The Amiri Hospital is a general hospital located in the Kuwait City and it serves an estimated 400,000 patients per year..
BACKGROUND:Head-to-head randomised trials or real-world studies comparing the safety and efficacy of natalizumab and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of natalizumab versus ocrelizumab/rituximab in a real-world cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients using data from the Middle East and North Africa Committee for the Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (MENACTRIMS) registry. METHODS:This registry-based, retrospective, multicentre study was carried out in seven Middle Eastern countries by analysing data from the MENACTRIMS registry. All adults RRMS patients treated with natalizumab, rituximab or ocrelizumab and maintained on treatment for at least 12 months were included. Patients were matched using propensity scores. Primary outcomes were annualised relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression and improvement and MRI activity. RESULTS:A total of 1954 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1277 receiving anti-CD20 therapy (768 on rituximab and 509 on ocrelizumab) and 677 natalizumab. Natalizumab significantly reduced ARR compared with anti-CD20 therapies (0.062 vs 0.092, p=0.001). Confirmed disability progression rates, MRI outcomes and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) were similar between the two groups. However, natalizumab demonstrated higher rates of disability improvement compared with anti-CD20 therapies (9.3% vs 5.5%, p=0.03). Adverse events were more frequent in the anti-CD20 group (36.4% vs 27.5% for natalizumab, p=0.001). CONCLUSION:In this large, real-world cohort, natalizumab was associated with lower ARR, greater likelihood of disability improvement, lesser adverse events, but lower persistence compared with anti-CD20 therapies. These findings provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy and safety of these RRMS therapies, aiding clinicians in personalised treatment decisions.
Obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are overlapping conditions that drive premature morbidity and mortality worldwide. Care remains siloed and reactive despite shared risk factors and strong evidence for early intervention. To support integrated disease management, the American Heart Association (AHA) recently introduced the concept of cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome, recognizing the bidirectional links between metabolic, kidney, and cardiovascular health. Kuwait faces one of the highest burdens of CKM-related diseases globally. Three-quarters of adults are overweight or have obesity, and 28
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a severe autoimmune disorder affecting the central nervous system, often misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis. The identification of aquaporin-4–IgG (AQP4-IgG) has improved diagnostic precision and enabled targeted therapies. Given the unique regional challenges in healthcare delivery across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, the Middle East and North Africa Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (MENACTRIMS) convened an expert panel to develop evidence-based, region-specific consensus recommendations for diagnosis and management. These guidelines endorse the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) criteria, emphasizing AQP4-IgG testing via cell-based assays. Differential diagnosis should consider multiple sclerosis, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). For acute treatment: initiate high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone promptly and use plasma exchange early for severe or steroid-refractory attacks. For long-term immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies (rituximab, inebilizumab, eculizumab, ravulizumab, satralizumab, or tocilizumab) are recommended according to availability and patient factors; conventional immunosuppressants remain alternatives when biologics are inaccessible. Guidance is provided for pediatric patients and for pregnancy and breastfeeding, including planning after ≥ 12 months of disease stability and early postpartum treatment resumption. These MENACTRIMS guidelines aim to improve NMOSD outcomes across the region by promoting accurate diagnosis and timely, effective therapy.
Predicting disease progression at the individual level is essential for personalized medicine. We previously developed machine-learning tools to estimate 5-year progression risk in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Such models should account for disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and objective outcome definitions. In a retrospective multicenter case–control study, we evaluated adults with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) at baseline. Using machine-learning, we developed two complementary tools for individualized 5-year risk estimation: DAAE-M, optimized for transparency, software-neutral use, and mitigation of indication bias, and ELIE, optimized for dynamic landmark-based modeling, complex treatment histories, and mitigation of immortal-time bias. Disease progression was defined using both a clinical outcome (RRMS-to-progressive MS) and an objective outcome (late-stage confirmed progression independent of relapse activity). Among 34,510 people with RRMS (72.6
Relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is a chronic inflammatory disease usually diagnosed at a young age. Most patients receive several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) over time, but evidence-based guidelines to support treatment sequencing are limited, particularly for switches between high-efficacy DMTs. An international group of experts in the care of RMS reviewed the current evidence and their clinical practice in order to provide recommendations on the optimal therapeutic use of cladribine tablets (CladT, an immune reconstitution therapy for RMS) in patients previously managed on anti-trafficking agents (S1P modulators, natalizumab) or an anti-CD20 agent. Recommendations relate to switching due to breakthrough RMS disease activity or safety/tolerability issues, to reduce the risk of safety concerns, including de-risking in older people with stable RMS, and to facilitate family planning. We propose that CladT is a rational option for people with RMS presenting with intractable safety/tolerability issues during treatment with a high-efficacy DMT, for older patients with stable RMS who have received long-term DMT, or for patients with breakthrough RMS disease activity despite treatment with an S1P modulator. In selected cases, CladT may be considered for patients with breakthrough RMS disease activity on anti-CD20 treatment. It is important to keep the interval between withdrawal of a previous anti-trafficking DMT (especially S1P modulators) and initiation of CladT as short as possible if the switch is intended to address breakthrough RMS disease activity, especially with regard to the prevention of rebound RMS disease activity. Immune reconstitution therapy with CladT may also provide an opportunity to plan for pregnancy in the absence of continuous DMT.
