• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    A

    American Foundation for AIDS Research

    EST. 1985
    75论文总数
    1,867引用总数

    amfAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research, known until 2005 as the American Foundation for AIDS Research, is an international nonprofit organization dedicated to the support of AIDS research, HIV prevention, treatment education, and the advocacy of AIDS-related public policy.AmfAR is a tax-exempt corporation under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) and operates as an independent nonprofit with worldwide initiatives. amfAR was formed in New York City in September 1985 by Dr. Mathilde Krim, along with physician Dr. Joseph Sonnabend and activist Michael Callen. The organization originally began in April 1983 as the Krim-founded AIDS Medical Foundation (AMF), which sought to lessen the stigma surrounding HIV/AIDS diagnoses, as well as to increase funding to the cause. The name change came as a result of the AMF's merge with the California-based National AIDS Research Foundation, which sought to actively engage in HIV-related drug development. What resulted was a foundation that prioritized both research and development as well as policy influence. This foundation was one of the first of its kind to embody both aspects of healthcare.AmfAR currently has three headquarters, located in New York City; Washington, D.C.; and Bangkok, Thailand. AmfAR spurs research and development through providing grants and fellowships to organizations, such as the Family Institute of Health, and individuals through the Mathilde Krim Fellowships in Basic Biomedical Research. AmfAR has provided over 3,300 grants to research teams across the world and has invested over $400 million to research aiming to effectively treat HIV and AIDS related illness. AmfAR's funds historically have gone to funding research, and as a result have helped pioneer community-based clinical research trials in the 1980s, as well as the involvement of AIDS patients in the drug approval process (see also: Denver Principles). Changes in leadership have marked changes in focus, resulting in shifts from public health outreach (needle exchange program pushes) to public education (the amfAR AIDS Handbook) to international research and outreach.AmfAR has embarked on various national and international campaigns to spur AIDS/HIV research, create a dialogue and decrease stigma surrounding the disease. Through TREAT Asia and GMT, amfAR took international roots and began funding research and outreach on all inhabited continents. National initiatives have included the Countdown to a Cure for AIDS. The Institute for HIV Cures Research and amfAR Research Consortium on HIV Eradication (ARCHE) were both created to aid this countdown, both to help fund research as well as provide a facility at which those researcher can work. To supplement the funding of these initiatives, amfAR is funded through sources like stock donations and their annual galas, which represent the majority of their source of funding.After Kenneth Cole stepped down as chairman, he was replaced by William H. Roedy. The current CEO Kevin Robert Frost joined amfAR in 1994 and became CEO in 2004. Together they lead 9 members of the Management Team, 25 Board of Trustees members and over 100 advisors to both their scientific and political platforms.Charity Watch rates the Foundation for AIDS Research an "A-" grade.Charity Navigator rates amfAR a four-star charity. Roedy. The current CEO Kevin Robert Frost joined amfAR in 1994 and became CEO in 2004. Together they lead 9 members of the Management Team, 25 Board of Trustees members and over 100 advisors to both their scientific and political platforms.C.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    论文(75)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1P-332. Screening Practices for HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections During Cabotegravir Long Acting or Daily Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use in the US
    Steven K Barnett,Laurence Brunet,Jennifer S Fusco,Karam Mounzer, Kevin R Frost,Supriya Sarkar, Kimberley Brown, Harmony Garges,Vani Vannappagari, Gregory P Fusco

