLUSIONS:In the present report, the risk of anaphylactic reaction with HES and the laboratory tests needed to support the diagnosis are highlighted.

Vena cava syndrome is caused by central venous obstruction and can be divided into superior vena cava syndrome and inferior vena cava (IVC) syndrome. Symptoms and signs of IVC syndrome vary from no symptoms to lower limb edema, hypotension, and typical venous stasis changes of the lower extremities, such as brownish discoloration of the skin, woody edema, and ulceration. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, lithotomy-Trendelenburg position, and abdominal obesity could increase intra-abdominal pressure. We report a patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery who showed intrathoracic herniation of peritoneal fat induced by elevated intra-abdominal pressure due to the reasons mentioned above, resulting in IVC syndrome and hypotension perioperatively. The patient was treated with a conservative approach because he was asymptomatic except for hypotension on the first postoperative day. Keywords: Inferior vena cava; Laparoscopy

BACKGROUND:Sugammadex is a reversal agent for non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers and widely used worldwide on account of its rapid and effective reversal from neuromuscular blockade, despite its advantages, multiple cases of sugammadex-induced anaphylactic shock have been reported.CASE:A 42-year-old man developed anaphylactic shock in the postanesthesia care unit. Initially, sugammadex was suspected as the causative agent, but an intradermal skin test revealed negative results. A further skin test was performed with sugammadex-rocuronium complex that yielded positive results.CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesiologists and healthcare providers should be aware of the possibility of anaphylaxis from the sugammadex-rocuronium complex, as well as from sugammadex or rocuronium alone.

Anaphylaxis during anesthesia is rare, but often fatal. Rocuronium is a neuromuscular relaxant used for induction of anesthesia. We experienced a case of anaphylaxis after rocuronium administration during induction of anesthesia. A 64-year-old female patient was scheduled for bilateral radius fracture fixation. The history of patient showed no specific findings other than hypersensitivity to mackerel. She had no previous experience of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol 100 mg and continuous infusion was begun with remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg/min, followed by rocuronium 40 mg. Immediately after intravenous administration of rocuronium, the manual ventilation became difficult, and the patient developed erythema and severe hypotension. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis based on clinical features and started treatment. First, we performed endotracheal intubation promptly. Then, immediate intravenous administration of epinephrine and fluid followed. Despite adequate treatment, hypotension was not corrected and intravenous epinephrine was administered. However, ventricular tachycardia occurred which was successfully treated with a defibrillator. Later, the patient uneventfully recovered in the intensive care unit. The patient was not tested for skin prick test, but rocuronium was the most likely cause of anaphylaxis at that time. The authors unexpectedly experienced drug-induced anaphylaxis, which is life-threatening to the patient. Clinicians should be aware of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention as anaphylaxis can be hazardous to the patient. (Allergy Asthma Respir Dis 2018;6:225-228)

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating central nervous system disease characterized by neurological deficits, including cognitive impairment, altered mental status, and muscle spasticity. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative airway management of the airway is difficult in patients with this disease. In this report, the authors describe a 62-year-old man with PML and spastic hemiparesis, who was scheduled for video-assisted thoracic bullectomy under general anesthesia. A preoperative airway evaluation, including Mallampati classification, could not be performed due to lack of patient cooperation. Additionally, the anesthesiologist did not perform diverse physical assessments of the airway or prepare an adequate airway management strategy. During induction of general anesthesia, difficulty with intubation was encountered because of limited mouth opening. This case emphasizes that anesthesiologists should have thorough knowledge of airway assessment and management strategies, and perform a comprehensive assessment to implement appropriate airway management in patients with this disease. Keywords: Intubation; Muscle spasticity; Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Anaphylaxis during anesthesia is rare, but often fatal. Rocuronium is a neuromuscular relaxant used for induction of anesthesia. We experienced a case of anaphylaxis after rocuronium administration during induction of anesthesia. A 64-year-old female patient was scheduled for bilateral radius fracture fixation. The history of patient showed no specific findings other than hypersensitivity to mackerel. She had no previous experience of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol 100 mg and continuous infusion was begun with remifentanil 0.25 mu g/kg/min, followed by rocuronium 40 mg. Immediately after intravenous administration of rocuronium, the manual ventilation became difficult, and the patient developed erythema and severe hypotension. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis based on clinical features and started treatment. First, we performed endotracheal intubation promptly. Then, immediate intravenous administration of epinephrine and fluid followed. Despite adequate treatment, hypotension was not corrected and intravenous epinephrine was administered. However, ventricular tachycardia occurred which was successfully treated with a defibrillator. Later, the patient uneventfully recovered in the intensive care unit. The patient was not tested for skin prick test, but rocuronium was the most likely cause of anaphylaxis at that time. The authors unexpectedly experienced drug-induced anaphylaxis, which is life-threatening to the patient. Clinicians should be aware of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention as anaphylaxis can be hazardous to the patient.