• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    M

    Mercy Medical Center (Springfield, Massachusetts)

    14论文总数
    129引用总数

    Mercy Medical Center (also known as Mercy Medical, or Mercy Hospital,) is located in Springfield, Massachusetts. Run by the Sisters of Providence Health System, Mercy Hospital is a faith-based, non-profit organization serving patients regardless of background or beliefs. Mercy Medical Center is known for its tradition of holistic health care.As of 2011, Mercy Medical Center is ranked among the Top 100 Community Value Hospitals by Cleverley & Associates.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    CA MILLER
    CA MILLER
    DIV NEUROL SURG, OHIO STATE UNIV HOSP
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Thomas B. Mcilraith
    Thomas B. Mcilraith
    Mercy Med Grp, Sacramento, CA USA
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Ashkan Javaheri
    Ashkan Javaheri
    Mercy Medical Group
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Lawrence J. Mervis
    Lawrence J. Mervis
    Division of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Vadim Gushchin
    Vadim Gushchin
    Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    M COX
    M COX
    Home Care Services, in Fairhope, Alabama USA
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Bruce Wyse
    Bruce Wyse
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, University of Queensland
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Frederick D. Todd
    Frederick D. Todd
    Mercy Medical Center, Springfield, Ohio, USA
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Scott D. Wright
    Scott D. Wright
    University of Utah
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0

    论文(14)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Elements Influencing Recruitment and Retention of Millennial Hospitalists Born in or after 1982: a Survey-Based Study
    Singh Amteshwar,Panek Tiffani,Tackett Sean,Paranji Suchitra,Gundareddy Venkat,Kauffman Regina,Wright Scott,Bowling Gregory,Torok Haruka,Patel Hemali, Alhadeff Ilan,Nogi Masayuki,

    Background Hospitalist turnover is exceedingly high, placing financial burdens on hospital medicine groups (HMGs). Following training, many begin their employment in medicine as early-career hospitalists, the majority being millennials. Objective To understand what elements influence millennial hospitalists' recruitment and retention. Design We developed a survey that asked participants to rate the level of importance of 18 elements (4-point Likert scale) in their decision to choose or remain at an HMG. Participants The survey was electronically distributed to hospitalists born in or after 1982 across 7 HMGs in the USA. Main Measures Elements were grouped into four major categories: culture of practice, work-life balance, financial considerations, and career advancement. We calculated the means for all 18 elements reported as important across the sample. We then calculated means by averaging elements within each category. We used unpaired t-tests to compare differences in means for categories for choosing vs. remaining at an HMG. Key Results One hundred forty-four of 235 hospitalists (61%) responded to the survey. 49.6% were females. Culture of practice category was the most frequently rated as important for choosing (mean 96%, SD 12%) and remaining (mean 96%, SD 13%) at an HMG. The category least frequently rated as important for both choosing (mean 69%, SD 35%) and remaining (mean 76%, SD 32%) at an HMG was career advancement. There were no significant differences between respondent gender, race, or parental status and ratings of elements for choosing or remaining with HMGs. Conclusion Culture of practice at an HMG may be highly important in influencing millennial hospitalists' decision to choose and stay at an HMG. HMGs can implement strategies to create a millennial-friendly culture which may help improve recruitment and retention.

    2022Journal of General Internal Medicine(2022)引用:5
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Shaping the Future of Diabetes Care: Innovation, People and Partnerships
    Neel Basudev

    The Mary MacKinnon lecture for 2021 tells the story of diabetes transformation in South London using local examples of change such as Diabetes Book and Learn and You and Type 2. The focus on projects is from the perspectives of innovation, people and partnerships. The lecture outlines factors that underpin successful partnership working, enablers of whole person care and how to gain traction for projects across a wide geography alongside key outcome data. The lecture also covers the use of technology and innovation to improve the experience for both health care professionals and people with diabetes and future directions of travel. Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons.

    2021PRACTICAL DIABETES(2021)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Bordetella Bronchiseptica: A Phantom Menace?
    N. Chan, P. J. Sloane, P. A. Eder
    2021AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE(2021)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Establishing of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Program: Background in Ukraine, Patient Selection, Staff Schedule, Perioperative Outcomes of First 28 Patients
    V. I. Kopetskyi,K. V. Kopchak,D. O. Cheverdiuk,O. O. Kvasivka,A. P. Beznosenko,O. O. Kolesnik,V. V. Gushchin

    A combination of cytoreductive intervention with the intrahepatic hyperthermic chemotherapy is a well-established treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. There are many challenges in establishing a new peritoneal surface malignancy program in a low-income country regarding perioperative safety and resource allocation. We analyzed the retrospective database to determine the immediate surgical outcomes of the first 28 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and the impact of the program on allocation of general hospital and human resources. During the preparatory stage, web conferences with international experts established the goals and general requirements of the program, formalized in a written document; and a peritoneal surface malignancy multidisciplinary team was established. The team created the patient selection criteria, perioperative management checklists, and suggested material and staff requirements for surgical and anesthesia services. Twenty-nine cytoreduction were carried out, of which 18 were followed by HIPEC. The average operative time was 6.2 h. The median blood loss was 350 mL, which did not result in additional blood transfusion requirements for the blood bank. No additional nursing and supportive staff were provided for the ICU and the surgical unit. The average postoperative stay was 8.7 days. One patient died with 30-day mortality rate of 3%. Ten patients (34.5%) developed postoperative complications, of which 6 (20.6%) had grade III and higher Clavien-Dindo complications. Establishing a peritoneal surface malignancy program is possible via staged planning, liberal use of international mentors, and thoughtful resource allocation. This new program did not result in a significant redistribution of resources among other service lines of cancer care within the same institution.

    2020Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology(2020)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Preceptorship in Primary Care: Why is It Needed?
    Mia Skelly

    Preceptorship is essential to the development of newly qualified nurses, as well as those moving into general practice from other areas of nursing. Mia Skelly discusses the need for preceptorship in primary care Preceptorship programmes have been recognised as fundamental to the development of a newly qualified nurse into a competent and confident practitioner. All nurses who are new to general practice should be equipped for the role by accessing a standardised preceptorship programme. In September 2017, the CapitalNurse Programme launched its Pan-London Preceptorship Framework to standardise the preceptorship programmes being offered across London. If we are to attract, grow and nurture the next generation of newly qualified nurses into primary care, then best practice programmes need to be developed.

    2018Practice nursing(2018)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 14 篇论文

    合作机构(8)

    德克萨斯大学卫生科学中心圣安东尼奥分校合作论文 1
    明尼苏达大学合作论文 1
    NHS Lothian合作论文 1
    The Queen's Medical Center合作论文 1
    约翰斯·霍普金斯大学合作论文 1
    科罗拉多州立大学合作论文 1
    National Cancer Institute (Sri Lanka)合作论文 1
    Allegheny Health Network合作论文 1

    机构统计