    HIV testing is required before pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation and recommended before an oral PrEP prescription refill or at the time of a cabotegravir long acting (CAB LA) PrEP injection per the CDC PrEP guidelines. Regular screening for syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia are also recommended, with frequency based on risk characteristics. We describe HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing practices during CAB LA or oral PrEP use in the OPERA cohort. Adults without HIV who received ≥ 1 CAB LA injection and/or an oral PrEP prescription in the OPERA cohort (21DEC2021-30JUN2023) were followed through 30JUN2024. Individuals could contribute to multiple PrEP episodes, defined as continuous use of a specific PrEP type (CAB LA, oral). Incidence rates (IR) of HIV and STI testing (univariate Poisson regression) and proportions of individuals receiving HIV or STI testing at relevant intervals were estimated from 14 days before, up to 12 months after, PrEP episode start. A total of 1,025 CAB LA PrEP episodes and 22,776 oral PrEP episodes were included. HIV testing occurred twice as frequently on CAB LA PrEP (IR: 5.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.76, 6.10) than oral PrEP (IR: 2.92; 95% CI: 2.90, 2.95) (Fig 1). Similarly, STI testing occurred 1.5 times more frequently on CAB LA PrEP (IR: 5.18; 95% CI: 5.02, 5.35) than oral PrEP (IR: 3.42; 95% CI: 3.39, 3.44) (Fig 2). Both HIV and STI testing were more likely to occur at the predefined intervals during CAB LA PrEP than oral PrEP episodes (Fig 3). The difference was most pronounced for HIV testing (55% vs 14%) and STI testing every 3 months (37% vs 15%). The 12-month HIV incidence rates per 100 person-years were 0.18 (95% CI: 0.03, 1.26) for CAB LA and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.71) for oral PrEP. HIV PrEP clinical care represents an opportunity to provide sexual health-related services. In this large, real-world US cohort of PrEP users, HIV acquisition rates were low. However, HIV testing was suboptimal, raising concerns for delayed HIV diagnosis and treatment. Rates of both HIV and STI testing were significantly higher during CAB LA PrEP use than oral PrEP use. These results suggest that increased clinical contact from regular CAB LA PrEP injection visits may encourage more frequent HIV and STI testing among PrEP users. Laurence Brunet, PhD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Merck & Co.: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies Inc.: Grant/Research Support|ViiV Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Jennifer S. Fusco, BS, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Merck & Co.: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies Inc: Grant/Research Support|ViiV Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Karam Mounzer, MD, Aspire Scientific: Medical writing support|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|Gilead Sciences: Medical writing support Supriya Sarkar, PhD, MPH, ViiV Healthcare: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Kimberley Brown, PharmD, ViiV Healthcare: Employee|ViiV Healthcare: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Harmony Garges, MD, GSK: I am an employee of ViiV Healthcare|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Vani Vannappagari, MBBS, MPH, PhD, ViiV Healthcare: Full time Employee of ViiV Healthcare and owns GSK stock|ViiV Healthcare: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Gregory P Fusco, MD, MPH, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies: Grant/Research Support|Viiv: Grant/Research Support

    2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Measuring PEPFAR Disruptions at Scale: Results from a 46-Country Implementing Partner Survey
    J. Sherwood, E. Lankiewicz, C. Gironda, A. Sharp, K. Alicea-Jorgensen, A. Bonifaz, K. Rucinski, M. Davis, B. Honermann, G. Millett, S. Baral
    2026JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Trends in Frequency of HIV Viral Load and CD4 Cell Count Monitoring among Asian Cohort of Adults with HIV: an Analysis of the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database, 2003-2018
    Mark Kristoffer Ungos Pasayan,Awachana Jiamsakul,Evy Yunihastuti,Iskandar Azwa,Jun Yong Choi, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy,Anchalee Avihingsanon,Romanee Chaiwarith,Yu-Jiun Chan, Vohith Khol,Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul,Man Po Lee,

    Introduction:Viral load (VL) testing is the recommended approach for monitoring antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectiveness, while guidelines recommend targeted CD4 testing after ART initiation. This study examined trends in VL and CD4 testing frequencies, as well as the relationship with AIDS diagnosis and mortality among people with HIV in the Asia-Pacific region. Methods:We included adults enrolled in the Treat Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD) between 2003-2018 who had been on ART for ≥1 year. VL and CD4 testing rates were analysed using Poisson regression models. Associations between testing frequency and AIDS diagnosis or mortality were evaluated using Fine and Gray competing risk regression. Results:Among 8,446 patients, VL testing rates remained steady at 1 per person-year (PYS) between 2003-2018. Increased VL testing was associated with more frequent CD4 testing (>2 tests in the previous year; IRR=1.57, 95%CI 1.53-1.60), later follow-up years (2008-2012: IRR=1.15, 95%CI 1.12-1.18; 2013-2015: IRR=1.07, 95%CI 1.04-1.10), older age (31-40 years: IRR=1.06, 95%CI 1.03-1.08; 41-50 years: IRR=1.08, 95%CI 1.05-1.11; >50 years: IRR=1.07, 95%CI 1.03-1.11), higher current VL (401-1000 copies/mL: IRR=1.16, 95%CI 1.09-1.24; >1000 copies/mL: IRR=1.07, 95%CI 1.04-1.11), initial ART regimen (NRTI+PI: IRR=1.07, 95%CI 1.04-1.10; other combinations: IRR=1.11, 95%CI 1.05-1.17), and higher country income levels (upper-middle: IRR=2.17, 95%CI 2.11-2.23; high: IRR=3.14, 95%CI 3.03-3.26). CD4 testing rates decreased from 2.04 to 1.06/PYS over the same period. Lower CD4 testing frequency was associated with HIV exposure mode (MSM: IRR=0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.96; IDU: IRR=0.93, 95%CI 0.90-0.97; other/unknown: IRR=0.90, 95%CI 0.87-0.93), higher current CD4 (201-350 cells/μL: IRR=0.95, 95%CI 0.93-0.97; 351-500 cells/μL: IRR=0.89, 95%CI 0.87-0.91; >500 cells/μL: IRR=0.85, 95%CI 0.83-0.87) and receiving an NRTI+PI first-line combination (IRR=0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98). VL and CD4 testing frequencies were not significantly associated with AIDS diagnosis. However, having > 2 CD4 tests in the previous year was associated with higher mortality risk. Conclusion:The trends in the rates for CD4 and VL testing in the region between 2003-2018 were significantly affected by demographic, clinical and socio-economic factors. Recognizing these factors is critical to optimizing differentiated monitoring strategies and improving outcomes for PWH in the region.

