• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    N

    National Paideia Center

    院校EST. 1980
    20论文总数
    110引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Franklin L. Hunt
    Franklin L. Hunt
    National Paideia Center
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Terry Roberts
    Terry Roberts
    Natl Paideia Ctr
    论文:6引用:0H-index:0
    Albert L. Midgley
    Albert L. Midgley
    National Trust
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Alexander H. Reynolds
    Alexander H. Reynolds
    PhiladelphiaPa.
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    C.A. Herrick
    C.A. Herrick
    论文:4引用:0H-index:0
    Ernest V. Madison
    Ernest V. Madison
    China Merchants Bank
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    e w elliot
    e w elliot
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    L.M. Doss
    L.M. Doss
    Oklahoma City University
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Laura Billings
    Laura Billings
    Natl Paideia Ctr
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0

    论文(20)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Opening Up the Conversation and Students Thinking
    Terry Roberts
    2020EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP(2020)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2The Memories of Others: Thomas Wolfe and the Creative Process
    Terry Roberts
    2017THOMAS WOLFE REVIEW(2017)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3From Mindless to Meaningful.
    Laura Billings,T. A. Roberts
    2014引用:23
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Thinking Is Literacy, Literacy Thinking.
    Terry Roberts,Laura Billings

    In literacy cycles built around Paideia seminars, students practice thinking as a function of reading, speaking, listening, and writing.

    2008EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP(2008)引用:38
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Performing for Yourself and Others: the Paideia Coached Project
    T Roberts,A Trainor

    Teachers seeking ways to motivate their students and to make the curriculum more relevant have found an answer in the Paideia Coached Project. When students know that their project or performance will be presented to an audience outside the classroom, are inspired to produce work of the highest quality. DURING THE past decade, the staff at the National Paideia Center has done an increasing amount of survey and interview research with the individuals and schools that have chosen to implement the Paideia Programs. This work often involves asking teachers what frustrates them most about their dealings with students. Across the country, teachers almost universally cite the lack of student motivation for learning as the single most serious issue face. Simply put, said one honest teacher, they don't find what we have to offer all that relevant to their lives. How do you present a sterile, standardized curriculum in a way that students can care about it? Our attempts to answer that question have led us to create the Paideia Coached Project. A coached project is a unit of study that leads to a student production or performance that demonstrates mastery of a subject to an audience outside the classroom. It is designed to provide students with a strong, experiential connection to the curriculum, thereby making the curriculum both more relevant and more interesting. Ideally, the coached project provides both teachers and students the opportunity to produce rigorous, relevant work and to measure the quality of that work against authentic standards. For teachers who are used to a more traditional approach to teaching and learning, it can be challenging to rethink the many aspects of how deliver their curriculum. For those who do, however, the rewards can be amazing. The Origin of the Paideia Coached Project Paideia, as its derivation (from the Greek pais, paidos, the nurturing of a child) suggests, has to do with the proper upbringing of a child. It has strong connotations of a holistic education that leads to physical, emotional, and spiritual health as well as intellectual health. The Paideia Program is a systemic, whole-school transformation project based on the work of philosopher Mortimer Adler, who argued that American classrooms could be made simultaneously more rigorous and more inclusive.1 In other words, we could raise intellectual standards while at the same time engaging more students. In order to do this, Adler described three types of teaching and learning: didactic instruction to transmit information, coaching in academic skills, and seminar discussion of ideas and values.2 Adler believed that didactic, teacher-centered instruction dominated American classrooms at the expense of the other types of teaching and learning. As a result of this belief, he and his colleagues in the original Paideia Group focused their efforts on defining the Paideia seminar. They were so successful that there still exists a common misconception that the Paideia Program is solely concerned with the use of the seminar. In fact, the seminar takes up only 10% to 20% of teaching time in a Paideia classroom, while the rest is devoted to high-quality didactic instruction and coaching.3 In the mid-1990s, when the staff of the National Paideia Center began to work extensively with whole school communities, it became obvious that we needed to develop a much clearer picture of intellectual coaching and that we needed to show teachers how the three types of instruction could work in concert. The result of our efforts was the Paideia Coached Project, an organized unit that employs all three instructional approaches. As mentioned above, the coached project results in a student production or performance that has authentic value to an audience outside the classroom.4 While designing the Paideia Coached Project, we studied the extensive body of research on learning as well as the work then going on in a number of instructional reform movements. …

    2004Phi Delta Kappan/˜The œPhi Delta Kappan(2004)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 20 篇论文

    合作机构(48)

    普罗维登斯学院合作论文 5
    Independent Broadcasting Associates合作论文 3
    阿拉巴马大学合作论文 2
    Newbury College合作论文 2
    Hanover College合作论文 2
    纽约州立大学杰纳苏分校合作论文 2
    Fredericksburg Independent School District合作论文 2
    National Bank of Australasia合作论文 2
    State Street Corporation合作论文 2
    拉萨尔艺术学院合作论文 2

    机构统计