In the new era,the cultivation of top-notch innovative talents in undergraduate education faces the challenge of effectively transforming external resource investment into the internal development motivation of academic talents.There is a lack of procedural and traceable scales for the development of top-notch students in existing research.This study is based on the policy context and practical context of cultivating top-notch undergraduate talents in China,and proposes the core concept of"academic self-identity"for the development of"top-notch students"through qualitative research.This concept includes five key dimensions:academic self-efficacy,academic value identification,academic recognition by others,academic interest,and academic belonging.This study developed the Academic Self-identity Scale for Top Chinese College Students based on this conceptual framework,and conducted item analysis,factor analysis,reliability and validity tests on survey data from 2,524 sample undergraduate students at T University.The results indicate that the scale has a reasonable structure and good reliability and validity.On the one hand,this study can enrich the academic understanding of the theory of cultivating top-notch undergraduate talents,and on the other hand,it can provide a tracking scale for analyzing the academic development of this special group of"top students".
胡显章大学文化思想发展经历了形成期、发展期和成熟期三个大的阶段,体现出从自发思考到自觉思考、从局部思考到整体思考、从实践思考到哲学思考的发展特征.胡显章大学文化思想的主要内涵可概括为以人为本、和合会通与文化育人.以人为本,强调大学文化建设要在彰显人的生命性、主体性、整全性的过程中实现人的自由全面发展;和合会通,强调大学文化建设应在"兼和"哲学观的指引下,辩证处理古今、中西以及通专、文理、理工等大学发展的重要主题;文化育人,强调大学要在高度的文化自觉中继承中华民族优秀传统文化并推陈出新,在文化融合中以文化育人.胡显章大学文化思想坚持以马克思主义为指导,在方法论上体现出了立足实践、辩证思考和守正创新的鲜明特点.
High-impact educational activities provide a new path for the learning participation and social emotional development of top-notch students in universities.Based on the data from the National College Student Survey,this study uses methods such as OLS regression,generalized exact matching,and quantile regression to explore the impact of high-impact educational activity participation on the social emotional abilities of top-notch students.Research has found that participating in high-impact educational activities has a significant promoting effect on the development of social and emotional abilities of top-notch students,but shows different trends of change;The impact of overseas exchanges on the social and emotional abilities of top-notch students with different abilities varies,presenting a"Matthew effect";The role of high-impact educational activities varies among different disciplines and grades.Participating in science and technology innovation competitions and social practice has a more prominent value in enhancing the social emotional abilities of top-notch students in science and engineering.Participating in freshman seminars is more conducive to enhancing the social emotional abilities of top students in lower grades;In addition,high-impact educational activities have a dual effect of"overlapping advantages"and"compensating for disadvantages"for top-notch students from different family backgrounds.It is recommended to explore the classification and training mode of top-notch innovative talents,improve the international training system,and provide diversified opportunities for high-impact educational activities to promote emotional equity among top-notch students.
Image is a narrative medium that presents messages in the form of pictures,images and other figurative forms.The intuition,richness and immediacy of images bring new opportunities for college students'patriotism education in the context of images,but at the same time,they are also facing new challenges such as the weakening of the rational thinking of the education targets by the entertainment of images,the dissolution of the seriousness of the education content by the vulgarization of images,and the impact of the mainstream discourse by the distortion of images.In this regard,college students'patriotism education should follow the trend and move according to the situation,and optimize the new path of college students'patriotism education in the context of images by shaping the critical thinking of images,building the platform of image resources,and creating the ecology of image governance in three dimensions.
Young students are the most energetic and innovative group,and they are the vanguard force in achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.Adhering to the innovative theory of the Party to cultivate the hearts and souls of young students is the fundamental task of ideological construction for young students in the new era,with clear political guidance,distinct characteristics of the times,and rich scientific connotations.Using the innovative theory of the Party in the new era to cultivate the hearts and souls of young students is not only an objective requirement for the physical and mental characteristics of young students and the development of the times,but also an internal requirement for inheriting the Party's red genes,and a fundamental requirement for cultivating new ideological construction capable of shouldering the great responsibility of national rejuvenation.In the context of embarking on a new journey of comprehensively building a socialist modernized country,strengthening the education of ideals and beliefs among young students,helping them master scientific worldviews and methodologies,guiding them to adhere to the innovative theories of the Party,resonating and empathizing with young students through online discourse,has become an important path to use the Party's innovative theory to solidify their hearts and souls,and to build a solid ideological foundation for young students.