    2026medRxiv the preprint server for health sciences(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Documenting HIV Service Delivery and Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices in HIV Care Programs: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey of HIV Clinics Participating in the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (Iedea)
    Ellen Brazier,Fernanda Maruri,Stephany N Duda, Kara Wools-Kaloustian,Aimee Freeman,Beverly Musick, Sophia Arabadjis, Marie Ballif, Nathalie Veronica Fernandez Villalobos,Mark H. Kuniholm, Kathryn Lancaster, Sita Lujintanon,

    Introduction: HIV care and treatment programs around the world continue to evolve in response to changes in clinical guidelines, evidence-based practices, domestic and donor funding for the HIV response, new technological developments, and changing weather patterns. Since 2009, the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) research consortium has conducted periodic surveys to document the characteristics of participating clinics and the availability of HIV-related services across diverse settings -- information that provides important context for understanding variations and trends in HIV care outcomes. This paper describes the protocol for IeDEA's 2026 site assessment survey, launched in August 2026. Methods and analysis: This cross-sectional descriptive study aims to document HIV-related services and practices among clinics in 42 countries. The survey explores the characteristics and services provided at HIV care and treatment sites participating in IeDEA in 2026, along with real-world adoption and implementation of evidence-based service delivery strategies for people living with or at risk of HIV. Designed for self-administration, the survey questionnaire was developed through two complementary processes: a review of questions and data collected through IeDEA' prior consortium-wide surveys and an open call to IeDEA investigators for new survey content to advance a timely implementation science agenda relevant to the global HIV community. Survey materials and links to an online REDCap questionnaire will be distributed to 232 eligible clinics across IeDEA in September 2026, with a deadline of November 30, 2026, for completion. Planned analyses will examine the following topics: HIV care amidst funding constraints; the roll-out of differentiated service delivery models; pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis; long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (ART); prevention, screening and/or treatment services for viral hepatitis, mental health and substance use disorders, cardiovascular disease, and cancers among PLHIV; the integration of HIV care with other health services; and clinic vulnerability to extreme weather events. Ethics and dissemination: A "non-human subjects" research designation was determined by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Human Research Protections Program. Survey findings will be shared with local partners and stakeholders across IeDEA, disseminated at regional and global conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study will be available upon reasonable request to the authors National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and the Fogarty International Center

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Accessibility of HIV Services for Key and Vulnerable Populations (kvps) in Criminalized Contexts: Findings from KVP-led Community Monitoring in Dar Es Salaam
    P. Liberatus, M. Mutongore, C. Peter, Z. Mansoor, A. Nicholaus, M. Milanga, E. Lankiewicz
    2025JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 75 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    加州大学旧金山分校合作论文 6
    约翰斯·霍普金斯大学合作论文 5
    玛希隆大学合作论文 5
    马来亚大学合作论文 5
    Udayana University合作论文 4
    台北荣民总医院合作论文 4
    布朗大学合作论文 4
    乔治敦大学合作论文 4
    印度尼西亚大学合作论文 4
    双溪毛糯医院合作论文 4

    机构统计