The high-quality education system is both a policy discourse and a theoretical discourse.The current discourse on"high-quality education system"is widely circulated but not unified,widely used but questionable in practice,broadly related but logically ambiguous,and its root lies in the confusion and mixture of different discourse systems.In this sense,it is necessary to examine the evolution and development logic of the"high-quality education system"under the discourse system of policies and theories,and to make mirror comparisons to distinguish its context and narrative methods.As a policy discourse,the"high-quality education system"arises from specific social contexts,educational reform contexts,and public opinion contexts,and is a long-term and gradual policy achievement.The emergence of the"high-quality education system"as a theoretical discourse was earlier,and it was a natural theoretical achievement based on the research of"education system"and"high-quality development".The difference between the two is essentially the difference between policy logic and theoretical logic.This difference not only constitutes the internal tension of the discourse system,but also points out the development direction of the discourse of"high-quality education system":at the value level,the transformation from interpretive discourse to constructive discourse is more advanced;at the logical level,the shift from a single policy logic to the integration and interweaving of multiple logics serves theory,making it more accurate;at the reality level,the high-quality education system can be decomposed into easily understandable policies and specific requirements,making it more operable.
Early training is a fundamental project for cultivating top-notch innovative talents.According to the differences in the educational stages of the target students,there are four types of practical explorations for the early cultivation of top innovative talents in China:primary-to-high school penetrating cultivation for a small number of children with exceptional intelligence,junior and senior high school connective cultivation,multi-party cooperative cultivation for junior high school students,and a supplementary training for all primary and secondary school students in extracurricular education institutions.The practical exploration of early cultivation of top-notch innovative talents faces practical challenges such as the dual conflict between the pursuit of efficiency in selection and training and the demand for fairness in basic education,the dilemma of independent and integrated training,the dual challenge of multiple overlapping responsibilities and collaborative needs in training,and the different choices between unified college entrance examination system and independent selection and enrollment.Improving the legitimacy of selection and training,highlighting the integration of training methods,promoting the synergy of training subjects,and enhancing the scientificity of talent evaluation are the basic strategies for optimizing the early cultivation of top-notch innovative talents.
As the"charter"of university autonomy,the charter of American private research university plays a leading role in the reform and development of colleges and universities.The effective implementation of the university charter is the key to the construction of the constitution,and the effectiveness of its implementation can be analyzed from the four dimensions of the execution degree,cognition degree,recognition degree and function realization degree of the university charter.The factors influencing the effectiveness of the execution of the university constitution are explored around the four dimensions,including the professionalism and cooperation of the execution organization,the standardization and coherence of the execution procedures,the driving and penetration of the execution environment,the richness and sustainability of the execution resources,and the perfection and regulation of the supervision system.Considering the effectiveness of the constitution of American private research universities,Chinese universities should take the opportunity of the amendment to clarify the implementation organization,emphasize the distribution of the rights and responsibilities of the subject;standardize the implementation procedures and reflect the adaptability;optimize the execution environment and release the supporting environment;develop the execution resources to realize the superposition of"blood transfusion"and"hematopoiesis";strengthen the execution supervision,and ensure the unity of obligation and actuality.
The problems of information generalization,algorithm technology alienation,and ideological and public opinion disorder in the digital era have disrupted and eroded the cohesion,leadership,and control of mainstream ideology,bringing negative impacts and practical impacts to the ideological construction of universities.Therefore,in the digital era,universities should strengthen ideological construction by adhering to the basic principles of socialist core values,regulating algorithm technology,constructive application and critical examination of digital technology,scientific indoctrination and innovative indoctrination methods.From digital recognition,visual technology empowers information management and high-quality image information supply,algorithm technology improves the effectiveness of mainstream ideological indoctrination,building a good and orderly mainstream ideological and public opinion environment and other aspects to promote the healthy development of ideological construction in universities.
高等教育集群促进人才高地建设是当前我国提升区域综合实力、服务国家战略的政策导向和现实需求.高等教育集群主要通过人才培育和人才吸引实现高地人才聚集及其结构优化.比较发现,粤港澳大湾区人才高地建设以政府为主导,高等教育集群吸引人才的质量和与产业集群的互动相较旧金山湾区存在差距.从"育"和"引"两条主线出发,寻求粤港澳大湾区高等教育集群发展推动人才高地建设的现实路径,即优化高等教育集群体系、提升人才高地育才水平,通过制度型开放增强人才高地聚才吸引力,产教融合、科教融汇推动人才、科技、产业互融.
以教育家精神引领新时代教师队伍建设具有重要意义,能够为驱动广大教师实现自我提升、自我塑造提供精神支柱,为建设高素质教师队伍、锻造更多"大国良师"提供精神动能,为加快推进教育现代化、建设教育强国提供精神引擎.就其奋斗方向而言,以教育家精神引领广大教师既要讲政治,又要讲道德;既要讲传承,又要讲创新;既要热爱学生,又要胸怀天下.就其实践路径而言,要坚持政治导向,全面落实立德树人根本任务;坚持目标导向,健全中国特色教师教育体系;坚持问题导向,持续深化教师管理综合改革;坚持效果导向,营造社会尊师重教良好风尚.
潘懋元先生的高等教育学研究涉及学科体系、学术体系和话语体系三个层次.他为创建学科奔走呼吁、组建学会、出版教材、扶持其他学位点;他长期探索高等教育学的学术体系,重视实践研究,其编著的《高等教育学讲座》和《高等教育学》为学科建筑了基本框架;他的话语具有务实性和自主创新性,主张在国际舞台上发出中国学者的声音.潘懋元先生在高等教育学研究上的探索对我国当前高等教育学自主知识体系建设具有借鉴意义.在学科体系上,各学位点要在合理分工的基础上处理好人才培养、科学研究和社会服务的关系;在学术体系上,学人需要重新认识学术体系的基础并重构学科的基本理论、学说;在话语体系上,学人要在中外传统的基础上构建内容充实、条理清晰的学术话语.
"新时代教育公平"作为"新时代中国特色教育学话语体系"的重要组成部分,继承和发展了马克思主义教育思想,超越了西方教育理论在全球教育公平理论上的话语垄断.中国的教育公平话语变迁经历了从与西方政策话语一致的"消除贫困""平等与全纳""起点、过程、结果公平"等全球公共话语表达后,走向"人民立场""面向人人""公平而有质量"的中国特色话语阐释."新时代教育公平"的表达转向不应是脱离了实践主体的概念罗列,而是表现为人民性表达、民族性话语、实践性阐释的"中国话语"."新时代教育公平"的阐释向度更需要多学科的跨域融合、中国式的阐释立场、接受性的传播语境,"第二个结合"为"新时代教育公平"话语表达提供了阐释论纲和理论遵循."新时代教育公平"的中国表达要从文化的主体性和包容性中释放内涵张力,从历史的自觉性和主动性中提升实践内力,从人民性立场和创造性中寻求思想驱力.
教育评价制度改革是教育评价改革的重要组成部分,是关乎教育高质量发展的关键命题.新中国成立以来我国教育评价制度先后经历了由主要指向政治到同时兼顾政治与经济再到顾全政治、经济和人本的横向发展时期,现正迈上价值整合下的纵深发展道路.整个制度变迁历程并非随机展开,而是宏观上受政治体制、经济制度、文化观念等深层结构因素的影响,中观上呈现出较强的路径依赖特征,微观上受行动者利益博弈和经验学习的驱动.未来教育评价制度应依循制度变迁的多重逻辑,以原则锁定为要旨,在守住"内在规定"的基础上把握"外在契机";以过程调控为重点,在侧重"历史继承"的基础上寻求"现状突破";以主体激活为抓手,在强化"统一规范"的基础上突出"自主创新".
建设教育强国是全面建成社会主义现代化强国的战略先导.中国特有的教育家精神具有丰富的时代内涵,可以从大德、大能、大爱三个层面来理解和把握.弘扬教育家精神是加快建设教育强国的强大精神动力,有助于落实立德树人根本任务,加快建设高质量教育体系,提升教育服务高质量发展能力,增强教育国际影响力,驱动教育科技人才一体化发展.新征程弘扬教育家精神,要坚持党的全面领导,突出思想政治引领,提高教师专业素养,推进体制机制创新,推动教育家精神入脑入心入行,造就支撑引领建设教育强国的高素质教师队伍.
伦理是制度的内在诉求,也是制度是否正当、合理的依据.高校考试招生制度"兹事体大",具有以及应该具有什么样的伦理精神、伦理关怀、伦理价值、伦理秩序,既是一个制度问题,也是一个伦理问题.我国高校考试招生制度在经济社会发展的不同时期有着不同的伦理诉求,也有着各种各样的缺失和困顿.进入新的世纪特别是党的十八大以来,高校考试招生制度改革不断推进,呈现出新的价值取向,伦理精神不断回归.未来,只有真正确立起伦理理念、伦理价值,才能最终提升高校考试招生制度乃至教育事业改革发展的伦理水准.
党的二十大报告对教育、科技、人才进行了"三位一体"的系统部署,并鲜明提出要"全面提高人才自主培养质量,着力造就拔尖创新人才",体现了对强国崛起规律的深刻洞察.从世界范围看,占据经济发展主导地位的关键往往在于率先掌握了科技创新主动权,率先取得了重大原创理论和核心技术的突破,而突破的产生来自顶尖人才,顶尖人才的集聚和培养归根结底要依靠教育、要依托大学.
推动高等教育数字化转型是顺应数字时代的必然要求,是实现教育大国向教育强国跃升的必然选择.以高等教育数字化转型推动教育强国建设,要对标教育数字化战略行动部署,准确理解高等教育数字化转型的内涵与特点,深刻把握高等教育数字化转型的总体现状,理性看待高等教育数字化转型面临的机遇和挑战,科学认识高等教育数字化转型对教育主体、管理运行机制和网络安全等方面的新要求.结合高校实际,探索总结高等教育数字化转型的机遇与实践路径,为加快建设教育强国、推进中华民族伟大复兴提供有力支撑作出高校应有的贡献.
党的十八大以来,随着纪检监察体制改革的不断深化,高校党风廉政制度建设体系得到进一步巩固和加强.党的二十大报告强调了要"坚持制度治党、依规治党".高校发生腐败问题的重要原因在于党风廉政建设有关制度缺乏有效执行,几乎每个腐败案件的背后都存在"制度空转"的情况.高校作为建设教育强国的主战场、主阵地之一,社会对高校的腐败现象往往更为关注、容忍度更低,因此,高校党风廉政建设制度执行力问题也更易于引起人们的思考.制度执行力问题是制度建设的基本问题,检验制度建设成效的重要标准之一就是制度是否得到有效执行.要切实抓好党风廉政制度建设,就必须切实提高制度执行力.
选取一所"双一流"建设高校为研究对象,还原和刻画大学场域中主要利益相关者对学科建设指标的理解、围绕指标采取的行动策略以及指标产生的影响.研究发现,高校高度重视学科建设指标并将其作为学科治理的重要工具.管理人员看重指标在学科建设"锦标赛"中的外在功用,依凭强有力的行政权威和资源垄断地位,将指标深度嵌入学科建设的各个层级和环节.在教师看来,使用指标是管理逻辑对学术逻辑的僭越,指标使用中的"一刀切"不仅会削弱指标的有效性,还可能抑制教师从事学术工作的内生动力,引发目标置换和无序竞争.学科建设指标的建构性决定了指标治理的管控逻辑并不能自动转化为学科绩效.我们需要对大学学科建设中的指标治理进行全方位清点和反思,以更好地推进学科建设工作,提高学科发展水平.
